R3. 2 billion transport budget unveiled as Cape Town grapples with traffic problems
Cape Town's crippling traffic congestion has been thrust into the spotlight with the unveiling of a bold R3.2 billion budget by Western Cape Mobility Minister Isaac Sileku, aimed at transforming the province's transport system and putting residents at the heart of long-term mobility planning.
Addressing the Western Cape Provincial Legislature, Sileku said the budget prioritises public transport expansion, rail recovery, and safer communities, describing mobility as 'a basic human right and the lifeblood of the Western Cape economy".
Cape Town, now ranked the 9th most congested city in the world, sees its residents lose an average of 94 hours per year in traffic, a situation Sileku said the department is urgently addressing.
'We are putting our money where our mouth is,' he declared, referencing the soon-to-be-finalised Provincial Land Transport Framework, which will be opened up to public input.
The province is also boosting public transport access, with major investment in the Go George bus service, which already serves 75% of households in George and makes over 21,000 passenger trips daily.
'We are stepping up to connect communities,' said Sileku.
'This budget is about more than transport, it's a catalyst for economic growth and job creation.'
Progress is also being made on reviving the long-defunct rail system. The Khayelitsha line is currently undergoing live testing, with Mitchells Plain next in line.
'This is a great win for the province, particularly for the residents of Khayelitsha, who were left with limited public transport options for more than five years,' said Sileku.
Minibus taxis, which transport 1.5 million people daily in the province, are set to benefit from targeted support, including training and conflict resolution initiatives.
In rural areas like the Central Karoo, the province is working to improve intertown travel and access to essential services.
'A functional public transport system encompasses passenger rail as its backbone while being supported and complemented by bus services, minibus taxis, e-hailing taxis and non-motorised transport. All these modes of public transport are vital for daily commuting,' Sileku said.
Additional investments include R113 million toward the Integrated Transport Hub, R60 million for electric vehicle infrastructure, and R2 million for road safety ambassadors in high-risk areas.
Bicycle distribution will continue in rural areas, helping residents, learners, and workers reach their destinations.
'We are stepping up for the economy and our residents,' said Sileku.
'This budget reflects a government that listens, plans boldly, and delivers with purpose.'
Cape Argus
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eyewitness News
a day ago
- Eyewitness News
Majodina issues warning to 'water mafia'
JOHANNESBURG - Water and Sanitation Minister Pemmy Majodina has issued a warning to the so-called water mafia who are vandalising infrastructure. She says law enforcement will crack down on those who sabotage pipelines to benefit from water tanker contracts. Majodina was speaking at the official launch of the completed 12-phase water supply project in Tulbagh, Western Cape, worth at least R113 million. The project - a private-public partnership - is set to supply over 1.2 million cubic meters of water to at least 10 000 households in the drought-prone area. Majodina said that while the region has abundant water from mountain snowmelt, storage has been a longstanding challenge. After the department identified a suitable site in 2007, authorities purchased a farm and constructed a dam as part of a multi-phase project. The new system aims to alleviate water shortages that have delayed housing projects and strained the rapidly growing community. Majodina also raised concerns over increasing vandalism of water infrastructure, allegedly by groups seeking to force municipalities to rely on private water tankers. "The non-revenue water is our challenge throughout the country. Gone are the days where water was reticulated and provided to our people. You meet water at the wrong places, water running down the street. And we agreed that in the first three months we must disconnect the illegal connections, deal with the water tinkering because our people want water, they want reliable water. And ours is water security," said Majodina Resident will have access to the clean running water from Saturday.
IOL News
5 days ago
- IOL News
Gauteng couple in financial distress blames Absa for reckless lending on R3. 2 million home loan
A Gauteng couple took action against Absa bank after alleging reckless lending practices that have led them into a spiralling debt of over R5.1 million. A Gauteng couple has launched legal action against Absa bank, alleging that reckless lending practices have pushed them into a spiralling debt of over R5.1 million. Christian Daniel De Klerk and his partner, who have been long-standing customers of the bank, argue that their financial well-being was jeopardised when they accepted a second home loan from Absa without receiving an appropriate affordability assessment. Initially, the De Klerks secured a R1.9 million home loan from Absa in 2011 and, for nearly a decade, they successfully met their repayment obligations. However, following the collapse of the husband's legal practice in March 2020 due to the pandemic, the couple were granted a temporary three-month payment holiday. Ironically, during the same month, they said Absa approached them with an offer for a second loan, amounting to R3.2 million. Despite their precarious situation, the couple accepted the offer. Meanwhile, the husband remained unemployed until June 2024 and the couple faced mounting debt because of missed repayments from 2022. They maintained that their current income was inadequate to service both the new instalments and the arrears. Nevertheless, they submitted that they could meet the loan obligations under terms similar to those agreed upon in March 2020.
IOL News
5 days ago
- IOL News
Financial distress: Couple accuses Absa of reckless lending after accepting R3. 2 million second home loan
A Gauteng couple took action against Absa bank after alleging reckless lending practices that have led them into a spiralling debt of over R5.1 million. Image: Oupa Mokoena / Independent Newspapers A Gauteng couple took action against Absa bank after alleging reckless lending practices that have led them into a spiralling debt of over R5.1 million. Christian Daniel De Klerk and his partner, long-standing customers of the bank, claim that their financial wellness was compromised when they accepted a second home loan from Absa without being given a suitable affordability assessment. Initially, the De Klerks secured a R1.9 million home loan from Absa in 2011 and, for nearly a decade, they successfully met their repayment obligations. However, following the collapse of the husband's legal practice in March 2020 due to the pandemic, the couple were granted a temporary three-month payment holiday. Ironically, during the same month, they said Absa approached them with an offer for a second loan, amounting to R3.2 million. Despite their precarious situation, the couple accepted the offer. Meanwhile, the husband remained unemployed until June 2024 and the couple faced mounting debt because of missed repayments from 2022. They maintained that their current income was inadequate to service both the new instalments and the arrears. Nevertheless, they submitted that they could meet the loan obligations under terms similar to those agreed upon in March 2020. In seeking respite, the couple brought their case before the National Consumer Tribunal (NCT), voicing their primary grievance against Absa's alleged failure to conduct a proper affordability assessment before approving the second loan. They argued that Absa did not request essential financial documentation such as proof of income, detailed expense records, or even a credit history report—critical assessments that would typically inform responsible lending practices. The couple contended that granting them a loan while the husband was unemployed amounted to reckless lending. In addition, the couple alleged that Absa also failed to provide clear information regarding the loan's terms, conditions, interest rates, and penalties for missed repayments, all of which they argue have contributed to their current financial hardship. As a result of these alleged contraventions, the couple said that they are suffering severe financial hardship, face the risk of foreclosure, and are enduring significant emotional distress, which has adversely affected their quality of life. In the answering affidavit, Absa argued the couple's application was time-barred as more than three years have elapsed since the alleged cause of action arose. Moreover, the bank submitted that the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria enforced the loan agreement in September 2024 and ordered the couple to pay over R5.1 million including interests and declared the couples' property executable. The bank added that the couple's case was frivolous, vexatious, and constitutes an abuse of the Tribunal's process. In their reply, the couple disputed the assertion that the matter was time-barred. They argue that the cause of action only arose in 2022 when they began defaulting on their home loan repayments. On this basis, they contend that the three-year period should be calculated from 2022, not from 2020 when the second home loan was granted. They also disputed the contention that the high court judgment precludes them from pursuing the complaint before the tribunal. They argue that the issue of reckless lending, which forms the crux of their complaint before the tribunal, and it was not adjudicated by the high court. Looking at matter, the tribunal said by law, the limitation period must be calculated from 2020 March when the alleged reckless credit was extended. Having filed their application for leave to refer in February 2025—almost five years post the alleged reckless lending—the tribunal indicated that they would be barred from considering the complaint, potentially closing the door on their search for justice. As a result, the application was dismissed. [email protected] IOL News Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel.
