logo
Teens learn and live online. How is Delaware trying to boost struggling media literacy?

Teens learn and live online. How is Delaware trying to boost struggling media literacy?

USA Today07-02-2025

Teens learn and live online. How is Delaware trying to boost struggling media literacy?
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Raw Video: Protesters gather to object to Trump administration's policies
Protesters march around at Legislative Hall in Dover to object to President Donald Trump's recent executive orders and policies. 2/5/25
Fewer than 2 in 10 teens could correctly answer three questions asking them to distinguish between information types like news, advertisement, opinion and entertainment, according to a recent report.
Then state Sen. Sarah McBride introduced "The Digital Citizenship Education Act" in 2021, with aims to make Delaware one of the first states to require media literacy teaching standards in schools.
The law required the state to adopt standards that are age-appropriate for K-12 and they had to address healthy online behavior.
These new standards didn't reach the classroom until last school year, and by next spring, each district and charter is tasked with reports to the state education department on their progress.
American teens spend hours scrolling.
Children and young adults alike dive into social media platforms, pulled into a loop of constant entertainment and advertisements, even rumors and conspiracy theories. This week marks National News Literacy Week, and the focus for 2025 is increasing news literacy among teens inundated with information.
USA TODAY Network partnered with the News Literacy Project to reach more families and educators under the same goal while offering activities and grant opportunities for teachers. This comes as the News Literacy Project also published a national report showing some 94% of teens believe schools should be required to teach media literacy.
The same survey showed, among other findings:
Fewer than 2 in 10 teens could correctly answer three questions asking them to distinguish between information types like news, advertisement, opinion and entertainment.
Nearly half of teens, or 45%, believed the news press does more to harm democracy than protect it.
About 8 in 10 teens reported seeing conspiracy theory posts on social media. A combined 51% said that came daily or weekly.
Just less than a quarter of those surveyed say they regularly, either daily or weekly, use generative artificial intelligence technologies.
National politics remain sharply polarized. TikTok is back, while President Donald Trump's order briefly staying its ban falls into a "gray area" of legal logistics. Updates and orders from the second Trump Administration have also been unfolding minute-by-minute, while hopes, rumors and fears develop simultaneously.
There may not be a more important time to help students become critical consumers of news or develop skills to spot misinformation. Technology and access won't stop evolving.
"Our citizens are not armed with the necessary tools to be discerning consumers of news and information online," said U.S. Rep. Sarah McBride, thinking back to Delaware legislation still taking shape. "Especially in this increasingly digital world where so many, especially young people, are obtaining their news not just online – but from non-verified news sources online."
So what can Delaware do about it?
Still trying to train the next generation of 'critical consumers'
McBride remembers taking a walk with Sen. Laura Sturgeon.
In the continued grip of the pandemic shutdown, the pair of then-state senators would often try to walk outside. And in early 2021, both lawmakers were trying to digest the aftermath of Jan. 6, wherein conspiracy theories, misinformation and unsubstantiated claims of election fraud spurred action at the Capitol.
"And we were discussing: What more can be done to combat the reality of disinformation and misinformation online that is fostering radicalization, in some cases, extremism?" McBride recalled, now in Washington D.C., beginning her first term as a Delaware congresswoman.
"It was spurred by Jan. 6, but it wasn't specific to Jan. 6," she continued. "After we started to have this larger conversation about disinformation and misinformation online, we see impact to people of every ideology and background and political persuasion."
McBride would introduce "The Digital Citizenship Education Act" in 2021, with bipartisan aims to make Delaware one of the first states to formally require media literacy teaching standards in schools. By the summer of 2022, it passed both state chambers and was signed into law by then-Gov. John Carney.
Looking back: How Delaware is taking the lead in teaching media literacy
The bill had a host of requirements to explore, and guidance got more involved from there after work from the state Department of Education, professional development staff, school district and charter school librarians, instructional technology specialists and more.
The law required the state to adopt standards that are age-appropriate for K-12 and they had to address healthy online behavior – including acceptable use of online platforms, the negative impact of inappropriate technology use, identifying credible sources of information, developing critical thinking skills, identifying the purpose of media messages and issues associated with cybersafety, cyberbullying, hate speech and more.
Coming standards – broken down by elementary, middle school and high school – get a bit heavy with jargon, as previously reported, but students should step away with skills like:
Engaging in positive, safe, legal and ethical behavior when using technology
Using a variety of communication tools and resources
Managing personal data to maintain digital privacy ad security
Evaluating the accuracy, perspective, credibility and relevance of information
Making critical choices about information sources to use
Questioning and assessing the validity and accuracy of information
Establishing connections with other learners
Using collaborative technologies to work with others to investigate solutions
Using technology, including the internet, to produce and publish writing and to collaborate with others
Recognizing target marketing strategies and persuasion techniques
Interacting with learners who reflect a range of perspectives
Collecting information representing diverse perspectives
Evaluating a speaker's point of view, reasoning and use of evidence
Exhibiting empathy with a tolerance for diverse ideas
Educators are still trying to deliver on those expectations.
These new standards didn't reach the classroom until last school year, and by next spring, each district and charter is tasked with the first reports to the state education department on how they're being met. That will look different across each system as it comes together.
And as educators and instructional technology teams work to meet benchmarks – students, tech and the latest new app just keep evolving.
ICE in Delaware: 'We're not politicians. We're educators': Delaware education head releases ICE guidance
'Look at it as life skills'
A high schooler held up his iPod Touch.
Kevin Wright still remembers the moment when he was student teaching around 2010. One of his students came up and asked if he could cite a meme.
"They showed me, and they're like, 'But look, this right here, it's a fact,'" Wright said with a smile, still not entirely sure if the student's Abraham Lincoln meme was a joke. "And that sparked a really interesting question and journey for me personally."
Fast forward to today, and both Jennifer Ashby and Wright have dedicated much of their time to these new standards in Appoquinimink School District. The instructional technology specialist and coordinator have also helped lend expertise in statewide peer networks as McBride's legislation has been slowly realized.
In some ways, the work is doomed to always be a few steps behind.
"We have to be mindful of not pigeonholing ourselves into mentioning specific platforms because tomorrow there's going to be a new one," Ashby said. "We're taking a step back and looking at it from not specifically TikTok or specifically this or specifically that – but how can we make them just global consumption, digital citizens?"
Media literacy instruction should evolve with students. At least, that's the idea.
"One of the central challenges in navigating this environment is that it is perpetually, and in some cases, more rapidly changing every single day," McBride said. "That is actually one of the reasons why, one of the many reasons why we sought the approach of education standards rather than more prescriptive curriculum."
Teams like Appo's throughout the state are tasked with fusing these standards into existing subjects and grade levels. That could be in science, word history or a kindergarten classroom. The overarching goal is to foster "internal skills," Wright explained, so students can thoughtfully challenge information sources, bias, intention and more.
Whether an educator or a parent, he said, you never quite know how children are getting and absorbing information. Similarly, success here is difficult to measure.
The first year was a gap study. This year, more school districts are finding ways to meet standards. Reports due next year will show where gaps still persist and what kind of difference this instruction is making across Delaware.
"I look at it as life skills," Wright said. "I think these are skills that we as adults need to have as well as children."
Got a story? Contact Kelly Powers at kepowers@gannett.com.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sometimes a Parade Is Just a Parade
Sometimes a Parade Is Just a Parade

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Sometimes a Parade Is Just a Parade

The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. President Donald Trump has gotten his way and will oversee a military parade in Washington, D.C., this summer on the Army's birthday, which also happens to be his own. Plans call for nearly 7,000 troops to march through the streets as 50 helicopters buzz overhead and tanks chew up the pavement. One option has the president presiding from a viewing stand on Constitution Avenue as the Army's parachute team lands to present him with an American flag. The prospect of all this martial pomp, scheduled for June 14, has elicited criticism from many quarters. Some of it is fair—this president does not shy away from celebrating himself or flexing executive power, and the parade could be seen as an example of both—but some of it is misguided. Trump has a genius for showmanship, and showcasing the American military can be, and should be, a patriotic celebration. The president wanted just such a tribute during his first term, after seeing France's impressive Bastille Day celebrations. Then–Secretary of Defense James Mattis reportedly refused, effectively threatening to resign by telling the president to ask his next secretary of defense. Three secretaries of defense later, Trump has gotten enthusiastic agreement from current Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. Criticism of the display begins with its price tag, estimated as high as $45 million. The projected outlay comes at a time of draconian budget cuts elsewhere: 'Cutting cancer research while wasting money on this? Shameful,' Republicans Against Trump posted on X. 'Peanuts compared to the value of doing it,' Trump replied when asked about the expense. 'We have the greatest missiles in the world. We have the greatest submarines in the world. We have the greatest army tanks in the world. We have the greatest weapons in the world. And we're going to celebrate it.' [Read: The case for a big, beautiful military parade] Other prominent critics of the Trump administration have expressed concern that the parade's real purpose is to use the military to intimidate the president's critics. The historian Heather Cox Richardson wrote on her Substack, 'Trump's aspirations to authoritarianism are showing today in the announcement that there will be a military parade on Trump's 79th birthday.' Ron Filipkowski, the editor in chief of the progressive media company MeidasTouch, posted, 'The Fuhrer wants a Nuremberg style parade on his birthday.' Experts on civil-military relations in the United States also expressed consternation. 'Having tanks rolling down streets of the capital doesn't look like something consistent with the tradition of a professional, highly capable military,' the scholar Risa Brooks told The New York Times. 'It looks instead like a military that is politicized and turning inwardly, focusing on domestic-oriented adversaries instead of external ones.' Even the military leadership has been chary. During Trump's first term, then–Joint Chiefs of Staff Vice Chairman Paul Selva reflected that military parades are 'what dictators do.' But these critics may well be projecting more general concerns about Trump onto a parade. Not everything the Trump administration does is destructive to democracy—and the French example suggests that dictatorships are not the only governments to hold military displays. The U.S. itself has been known to mount victory parades after successful military campaigns. In today's climate, a military parade could offer an opportunity to counter misperceptions about the armed forces. It could bring Americans closer to service members and juice military recruitment—all of which is sorely needed. The American military is shrinking, not due to a policy determination about the size of the force needed, but because the services cannot recruit enough Americans to defend the country. In 2022, 77 percent of American youth did not qualify for military service, for reasons that included physical or mental-health problems, misconduct, inaptitude, being overweight, abuse of drugs or alcohol, or being a dependent. Just 9 percent of Americans ages of 16 to 24 (a prime recruitment window) are even interested in signing up. In 2023, only the Marine Corps and Space Force met their recruiting goals; the Army and Navy recruited less than 70 percent of their goals and fell 41,000 recruits short of sustaining their current force. Recruiting picked up dramatically in 2024 but remains cause for concern. One possible reason for this is that most Americans have little exposure to men and women in uniform. Less than 0.5 percent of Americans are currently serving in the military—and many who do so live, shop, and worship on cordoned military bases. Misperceptions about military service are therefore rife. One is that the U.S. military primarily recruits from minority groups and the poor. In fact, 17 percent of the poorest quintile of Americans serve, as do 12 percent of the richest quintile. The rest of the military is from middle-income families. Those who live near military bases and come from military families are disproportionately represented. The Army's polling indicates that concerns about being injured, killed, or suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder are major impediments to recruitment. Women worry that they will be sexually harassed or assaulted (the known figures on this in the U.S. military are 6.2 percent of women and 0.7 percent of men). Additionally, a Wall Street Journal–NORC poll found that far fewer American adults considered patriotism important in 2023 (23 percent) than did in 1998 (70 percent)—another possible reason that enthusiasm for joining up has dampened. [Read: The all-volunteer force is in crisis] A celebratory parade could be helpful here, and it does not have to set the country on edge. Americans seem comfortable with thanking military men and women for their service, having them pre-board airplanes, applauding them at sporting events, and admiring military-aircraft flybys. None of those practices is suspected of corroding America's democracy or militarizing its society. Surely the nation can bear up under a military parade once every decade or two, especially if the parade serves to reconnect veterans of recent wars, who often—rightly—grumble that the country tends to disown its wars as matters of concern to only those who serve in them. The risk, of course, is that Trump will use the occasion not to celebrate the troops but to corrode their professionalism by proclaiming them his military and his generals. This is, after all, the president who claimed that Dan Caine, his nominee to become chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, wore a MAGA hat and attested his willingness to kill for Trump, all of which Caine denies. This is also a president known to mix politics with honoring the military, as he did in Michigan, at Arlington National Cemetery, at West Point's commencement, and in a Memorial Day post on Truth Social calling his opponents 'scum.' Even so, the commander in chief has a right to engage with the military that Americans elected him to lead. The responsibility of the military—and of the country—is to look past the president's hollow solipsism and embrace the men and women who defend the United States. Being from a military family or living near a military base has been shown to predispose people toward military service. This suggests that the more exposure people have to the military, the likelier they are to serve in it. A big celebration of the country's armed forces—with static displays on the National Mall afterward, and opportunities for soldiers to mix with civilians—could familiarize civilians with their armed forces and, in doing so, draw talented young Americans to serve. A version of this essay originally appeared on AEIdeas from the American Enterprise Institute. Article originally published at The Atlantic

Musk's Allegation Against Trump Is Deleted From Social Media
Musk's Allegation Against Trump Is Deleted From Social Media

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Musk's Allegation Against Trump Is Deleted From Social Media

President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference with Elon Musk in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C, on May 30, 2025. Credit - Allison Robbert—Getty Images Amid President Donald Trump and Elon Musk's bitter online war of words, key posts have been deleted from social media. The most divisive post from Musk alleged that Trump is listed in the files related to the late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, and that this is why they have not been fully released to the public. Musk made the allegation on Thursday, in a post shared on his social media platform, X (formerly Twitter). But as of early Saturday morning, Musk's Epstein-related post was no longer showing, with X users instead receiving a notice that reads: "Sorry, that post has been deleted." And it's not the only post of Musk's that has been deleted. Another inflammatory post from Thursday, which saw Musk respond 'yes,' endorsing a message that said 'Trump should be impeached' and that Vance 'should replace him,' is also no longer viewable on X. The deleted posts suggest that the explosive feud between Trump and his one-time ally could be thawing. Read More: Where Things Stand With the Epstein Files Following Musk's Allegation Against Trump Musk's original posts came as Trump also lobbed insults and threatened to take away government funding and contracts related to billionaire Musk's Space X company. Although things appear, for now, to be simmering down, Trump has made it clear he does not have plans to reconcile with Musk. When asked on Friday night by reporters if he intends to speak with Musk—who until recently lead the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)—the President gave a clear response. 'No I don't have plans… I'm not even thinking about it,' Trump said on Air Force One. 'I'm not really interested in that, I'm really interested in the country, and solving problems.' However, when asked if he plans to take back the symbolic White House key that he gifted to Musk, Trump said that he has no intention of doing that."I don't take things back, I gave him a key, he tried very hard,' the President told reporters, praising the efforts of DOGE. Read More: J.D. Vance Speaks Out After He's Dragged Into Explosive Row Between Trump and Musk Trump also appeared to defend Musk against the New York Times' reported allegations that the Tesla CEO regularly consumed ketamine, ecstasy, and psychedelic mushrooms when traveling with Trump on the campaign trail in 2024. 'I don't want to comment on his drug use. I don't know what his status is,' Trump said, when asked by reporters if he had concerns. 'I read an article in the New York Times. I thought it was, frankly, it sounded very unfair to me.' Trump's Air Force One remarks, issued late on Friday, came hours after he told ABC News that Musk had 'lost his mind.' Contact us at letters@

Musk deletes Epstein tweet after Trump rift
Musk deletes Epstein tweet after Trump rift

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Musk deletes Epstein tweet after Trump rift

Elon Musk has deleted a tweet in which he alleged that Donald Trump was 'in the Epstein files'. The social media post was written on Thursday during a fierce war of words between the tech billionaire and the US president, after a dispute over Mr Trump's flagship spending Bill marked an abrupt end to their close alliance. As the disagreement escalated, Mr Musk also suggested that his former boss should be removed from office. 'The Epstein files' is a phrase colloquially used to describe intelligence the US authorities hold on Jeffrey Epstein, the paedophile financier who died in 2019. However, by Saturday morning, Mr Musk had deleted his post on X, in a sign the row could be winding down. Mr Trump also appeared to suggest he was moving on from the spat, telling reporters during a flight to New Jersey: 'Honestly I've been so busy working on China, working on Russia, working on Iran... I'm not thinking about Elon Musk. I just wish him well.' The row began when Mr Musk – who last week stepped down as head of the Department of Government Efficiency – criticised the president's upcoming Bill as a 'disgusting abomination' and claimed it would increase the national debt. Mr Trump retaliated by saying the billionaire was upset because one of his allies had not been chosen for a role in the new Nasa administration. The president also suggested Mr Musk was annoyed because the White House's 'big beautiful Bill' would end tax breaks for electric vehicles worth billions of dollars to his car company Tesla. 'He knew it better than almost anybody, and he never had a problem until right after he left,' Mr Trump said. The president later said, during an Oval Office meeting with Friedrich Merz, the German chancellor, that Mr Musk had 'Trump derangement syndrome'. The Republican later added that he was 'very disappointed' in the entrepreneur. However, Mr Musk was quick to hit back, alleging that the president had only won last year's election because of his support. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election. Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate... Such ingratitude,' he wrote on X. The world's richest man then published his post about the president and the Epstein files – but provided no evidence to back up his claim. Mr Trump and Epstein ran in the same social circles in New York and were pictured partying together on various occasions in the 1980s and 1990s. Epstein killed himself in 2019 in a Manhattan jail cell while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. In February, Pam Bondi, the US attorney general, pledged to release the Epstein files. However, the 'phase one' documents that were released to a hand-picked group of conservative influencers contained information that was largely already in the public domain. As the row escalated, Mr Musk said he would decommission his Dragon spacecraft, which is used by Nasa to deliver and collect astronauts from the International Space Station. Mr Trump in turn threatened to cancel all the Tesla and SpaceX owner's government contracts. 'The easiest way to save money in our budget, billions and billions of dollars, is to terminate Elon's governmental subsidies and contracts,' he said. The president also reportedly considered selling or giving away the red Tesla car he purchased earlier this year. Tesla shares tanked as the rift intensified, amid investor fears that Mr Trump might hinder the roll-out of self-driving cars in the US, hitting the company's growth potential. Shares closed down 14.3 per cent on Thursday and lost about £111 billion, although the firm staged a partial recovery on Friday. An administration official claimed Mr Musk was 'clearly having an episode', while Steve Bannon, Mr Trump's former adviser, encouraged the president to initiate a formal investigation into Mr Musk's immigration status and have him 'deported from the country immediately'. As well as deleting the Epstein post, Mr Musk also appeared to walk back on his threat to decommission the Dragon spacecraft. When an X user suggested Mr Musk and Mr Trump 'take a step back for a couple days', the Tesla chief executive wrote: 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' However, the billionaire has continued to keep a poll pinned to the top of his X profile which invites users of the social media platform to vote on whether it is time for a new political party in the US. Mr Musk wrote on Friday night: 'The people have spoken. A new political party is needed in America to represent the 80 per cent in the middle! This is fate.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store