Qantas reveal 'contingency plans' for when airspaces shut
Don't miss out on the headlines from National. Followed categories will be added to My News.
Australian airlines have been forced to reroute and cancel flights this week after conflict caused major disruption the Middle East.
But what is the process behind calculating risk in international airspace?
On Tuesday, two Qantas flights from Perth - one to London and one to Paris - were diverted due to a traffic jam in the skies above the Gulf.
In the hours prior, Iranian missile attacks on a US military base had led to the closure of parts of the airspace in Qatar and the United Arab Emirates.
Two Qantas flights from Perth - one to London and one to Paris - were diverted due to a traffic jam in the skies above the Gulf. Picture: Julian Andrews
Pilots London-bound on QF9 were advised by Mumbai air traffic control of the situation and quickly alerted Ben Holland, head of Qantas' integrated operations centre.
The contingency plans were as follows: within minutes, Holland had met with senior staff from multiple departments via conference call.
Qantas took a 'conservative risk perspective' and used multiple sources of intelligence and information as a part of a multi-layered process to manage situations, Qantas chief risk officer Andrew Monaghan told The Sydney Morning Herald.
'We're doing things more frequently in terms of risk assessment,' he said.
Ben Holland, the head of Qantas' integrated operation centre, jumped on a conference call with other executives minutes after the call. Picture: Qantas
'There's just more effort that has to go into it because the availability of airspace is limited.'
The flight corridors through the Middle East are one of the main avenues by air to Europe for Aussie travellers, which have been narrowed significantly since the Iran-Israel conflict escalated.
QF9 was directed to reroute to Singapore while the other aircraft, QF33, was told to return to Perth - with passengers enduring a 15-hour flight to nowhere.
Those on board were not told about the missile attack until returning to Australia, WAToday reported, instead were only told the flight was turning back because airspace over Qatar had closed.
Originally published as Qantas reveal 'contingency plans' for when airspaces shut
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
41 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent calls for ‘revenge tax' to be scrapped after meeting with Albanese, Chalmers
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has called on Republican lawmakers to scrap section 899 – known as the 'revenge tax' - after Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Treasurer Jim Chalmers spoke to him directly. The section 899 in President Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill' would allow the US to implement retaliatory taxes on nations his administration believes unfairly treats US firms – such as tech giants Meta and Alphabet. On Friday, Bessent posted on X that after months of productive dialogue, a 'joint understanding' among G7 countries would be announced. Bessent said that under the agreement, the 15 per cent global corporate minimum tax would not apply to US companies under "Pillar 2" of the OECD tax deal. He added: "We will work cooperatively to implement this agreement across the OECD-G20 Inclusive Framework in coming weeks and months." On Friday, Mr Albanese told reporters in Sydney he had spoken to Secretary Bessent on the sidelines of the G7 in Canada earlier this month about section 899. "This would (have had an) adverse impact on Australian investment if it had had been implemented, particularly on investment from superannuation companies," Mr Albanese said. "One of the things that we held earlier this year in Washington DC was a round table of Australian investment funds that are willing and keen to invest in the United States - it's just one way in which the Australia-US economic relationship is an important one." Treasurer Jim Chalmers on Wednesday told reporters he had discussed section 899 with US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and made Australia's case against the looming tax. 'I've engaged a lot with Australian investors over the course of the last couple of weeks on their concerns,' Mr Chalmers said. 'I was able to represent them and raise their concerns directly with US Treasury Secretary Bessent and I know that the Treasury Secretary is very focused on these issues as well. 'We hope that they can be resolved. We do not want to see our investors and our funds unfairly treated or disadvantaged when it comes to developments out of the US Congress.' Investors have expressed caution about investing in the United States over growing uncertainty surrounding section 899. Bessent's announcement comes after prominent House Republicans said on Wednesday that Section 899, which drew opposition among some in the party and US corporate interests, could be removed from the bill. Republicans are pushing for final votes as early as Saturday on the sweeping fiscal package, which extends 2017 tax cuts for individuals and adds new breaks, so that Trump can sign it into law before the July 4 U.S. Independence Day holiday. "This understanding with our G7 partners provides greater certainty and stability for the global economy and will enhance growth and investment in the United States and beyond," Bessent said. AMP economist My Bui said the 'revenge taxes' would make the US a 'less attractive' investment destination and that Australian super funds are rethinking how they will deploy their capital in the future. -with Reuters


Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Super funds spared multi-billion dollar 'revenge tax'
Australian superannuation funds have been spared a multi-billion dollar hit after Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced the US would drop a so-called "revenge tax" on foreign investors. The super industry had been ringing alarm bells over section 899 of President Donald Trump's proposed big beautiful bill, which would have raised taxes by up to 15 percentage points on foreign entities in retaliation to "unfair taxes" other countries had imposed on US companies. But Mr Bessent revealed the section would be removed from the bill in a social media post early on Friday, after a deal was reached with G7 nations allowing the US to back out of a global minimum tax rate. "After months of productive dialogue with other countries on the OECD Global Tax Deal, we will announce a joint understanding among G7 countries that defends American interests," he wrote on X. "OECD Pillar 2 taxes will not apply to U.S. companies, and we will work cooperatively to implement this agreement across the OECD-G20 Inclusive Framework in coming weeks and months. "Based on this progress and understanding, I have asked the Senate and House to remove the Section 899 protective measure from consideration in the One, Big, Beautiful Bill." The announcement was met with a sigh of relief from the $4.2 trillion Australian superannuation industry, which would have been particularly exposed to the tax, given it holds more than $600 billion worth of US assets. Modelling conducted for the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia by consulting firm Mandala found it could have cut $3.5 billion from returns over the first four years. Treasurer Jim Chalmers raised Australia's concerns about the tax during a phone call with Mr Bessent on Wednesday, when he told reporters he was hopeful of positive development in the coming days. "We do not want to see our investors and our funds unfairly treated or disadvantaged when it comes to developments out of the US Congress," he said. "And once again, I'm very grateful to Scott Bessent for hearing me out and for also undertaking to make what progress he can to try and resolve these issues. "I'm confident he understands these issues." In a speech in June, Future Fund chair Greg Combet said US investments were a less attractive proposition for the sovereign wealth fund, in part because of the proposed tax hike contained in Mr Trump's "big beautiful bill".

ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Should commercial surrogacy be allowed in Australia?
A review into Australia's surrogacy laws is currently looking at whether commercial surrogacy should be allowed in Australia. Advocates say the number of couples going overseas for surrogacy arrangements has increased significantly, and allowing Australian surrogates to get paid would make it more accessible for intended parents here. But those who want to see commercial surrogacy stay banned, say allowing it would lead to exploitation.