
OKLAHOMA VOICE: Legislature sees renewed efforts to change cockfighting laws
Jan. 28—OKLAHOMA CITY — Bills introduced by Oklahoma lawmakers seek to make changes to the state's cockfighting laws by reducing the penalties for participating or allowing robotic participation in the fights.
But opponents of cockfighting argue that reducing the penalty would send the wrong message to Oklahomans about the "cruel" and "outdated" form of entertainment. They said that voters in the state passed a ballot measure in 2002 making it a felony to own, possess, keep or train fowl with the intent of cockfighting and can carry a penalty of up to 10 years in prison and up to $25,000 in fines.
Rep. Justin Humphrey, R-Lane, authored House Bills 1313 and 1326, which respectively attempt to reduce the penalty for cockfighting to a misdemeanor and allow a fowl to fight a robot if the rooster is unharmed.
Cockfighting is the practice of forcing two roosters to fight each other, often to the death, for entertainment and regularly includes gambling on outcomes of the fights. The birds are bred and trained for the purpose of fighting.
'I'm not trying to legalize it," Humphrey said. "I'm trying to reduce it to a misdemeanor. We've reduced dangerous drugs that are killing people ... to a misdemeanor, and yet raising a chicken is a felony that carries 10 years. That's complete stupidity."
He sponsored a bill in 2024 that passed the House but was never heard in the Senate. It would have authorized voters to reduce violations relating to cockfighting to misdemeanors in each county.
Humphrey said it was a "tough deal" to get his bill passed in the House last year, and these attempts will be more difficult to get support for than last year because of resistance from House leadership. He said he doesn't expect the bill allowing robots in cockfights to pass, but he wanted to start a conversation and plant the idea in the minds of Oklahomans.
Sen. Tom Woods, R-Westville, also proposed a cockfighting bill, Senate Bill 1111, which would reduce the penalty to a misdemeanor and alter the definitions of what it means to participate in cockfighting.
A first conviction would be a misdemeanor with a $500 fine. A second conviction would still be a misdemeanor, but with a penalty of up to a year in county jail, a fine of $2,500, or both. A third offense would bring the penalty to felony status with a two year sentence, a $5,000 fine, or both.
"This legislation creates options for law enforcement to prosecute this crime more than they are now," Woods said in a statement. "Currently, there are very few cases being prosecuted because of the level of penalty assessed with the crime and burden on law enforcement to take it to court. If passed, this will still be a crime with felony punishments attached to it while bringing more reasonable penalties into alignment for the offense."
Brendan Hoover, a coordinator for the Kirkpatrick Policy Group, a nonprofit advocacy group focused on animals, arts, education and reproductive rights, said reducing the penalties for cockfighting sends a message that the crime "isn't a big deal."
Enforcement can be difficult, Hoover said, because one almost needs to be caught "red-handed" in a building with fowl fighting to be charged.
Cockfighting has remained a felony since 2002 and the statute was unanimously upheld by the Oklahoma Supreme Court in 2004, but bills have been introduced time and time again attempting to reduce penalties or legalize the fights, he said.
"But the cockfighters, you know, they don't want to give up," Hoover said. "They think it's part of their heritage. They call it agriculture, you know, they say a lot of things to make it seem like it's OK and like it's accepted in Oklahoma, but it's not, it's animal cruelty. You're forcing animals to fight to the death, and you're betting on it for entertainment."
Spreading the bird flu
Kevin Chambers, the Oklahoma state director of Animal Wellness Action, said he's witnessed many cockfights and called them a "bloody mess" and "horribly cruel."
But he said he's also concerned about cockfighting spreading the bird flu. Over 100,000 birds have been euthanized in Oklahoma alone amid a current outbreak of the illness, he said.
"Cockfighting has been identified as a cause of the transmission for avian diseases because these birds are transported across state lines and even across the border with Mexico," Chambers said. "It's spreading avian diseases. Commercial flocks, they don't move them back and forth across the state lines all the time, but cockfighters do. They fight them and then they move the survivors back home to their state, and it's a perfect conduit for avian diseases."
He said reducing the penalty for cockfighting would be an "embarrassment" for Oklahoma and send the state backwards as all 50 states and U.S. territories have outlawed cockfighting.
The practice is still legal and popular in some Mexican states, parts of southeast Asia and the Philippines.
A 2023 poll of Oklahoma voters signaled that cockfighting remains unpopular in the state. Of the Oklahomans polled, over 70% believed cockfighting should remain a felony.
The National Sheriffs Association has also urged law enforcement to combat animal fighting, including cockfights.
The group said animal fights often have links to other criminal activity, such as organized crime, trafficking of narcotics, bribery of elected officials, illegal firearms, crimes against people, and more.
Oklahoma Voice is an affiliate of States Newsroom, a national 501©(3) nonprofit supported by grants and donations. The Voice retains full editorial independence. You can read more at https://oklahomavoice.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
34 minutes ago
- New York Post
GOP leaders, pro-Israel Dems affirm support for Israel after preemptive strikes on Iran
WASHINGTON — Republican leaders and pro-Israel Democrats in Congress rallied behind Israel after it carried out preemptive strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities and killed top military leaders on Thursday night. 'Israel and the United States have been united, including in our shared insistence that Iran must never obtain a nuclear weapon. President Trump and his Administration have worked tirelessly to ensure that outcome,' said House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) Friday morning. 'Unfortunately, Iran has refused to agree and even declared yesterday its intent to build a new enrichment facility,' Johnson added. 'Israel decided it needed to take action to defend itself. They were clearly within their right to do so.' 7 Republican leaders and pro-Israel Democrats in Congress rallied behind Israel after it carried out preemptive strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities Thursday night. IRGC telegram channel/HANDOUT/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) in a statement Thursday night noted the UN's nuclear watchdog had also just censured Iran for continuing to enrich uranium to near weapons-grade levels. 'For too long, the mullahs in Iran have publicly aspired to wipe the only democracy in the Middle East off the face of the map via any means possible: funding and arming terror groups on Israel's borders, choking off international sea lanes, and multiple barrages of missiles and drones,' Thune said. 'Today, Israel has determined that it must take decisive action to defend the Israeli people,' he added. 'The United States Senate stands ready to work with President Trump and with our allies in Israel to restore peace in the region and, first and foremost, to defend the American people from Iranian aggression, especially our troops and civilians serving overseas.' 7 'Israel and the United States have been united, including in our shared insistence that Iran must never obtain a nuclear weapon,' said House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) Friday morning. AP Operation Rising Lion targeted nuclear facilities and missile sites — and eliminated the leader of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Gen. Hossein Salami, Tehran's military leader Mohammad Bagheri, emergency command head Gholam Ali Rashid and six nuclear scientists. 'thank u, next,' staunch Israel supporter Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) posted on X in response to the Iranian state media confirming Salami's death. 'Our commitment to Israel must be absolute and I fully support this attack. Keep wiping out Iranian leadership and the nuclear personnel,' Fetterman added. 'We must provide whatever is necessary — military, intelligence, weaponry — to fully back Israel in striking Iran.' 7 Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) in a statement Thursday night noted the UN's nuclear watchdog had also just censured Iran for continuing to enrich uranium to near weapons-grade levels. AP Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in a national address Thursday said he would not 'leave these threats for the next generation' and the Israel Defense Forces would continue its attacks for 'as many days as it takes.' Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi called the strikes a 'declaration of war,' and Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said 'the Zionist regime has prepared for itself a bitter and painful fate.' 'Make no mistake: Israel is not the aggressor. It is defending itself against an existential threat that long predates the present preemptive strike,' agreed Bronx Democratic Rep. Ritchie Torres. 'The true aggressor is the Islamic Republic and its empire of terror — an empire stained with the blood of innocent Israelis.' 7 'thank u, next,' staunch Israel supporter Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) posted on X in response to Iranian state media confirming Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Gen. Hossein Salami's death. AP 'Iran is the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism and poses an existential threat to our key democratic ally, Israel,' added Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ). 'Iran and her terror proxies have also attacked American bases, service members, and ships.' 'I fully stand with the people of Israel and support her right to defend herself against Iran's nuclear and terror programs,' he said. House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries affirmed 'that Iran should never be allowed to become nuclear capable' during an interview on MSNBC Thursday night but also called for 'a reduction in hostilities.' 7 Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in a national address Thursday said he would not 'leave these threats for the next generation' and the Israel Defense Forces would continue its attacks for 'as many days as it takes.' AFP via Getty Images 'I'm hopeful that cooler heads will prevail in the Middle East and the situation is de-escalated,' Jeffries said on 'The Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell.' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) has yet to release a statement, but other Democratic senators were quick to condemn Israel's actions. Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) claimed the attack was 'clearly intended to scuttle the Trump Administration's negotiations with Iran' and that the president was responsible for allowing Tehran to increase its uranium enrichment levels after pulling out of a nuclear deal with Tehran in 2018. 7 Operation Rising Lion targeted nuclear facilities and missile sites. IDF 'Iran would not be this close to possessing a nuclear weapon if Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu had not forced America out of the nuclear agreement with Iran that had brought Europe, Russia, and China together behind the United States to successfully contain Iran's nuclear ambitions,' Murphy said. 'This is deeply disturbing,' added Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) on MSNBC's 'All In with Chris Hayes.' 'We need more negotiation; we need de-escalation; we need to get to a deal.' 7 President Trump's administration had been negotiating for two months with Tehran's regime about its nuclear program, with no resolution in sight. Airbus defense and space. President Trump's administration had been negotiating for two months with Tehran's regime about its nuclear program, with Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff expected to engage in a sixth round of talks with Iranian officials in Oman on Sunday — before Israel launched its attack. 'Two months ago, I gave Iran a 60-day ultimatum to 'make a deal.' They should have done it! Today is day 61,' Trump posted on his Truth Social Friday morning. 'I told them what to do, but they just couldn't get there. Now they have, perhaps, a second chance!' The UN's International Atomic Energy Agency disclosed to states comprising its board of governors in late May that Iran had nearly doubled its stockpile of 60%-enriched uranium since February, leading to the censure vote Thursday put forward by France, Germany and the UK.


Boston Globe
34 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Hundreds of former R.I. special needs students could be compensated for state cutting their education short
Advertisement It took another seven years for the damages for the affected students to be negotiated. Get Rhode Map A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State. Enter Email Sign Up The tentative settlement was publicly disclosed for the first time by House Speaker Joseph Shekarchi on Tuesday night. While briefing reporters on the late-night agreement on a $14 billion state budget, he said the process had been delayed by a last-minute request by the Rhode Island Department of Education to include a nearly $2 million appropriation for the legal settlement. 'We literally worked until 15 minutes ago' to fill the unforeseen budget hole, Shekarchi said around 9:15 p.m. The House Finance Committee approved the budget proposal before midnight. The settlement, which still requires a judge's approval, has not yet been made public. RIDE Spokesperson Victor Morente said the students who will be eligible for compensation from the $1.86 million settlement are those who were 21 between Feb. 10, 2012 and July 1, 2019, did not get a regular high school diploma, and lost access to public school when they turned 21. Advertisement The number of former students in that group number roughly 300, according to Sonja Deyoe, the lawyer for the plaintiffs. Two plaintiffs, identified by their initials K.L. and K.S, represented the wider class in the suit. K.S., who was a 20-year-old student at Toll Gate High School in Warwick at the time the lawsuit was filed, was about to be cut off from high school despite having Asperger syndrome and ADHD. She was working toward a traditional high school diploma when she was told she would have to leave school on her 21st birthday, the lawsuit said. K.L. had been a student at Chariho High School and suffered from a genetic disorder and developmental delays that left her at the 'cognitive level of a toddler,' the lawsuit said. She was cut off from school when she turned 21. The suit noted a similar case in Hawaii resulted in courts ruling Hawaii had to provide education up to age 22. Deyoe said it was 'very difficult' to come to an agreement on damages, as the two sides debated whether all the individuals affected in the class were eligible for compensatory services. She said the $1.86 million could be used to reimburse students for GED classes, tutoring, assistive devices, or other services like speech therapy they may have sought to assist them in getting education in lieu of the extra year of public school. Advertisement She said she has spoken to one former student who is paraplegic and plans to use the funds to pay for a device that helps them communicate. Deyoe said cutting students off from high school at 21 had a serious impact. 'There are numerous people who we initially talked to who were very close to graduation, who, if they were given that additional period of time, would have been able to graduate,' Deyoe said. 'It's very sad.' Deyoe said the issue at hand in the case was the word 'inclusive' in the federal requirement that free public education be provided for those ages 3 to 21. The plaintiffs interpreted that to mean inclusive of the 21-year-olds, not ending on their 21st birthday. In its 2018 decision, the appeals court noted that some students without disabilities — such as those who went to prison in high school — had access to education up to age 22, but the special needs students were cut off at 21. Rhode Island now provides education to students with disabilities until age 22, Morente confirmed. Morna Murray, the executive director of Disability Rights Rhode Island, said while it's not ideal that students will be compensated a decade later, 'it's never too late' to right a wrong. She said for students who need it, staying in school an extra year can make a big difference in their futures. 'Having those extra years is golden, before they have to face the world,' Murray said. 'It's really significant.' Disability Rights Rhode Island was involved in the negotiations for damages. It is not yet clear when a judge will consider approving the settlement. After that, there will be an opportunity for affected students to seek reimbursement from the $1.86 million fund. Advertisement The pool of money will also be used to pay an administrator to manage the fund, Morente said, along with legal fees. Unspent funds would be returned to the state after 20 months. The Rhode Island House is slated to vote on the state budget on Tuesday. Steph Machado can be reached at
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Minnesota House Speaker Lisa Demuth reflects on 2025 session, historic speakership
Minnesota House Speaker Lisa Demuth hands off a booklet of revisions from the Minnesota Senate near the end of a late-night special legislative session Monday, June 9, 2025 at the Minnesota State Capitol in St. Paul. (Photo by Nicole Neri/Minnesota Reformer) Minnesota House Speaker Lisa Demuth, R-Cold Spring, was elected to the Legislature in 2018, and she's served as the House's Republican leader since 2023. Before Demuth could even grasp the speaker's gavel, the 2025 legislative session had a rancorous start. A judge ruled one of the newly elected Democrats ineligible for office because he didn't live in the district, and Republicans sought to use a temporary 67-66 advantage to win full control by threatening to unseat another Democrat, Rep. Brad Tabke, who won a contested race. To prevent this usurpation, Democrats boycotted the session for three weeks and litigation ensued until the two sides came to an agreement: seat Tabke and Republicans could claim the speakership for the whole two-year session. Demuth won the speakership under extraordinary circumstances, and she used her caucus' power of exactly half of the House to force the DFL to roll back one of their signature policies — state-subsidized health insurance for undocumented immigrants. House Republicans also blocked numerous tax increases proposed by the DFL. Long negotiations in the split Legislature caused the session to go into overtime, and lawmakers wrapped up their work and passed a $66 billion budget in a one-day special session on Monday. The Reformer interviewed Demuth this week and asked her to reflect on the unorthodox session. This interview has been edited for length and clarity. Because of the special session and so many things, it has been full of learning all the way through. There hasn't been a time that I'm like, 'Okay, I got this.' Things kept changing, and the historical nature of a tie for the second time in history. When the Democrats decided to finally show up, I was elected as speaker. I don't usually go down this road, but there was a historical piece: me being elected speaker as the first Republican woman to ever hold that role. But not just that, the first person of color to hold that for either party ever in the chamber. But unfortunately, our Democrat colleagues chose not to appreciate the historical nature of that and voted against me, even though I still became the speaker for two years. They literally voted against the first person of color to ever hold that office, even though they say that is a very important thing. Watching us come together and being able to, as I mentioned, do good work before the deadline. Democrats and Republicans coming together, making sure that our state has what it needs to be safe and to make some meaningful changes that will strengthen that going forward. We really tried to attack the overspending that we saw over the last two years, trying to get ahold of the state budget, not wanting Minnesota families to experience higher costs. We heard Democrats say on the last day of special session, 'We needed more revenue.' That translates to me that they missed the opportunity to raise taxes like they wanted to. The other thing is, again, I was sworn in as speaker. Being the first Black speaker ever, I was also sworn in by Senate President Bobby Joe Champion, who is the first Black president of the Senate. I think that moment was very historic. I appreciate you saying that I've emphasized merit, and I will always do that. When I'm reflecting over this session and looking at the historical things that have happened, that is a historical piece. I'm looking forward to when people are no longer surprised by the fact that a woman is the first whatever or the first person of color or Black person being where I am. But somebody needed to start it, and in this case — the first Republican woman and the first Black speaker, Republican or Democrat — I have set that standard now, and I'm looking forward to others following after me. You're right. I don't lead with that. My Democrat colleagues always focus on race or gender, and in this case they chose to completely ignore it because I'm a Republican. We really rejected the tax increases that would cover Minnesota families overall. Yes, there is a tax increase from 10% to 15% on cannabis. But Democrats wanted a fifth income tax tier. The governor had pushed for new sales taxes on services that were never taxed before. We really held the line on that. On data centers, we were able to secure a longer timeline for their sales tax exemption. That is a true sign of a compromise. Perfect? Probably not, but a true sign of a compromise is that no one side gets absolutely everything they wanted. I always have to laugh when I get that question. If you would have asked me back in the early 2000s if I would ever think about running for school board, I would have told you I haven't thought about it. Yet I did run for school board. I remember when I was asked about running for the Legislature, I had never thought about it. And so I'm telling you, I'm not saying I'm running for governor at all. I'm not telling you that, but I would have been foolish to have said 'no' to anything in the past. So I'm not telling you yes. Obviously, we're looking at the 2026 election and so I'll be doing a lot of heavy work. Even though the tie has been great for Republicans in the House, we want an outright majority. That has been our laser focus for quite a while. I'm also looking forward to spending time with family and decompressing a little bit, but I'm not sure when that gets to start.