BBMP to bear cost of seva sindhu certificates for Pourakarmika candidates
The Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) on Thursday announced that it will cover the expenses incurred in obtaining necessary certificates through the Seva Sindhu portal for pourakarmika (civic workers) candidates selected under the Direct Payment System (DPS) in the Solid Waste Management (SWM) department.
As per the roster and reservation rules, the final selection list of 12,692 pourakarmika candidates was published on November 16, 2024.
BBMP in a release said that to verify the authenticity of the selected candidates, reports will be procured from the respective Deputy Commissioners. Candidates have already submitted applications through the Seva Sindhu portal.
Candidates are required to upload supporting documents such as Certificate-1, Certificate-2, and other relevant records on the portal. The BBMP Commissioner has decided that the civic body will bear the cost involved in preparing these mandatory certificates.
Special Commissioner of the Administration Department and Member Secretary of the Pourakarmika Selection Committee, Avinash Menon Rajendran, has appealed to the selected candidates not to fall prey to any illegal demands or middlemen and to ensure the uploading of documents is carried out in a transparent and timely manner.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
House sites to every eligible poor soon, says MLA Vemireddy
Nellore: Kovur MLA Vemireddy Prashanthi Reddy has directed the officials to endure for providing house sites to the eligible poor in Kovur constituency. She conducted meeting with housing officials at her residence in the city here on Friday. Speaking the occasion, the MLA said that there are 1,600 people who has applied for house sites in the constituency. She pointed out that even after 10 months there was no proper response from the housing department as they least bothered over the issue. She directed them to identify empty places in Jagananna Layout and provide them to the eligible poor. She said that in case the empty places are not available in Jagananna colonies, immediately conduct land acquisition wherever government lands are available in the villages. The latter stressed on the need of coordination between revenue and housing department to take up the land acquisition process. She said that if it's necessary, she will take the issue to the notice of Chief Minister Nara Chandrababu Naidu. MLA Prashanthi said that after providing house sites to the beneficiaries, she will initiate steps for constructing the houses under Prime Minister Avas Yojana- 2(PMAY-) scheme. Housing department PD Venugopal, EE Venkatwswarlu MROs were present.
Hindustan Times
5 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Delhi Police HQ, LNJP Hospital denied fire safety clearance
The Delhi Fire Services (DFS) has denied fire safety certificate (FSC) renewals to two major public buildings this month — the Delhi Police Headquarters on Jai Singh Marg and Lok Nayak Hospital near Delhi Gate — citing violations of prescribed fire safety norms. This is the first time the Delhi Police HQ has been denied a fire No-Objection Certificate (NOC), while Lok Nayak's application has been turned down twice this year after inspections revealed multiple lapses. The denials come amid heightened scrutiny of fire preparedness in public institutions, following a spate of hospital and industrial fires earlier this year. As reported by Hindustan Times on May 22, the DFS had also rejected FSC renewals for Ambedkar Nagar Hospital, Bhagwan Mahavir Hospital, and two AIIMS blocks. Under the Delhi Fire Services Rules, 2010, public and commercial buildings must renew their fire clearance every three years. DFS officials said inspections were carried out meticulously, and notices with rectification advice were sent to both the police and hospital administrations. Once the deficiencies are addressed, fresh inspections can be requested in the coming days or months. Flagship police HQ fails fire audit The Delhi Police Headquarters, a 17-storey twin-tower complex inaugurated in 2019 by Union home minister Amit Shah, is the force's first purpose-built headquarters after decades in rented buildings. Located on an 8-acre plot near Connaught Place, it houses the offices of the commissioner, special commissioners, control rooms, social media and surveillance units, and critical intelligence wings. In May, DFS officials, along with Delhi Police staff, carried out an inspection in response to a renewal request submitted on April 21. A detailed report dated June 5 flagged at least five major deficiencies, most notably the replacement of mandated fire check doors on the 17th floor with ordinary glass doors, and the removal of door closers — a combination that compromised the lift lobby's pressurization system. 'Fire check door has been replaced with normal glass door at the 17th floor and door closers also found removed… which make the pressurization ineffective,' the report noted. It also cited the absence of a reception at the lift lobby and non-functional smoke detectors at several locations, significantly weakening emergency preparedness. 'These lapses directly affect the containment of smoke and fire in an emergency,' said a senior DFS official. 'A high-rise like the police HQ must meet the highest standards — anything less is a risk to life and property.' Responding to the denial of fire safety clearance, a Delhi Police spokesperson said the issues raised were 'minor errors which are being rectified', and confirmed that corrective work was already underway. 'There's no permanent denial. It's only a report on what all needs to be fixed,' the officer added. Persistent lapses at Lok Nayak Hospital The Lok Nayak Hospital, one of the Capital's busiest government-run facilities, fared worse in fire inspections. It first applied for FSC renewal in March-April this year, but was denied in April due to non-compliance. A second application submitted in May was rejected on May 30, following another round of inspections that found persistent and, in some cases, worsening deficiencies. DFS officials said their inspection uncovered lapses across the casualty OPD, surgical block, ortho block, and new special ward — with some violations posing 'serious threats' to patient and staff safety. In the surgical block and casualty OPD, access roads needed for fire tender movement were either inadequately marked or obstructed by construction material. A staircase in the surgical block was found blocked by waste and debris — a major evacuation hazard in case of fire. Fire hoses and branches were missing from hydrant boxes, while on some floors, firefighting systems had been deactivated due to ongoing renovations. In the ortho block, access roads were obstructed by parked vehicles and encroachments. Overgrown trees further impeded movement, fire officials said. The inspection report also recorded non-functional fire detection and manual call point (MCP) systems, diesel pump engines not in auto mode, and missing fireman switches in hospital lifts — all essential components for early response in case of fire. In the new special ward, officials found missing or incomplete hydrant boxes and door closers. Several areas were undergoing civil work without adequate fire safety backup, the DFS noted. 'These are not just technicalities — these lapses could prove fatal in a real emergency,' said a senior fire official. 'Hospitals must remain operationally safe even during renovations. That's a basic regulatory expectation.' Repeated attempts to reach the Lok Nayak Hospital administration for a statement were unsuccessful. Calls and messages went unanswered. Institutional apathy or systemic lag? Fire safety experts and public health advocates say the spate of FSC denials reflects a deeper structural problem — lack of routine compliance and inadequate investment in fire infrastructure. 'Institutional apathy is a real issue,' said one former DFS chief, adding that while inspections are becoming more rigorous, many public buildings still treat fire audits as a formality. 'There's also a shortage of trained fire safety officers in many institutions, which leads to poor maintenance and reactive compliance.' A senior government official who oversees urban safety policy acknowledged that delays in budget approvals and lack of coordination between departments often slow down fire preparedness upgrades in public buildings. 'There's also the issue of legacy buildings that were constructed decades ago without modern fire planning,' the official said. 'Retrofitting them is time-consuming and expensive — but unavoidable.' The DFS, meanwhile, has begun increasing scrutiny of FSC applications, with more stringent inspections and cross-verification. Officials said they plan to re-inspect several hospitals and police buildings over the next few months and have issued advisories to all major government institutions. 'If even the Capital's most high-profile public buildings cannot maintain basic fire safety, that's a serious red flag,' said a fire safety consultant. 'This isn't just about paperwork — it's about whether public institutions can protect lives.'
Time of India
20 hours ago
- Time of India
Karnataka HC strikes down amendment laws on civic body's retrospective levies
BENGALURU : In a major setback for the state govt and more particularly BBMP , the high court has struck down the Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Acts of 2021 and 2023. These acts aimed to validate previous collections of various fees from Bengaluru residents and builders. The 2021 Amendment Act was enacted to override the high court's earlier decision in the Sundaram Shetty case rendered in 2021, which declared the practice of linking levies to guidance value as illegal. While litigation against the legislation was under way, the govt promulgated a second amendment in Aug 2023, introducing further definitions of "ground rent," "guidance value," and "scrutiny fee," amending Section 240A of the BBMP Act and attempting once again to validate past levies retrospectively. The petitioners, comprising developers and property owners, challenged the levies imposed by BBMP and BDA during the layout and building approval process. These included scrutiny fees, ground rent, licence fees, security deposits, lake rejuvenation fees, and compound wall charges under the BBMP Act 2020, and water supply cess, slum cess, surcharges for mass rapid transit and ring road, administrative charges, and betterment charges under the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 (KTCP Act). In his order, Justice R Devdas noted that after a coordinate bench ruling in Oct 2021 (Sundaram Shetty case) declared these levies unenforceable, the authorities had an opportunity to reconsider the rates. However, they maintained similar rates through govt circulars without proper justification or empirical data collection, as suggested in that order. Development plan The judge also declared the provisions contained in Section 18A of KTCP Act (collection of cess and surcharge by a planning authority), read with rules 37-A and 37-C of Karnataka Planning Authority Rules, 1965, are applicable only in respect of a development plan for construction on plots measuring over 20,000sqm and not for plots measuring less than that. If a fee was earlier collected for a change of land use or while approving a layout plan, a fee shall not be collected for a subsequent development plan, the judge added. While the govt and BBMP retain the right to establish new standards based on empirical data, Justice Devdas also suggested implementing a one-time settlement scheme to resolve the situation. The court highlighted that the fee collection was intended for large construction projects but was being applied indiscriminately. Citizens began objecting after a Sept 4, 2015, circular revised ground rents and linked them to guidance values. The provision made in clause 3.8 of the building by-laws permitting a person to stock building materials on public land/roads/pavements would be directly in the teeth of the statutory provision contained in Section 229(2) of the BBMP Act, 2020, which empowers the zonal commissioner to summarily evict any encroachment, either temporary or permanent, caused on a public street including footpaths, the judge pointed out while emphasising that public safety should not be compromised, particularly regarding road and pavement maintenance. The court noted that the fees should correspond to the services provided by BBMP, following the principle of quid pro quo. The petitioners demonstrated through BBMP's financial records that relevant factors weren't considered when determining fees. The court agreed that service charges should be uniform across localities and vary only based on plot size and construction extent, rather than property's guidance market values.
