Apple WWDC 2025 Confirmed For June: Here's The Full Event Schedule
Last Updated:
Apple WWDC 2025 keynote will talk about the new iOS 19 version, Apple AI features and some surprising updates.
Apple WWDC 2025 is next on the agenda for the tech circuit this year and the company has a big lineup scheduled for the developer conference next month. Apple WWDC 2025 dates were already confirmed, starting from June 9 when Tim Cook will be part of the WWDC 2025 keynote session.
This is the event where we yearly see the new iOS, iPadOS and macOS versions announced and also their features are given a demo in front of the world. The WWDC 2025 is unlikely to be any different barring some few surprises if Apple plans to have them in store.
The usual entries of the WWDC 2025 have been detailed and now Apple is giving us more in-depth information about the content that will be part of the event this year.
The company will have a Platforms State of Union session after the big WWDC 2025 keynote, where the developers will be given a deep-dive about the new features and upgrades coming to its platforms. Apple is confirmed to have over 100 sessions with its experts and offering developers further insight into the new versions.
Apple is also offering special access to the Developer Program and Developer Enterprise members who can reach out to Apple experts directly and even get one-on-one sessions to understand topics like Apple AI, Swift and more.
Apple WWDC 2025 will be taking place from June 9 to June 13, 2025. The company has also confirmed the WWDC 2025 edition will be livestreamed online but giving a select group of people the opportunity to attend the event in person at the Apple Park in California. Apple WWDC 2025 will be available on the official Apple YouTube page and Events page.
For this, macOS, iPadOS and watchOS will be equally important and their feature upgrades need to be in line with the iPhone additions. Apple AI is likely to grab the headlines but Siri AI is not expected to be part of the lineup this year as it struggles internally to compete with Google and OpenAI.
First Published:
May 22, 2025, 10:45 IST
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
7 minutes ago
- Mint
Reddit sues AI giant Anthropic over content use
Social media outlet Reddit filed a lawsuit Wednesday against artificial intelligence company Anthropic, accusing the startup of illegally scraping millions of user comments to train its Claude chatbot without permission or compensation. The lawsuit in a California state court represents the latest front in the growing battle between content providers and AI companies over the use of data to train increasingly sophisticated language models that power the generative AI revolution. Anthropic, valued at $61.5 billion and heavily backed by Amazon, was founded in 2021 by former executives from OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT. The company, known for its Claude chatbot and AI models, positions itself as focused on AI safety and responsible development. "This case is about the two faces of Anthropic: the public face that attempts to ingratiate itself into the consumer's consciousness with claims of righteousness and respect for boundaries and the law, and the private face that ignores any rules that interfere with its attempts to further line its pockets," the suit said. According to the complaint, Anthropic has been training its models on Reddit content since at least December 2021, with CEO Dario Amodei co-authoring research papers that specifically identified high-quality content for data training. The lawsuit alleges that despite Anthropic's public claims that it had blocked its bots from accessing Reddit, the company's automated systems continued to harvest Reddit's servers more than 100,000 times in subsequent months. Reddit is seeking monetary damages and a court injunction to force Anthropic to comply with its user agreement terms. The company has requested a jury trial. In an email to AFP, Anthropic said "We disagree with Reddit's claims and will defend ourselves vigorously." Reddit has entered into licensing agreements with other AI giants including Google and OpenAI, which allow those companies to use Reddit content under terms that protect user privacy and provide compensation to the platform. Those deals have helped lift Reddit's share price since it went public in 2024. Reddit shares closed up more than six percent on Wednesday following news of the lawsuit. Musicians, book authors, visual artists and news publications have sued the various AI companies that used their data without permission or payment. AI companies generally defend their practices by claiming fair use, arguing that training AI on large datasets fundamentally changes the original content and is necessary for innovation. Though most of these lawsuits are still in early stages, their outcomes could have a profound effect on the shape of the AI industry.
India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
Elon Musk once gave Apple 3 days to accept his Rs 55000 crore offer, Tim Cook rejected it, paid heavy price due to...
(File) Elon Musk, the world's richest man is infamous for aggressive business tactics, and one such example was none other than Apple, when Musk reportedly issued a 3-day ultimatum to the tech giant to accept his SpaceX satellite connectivity deal for a whopping $5 billion, days ahead of the iPhone 14 launch. When Elon Musk gave an ultimatum to Tim Cook According to reports, Elon Musk's SpaceX offered satellite connectivity for the iPhone, but Apple would have to pay $5 billion upfront for the service, and $1 billion annually after an 18-month exclusivity period. The egotistic billionaire was convinced that Apple wouldn't dare turn down such a deal, and gave Tim Cook 3 days to decide. Musk also threatened to launch a competing service that would work directly with iPhones if Apple refused his offer. Tim Cook defies Elon Musk However, unfazed by Musk's ultimatum and threats, Apple CEO Tim Cook turned down the offer and chose to partner with a smaller satellite communications provider (satcom), and even though the SpaceX deal would have provided more expansive satellite network for the iPhone, Cook decided otherwise due to various factors. Scorned by the refusal, Elon Musk did exactly what he had threatened to do; the tech billionaire launched Starlink Direct to Cell, a competing satellite service that offered satellite-powered communication for smartphones, including the iPhone running a T-Mobile network. The service was a collaboration between SpaceX and T-Mobile. Musk sues Globalstar in spectrum battle The situation presented a major legal challenge to Apple as iPhones using a T-Mobile network, could connect to Musk's Starlink Direct to Cell services, even though the devices were legally tied to Globalstar. The legal battle escalated after SpaceX challenged Globalstar's rights to an important wireless spectrum, claiming that the latter had failed to fully utilize the allocated spectrum, and was trying to block competitors from entering the market. This directly impacted Apple as the spectrum being challenged was being used for its iPhone satellite connectivity service, which meant that it would have to find an alternative satcom provider, if SpaceX were to win the lawsuit. SpaceX legal challenge triggers internal rift at Apple As per a report by Apple Insider, Musk's legal onslaught created internal rifts within Apple as senior executives, including its software chief Craig Federighi, and Adrian Perica, head of corporate development, expressed concerns over the tech giant's partnership with Globalstar, which reportedly has an outdated and slower network compared to its competitors like SpaceX. Globalstar was planning to expand its satellite network, but only marginal improvements were expected over the next decade. Many Apple executives feared that the company's reliance on Globalstar could draw unwanted regulatory attention, particularly over the issue of whether Apple could be classified as a telecommunications carrier. However, despite these reservations, Apple decided to continue its partnership with Globalstar, and has a $1.7 billion investment with the satcom provider, out of which $1.1 billion is dedicated to developing and launching new satellites.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
After Jefferies and Rosenblatt Securities, Needham downgrades Apple; says: For this stock to work, it must have ...
Apple Inc. shares declined 0.6% in premarket trading on Wednesday, signaling a continuation of its 2025 struggles, with the stock down 19% year-to-date, the weakest performance among the Magnificent Seven, according to Bloomberg. Wall Street's concerns center on Apple's growth prospects and its lagging position in the artificial intelligence (AI) landscape, compounded by competitive pressures and political risks. Needham & Company downgraded Apple to hold from buy, joining a growing list of firms tempering expectations. Analyst Laura Martin highlighted multiple risks, including intense competition, sluggish growth, and a valuation that 'looks expensive on several metrics.' She noted, 'For this stock to work, it must have the catalyst of an iPhone replacement cycle , which we do not foresee in the next 12 months,' per Bloomberg. Martin also pointed to Apple's slow progress in generative AI, stating that innovations in this space 'open the door for new hardware form factors that threaten iOS devices.' What is hurting Apple stock The selloff partly reflects political uncertainty, as Apple's global manufacturing footprint makes it vulnerable to tariffs, with the Trump administration repeatedly targeting the company. Additionally, Apple's AI struggles have intensified scrutiny. The recent acquisition of io, a startup co-founded by former Apple design icon Jony Ive, by OpenAI underscores the competitive threat in AI-driven innovation, potentially challenging Apple's hardware dominance. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo Needham's downgrade follows similar moves by Jefferies and Rosenblatt Securities in May, with Oppenheimer, MoffettNathanson, Loop Capital, Aletheia Capital, and DBS Bank also cutting ratings earlier in 2025, Bloomberg reports. Only 58% of analysts tracked by Bloomberg now recommend buying Apple, a stark contrast to peers like Microsoft, Amazon, Nvidia, and Meta, which boast buy ratios near or above 90%. Apple's challenges in AI, coupled with macroeconomic headwinds and a lack of near-term catalysts, continue to weigh on investor sentiment.
