‘The dust will fly' – but control measures returning this fall to Chatham-Kent
Chatham-Kent council has voted to reinstate its dust suppression program after backlash from rural residents who were left frustrated by the initial decision to cut it during 2025 budget talks.
Council voted 13-3 on Monday night to bring the program back, months after eliminating it in an effort to save about $1.3 million from the municipal budget — a move that represented a 0.8 per cent savings on the tax rate.
The change of direction came after vocal opposition from residents who live on gravel roads, including farmers and members of the Kent Federation of Agriculture.
'We're very happy that it's coming back,' said KFA president Jim Brackett, who lives on a dirt road in Morpeth.
But Brackett warned that reinstating the program isn't enough — it has to be done properly.
'It has to be applied properly and has to be applied at the right rate, it has to be the right product, and it has to be done twice a year to be the most effective,' he said.
The dust, he added, has serious consequences for both people and crops along with motorist's safety.
'It's bad for our health. And if you were doing a construction site in town, you would be obligated to mitigate the dust,' said Brackett. 'I wash my vehicle every couple of days because of this. My house, I can't open the windows. My crops, it'll form a layer over the crops and interfere with translocation, increase the heat.'
He explained, 'I already know of one resident that's been forced off the road because he was in a cloud of dust.'
Although residents have been calling for immediate relief, municipal staff say the program won't resume until sometime this fall due to tendering and administrative delays.
'If they wanted to, they could be doing it quickly, but it sounds like it's going to be September before we get it back,' said Brackett. 'I may not get dust control this year, but someone may. So as long as some of our members get dust control and some of our people that travel the rural roads, then that's a plus versus nothing.'
Ward 6 Councillor Michael Bondy, who originally voted to cut the program, brought the issue back to the council table after hearing from residents across the municipality. 'I heard from a lot of rural voices, and they felt pretty slighted and, frankly, kind of ripped off because something that had been done for 40 plus years was cut from the budget with my help, because I voted to help cut it from the budget, because we were told by staff that it's ineffective, it doesn't work and it's a waste,' said Bondy.
Bondy told CTV News there are upwards of 1700 kilometres of gravel roads across the municipality.
'It was just another one of these instances of the rural voices just weren't heard and I'm a city guy, but I represent all of Chatham-Kent as a councillor, right? So I thought, well, I'll bring this back. This should be an easy one. Well, not quite that easy, but it did pass after an hour and a half discussion.'
Bondy says red tape is now the main hurdle.
'The dust will fly unless the process can be changed because there has to be a report to council. It has to be tendered. The tender award has to be signed and contracted... blah blah. What am I saying? I'm saying red tape is what it is. It's red tape.'
While hopeful that staff can speed up the process, Bondy acknowledged it may take time.
'I'm really hoping that, you know, staff can maybe get this moving a little earlier as it is only the beginning of June,' he said. 'I thought this was going to be rather simple, because it's been done for 40 plus years, by the same people. So I didn't think it would be difficult to reinstate. But I'm not complaining because we did vote to reinstate it, so, you know, we're halfway there, I would say.'
Meantime, residents like Brackett are cautiously optimistic, saying any progress is better than none.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
14 minutes ago
- CTV News
Wind project just south of Fort Macleod approved
Calgary Watch The Alberta Utilities Commission approved a wind project just south of Fort Macleod, but the approval hasn't come without opposition.
Globe and Mail
20 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Canada's UN vote on Israel criticized as departure from past position
Canada joined 148 other countries in voting in favour of a United Nations resolution that calls for an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in the war in Gaza, despite opposition to the motion from the U.S. and Israel. The vote Thursday took place days after Ottawa imposed sanctions against two far-right Israeli cabinet ministers for 'inciting violence against Palestinians' in the West Bank, in a rare rebuke to an allied country. It's another example of how Canada's policy toward Israel appears to be shifting under Prime Minister Mark Carney, who took office in March. A major Jewish-Canadian lobby group condemned the Canadian government's vote, saying it marked a significant departure from Ottawa's previous position at the United Nations. 'The resolution makes no demand for Hamas to disarm or be excluded from Gaza's future. It ignores Israel's right to self-defence, dismisses its legitimate security concerns, and says nothing of the existential threat posed by a genocidal terrorist group,' the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA) noted in a statement. CIJA noted that last September, when Justin Trudeau was still prime minister, Canada abstained from a similar UN resolution vote on the grounds, according to the Department of Global Affairs, that Canada could not 'support a resolution where one party, the state of Israel, is held solely responsible for the conflict.' The Jewish-Canadian group argued that Canada's vote will only embolden Hamas, the Palestinian militant group fighting Israel. Hamas is designated as a terrorist group by Ottawa. Canada, Western allies sanction two Israeli lawmakers for incitement of 'extremist violence' The resolution also called for the release of all hostages held by Hamas, and unrestricted access for the delivery of desperately needed food to 2 million Palestinians. The vote in the 193-member General Assembly was 149-12, with 19 abstentions. Speaking before the vote, Israel's UN Ambassador Danny Danon vehemently opposed the resolution. He denied that Israel was using starvation as a weapon of war, calling the accusation 'blood libel,' and insisted that aid is being delivered. Experts and human-rights workers say hunger is widespread in Gaza and that Palestinians are at risk of famine if Israel does not fully lift its blockade and halt its military campaign, which it renewed in March after ending a ceasefire with Hamas. Ottawa did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Bob Rae, Canada's ambassador to the United Nations in New York, told the General Assembly Thursday that the Canadian government 'profoundly regrets' that the resolution 'does not with explicit language, condemn Hamas's horrific terrorist attacks on October the 7th, 2023, in which over 1,200 people were killed' in Israel. He said Hamas's taking of hostages, 'many of whom were killed, still remain in captivity, and is entirely unacceptable to us and frankly, I think, to this assembly.' Mr. Rae said he is sorry that an amendment could not be made to the resolution, adding that Canada continues to condemn Hamas and 'it is clear that Hamas must disarm and that the organization cannot have any role to play in the future governance of Gaza.' Thursday's vote also comes ahead of a UN conference next week that aims to reinvigorate an international push for a two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians. The United States has urged countries not to attend. NDP foreign affairs critic Heather McPherson said voting for the resolution is the 'bare minimum' Canada should be doing to help Gaza. She said Ottawa should be suspending its free-trade agreement with Israel, take more action to end all weapons trade with Israel and recognize the state of Palestine. Asked about the criticism of the Canadian government from CIJA, Ms. McPherson said the group 'seems very out of touch' on some things. 'There are children that are dying right now of hunger.' With reports from the Associated Press and Reuters
Globe and Mail
20 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Business groups urge Carney to pause Digital Services Tax in fear of Trump backlash
A group of Canadian business associations are pressing Prime Minister Mark Carney to pause the implementation of 'discriminatory' taxes that have spurred U.S. President Donald Trump to retaliate with proposed tax hikes. In a letter sent to Mr. Carney on Thursday, six industry associations representing a wide variety of businesses – including Canada's major banks, life insurers, retailers and the venture capital community – asked the government to pause the scheduled June 30 payment of the Digital Services Tax, which was introduced in 2024 and targets large U.S. technology companies. Canada passed the DST retroactively to 2022 after the Liberal government said it could no longer wait for a multilateral agreement to emerge from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development for taxing global tech giants, most of which are based in the U.S. The deadline for filling the first DST return for 2022-2024 and paying the tax is June 30. Canadian business groups press Ottawa on digital tax as U.S. bill targets investors Canada's Digital Services Tax and online regulation bills are likely Trump trade targets Implementing a DST in Canada was intended to ensure digital businesses that monetize the data and content of Canadian users are 'paying their fair share,' the federal government said in its 2024 budget document. The Canadian business groups said pausing the DST would allow negotiations ahead of – and at – the G7 summit next week, to continue without the 'risk of further escalation by the administration on current tariff actions that place considerable risk on Canadian businesses and families.' The DST is just one tax among a broader group of 'unfair' taxes Mr. Trump has flagged in his recent One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Other taxes on Mr. Trump's hit list are diverted profits taxes and the undertaxed profits rule, both of which are global initiatives meant to ensure multinational firms pay enough tax. Canada released draft legislation last year to implement a UTPR as an amendment to Canada's Global Minimum Tax Act, but did not table it in Parliament. The Canadian business associations' letter expresses concern that the DST, UTPR and GMT run counter to Mr. Carney's plan to build a single Canadian economy, strengthen relations with the U.S. and reduce costs for Canadians. 'The unintended consequence of the DST and other digital taxes is that they have handed the U.S. Administration a ready-made issue to rally support from U.S. lawmakers who are now working to retaliate,' the letter says. A key example is Section 899 of Mr. Trump's bill – a U.S. tax proposal that is targeting foreign jurisdictions that have implemented a discriminatory tax. The bill was recently passed by the U.S. House of Representatives, but still requires Senate approval. If Section 899 becomes law, Canadians could see withholding and income tax increase by five percentage points in the first year – rising to a maximum of 20 per cent for income tax and up to 50 per cent total for withholding tax, on any holding of an American asset held by a Canadian or the U.S. subsidiary of Canadian company. 'Every pension fund, retirement fund, investment account, and deeply interconnected investment funds with American holdings, held by the likes of teachers, municipal workers, elected officials, and regular everyday Canadian families, are at risk,' the Canadian business associations' letter says. If Canada wants to commit to building stronger ties with the U.S., the group said it cannot be achieved if Ottawa proceeds with its current timeline to collect a punitive retroactive tax on digital service companies on June 30. 'The dire downstream effects of this are still avoidable,' the letter says. Meanwhile, 21 members of the U.S. Congress have sent a letter of their own urging Mr. Trump to push Canada to drop the DST before the end of the month, when the first payment is due. In a June 11 letter, the U.S. Congress group said 90 per cent of what Canada would collect under its DST will come from U.S. firms. 'Allowing Canada to proceed with this unprecedented, retroactive tax on U.S. firms would send a signal to the rest of the world that they have the green light to proceed with similar discriminatory cash grabs targeting our firms, workers, and tax base,' the letter says. The June 11 letter, alongside another letter sent last week to the U.S. administration from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other trade groups, say that Canada has the regulatory authority to delay the date of payment and other provisions of the DST without having to pass new legislation. Canada's Department of Finance did not respond Thursday to a request for comment on the tax. The Canadian group of business associations – which consists of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, Canadian Life and Health Insurance Association, Retail Council of Canada, Canadian Venture Capital Association, Future Borders Coalition and Canadian Bankers Association – said the current political climate and risks to the Canadian economy could not have been foreseen when the DST was first introduced. 'There is still time to correct course and demonstrate that Canada is serious about strengthening alliances, improving competitiveness, and restoring affordability,' the letter says. 'The alternative will lead Canada down a very difficult path.'
