US authorities investigate deadly Mexican navy ship crash in New York, echoes Baltimore bridge disaster
NEW YORK, May 19 — US safety officials launched a probe yesterday after a 150-foot tall Mexican sailing ship crashed into New York's iconic Brooklyn Bridge, snapping its masts and killing two crew members.
Numerous sailors were positioned among the navy vessel Cuauhtemoc's rigging at the time, video of the incident showed.
New York Mayor Eric Adams said early Sunday that 277 people had been on board the vessel and that two people had died from their injuries, without specifying where they were located on the vessel.
Nineteen others sustained injuries, he said, two of whom were in critical condition.
The white-hulled ship was moored Sunday along banks of the East River, its mangled masts contrasting against colourful decorations for its US departure.
The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) said on social media that it was 'launching a go-team' to conduct an initial probe of the crash.
Nearby the ship, Aldo Ordonez told AFP that his sister, 24-year-old cadet Alejandra Ordonez, had been standing among the sails when the ship struck the Brooklyn Bridge.
His sister was temporarily left hanging from a sail, he said, but sustained only minor injuries and slept with others on the boat.
Aldo Ordonez arrived Sunday morning from Mexico City after seeing the accident on television.
Crew members were expected to fly home to Mexico later Sunday, he said.
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum wrote on X that she was 'deeply saddened' by the two crew members' deaths.
The ship lost power at around 8:20 pm (0020 GMT Sunday) while the captain was manoeuvring the vessel, forcing it to head for a bridge abutment on the Brooklyn side, New York police chief of special operations Wilson Aramboles told a press conference.
There was 'panic on the ship,' Brooklyn resident Nick Corso, 23, who was standing near the water, told AFP.
He had been poised to take a photo, but when he realised what was happening he switched to video.
'Lots of screaming, some sailors hanging from the masts, looked like panic happening on the ship,' he said.
The Mexican Navy said in its statement that no one had fallen into the water, and that no rescue operation had been launched.
The ship had been departing New York at the time and flags fluttered in its rigging, while an enormous Mexican flag waved off its stern.
The Cuauhtemoc, built in 1982, was sailing to Iceland when it crashed into the Brooklyn Bridge, the world's longest suspension bridge when it opened in 1883.
The incident is the second deadly ship crash into a US bridge in little over a year, after a fully laden cargo vessel smashed into a bridge in Baltimore, Maryland in March 2024, causing it to collapse and killing six road workers. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
2 days ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Low turnout set to thwart moves to ease Italian citizenship rules
Create profiles to personalise content Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Malay Mail
4 days ago
- Malay Mail
Fire on EV-loaded cargo ship off Alaska left to burn until salvage team arrives
WASHINGTON, June 7 — A fire on a cargo ship carrying electric vehicles off the coast of Alaska was left burning with salvage teams expected to intervene on Monday, according to media reports. The Alaskan coastguard received a distress call on Tuesday reporting a fire onboard the Morning Midas, a British-managed cargo ship with 22 crew members and carrying thousands of vehicles. The crew evacuated on a lifeboat before being rescued by another private vessel. An overflight of the cargo ship, currently located around 340 miles (547 kilometers) southwest of Adak, confirmed the ship was still burning on Wednesday, the coastguard said in a statement. 'Currently, there are no visual indications that the ship is taking on water or listing, and the extent of the damage is unknown,' it said. Dustin Eno, a spokesman for the ship's management company Zodiac Maritime, said there were no firefighting vessels nearby to help extinguish the blaze, the New York Times reported. A salvage team was expected to arrive on Monday, the outlet and the Los Angeles Times said. Video footage released by the coastguard shows smoke rising from the 600-foot (183-meter) vessel, which is reported to be carrying more than 3,000 vehicles, around 750 of which are electric or hybrid. Electric vehicles contain lithium-ion batteries, which are generally safe but can overheat and ignite if damaged. The ship is also estimated to be carrying hundreds of metric tons of gas fuel, according to the coastguard. — AFP
Malay Mail
5 days ago
- Malay Mail
Beyond the recycling bin: Why Gen Z is putting employers' green cred to the test — Elman Mustafa El Bakri
JUNE 6 — Putting a recycling bin in the pantry doesn't make you a green company anymore. That may have been acceptable a decade ago, but today's workforce — particularly Gen Z — is far more discerning. They are no longer content with symbolic gestures. When it comes to the environment, they expect substance, transparency, and accountability. According to LinkedIn, 74 per cent of Gen Z find it crucial to work at companies that reflect their values, and 87 per cent are willing to switch jobs if the employer's values do not align. They want transparency on environmental policies alongside diversity, equity, and inclusion. And according to a 2024 article, Gen Z looks for employers who provide meaningful sustainability initiatives, such as reducing carbon footprints, committing to net-zero emissions, offering sustainable products, and providing sustainability training. They want these efforts embedded in company culture, not just as PR. For many years, employers have been the ones leading the conversation during job interviews. But that dynamic is shifting. Increasingly, Gen Z candidates are the ones asking the more profound questions: 'What does this organisation stand for?' And for a growing number of them, one of the first filters is a company's environmental stance. Environmental responsibility can no longer be confined to an annual CSR campaign or a glossy page in a sustainability report. This generation is not simply seeking jobs — they are seeking alignment. They want to work in spaces that reflect their values, including a sincere commitment to the planet they hope to protect. And while these questions may not come in the form of a checklist, the audit is real. Gen Z professionals are asking how seriously companies take their environmental footprint. They pay attention to how a business sources its materials, whether hybrid or remote work is genuinely encouraged, and whether any sustainability claims are backed by evidence. They are not looking for perfection, but they are looking for intention. They want to see the work behind the words — the plan behind the promises. What distinguishes this shift is not just the demand for environmental action, but the demand for consistency. To Gen Z, sustainability is not about compliance or marketing. It's cultural. It reflects how decisions are made, who gets involved, and whether those decisions are aligned with long-term thinking rather than short-term image. This is why surface-level efforts — such as replacing plastic cups or holding a one-off 'green day' — often fall flat. Gen Z professionals are informed, connected, and aware of the deeper issues at stake. Performative actions are easily spotted. And once a company loses that trust, it is difficult to regain. In my role working across both industry and academia, I've observed how environmental expectations are quickly becoming part of the employer brand. It's no longer just about salaries, perks, or even work-life balance. Increasingly, it's also about environmental credibility. And companies that don't keep up may find themselves struggling not only to attract talent, but to retain it. The good news is that there is space for progress. You don't need to have all the answers today, but you do need to be asking the right questions. Organisations can begin by understanding their environmental footprint — energy usage, waste patterns, procurement habits — and identifying where change is both needed and possible. Integrating sustainability into operational decisions, enabling more climate-conscious policies such as hybrid work arrangements, and engaging staff in ongoing environmental initiatives are all meaningful steps. Equally important is the culture of inclusion. Young professionals should be given the opportunity to participate in shaping sustainability efforts, rather than simply being expected to follow them. Progress is far more likely when employees feel they are part of the solution. And whatever the starting point, transparency matters. Admitting that there is still work to be done is not a weakness — it is often seen as a strength. At its core, this is not about appeasing a generation. It is about evolving with the times. The environmental expectations of Gen Z reflect a broader shift in how work is perceived. Employment is no longer just a transaction — it is an extension of identity and purpose. And businesses that understand this shift will be better positioned to lead in the future. As we mark World Environment Day 2025, it is worth asking ourselves: What kind of workplace are we building? Is it one that future employees would be proud to join — not just because of what we do, but because of how we choose to do it? In an age where values drive choices, where integrity is visible, and where climate action is no longer optional, the organisations that lead with purpose will also lead in performance. Because in the end, it's not just about attracting talent. It's about earning their belief. * The author is CEO and Founder of HESA Healthcare Recruitment Agency and serves on the Industrial Advisory Panel for the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Universiti Malaya. He may be reached at [email protected] ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
