Hegseth: Prepare for war to ensure Indo-Pacific peace
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth says nations must prepare for war to ensure peace amid Chinese aggression in the Indo-Pacific region during the International Institute for Strategic Studies Shangri-la Dialogue Defence Summit in Singapore on Saturday. Photo by How Hwee Young/EPA-EFE
May 31 (UPI) -- The United States and its allies won't allow China to dominate the Indo-Pacific region, but do not seek war, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Saturday morning in Singapore.
He addressed regional concerns while speaking during the International Institute for Strategic Studies Shangri-La Dialogue event in Singapore.
Hegseth said the Indo-Pacific region is the United States' "priority theater" and won't allow China to push the United States and its allies out of the region, the Department of Defense announced Friday in a news release.
Instead, deterrence will be the primary tool by which the United States and its allies will counter any aggressive moves made by China, particularly in the South China Sea and against Taiwan.
"As our allies share the burden, we can increase our focus on the Indo-Pacific," Hegseth said, adding that the region is the nation's "priority theater."
He said the futures of the United States and its allies in the Indo-Pacific depend on each other.
"We share a vision of peace and stability, of prosperity and security," Hegseth said, "and we are here to stay."
Common sense and national interests with guide policy making in the region, while respecting mutual self-interests.
President Donald Trump is working to get European nations to do more to increase their respective national security interests instead of largely relying on the United States.
As European nations do more to protect themselves, Hegseth said the United States will be better able to focus on matters in the Indo-Pacific region and do more to thwart Chinese aggression.
"This enables all of us to benefit from the peace and stability that comes with a lasting and strong American presence here in the Indo-Pacific," Hegseth said.
That presence won't come at a cost for the nation's allies, though.
"We are not here to pressure other countries to embrace and adopt our politics or ideology," Hegseth told the audience. "We are all sovereign nations."
He said the United States does not "seek conflict with communist China."
But the United States "will not be pushed out of this critical region," Hegseth added. "And we will not let our allies and partners be subordinated and intimidated."
He said China's leaders are "preparing to use military force to alter the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific," including occupying Taiwan.
Any move by China to take over Taiwan, which China has claimed as part of its sovereign state, would trigger "devastating consequences" for the region and the world, Hegseth told the audience.
"The threat China poses is real, and it could be imminent," he said, adding that the United States and its allies must be prepared with "urgency and vigilance."
If deterrence doesn't work and a fighting war is inevitable, "we are prepared to do what the Department of Defense does best: to fight and win decisively," Hegseth said.
The best way to ensure peace is to prepare for war, "but we have to do this quickly," he said. "We have no time to waste."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Congressional committees demands records from Nashville mayor on immigration enforcement
Nashville Mayor Freddie O'Connell requested detailed information about immigrants arrest in the city and what they were charged with. Now, immigration czar Tom Homan wants him investigated. (Photo: John Partipilo/Tennessee Lookout) In an escalation by Trump Administration officials and Republican lawmakers, two U.S. House committees have launched an inquiry into the response by Nashville's mayor and local officials to federal immigration enforcement activities. A letter sent Thursday by the House Judiciary and Homeland Security Committees demands a series of documents from the office of Mayor Freddie O'Connell by June 12. They include documents related to the mayor's executive order requiring city emergency personnel to report interactions with federal immigration officials within 24 hours. The committees are also demanding all communications between city officials and other organizations and individuals regarding federal immigration activities during the month of May. The letter accuses the mayor of actions that 'threaten to chill immigration enforcement in the City of Nashville and Davidson County.' O'Connell, during a regularly scheduled news conference on Friday, said he intends to 'appropriately respond.' 'There will be repercussions' Homeland Security official targets Nashville mayor over immigration 'I am not particularly concerned,' the mayor said in response to a reporter's question about the inquiry. 'We're going to respond appropriately to all inquiries, and we have been guided by a full understanding of state and federal law and we will continue to be,' he said. The letter was sent to O'Connell the same day the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) released a list of hundreds of U.S. cities, counties and several states that Trump Administration officials accused of 'deliberately and shamefully obstructing the enforcement of federal immigration laws endangering American communities.' Nashville, along with Shelby County in west Tennessee, was on the list. But in a reversal over the weekend, the list was removed from the agency's website. Reuters reported Sunday that the list was taken down after DHS received pushback from the National Sheriff's Association, which issued a statement noting that local law enforcement had not been consulted before the sanctuary city list was made public and that it 'violated the core principles of trust, cooperation, and partnership with fellow law enforcement.' On Friday, O'Connell held in his hand a copy of Tennessee law barring sanctuary status, a designation that typically limits cooperation between cities and federal immigration officials, noting that Nashville has not engaged in any of the actions barred by the legislation. 'By definition Nashville is not a sanctuary city,' the mayor said. 'We do not, nor have we ever had a policy that violates state law.' 'As we've stated several times in recent weeks, Metro (Nashville) does not have any legal authority as it relates to immigration enforcement and we do not impede federal law enforcement actions,' O'Connell said. 'In fact we regularly partner with state and federal agencies to take violent criminals off our streets. This is the reality.' U.S. border czar: Nashville mayor, a critic of immigration sweeps, now faces investigation O'Connell also noted that both violent and property crimes in Nashville are significantly down from prior years. The mayor's remarks came at the end of a week marked by escalating attacks against him by top federal immigration officials as well as Tennessee Republican Rep. Andy Ogles. During a Memorial Day press conference, Ogles accused O'Connell, a Democrat, of 'aiding and abetting illegal immigration.' Subsequently, White House 'border czar' Tom Homan warned that immigration agents would 'flood the zone' in Nashville seemingly in retaliation for the mayor's perceived political stance against mass immigration detainments. And on Thursday a Department of Homeland Security assistant secretary for public affairs accused O'Connell of 'harboring' immigrants without legal status and 'doxxing' immigration enforcement agents. O'Connell has drawn the ire of Republicans for two actions: during mass immigration stops in Nashville earlier this month, O'Connell issued a revised executive order requiring the city's emergency personnel – and some non-emergency employees – to report any interaction with federal immigration officials within 24 hours. The city then posted a list of those interactions on its web site. Initially the names or partial names of four federal immigration staffers appeared on that list in error, city officials said. The names have since been removed. O'Connell also publicized a fund established by the Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee to assist family members of those detained by immigration authorities. While Trump Administration officials accused O'Connell of using public funds to support immigrants without legal status, the fund operates only with private donations, a foundation spokesperson said. ogles-request-for-docs
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Six news stories that defined the inclusive classroom sign debate in Idaho
Stories by Idaho Statesman journalists, with AI summarization The debate over inclusive classroom signage in Idaho reached a flashpoint when West Ada School District ordered a teacher to remove her 'Everyone is welcome here' sign, featuring hands of different skin tones. This decision ignited protest rallies at the Idaho Capitol and brought vocal feedback from parents, teachers, and students at school board meetings. While the district stuck to claims that the signs violated rules on 'content-neutral' displays, public support was displayed for the teacher, with local events like 'Chalk the Walk' and T-shirt campaigns spreading the inclusive message. In May, West Ada took action on its policy, and the teacher took an action of her own. 'American dreams the way we planned them,' sang one participant, in a 'Wicked' reference. | Published March 15, 2025 | Read Full Story by Carolyn Komatsoulis The controversial policy was intended to 'remove distractions, or perceived distractions, from the classroom,' a district spokesperson said. | Published March 18, 2025 | Read Full Story by Rose Evans The district has so far stood firm that the sign in a Meridian teacher's classroom violated policy requiring displays be 'content neutral.' | Published April 3, 2025 | Read Full Story by Rose Evans Dozens of parents, teachers, and students spoke at the meeting Monday. Finally, the elected board members did, too. | Published April 15, 2025 | Read Full Story by Rose Evans One school trustee asks: Could teachers still wear T-shirts similar to the sign in a teacher's classroom with multicolored hands and the message 'Everyone is welcome here'? | Published May 14, 2025 | Read Full Story by Rose Evans 'I don't understand why we can say we embrace diversity but not show what we mean,' the teacher said. | Published May 15, 2025 | Read Full Story by Rose Evans The summary above was drafted with the help of AI tools and edited by journalists in our News division. All stories listed were reported, written and edited by McClatchy journalists.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
In Dozens of Districts, Teachers Can't Afford to Live Near Their Schools
In a recent analysis, Katherine Bowser of the National Council on Teacher Quality finds that teachers are increasingly being priced out of housing in their communities. She notes that, between 2019 and 2024, the percentage growth in home prices and the cost of renting a one-bedroom apartment have significantly outpaced increases in both inflation and teacher salaries. In short, teachers face, 'a widening gap between income and housing affordability,' according to NCTQ President Heather Peske. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development defines 'affordable' as 'paying no more than 30% of gross income for housing costs, including utilities.' NCTQ had previously looked at a select sample of 69 large urban districts and found 18 where beginning teacher salaries met the definition for 'unaffordable' as of 2019. By 2024, that number had risen to 39, or about half the sample. In 10 of those districts, the rent for a one-bedroom apartment cost 40% of a beginning teacher's salary. In Boston, for example, it would eat up nearly 43%. Bowser notes that the picture today is even grimmer when looking at a teacher's prospects for purchasing a home. Using some (ambitious) estimates about how much an educator could save toward a down payment on a mortgage and comparing it with local real estate prices, Bowser finds that teachers would struggle to purchase a home in 54 out of 56 sample districts. These are extreme numbers. But who or what is to blame? And what can be done? Related One potential solution starts with a simple premise. If teachers can't find affordable housing, school districts could partner with developers to build apartments and become landlords to their own employees. This has been a particular focus in California, where state Superintendent of Public Education Tony Thurmond and a coalition of legislators and developers are encouraging districts to repurpose empty buildings and unused land to address housing needs. That may seem like a good idea at first blush, but previous efforts have been plagued by delays and rules that prevent 'low-income' housing subsidies from going to people who are not truly low-income. In other words, teachers often make too much to qualify for extra financial assistance. The idea that districts can solve teacher housing issues is also complicated by the fact that educators are far from the only group of workers who struggle to make ends meet in high-cost urban areas. Indeed, recent studies have found that high housing costs have led to lower mobility and fewer opportunities for people to climb the economic ladder. If police officers, social workers, janitors and cleaners, bus drivers, food service workers and many other types of low- and moderate-income employees are all being priced out of many American cities, there's only so much a school board can do. In that case, the 'teacher' housing problem is largely a generic, community-wide affordability problem that will be solved only by building more housing units. But even if individual school boards cannot solve this big, societal trend, education policymakers are not helping. In fact, their choices have made the housing affordability problem worse. How? By not turning rising revenues into higher salaries, they've chosen to prioritize a larger education workforce over a better-paid one. In turn, that makes it harder for teachers and other school employees to afford housing in the places where they work. Related As I noted in a recent project for The 74, school spending is keeping up with or even outpacing inflation in many parts of the country, but those investments are not translating into higher compensation for district employees. If those salaries had merely kept up with total education spending, they would be 34% higher. At the national level, that would have worked out to a $22,000 raise for the average school employee. In Portland, Oregon, for example, NCTQ's Bowser finds that it would take 41% of a beginning teacher's salary to rent a one-bedroom apartment. But that's not for lack of investments in the district. As we found in our report, Portland's revenues rose 54% from 2002 to 2022 in inflation-adjusted, per-pupil terms. (That is, the district revenues increased much faster than inflation.) And yet, the average salary paid to Portland school employees fell by 8%. Portland, like many parts of the country, did not turn budget increases into salary gains for its workers. These trends have continued in recent years. While Portland housing prices surged over the last five years, the district lost 10% of its student enrollment. At the same time, it added the equivalent of 445 full-time employees to its payroll (an 8% increase). In other words, instead of leaning into the housing problem and trying to pay its existing workers higher salaries, the Portland school district actually made the city's housing problems just a bit worse by hiring more, lower-paid workers.I don't want to just pick on Portland here. As we showed in our project last month, 90% of districts are making these types of choices. But they effectively mean that school district leaders in some of the biggest, most expensive places to live are making budgetary decisions that add to the housing difficulties in their communities.
