Mount Street residents and businesses feel ‘barricaded in' as anti-tent fences remain one year on
When barricades were erected along Dublin's Mount Street on May 1st last year, there was a sense of 'relief' and even 'celebrations' among some residents and business owners.
The barriers were installed around the
International Protection Office
(IPO) and its surrounding areas by
Dublin City Council
(DCC) after a significant operation saw the removal of the more than 200 tents which had built up.
The encampment had grown due to a lack of State-provided accommodation for male international protection applicants, while the barriers were to act as a deterrent to prevent the erection of further tents or rough sleeping.
Some 12 months later, what was initially believed by residents to be a short-term measure has become the norm, with those living and working in the area 'barricaded in' and fighting for the removal of the fences.
READ MORE
Some residents who spoke to The Irish Times described feeling 'locked up', believing 'it's never ever going to change'.
Others described themselves as 'fuming' that the barricades have remained for so long and highlighted a general lack of engagement from DCC and Government departments on the issue.
The barriers, installed around the International Protection Office and its surrounding areas by Dublin City Council, have been up for a year. Photograph: Chris Maddaloni/The Irish Times
'It's like I'm living in a prison,' said Fran Nolan, a resident in her 70s who downsized and moved from Sandycove to an apartment on Mount Street 11 years ago.
Her building is surrounded by barricades and every morning, she pulls back her bedroom curtains and sees the 'depressing' fencing stretched along her street, behind which weeds grow large and litter builds up.
The barricades have become a source of 'embarrassment,' she added.
'Usually, I have American friends coming to stay with me here and I said to them this year, 'Please, don't come'.
'It's so upsetting when I think of what I have to pay in taxes and everything else to live here, and to be treated like this at this stage of my life,' she said, adding that she and others have been 'totally disregarded'.
Ideally, those living and working on Mount Street would prefer the barriers to be removed and replaced with security personnel to patrol the area instead. This would be similar to the measures taken by Waterways Ireland at the Grand Canal.
While DCC did not respond to requests for comment by the time of publishing, its chief executive, Richard Shakespeare, told business owner Ruth Hamilton two weeks ago that the barricades are 'considered an effective method of ensuring people do not rough sleep or set up camp on the footpaths.
'24-hour security is not something that the city council would consider as it would set a precedent for various other areas of the city that experience similar issues,' he said in an email.
[
Will dramatic immigration law reforms in Ireland change the number of people seeking asylum?
Opens in new window
]
Alongside security patrols, Hamilton suggested the installation of planters or poles instead of the fencing. Shakespeare responded, however, that the council did not believe these would be an 'effective deterrent here, albeit they may look nicer'.
Hamilton, with her husband Clint, owns Mamma Mia, a restaurant on Grattan Street which is located behind the IPO and surrounded by barricades.
'Any suggestion that I've brought to them, they're not taking them on. As far as I'm aware, DCC is happy to leave them up there,' she says.
Describing the encampment which surrounded the IPO as a 'disaster' for her business, she was initially relieved to see the barricades. She believed, at the time, they would be a short-term measure for two months or so until a more practical plan was developed.
'People are not going to come into my restaurant and spend money to look out at a horrific view,' she said.
'It's heartbreaking because our business was booming before the tents and these barriers and, now, we're actually just going month by month at this stage,' she said, adding: 'Our business is on its knees. We just feel like we've been completely forgotten about. It's hard to believe that it's still going on.'
Footfall at Mamma Mia has 'completely diminished' due to the barricades, preventing a recovery from an already severe downturn due to the encampment previously on its doorstep.
Michael Finlay, the owner of the Punnet Health Store, a shop, cafe and deli, however, describes the barricades as the 'lesser of two evils'.
'For six months, I was dragging tents off the front of my property to try and get into work every day, but the barricades have come with their own set of problems,' he said.
While revenue fell by 70 to 80 per cent at the time of tents, it remains at least 30 per cent below what it was prior, which he attributes to the barricades.
'Without fail, every single day, I'll have at least five or six conversations with customers about it.
'Everyone was happy when something was done about the actual tent city, but the longer it's dragged on, it's sapped everyone's energy,' he said.
Although he has largely become used to the barricades, it dawns on Finlay how 'abnormal' they are at certain moments, including when he 'tip toes' around them to carry in stock.
'It has a very detrimental effect on the business but also on the psyche of the area. here's quite a demoralised tone at the moment,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Irish Sun
4 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Govt ministers could owe State thousands of euro after ‘absolutely unacceptable' pensions pay gaffes leads to 13k audits
GOVERNMENT ministers are among thousands of civil servants who have been accidentally overpaid or underpaid in their pensions in an embarrassing series of gaffes. Three separate mess ups at the National Shared Services Office has resulted in thousands of civil servants being either One of these mistakes relates to Due to an administration error, a number of current and former Other Ministers and senior civil servants will have to repay the State amounts ranging between the low hundreds up to €30,000. The NSSO began the process of contacting Ministers and former Ministers today to inform them about the mistake. READ MORE IN IRISH NEWS Another gaffe relates to the administration of Chargeable Excess Tax and Witholding There are 30 of these cases that need to be corrected with one person mistakenly overpaid up to €280,000. A third mess up by the NSSO relates to the miscalculation and under payment of pensions for some civil servants who were work sharing in their careers and spans back 20 years. Some 13,000 civil servants are having their cases audited to find out how much they need to be paid or owe the State over the mishap. Most read in Irish News Public Expenditure Minister The FURIOUS AT MISTAKES The mistakes were not the fault of any of the individuals impacted and are instead completely on the NSSO. The Minister is furious at the mistakes and has ordered the CEO of the NSSO to correct the matter immediately while also ordering a full external audit of the State pension body. He said: 'The issues that have been brought to my attention by the NSSO are completely unacceptable. 'The NSSO has responsibility for the essential function of the provision of pay and pensions to public and civil servants and it has failed in this fundamental duty. 'I have instructed the CEO of the NSSO that the multiple errors must be corrected by the NSSO as a matter of urgency, particularly regarding the treatment of retirees who had been on a work-sharing pattern in the civil service. 'I am committed to fully and comprehensively addressing this matter.' 1 Some Ministers are owed refunds of up to €20,000 Credit: Getty Images - Getty


Irish Independent
5 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Running public toilets on 24-hour basis in Dublin would ‘quadruple' costs
Derek Kelly, Director of Services at DCC, told councillors that the four public toilets planned for the capital were only intended to be open during 'retail hours'. 'In general, people who are in town for the night-time economy are in a bar, they're in a restaurant, they're in a venue, they're at a theatre,' he said. 'There are toilets in all those facilities. If we're going to open these [toilets] up 24 hours a day, the numbers I'm talking here are going to quadruple for managing them.' Management costs for the four new units, planned for South King Street, Barnardo Square, O'Connell Street/North Prince's Street and Smithfield Square, makes up the bulk of the €5.7m cost over five years. Between maintenance, cleaning and security services, an estimate of €4.4m is attached to the five-year operations contract. Councillors at yesterday's monthly meeting were broadly critical of the costs involved, with many drawing comparisons between Dublin and other European capitals. 'The projected cost of €5.7m for just four on-street public toilets over five years represents €285,000 per toilet per unit per year. That is staggeringly high,' said Fine Gael councillor Ray McAdam. 'When I look at other cities of comparable scale and size, Oslo population 700,000, 200 public toilets. The cost there is between €50,000 and €80,000 [a year]. Helsinki, 650,000 population with costs between €30,000 and €70,000. 'So, my question is, one: how can we bring the costs down?, but then, two: how are other cities able to mitigate the costs we don't seem to be able to?' Mr Kelly said the costs in the report were only estimates, and that companies with experience managing toilets around Europe would be able to inform the council as the project moved forward. ADVERTISEMENT 'We've engaged with [companies] previously through the market consultation, and they've told us they won't provide automated units in the city centre. They just won't last. They're the ones telling us previously that manned and serviced units are the way to go,' he said. DCC is open to reducing costs by introducing advertising boards in future, and by having staff roving between manned sites rather than assigning staff per unit. One factor complicating the advertising displays is Dublin City Council's contract with advertising giant JCDecaux, which is due to end in September 2027. Mr Kelly said that once this contract expires, the possibility of advertising panels subsidising the toilets could be examined, but the units could be installed with the infrastructure necessary for advertising in the meantime. Consultants are to be appointed this month to prepare designs for the four new structures, with a public consultation set to take place in the second or third quarter of this year. The toilets are expected to be installed in the second or third quarter of 2026, following the appointment of a service provider. Funded by the Local Democracy Reporting Scheme


Irish Times
6 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on rental reform: the perilous task of fixing a broken market
Reform of the rent pressure zone rules was always going to be one of the trickiest issues facing the Cabinet. It is difficult to get the balance right between protecting tenants and encouraging development. And the topic is politically toxic, allowing the Opposition to make charges of incompetence and favouring international capital over hard-pressed renters. The backdrop is clear, even if the solutions are not. There is a supply crisis in the rental market. Doing nothing is not an option. The shortfall cannot be dealt with through State investment alone – private capital is also needed. Yet just scrapping rent pressure zones and allowing market rents across the board is not an option, as this would place an unacceptable burden on many renters. The Government has tried to square this circle by allowing market rents to apply for new developments – and to increase with inflation – while leaving current rental price protections for existing renters. Built around this are some new protections for tenants, including the extension of rent pressure zones to the entire State. Not surprisingly, the reaction is mixed, with warnings of new pressure on some renters and investors warning that the changes are not enough. The Government, too, knows pain lies ahead . Average rents are likely to increase, at least in the short term, and new supply will be unaffordable to many. Fixing a broken market is not easy. READ MORE The hope is that an increased level of development and new supply will eventually lead to more properties and falling rental costs. But in the short term a key question for investors will be whether there are enough people able to pay rents which are sufficiently high to give them the return they are looking for. The extent to which the loosening of the rules will bring forward new investment thus remains to be seen. In this mix, a significant issue is that current renters will remain in a better position than future ones, unless in time higher supply brings down new rental costs. To have enough properties affordable for lower and middle earners, this means that the Government needs to increase the supply of cost rental properties – as well as social and affordable housing – to provide options for those who cannot pay market rents. If the plan is to to lead to any kind of sustainable rental market, this type of State-led investment is essential. And other reforms are also needed to speed both private and public development. Here we are in familiar territory. The chronic shortages of infrastructure must be tackled. The planning system needs to operate much more efficiently. And further efforts are needed to bring down the costs of development. These fundamental factors are much more important than considering yet more financial incentives for developers. If the Government is to move the dial, a relentless push is needed.