
Why are we still hiding periods in 2025?
First periods are a universal rite of passage for girls. Biologically, menarche indicates the body's preparedness to ovulate and eventually reproduce. However, the social and cultural significance of this milestone can vary significantly.
In some cultures, like the Maoris', a menstruating girl represents the survival and longevity of the heritage and bloodline. Among some Indigenous people of the Americas, the first bleed is the moment when the initiation into the community happens, embodying spiritual connection. In China, menstruation is believed to hold vast potential for rejuvenating one's vital essence.
Among Muslims, attitudes towards menstruation vary greatly, shaped by cultural heritage or by the disconnect from cultural lineages caused by colonisation, migration and conflict.
For example, in the United States, where I am from, I can name communities that regularly host elaborate period parties – celebratory galas for girls who are coming of age – much like the early generations of Muslims in Medina. And in the same country, I know of communities where women still conceal the fact that they are menstruating by pretending to fast and pray in Ramadan.
To bridge these dissonant understandings of menstruation among Muslim women, we can seek inspiration and guidance from the Holy Quran and the Prophet Muhammad's biography. They offer a blueprint for reparative and positive period education, which can be a vital tool for ending period shame and abolishing period poverty.
In the Islamic tradition, menstruation enters the discourse as a determinant of rite and ritual. The Quran dictates that menstruating women are relieved of the obligation to fast in Ramadan or perform the five prescribed daily prayers. Sexual intercourse is forbidden at this time as well as circumambulating the Kaaba while performing the Hajj in Mecca.
However, to understand what menstruation meant to the early Muslim community, we can look to the Prophetic tradition, which illustrates how the Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) interacted with menstruating women in his life.
There is the example of Umayyah bint Qays, a girl who rode to battle with the women of her tribe seated on the Prophet Muhammad's animal. Her first period appeared unannounced, soiling her garments and the Prophet Muhammad's luggage, which she was seated beside.
Upon noticing Umayyah shifting in her seat with awkward discomfort, the Prophet Muhammad asked if she had menstrual bleeding, to which she responded affirmatively. She was then gently instructed by her Prophet to take water and salt to clean herself as well as the soiled articles.
When the battle concluded victoriously for the Muslims, a necklace was taken from the spoils of war and placed on Umayyah's neck by the Prophet himself. She treasured this gift, neither removing it during her life, nor allowing it to be removed from her body in death.
Ease in discussing and acknowledging menstruation is also evident in interactions between the Prophet Muhammad and his wife Aisha. Expressions of tenderness abounded between the two while she was on her period.
She relates that when sharing a meal and drinking vessel, her husband would place his mouth on the place where she ate and drank from. During her menstruation, he would also lay on her lap while reciting the Quran and express intimacy through cuddling and closeness.
During the singular Hajj pilgrimage performed by the Prophet Muhammad after a year of anticipation and longing to fulfil this rite, the Prophet found Aisha despondent. He lovingly inquired if she was menstruating and comforted her by affirming, 'This is a matter decreed for the daughters of Adam.'
All of these examples demonstrate that per the Islamic tradition, menstruation is not a cause for despair, sorrow or embarrassment.
While we have the Prophet's example to look up to and learn from, the reality is that perceptions of menstruation are often shaped by others around us.
Organisations, institutions and schools play a role in menstrual health awareness by offering menstrual health education, access to period products and hygienic facilities for girls to use to change their menstrual products.
However, most of our ideas about menstruation come before a lesson in school. The cycle we know first is the cycle that brought us into being – the bleeding of our mother. How she feels, shifts and lives with her own monthly period serves as an introductory lesson, setting expectations to share or conceal, to slow down or push through, to rejoice or to lament.
It is a well-known adage among Muslims that mothers are a child's first madrassa, or school. This not only applies to information and ethics but also body literacy, roles, responsibilities, self-care and self-esteem.
As such, mothers have a pivotal role in preparing girls for puberty and menstruation. Every parent and guardian should regard preparing girls for their first periods as observing their human rights. Without this instruction, girls can turn to social media or their peers, neither of which are reliable sources of menstrual health information. Every family has an opportunity to break the cycle of period shame by starting within their own home.
Very often it is up to them to decide how their daughter experiences her first period. She could be a girl who discovers a red stain on her underwear, and, unprepared for this moment, can slip into emotions connected with other encounters with blood – harm, injury and pain. She might conceal this discovery by rolling wads of tissue paper or socks into her underwear, afraid to tell anyone.
Or she can be a girl who is prepared for this moment and feels a giddy excitement and intrigue when it comes. She can be delighted to be joining the sisterhood of older sisters, cousins, aunts and mothers who had already told her this day would come.
In both cases, the people around her shape her beliefs and expectations of this moment. She could just be shown where the pads are and told to keep her period as a shameful secret. Or she could be celebrated, recognised and supported by her family.
On this Menstrual Hygiene Day, let us agree that concealing menstruation serves no one – neither the girls and women who bleed nor the boys and men who care for them.
To improve access to menstrual health resources and abolish period poverty, we must remember a key point: Policies are made by people. They are made by women who were once girls who were shamed or celebrated and men who were once boys either obliviously unaware or consciously educated about the monthly reality of their female peers.
By reviving Prophetic examples of showing tenderness to menstruating girls and women, sharing gifts at menarche and acknowledging menstruation as a divinely designed and life-giving process, we have an opportunity to heal the culture that shapes society and the individuals who form families. We can and must take action towards ending period shame and ensuring menstrual equity for all.
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
5 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
‘Disgusting abomination': Why is Elon Musk slamming Trump's budget bill?
Billionaire Elon Musk has lashed out at United States President Donald Trump's budget bill, describing it as a 'disgusting abomination', less than a week after he left the administration and at a time when the legislation is expected to come up for voting before the Senate. The so-called 'One Big Beautiful Bill' passed in the House of Representatives in late May has come under increasing scrutiny not just from opposition Democrats but from sections of conservatives, including a handful of Republican senators, and Musk. Musk, who headed the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), set up by Trump to cut waste in public spending, left the administration on May 29. He had criticised the bill a day before his stint in government ended, but in much more muted language than the words he used on Tuesday. But why is Musk so opposed to the bill, why is the legislation so important to Trump, and how does it square with the president's other stated fiscal priorities? 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk wrote on X, the social media platform he owns. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.'In another post, Musk wrote, 'Mammoth spending bills are bankrupting America! ENOUGH.' The world's richest man continued his tirade against the bill on Wednesday. 'This immense level of overspending will drive America into debt slavery!' he wrote on X. Musk claimed the bill would 'massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion'. The US government's budget deficit has been rising. It stood at $1.83 trillion in the 2024 fiscal year, according to the Department of the Treasury. This is not the first time that Musk has criticised the 'One Big Beautiful Bill', even mocking its name in a television interview in late May. 'I think a bill can be big or it can be beautiful. But I don't know if it can be both. My personal opinion,' Musk told CBS journalist David Pogue on May 27. He added that he was 'disappointed to see the massive spending bill'. At DOGE, Musk was tasked with slashing US government infrastructure – a mandate that saw his team push through a significant culling of the federal workforce, with thousands laid off. The United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the government's foreign aid diplomacy arm, was also gutted, leaving critical public health initiatives, among others, struggling for survival in several emerging economies. In the interview with Pogue, Musk suggested that profligate government spending through the bill would undercut the gains made by DOGE in saving tax dollars. The 'One Big Beautiful Bill' is the centrepiece of Trump's legislative agenda and aims to deliver on a series of his campaign promises. It extends the tax cuts Trump introduced during his first term in office in 2017. At the same time, however, it earmarks funding for other priorities of the current administration. It sets aside, for instance, $46.5bn to continue work on constructing barriers along the US-Mexico border to stop migrants and refugees from entering the country. On social media, Trump has described the bill – characteristically, in all caps – as a 'WINNER' and as a 'BIG GROWTH BILL'. The bill carries financial – and many believe political – costs. To finance Trump's priorities, the bill in its current form would dramatically cut social security programmes that millions of Americans depend on. Funding for Medicaid subsidies will drop by $698bn, according to estimates by the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO). More than 71 million Americans were enrolled under Medicaid as of January 2025, according to government data. The programme offers health insurance to low-income Americans. The bill will also snip $267bn in funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), better known as food stamps, according to the CBO. An estimated 41 million Americans used food stamps in 2024. Many critics of the bill have said these cuts leave the most vulnerable Americans even more exposed to healthcare crises and food shortages. But others, especially at the conservative end of the political spectrum, have pointed to how the bill will further bloat the country's debt. The current US federal debt limit stands at $36.1 trillion, set on January 2, 2025. But that gives the government no leeway to borrow any more, since the federal government is currently $36.2 trillion in debt. The new bill proposes raising the debt ceiling by $4 trillion. That has angered some Republicans. Rand Paul, a Republican senator from Kentucky, on Tuesday backed Musk's criticism of the bill. 'I agree with Elon. We have both seen the massive waste in government spending,' Paul wrote on X. 'We can and must do better.' Paul has said he will try to block the bill in its current form in the Senate, where Republicans have a razor-thin majority. In the House, the bill passed with 215 votes in favour, and 214 against: all Democrats voted against it, joined by two Republicans, Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Warren Davidson of Ohio. Yes, in many ways, the bill's proposal to raise the debt ceiling contradicts another Trump campaign promise – to cut debt. DOGE was set up with that in mind, and the Trump administration has justified slashing foreign aid by arguing that it would curb US debt. Trump has also argued that the tariffs he has imposed – and wants to impose – on a range of countries and goods will help the US trim its debt, though many economists have challenged the logic behind that claim.


Al Jazeera
6 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
In Gaza, even humanitarian aid 'has been politicised'
Colin Clarke, the research director at The Soufan Group, discusses the chaotic US-backed aid distribution drive in Gaza and explains why trained professionals must lead the effort.


Al Jazeera
8 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Donald Trump's 50% steel and aluminium tariffs take effect
In a move that has reignited trade tensions with key allies, United States President Donald Trump has doubled tariffs on steel and aluminium imports. The new rates, which came into effect early on Wednesday, raise duties from 25 percent to 50 percent. Trump says the measure is designed to bolster the struggling US metals sector. 'We started at 25 and then, after studying the data more, realised that it was a big help, but more help is needed. And so that is why the 50 [percent tariff] is starting tomorrow,' said White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett during a steel industry event in Washington on Tuesday. The executive order applies to all trading partners except the United Kingdom, which has reached a provisional trade deal with Washington during a 90-day pause on broader tariffs. British exports will continue to face a 25 percent rate until at least July 9. The hike is expected to weigh heavily on Canada and Mexico, two of the US's closest economic allies and among the largest suppliers of steel. Census Bureau data shows Canada alone exports more aluminium to the US than the rest of the top 10 countries combined. Almost half of the US aluminium consumption is imported. Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney's office confirmed that 'intensive and live negotiations' were ongoing to remove the tariffs. Mexico's Economy Minister Marcelo Ebrard slammed the decision as irrational, noting the imbalance in steel trade between the two nations. 'It makes no sense for the United States to levy a tariff on a product in which you have a surplus,' he said, adding that Mexico would seek an exemption. The European Union criticised the decision, saying it 'strongly regrets' the move and warned it could take retaliatory action, accusing Washington of undermining attempts at a negotiated settlement. OECD chief economist Alvaro Pereira told the AFP news agency that the tariffs have already dampened global trade, investment and consumption, and that the US will bear the brunt of the fallout. While several of Trump's tariff measures face legal scrutiny, they remain in force during the appeals process.