EU seeks safer toxin-free children's toys with stricter rules
ADVERTISEMENT
Chemicals that pose risks to children's health and development will now be banned from toys sold in the EU, introducing stricter safety requirements for manufacturers and sellers, including those operating on online platforms, EU institutions agreed on Thursday.
The new rules update the bloc's 2009 Toy Safety Directive with further restrictions on the use of hazardous substances.
'We have also future-proofed the regulation, the Commission will be able to react more quickly to new scientific findings on chemical substances,' said MEP Marion Walsmann (Germany/EPP), negotiator from the European Parliament.
The regulation introduces essential safety standard to ensure a high level of health and safety protection for children.
It imposes a ban on chemicals that can cause cancer, alter DNA, or harm reproductive organs, but also other dangerous substances such as endocrine disruptors, respiratory sensitisers and PFAS, also known as 'forever chemicals'.
It also bans skin sensitisers and toys treated with biocides, except for toys meant to stay outdoors. Biocidal products are used to protect people and animals against harmful organisms, like pests or bacteria.
The agreement further limits the use of preservatives and prohibits fragrance allergens in toys intended for children under three years old, or in toys meant to be placed in the mouth.
'Children's safety must always come first. While the EU's toy safety rules are among the strictest in the world, we must remain vigilant, adapt the rules to emerging risks and ensure that safety standards are met for all toys – whether made in Europe or abroad,' said Krzysztof Paszyk, Polish Minister for Economic Development and Technology in a press release after the agreement.
Before introducing a toy to the market, manufacturers will be required to carry out a safety assessment covering all potential risks, including chemical, physical, mechanical, electrical, flammability, hygiene and radioactivity hazards.
Related
Exposure to 'forever chemicals' linked to gut health and kidney damage in young adults, study finds
Children are especially vulnerable
Walsmann noted that although the European market already offers 'the safest toys in the world', one in five products flagged as dangerous and withdrawn from the EU market is a toy.
'The PFAS restriction is a step forward in the fight against pollution from these forever chemicals. By restricting PFAS in toys, co-legislators have made the Toy Safety law future-proof and aligned with standards in other parts of the world,' said Ioana Bere, EU Policy advocate at CHEM Trust, an European charity that works to protect human health and the environment from harmful chemicals.
A study by a Danish consumer organisation found that more than 60% of
121 children's products
sampled including toys, blankets and feeding bottles contained or released at least one bisphenol – a chemical harmful for the brain and prostate gland of foetuses, infants and children. In many cases, two or more bisphenols were found.
New requirements for online sellers
'Toys are among the most reported product category in the EU's alert system for dangerous products,' said Agustín Reyna, Director General of BEUC, a European consumers organisation.
He added that while the new rules are strong on paper, enforcement is key and member states must now provide the resources needed for authorities to ensure that only safe toys are sold.
BEUC's
recent study
on the safety of toys sold in the Chinese online marketplace Temu concluded that the platform 'is an entry point for dangerous products in Europe'.
ADVERTISEMENT
To tackle this, the new rules introduce specific obligations for online sellers to comply with broader EU laws, including the Digital Services Act. All toys sold in the European market now need a digital product passport showing they meet safety standards. This, according to the legislators, will facilitate to track the products, improve checks by market inspectors and customs and increase transparency.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Local France
2 hours ago
- Local France
OPINION: The Macron-Trump bromance is heading for a bust-up
On Sunday President Emmanuel Macron will become the first French leader ever to make an official visit to Greenland. He will be the first EU leader to set foot in the vast Danish autonomous territory since Donald Trump began to make bullying comments about the manifest right of the United States to grab all the real estate on its northern borders. Trolls were originally part of Danish, Swedish and Norwegian folklore. Macron is 'trolling' Trump – on his way to a G7 summit in Canada where he will meet the US President that he calls a 'friend'. Something has changed in Macron's obsequious public approach to Trump in the last few weeks. Other members of the French government – the Prime Minister François Bayrou and the foreign minister Jean-Noël Barrot – have overtly criticised the US President. In March Bayrou said that Donald Trump planned to 'destroy the international order' and 'make the world even more dangerous'. In public, Macron has been careful not to attack Trump by name. He claims a 'friendship' with the US president from their first terms of office. He said in March that he speaks to Trump at least once every two days. Advertisement In private, Macron, I am told, has no illusions about the US leader. He returned from his visit to the White House in February disturbed by what he heard off-camera. He told senior political and military figures in France that his conversations with Trump and senior US administration figures had been 'bizarre, brutal and sometimes racist'. Macron believes nonetheless – or once believed - that nothing can be gained by frontal attacks on Trump. Something useful might still be achieved, he once hoped, for Ukraine and for transatlantic trade, by a mixture of flattery, cajolery and a patient separation of facts from Trumpian obsessions and inventions. Four months later, something is shifting. Macron has still not attacked Trump directly. But the French president is moving towards the kind of open challenge to the Trumpian worldview that is likely to strain their strange bromance. On his visit to south-east Asia last month, Macron called on Asian countries to ally with Europe to resist bullying attempts by 'big powers' to build 'spheres of coercion'. Officially, he was talking about China and Russia. In the context, he was also clearly referring to the United States. Speaking at a conference on the future of the oceans in Nice on Tuesday, Macron said that 'ocean depths are not for sale, any more than Greenland is for sale'. Referring to his visit to the Danish territory this weekend, he said that his intention was to make it clear that 'predation' and 'threats' were not acceptable. Where all this is heading is unclear. Trump may not yet have noticed the change in Macron's tone. It may suit both men to continue the fable of their unlikely friendship. But I expect that we are heading for a bust-up. The French President has almost two years left in power but no majority in parliament and little real influence on domestic policy. The second coming of Trump offered him vindication at home and pivotal, diplomatic influence abroad. His appeals in the last eight years for Europe to build its own 'strategic autonomy', independent of the US, have proved to be visionary. Macron remains an important figure in Europe and internationally. It was the Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen and Greenland prime minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen who invited him to 'troll Trump' by joining them in talks on the territory's future this weekend. But Trump's return to office has also confronted the French President with his own contradictions. After appealing for years for the EU to move towards military and diplomatic autonomy, Macron finds that France's own future defence investment is compromised by the state budget deficits that have piled up during his eight years in office. At the Nato summit in The Hague later this month, Trump will push for European countries to increase defence spending to 5 percent of GDP (while doing everything he can to undermine their economies). Macron has spoken vaguely of increasing the French defence budget to 3.5 percent of GDP but there is no obvious way that can happen without cutting social spending or missing France's deficit-cutting targets. Advertisement In alliance with Sir Keir Starmer, Macron hoped that he could persuade Trump that Vladimir Putin had no plans to end the war in Ukraine. It was time to intensify international sanctions on Russia, not weaken them. Trump seems to have accepted that his disjointed and floundering peace initiative is going nowhere. But there is no sign that he is willing to join the EU in new sanctions or that he is prepared to continue military aid to Ukraine. On transatlantic trade, Trump continues to speak nonsense about the size of the US-EU trade deficit and refer to the EU as a 70-year-old conspiracy to damage the United States. The Trump State Department published an unhinged new doctrine on Europe last month in which France, Britain and Germany are America's enemies and Marine Le Pen and 'Christian Hungary' are America's friends. Advertisement In sum, the chances of a big quarrel between the US and Europe in the next month are high. Trump has given way on China; he will be looking for a diversionary squabble elsewhere. The French president, marginalised in domestic politics, is understandably tempted to prove that he still exists by playing a pivotal role in European and international affairs. But at some point soon he will have to make a clear choice. Will he continue to humour and flatter Trump or will he stand up to him?
Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
Danish cities drop Microsoft over concerns about Trump and US Big Tech
Two of Denmark's biggest municipalities are ending their use of Microsoft systems in the latest move by European governments away from US Big Tech companies. Henrik Appel Espersen, the chairman of Copenhagen's audit committee, told newspaper Politiken that the council is making the decision to move away from Microsoft Office programmes due to the economy and the "monopoly-like" control of the company. Plus, the foreign policy situation with US President Donald Trump has made the problem "more topical," Espersen added. The same decision was made in Aarhus, Denmark's second-biggest municipality, where, according to the newspaper, a German system has already replaced Microsoft technology. Euronews Next contacted both municipalities to independently verify local reporting. The reported moves from local governments in Denmark follows a public debate in the Netherlands that saw the Dutch parliament approve a series of motions earlier this year to build a digital cloud and reduce its dependence on US cloud technology. There are concerns from experts who previously told Euronews Next that the Trump administration could either compel tech companies to provide the US with Dutch data or force them to no longer provide cloud services to Europe, which could cause massive disruptions to public services. The debate on US Big Tech influence has been going on for some time in Denmark, based on the results of an expert panel looking into their influence. The Danish expert group on tech giants released a report in December 2024 that called for Big Tech alternatives in Europe to "be able to emerge and grow large". "No one should be forced to use the services of tech giants to get information and participate in social, cultural, and democratic communities," the report said. It also asked for an "overview" of the tech giants' influence on digital infrastructure in Denmark, saying that the public sector and education systems should not be "dependent" on the services of tech giants. "We need to fence in the tech giants," Morten Bodskov, Denmark's minister of business and industry, said in a statement at the time. "If we only use their solutions, it makes our society extremely vulnerable in a world that is changing with pressure from great powers, geopolitical tensions, and a technology race. That is why we must develop our own solutions". Euronews Next followed up with the panel of experts and the Danish government to see whether this inquiry has been started or promised but did not receive a reply at the time of publication. Another alternative for Denmark, the Netherlands, and other states concerned about the influence of US Big Tech companies is EU-wide initiatives that are in the works. The European Commission is holding public consultations until July 3 on the future of cloud legislation in the bloc to "address Europe's gap in cloud and AI infrastructure capacity". The act will eventually address research and innovation to accelerate data centres for cloud and AI, private investment in sustainable cloud and AI capacity, and increasing the "secure processing capacity" of EU-based cloud providers. Mario Draghi's 2024 report on the state of Europe's competitiveness noted that the bloc has to "enhance technological infrastructure and reduce dependencies" on non-EU cloud service providers. On March 18, 1967, the supertanker SS Torrey Canyon struck a reef off the coast of Cornwall, United Kingdom, spilling 100,000 tonnes of crude oil into the English Channel. Beaches in southern England, the French region of Brittany, and Guernsey in the Channel Islands were submerged in thick sludge. More than 15,000 seabirds were killed, and the spill caused innumerable long-term damages to the marine environment. The Torrey Canyon disaster was the first major oil spill in European waters. It marked a turning point in the way people interacted with oceans, revealing how vulnerable marine ecosystems are to human-induced threats. To mark World Oceans Day on June 8, Euronews Tech Talks talked to two ocean experts to better comprehend the state of our oceans and the high and low-tech innovations that can help protect them. Over the past four decades, global plastic production has more than quadrupled, yet recycling has failed to keep pace, with rates remaining below 10 per cent. Simon Bernard is the CEO and co-founder of Plastic Odyssey, a project dedicated to tackling ocean plastic pollution. Bernard and a group of researchers embarked on a tour around the world aboard a research vessel to explore the best solutions for reducing plastic pollution. "The idea of a research vessel is to be a scientific platform to study, do research, and development... The vessel acts as a laboratory, so for example, the aft is dedicated to recycling with various machines used to recycle plastic, test different solutions and technologies, and train local entrepreneurs," Bernard explained to Euronews. Plastic Odyssey has been sailing for two and a half years. During the journey, the crew stops for three weeks in locations affected by plastic pollution, meets the locals, institutions, and entrepreneurs to learn about their solutions, and helps support them. "That's quite shocking to realise that there is no pristine environment anymore, because plastic pollution has impacted all the places," said Bernard. Throughout the Plastic Odyssey's journey, Bernard has met many people tackling plastic pollution and has been impressed by the cleverness of the simplest solutions. "We've visited maybe 150 factories and initiatives, and what's most interesting to us is the ingenuity and the use of low-tech solutions," he said. "We met a guy in Lebanon who made the equivalent of a food delivery app but for waste connection... and I'm thinking about Silvio in Colombia who was building houses out of plastic waste," Bernard said. While plastic pollution is a visible threat to marine ecosystems, oceans are also damaged by hazards that are much harder to detect, like chemical pollutants. Researcher Anneliese Hodge from the University of Plymouth is studying these complex pollutants, and one of her most recent studies focuses on sunscreen. The most harmful components of sunscreen are its UV filters designed to block, absorb, or reflect the sun's ultraviolet rays. "A recent estimation has suggested that approximately 10 million tonnes of UV filters are produced annually for the global market, of which an estimated 6,000 to 14,000 tonnes are released into coral reef zones alone annually," Hodge told Euronews. "So this is quite a widespread issue," she continued. Hodge explained that UV filters in sunscreen can affect marine ecosystems at a molecular, cellular, individual, and community level. For instance, sunscreen can damage the DNA of marine organisms and cause coral bleaching. Despite the need for further research into this topic, Hodge highlighted several potential solutions to reduce the threats sunscreen poses to marine environments. Among them is the encapsulation of UV filters in biodegradable capsules that activate only upon contact with the skin. In addition, Hodge cited the possibility of reducing UV filters and instead using Sun Protection Factor (SPF) boosters, specialised ingredients that could replace UV filters. She also pointed to the introduction of some regulations to make corporations reduce the UV filters or ban the use of certain products.
Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
Zelenskyy: Russia aims to take Odesa and threaten Moldova and Romania
Russia's plan in its ongoing all-out war on Ukraine is to take Odesa and continue to Moldova and Romania, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy told southeastern European leaders at a summit in the Black Sea port city on Wednesday. 'Russia's war plans target this region, Odesa. Then they are targeting the borders with Moldova and Romania. Of course, we need protection now. But above all, we need long-term guarantees that these can never happen again," he emphasised. The summit, attended by Ukraine, Romania, the Republic of Moldova, Serbia, Albania, Greece, Montenegro, Croatia and Slovenia, brought together countries, some of which have already been targeted by Moscow's hybrid warfare. Moldova's President Maia Sandu has warned of the dangers of hybrid warfare aimed at influencing the country's parliamentary elections scheduled for this fall. 'We do learn everyday by new attempts and new ways through which Russia tries to interfere with our internal political processes, democratic processes," Sandu said. "It is going to be tough, but we do want Moldovans to decide for Moldova at the parliamentary elections, and not the Kremlin." Through its actions, the Kremlin is threatening peace across the continent, while sabotaging efforts to reach a lasting peace in Ukraine, participants pointed out. 'Russia constantly rejects any constructive initiative and strives to undermine the path to peace," Romanian President Nicușor Dan, who was on his first official visit to Ukraine after winning the dramatic elections in May, said at the summit. "Russia proposes unreasonable demands, knowing that they cannot be accepted. The only language Russia understands is the language of force and we must do our utmost to help Ukraine negotiate from a position of strength.' Both Dan and Sandu have recently been targeted by disinformation campaigns on pro-Russian Telegram channels, as revealed by Euronews and Euroverify. Meanwhile, Odesa was again in the Russian forces' crosshairs in the run-up to the summit. Euronews Romania journalists have visited the Black Sea port city districts destroyed by Moscow's massive bombing in recent days. The extent of the destruction is significant: buildings in ruins, burned cars and people who no longer have a home. Every night, people are woken up by airstrikes and the long sound of sirens. The most terrifying, people say, is the noise of drones or missiles overhead. Kateryna, 32, witnessed the bombings in recent nights. The apartment she lives in, together with her mother, was hit by drones launched by the Russians. Everything was reduced to ashes. "This is the first time our home was bombed. My mother was sleeping in my room, and when the first Shahed drone came, she ran away and hid in the basement. The first strike was right in the room she ran from," Kateryna told Euronews. Earlier this week, at least two people died and 9 were injured in a missile and drone attack that also struck a maternity hospital and another medical facility, and the city's film studio and zoo. Odesa is of strategic importance to Ukraine, serving as one of the primary logistical channels for both the export and import of goods needed by the country, which has been affected by Russia's ongoing full-scale aggression. The EU is wrangling over a provision of Donald Trump's so-called "Big Beautiful Bill" for the US budget that could see European companies taxed higher than others in retaliation for certain taxes imposed on US enterprises overseas, the vice-chair of the European Parliament's tax subcommittee has told Euronews. The German European People's Party MEP Markus Ferber said the European Commission has raised the proposed legislation—already approved by the House of Representatives—in ongoing tariff negotiations with the Trump administration. 'We are concerned because within this 'One Big Beautiful Bill' there are special taxes aimed at jurisdictions that impose taxes on the US,' Ferber told Euronews. He added that jurisdictions like the EU, which have already implemented the OECD agreement establishing a global minimum tax of 15% on multinationals, are directly targeted. 'It could also affect member states that have introduced a digital services tax,' he noted. The OECD agreement, approved by 140 countries - though as yet unratified by the US - introduced a global minimum tax of 15% on the profits of multinational companies, regardless of where those profits are declared, with effect from 1 January 2024. The EU has transposed the agreement into law and applies it to multinationals operating within the Union, to the ire of the Trump administration. Meanwhile countries such as Denmark, Portugal and Poland have implemented digital services taxes targeting US tech giants, while others are in the process of creating one. The US is now looking to retaliate against taxes it deems unfair through a provision of the "Big Beautiful Bill' which would hit foreign investors with a bump in US income tax by five percent points each year, potentially taking the rate up to 20%, in addition to existing taxes. The Commission is concerned, officials said. According to Ferber, the EU executive has put this provision of the US budget bill on the negotiating table. 'But we are not sure yet that the US agreed to put it in the basket,' the MEP said. For several weeks, the EU and the US have been discussing a resolution to the trade dispute that has been ongoing since mid-March. The US impose 50% tariffs on EU steel and aluminium, 25% on cars and 10% on all EU imports. For its part, the EU has prepared countermeasures targeting around €115 billion worth of US products. These measures are either suspended until July or still awaiting approval by EU member states.
