Effort to ban flavored tobacco products in WA revived in legislature
The Brief
Previously thought to be dead for the year, lawmakers heard legislation Monday that would ban flavored vapes and cigarettes.
A new bill takes the extra step of increasing taxes on manufacturing, selling and buying all other tobacco products to bring in more revenue.
OLYMPIA, Wash. - Efforts to ban flavored tobacco products in Washington got a breath of life, as a bill to do so got a committee hearing Monday after the effort was previously assumed dead.
House Bill 2068 would ban the sale of flavored tobacco products like vapes and menthol cigarettes starting in July 2027 – with the exception of flavored shisha, which is used in hookah.
"These products don't contribute to the social wellbeing of our communities," prime sponsor Rep. Kristine Reeves, D-Federal Way, told the House Finance Committee on Monday. "They definitely don't contribute to the health and wellbeing of our children. And I would love for you to join me in helping find a path forward to make sure that the next generation is not getting hooked on tobacco."
Reeves pushed similar restrictions in another bill this session which failed to move forward.
However, the new proposal goes a step further and increases taxes and fees around manufacturing, selling and buying tobacco products, with revenues going toward cancer research, tobacco use prevention and general operating funds. One of those increases is in the tax on a pack of cigarettes, going up by $2 under the bill and is adjusted to inflation every three years.
The increased taxes backfills lost revenues from flavored products being off the market, Reeves said, while also funding efforts to get people away from the dangers of tobacco products, especially youth vaping.
"The intent is really to ensure that we are getting at consumer education," she said. "That we're focusing on how we address youth prevention and adult cessation. And that we hopefully address some of the enforcement needs of the liquor and cannabis board to be able to address this uptick."
A handful of high school students testified in support of the legislation Monday. They told lawmakers that teens are targeted by vapes' fruity flavors, contests and other marketing ploys, with the resulting addiction getting in the way of kids learning, playing and living healthy lives.
"Flavored tobacco pulls teens in," said Jayce Hartman, a senior at Tacoma's Silas High School. "It smells like candy, looks like candy, and it feels harmless, but it's not. And I've seen students at my school – classmates, friends – get hooked before they even realize what's happening."
Opponents to the bill argued flavored vape products are a less harmful alternative to traditional cigarettes and adults should have unrestricted access to them. They also point to federal data showing a decline in youth use of tobacco in recent years, with store clerks being responsible in keeping products away from kids.
"We are the first line of defense, and our efforts are working," testified Yujin Ghim with the Korean American Grocers Association of Washington. "The current system of licensed retailers, strong minimum age laws and government oversight is working."
Retail groups also argued the ban would cause a drop in revenue for businesses and force some to close their doors. They believe a ban would push the tobacco market underground and potentially cause more harm.
"Increasing taxes doesn't necessarily limit or reduce people who are trying to access tobacco, or encourage cessation," said Crystal Leatherman with the Washington Retail Association. "Instead, it actually just forces them to purchase from an unregulated or illicit market."
Lawmakers face a deadline on Tuesday to move legislation forward, but a spokesperson for the House Finance Committee chair said generally bills that include taxes are not subject to that cutoff.
The Source
Information in this story is from Albert James, a television reporter covering state government as part of the Murrow News Fellowship program – a collaborative effort between news outlets statewide and Washington State University.
Seattle driver plummets off multi-story parking garage, 77-year-old rescued
Thousands attend Seattle 'Hands Off!' rally against Trump, Elon Musk
Tacoma police shoot, kill carjacking suspect Saturday afternoon
Sue Bird named to Naismith Basketball Hall of Fame
Trump tariffs live updates: Global markets plunge as countries scramble to respond
USPS mail delivery changes begin: Here's what to know
To get the best local news, weather and sports in Seattle for free, sign up for the daily FOX Seattle Newsletter.
Download the free FOX LOCAL app for mobile in the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for live Seattle news, top stories, weather updates and more local and national coverage, plus 24/7 streaming coverage from across the nation.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Reeves's spending priorities leave little wiggle room
The words Spending Review may not instantly quicken the heart rate of many, but what we hear from the Chancellor Rachel Reeves will have an impact on what your life is like in the UK in the coming years. It could be one of the defining moments between now and the next general election, as the government divvies up spending for the health service, defence, schools, the police, prisons, courts and much else. After plenty of words about the government's priorities, we will get a sense of the numbers. And yes, a sense of the winners and losers. We can expect ministers to claim that much of what it has done in its first year in office has been about "fixing the foundations". That is code for the tricky stuff: think those big and in many places unpopular tax rises, such as the increase in employers national insurance contributions. There is also a keen awareness that rarely has a new government suffered such a big whack to its popularity so fast. Yes a whopping majority, but just 34% of the vote last summer, and they have gone a long way backwards since. Little wonder we can expect the chancellor to claim "this government is renewing Britain" but also acknowledge "I know too many people in too many parts of the country are yet to feel it". Baked into what we can expect to hear is an emphasis from Reeves of the importance of stability. As an illustration of that, the chancellor recently returned from a meeting of G7 finance ministers in Canada, where she, not yet a year in office, was the second longest serving attendee around the table. It is a volatile world. As the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) and others have pointed out, the key decision above all others that we await in the Spending Review is how much money is allocated to the health service. The NHS makes up such a big chunk of day-to-day government spending - about 40% - that how well or otherwise it does shapes everything else. This has long been the case, particularly because it is often also gets a proportionately more generous settlement than others. And, on top of that, what has changed more recently as well the government's desire to spend more on defence too and to do so in an era of low growth. If we put all these things together, you have an explanation for why other budgets will be squeezed. Or, as Paul Johnson, the outgoing director of the IFS puts it, "this will be one of the tightest spending reviews in modern times, outside of the austerity period of the early 2010s". For much of the last week, the government has been leaning into the elements of its plan that it feels most comfortable selling: the long term, so-called capital spending on transport and nuclear power. What gets squeezed and by how much is the detail we are waiting for. Labour MPs have been invited in to see the chancellor and be talked through the plans. The aim, as one person put it to me, was to give them "a song to sing", things they can talk about when they are asked what the government is up to. Plenty of Labour MPs I talk to welcome the long-term spending but are also acutely conscious of how bumpy politics feels right now and how important it is they are seen to deliver and deliver quickly. "The problem with talk of 'a decade of national renewal' is so much of this stuff is long term and so we could get half way through the decade and then lose the election," one MP reflects. Folk in the Treasury are aware of this critique and particularly those who might point to some squeezed day-to-day budgets and claim we are experiencing what they see as austerity. It has led those around Reeves to declare a "war on graphs" or, as Laura Kuenssberg reported the other day, a desire to point to graphs that help illustrate a key part of their argument in taking on this criticism. They point out that when you combine day-to-day spending with capital spending, the graph is going up - the opposite of what some might describe as austerity. "This is about four trillion pounds of spending," one senior figure tells me. "We reset the foundations. This is stage two: setting things out. Then, we hope for the delivery." Let's see. The political and economic backdrop is perilous: an electorate without much patience, limited economic growth and a wildly unpredictable international landscape, not least President Trump. Given what the government has chosen to prioritise - the NHS and defence - and the rules it has set itself with the aim of projecting economic competence, it leaves the chancellor with little room for manoeuvre. Spending review now settled, says Downing Street Reeves admits some will lose out in spending review IFS says tough public spending choices unavoidable
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Reeves to promise investment in ‘renewal' as she unveils spending plans
Rachel Reeves will vow to 'invest in Britain's renewal' as she reveals her spending plans for the coming years on Wednesday. The Chancellor is expected to announce big increases in spending on the NHS, defence and schools as part of a spending review set to include £113 billion of investment thanks to looser borrowing rules. She will also reveal changes to the Treasury's 'green book' rules that govern which projects receive investment in an effort to boost spending outside London and the South East. Arguing that this investment is 'possible only because of the stability I have introduced' after the October budget, Ms Reeves is expected to say her spending review will 'ensure that renewal is felt in people's everyday lives, their jobs, their communities'. She will say: 'The priorities in this spending review are the priorities of working people. 'To invest in our country's security, health and economy so working people all over our country are better off.' Among the other announcements expected at the spending review is £39 billion for affordable homes over the next 10 years as the Government seeks to meet its promise of building 1.5 million homes by the next election. The Treasury said this would see annual investment in affordable housing rise to £4 billion by 2029/30, almost double the average of £2.3 billion between 2021 and 2026. A Government source said: 'We're turning the tide against the unacceptable housing crisis in this country with the biggest boost to social and affordable housing investment in a generation, delivering on our plan for change commitment to get Britain building.' The Chancellor has also already announced some £15.6 billion of spending on public transport in England's city regions, and £16.7 billion for nuclear power projects, the bulk of which will fund the new Sizewell C plant in Suffolk. But the spending review is expected to set out tough spending limits for departments other than health, defence and education. Although Ms Reeves is reported to have agreed to an above-inflation increase in the policing budget, this is thought to have come at the expense of cuts in other parts of Home Office spending. And sources close to London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan have expressed concern that the spending review will have nothing for the capital. Ahead of the spending review, the Institute for Fiscal Studies has warned that any increase in NHS funding above 2.5% is likely to mean real-terms cuts for other departments or further tax rises to come in the budget this autumn. The Chancellor has already insisted that her fiscal rules remain in place, along with Labour's manifesto commitment not to increase income tax, national insurance or VAT. She will say on Wednesday: 'I have made my choices. In place of chaos, I choose stability. In place of decline, I choose investment. In place of retreat, I choose national renewal. 'These are my choices. These are this Government's choices. These are the British people's choices.'
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Reeves to promise investment in ‘renewal' as she unveils spending plans
Rachel Reeves will vow to 'invest in Britain's renewal' as she reveals her spending plans for the coming years on Wednesday. The Chancellor is expected to announce big increases in spending on the NHS, defence and schools as part of a spending review set to include £113 billion of investment thanks to looser borrowing rules. She will also reveal changes to the Treasury's 'green book' rules that govern which projects receive investment in an effort to boost spending outside London and the South East. Arguing that this investment is 'possible only because of the stability I have introduced' after the October budget, Ms Reeves is expected to say her spending review will 'ensure that renewal is felt in people's everyday lives, their jobs, their communities'. She will say: 'The priorities in this spending review are the priorities of working people. 'To invest in our country's security, health and economy so working people all over our country are better off.' Among the other announcements expected at the spending review is £39 billion for affordable homes over the next 10 years as the Government seeks to meet its promise of building 1.5 million homes by the next election. The Treasury said this would see annual investment in affordable housing rise to £4 billion by 2029/30, almost double the average of £2.3 billion between 2021 and 2026. A Government source said: 'We're turning the tide against the unacceptable housing crisis in this country with the biggest boost to social and affordable housing investment in a generation, delivering on our plan for change commitment to get Britain building.' The Chancellor has also already announced some £15.6 billion of spending on public transport in England's city regions, and £16.7 billion for nuclear power projects, the bulk of which will fund the new Sizewell C plant in Suffolk. But the spending review is expected to set out tough spending limits for departments other than health, defence and education. Although Ms Reeves is reported to have agreed to an above-inflation increase in the policing budget, this is thought to have come at the expense of cuts in other parts of Home Office spending. And sources close to London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan have expressed concern that the spending review will have nothing for the capital. Ahead of the spending review, the Institute for Fiscal Studies has warned that any increase in NHS funding above 2.5% is likely to mean real-terms cuts for other departments or further tax rises to come in the budget this autumn. The Chancellor has already insisted that her fiscal rules remain in place, along with Labour's manifesto commitment not to increase income tax, national insurance or VAT. She will say on Wednesday: 'I have made my choices. In place of chaos, I choose stability. In place of decline, I choose investment. In place of retreat, I choose national renewal. 'These are my choices. These are this Government's choices. These are the British people's choices.'
