Intel Spars with EU Regulators Over $421.4 Million Antitrust Fine
US chipmaker Intel on Friday sparred with EU antitrust regulators over a 376 million euro ($421.4 million) fine levied nearly two years ago for excluding rivals from the market, arguing that it was disproportionate and unfair.
The case dates to 2009 when the European Commission slapped a then-record 1.06 billion euro fine on Intel for blocking rival Advanced Micro Devices.
The tech giant managed to convince the General Court, Europe's second-highest, to scrap the penalty in 2022.
Judges however agreed with one part of the Commission's 2009 decision, prompting the EU competition watchdog to re-impose a 376 million euro fine for payments made by Intel to HP, Acer and Lenovo to halt or delay rival products between November 2002 and December 2006.
Such practices are known as naked restrictions and are frowned on by antitrust regulators. Intel then took its case back to the General Court, asking for the new EU decision and penalty to be annulled.
Intel's lawyer said the EU competition enforcer had not taken into account the limited scope of the violations related to HP, Acer and Lenovo.
"The Commission cannot sustain a finding that there was an overall strategy to foreclose competitors from the entire x86 chips market. These were narrow, tactical moves," Daniel Beard told the panel of five judges.
"The naked restrictions can't be treated as in effect of equal weight to each of the pricing practices which were overturned. Nor do they have the same sort of cumulative effect or strategic weight. They, on their own, don't sustain an overall, market-wide strategy finding," he said.
Beard said the Commission had imposed "a wholly disproportionate and unfair" fine.
The EU watchdog rejected Intel's arguments.
"The Commission correctly applied the finding guidelines, and when in doubt, opted in Intel's favor," its lawyer Pedro Caro de Sousa said.
"The fine is clearly not disproportionate to the seriousness of Intel's conduct, amounting to 1% of its turnover on the last year of the infringement, and about 0.5% of its turnover today," he said.
Both Intel and the Commission called on the court to resolve the issue by setting the size of the fine. A ruling is expected in the coming months.
The case is 09:30 T-1129/23 Intel Corporation v Commission.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asharq Al-Awsat
3 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Apple Challenges ‘Unreasonable' EU Order to Open Up to Rivals
Apple has submitted a legal challenge to an EU order to open up its closed ecosystem to rivals such as Meta and Alphabet's Google, saying the demands are unreasonable and hamper innovation. The European Commission had in March detailed how Apple must comply with the Digital Markets Act, which aims to rein in the power of Big Tech. Apple said the EU's interoperability requirements create "a process that is unreasonable, costly, and stifles innovation". "These requirements will also hand data-hungry companies sensitive information, which poses massive privacy and security risks to our EU users," it said in a statement. "These deeply flawed rules that only target Apple and no other company will severely limit our ability to deliver innovative products and features to Europe, leading to an inferior user experience for our European customers." Meta, Google, Spotify and Garmin are among companies that have requested access to Apple users' data. The legal fight will likely take years to play out in court. Until then, Apple will have to comply with the EU order. The Commission ordered Apple to give rival makers of smartphones, headphones and virtual reality headsets access to its technology and mobile operating system so they can connect with Apple's iPhones and iPad tablets. It also set out a detailed process and timeline for Apple to respond to interoperability requests from app developers.
Asharq Al-Awsat
7 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
The Election of a Trump Ally in Poland Could Alter EU and Ukraine Policies
Poland has elected Karol Nawrocki, a conservative historian and staunch nationalist, as its next president in a closely watched vote that signals a resurgence of right-wing populism in the heart of Europe. Nawrocki, who is set to take office on Aug. 6, is expected to shape the country's domestic and foreign policy in ways that could strain ties with Brussels while aligning the Central European nation of nearly 38 million people more closely with the administration of President Donald Trump in the United States. Here are some key takeaways: Conservative populism on the rise Nawrocki's victory underscores the enduring appeal of nationalist rhetoric among about half of the country along the eastern flank of NATO and the European Union, and its deep social divisions. The 42-year-old historian, who had no previous political experience, built his campaign on patriotic themes, traditional Catholic values, and a vow to defend Poland's sovereignty against the EU and larger European nations like Germany. His win also reflects the appeal of right-wing nationalism across Europe, where concerns about migration, national sovereignty, and cultural identity have led to surging support for parties on the right — even the far right in recent times. Far-right candidates did very well in Poland's first round of voting two weeks earlier, underlining the appeal of the nationalist and conservative views. Nawrocki picked up many of those votes. As his supporters celebrate his win, those who voted for the defeated liberal candidate, Warsaw Mayor Rafał Trzaskowski, worry that it will hasten the erosion of liberal democratic norms. Prime Minister Donald Tusk's troubles Nawrocki's presidency presents a direct challenge to Prime Minister Donald Tusk, who returned to power in late 2023 pledging to mend relations with the EU and restore judicial independence which Brussels said was eroded by Law and Justice, the party that backed Nawrocki. But Tusk's coalition, a fragile alliance of centrists, leftists, and agrarian conservatives, has struggled to push through key promises. Nawrocki will have the power to veto legislation, complicating Tusk's agenda and potentially triggering political gridlock. Ties with the Trump administration Nawrocki's election could signal a stronger relationship between Poland and the Trump administration. Poland and the US are close allies, and there are 10,000 US troops stationed in Poland, but Tusk and his partners in the past have been critical of Trump. Nawrocki, however, has a worldview closely aligned with Trump and his Make America Great Again ethos. Trump welcomed Nawrocki to the White House a month ago and his administration made clear in other ways that he was its preferred candidate. A shifting focus on Ukraine While Nawrocki has voiced support for Ukraine's defense against Russian aggression, he does not back Ukrainian membership in NATO and has questioned the long-term costs of aid, particularly support for refugees. His rhetoric has at times echoed that of Trump, for instance by accusing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of what he said was insufficient gratitude for Poland's assistance. With growing public fatigue over helping Ukrainian refugees, Nawrocki's approach could shift Poland's posture from strong ally to conditional partner if the war drags on much longer. Ties with the EU The election result is a setback for the EU, which had welcomed Tusk's return in 2023 as a signal of renewed pro-European engagement. Nawrocki and the Law and Justice party have criticized what nationalists view as EU overreach into Poland's national affairs, especially regarding judicial reforms and migration policy. While the president does not control day-to-day diplomacy, Nawrocki's symbolic and veto powers could frustrate Brussels' efforts to bring Poland back into alignment with bloc standards, particularly on rule-of-law issues. Market jitters Though an EU member, Poland has its own currency, the zloty, which weakened slightly on Monday morning, reflecting investor concerns over potential policy instability and renewed tensions with EU institutions. Billions of euros in EU funding has been linked to judicial reforms which Tusk's government will now be unlikely to enact without presidential cooperation.
Arab News
8 hours ago
- Arab News
Starmer's grown-up approach may lift some negativity
Nine years ago this month, the UK narrowly voted to jettison its membership of the EU. Depending on your point of view, this was either the greatest act of self-harm perpetrated by a modern nation state or a long-overdue reclamation of a great nation's sovereignty and independence. The political, economic and social fault lines that erupted were deep and painful, often akin to a hellish psychodrama. Four years of negotiation, much of it between factions within the British Conservative Party, were required to set the terms of this divorce. As with many divorces, it was costly and bitter. It may not have been a happy marriage, with plenty of febrile squabbles, but separation was tough to take. Now, five years after the exit deal came into effect, emotions have cooled and a more sober examination of the relationship has led to a reevaluation, not least with a more Europhile Labour Party in power. A second marriage is not on the cards, but a more civilized working relationship has been sought. All the arguments of old seem stale and irrelevant. Many Brexiteers have also had buyers' remorse. Hence, a recent poll found that 62 percent of Britons see Brexit as more of a failure than a success, while 56 percent believe it was wrong to leave the EU. Five years after Brexit, emotions have cooled and a more sober examination of the relationship has led to a reevaluation Chris Doyle This is the backdrop to the new deal signed in the middle of May. It realigned the UK-EU relationship, away from what many saw as a hard Brexit to something a little softer and closer. The electorate is broadly content to adhere to some EU rules and regulations if it means a closer economic relationship and easier access to the bloc's market. The security aspect of the deal was a no-brainer. The UK brings military capabilities the EU greatly needs and, with the threat of Russia ever-present, it makes sense for all parties. The isolationist position of the Trump administration and the increasing appeal of this approach in the US has only served to energize a desire for a more assertive European defense posture. There will be meetings every six months to discuss foreign and defense matters, which should return a degree of cooperation to such issues. At the security level, the two sides will share DNA samples and fingerprints, a move that is hard to object to. Few nowadays dissent from the view that Brexit has been costly for the UK economically. The increased red tape and bureaucracy to export to the EU has been a massive burden for businesses. Many stopped bothering trying to export. This agreement envisages a reduction on checks on food exports to the EU, with most routine checks being dropped. The UK will now be able to sell raw burgers and sausages into the bloc for the first time since Brexit. The Starmer government claims this will benefit the UK economy by as much as £9 billion ($12 billion) a year by 2040. Many will also welcome the arrangement to permit British holidaymakers to once again use e-gates at more European airports. This will probably not happen until the autumn. A more politically challenging aspect is the youth experience scheme, which will permit young people to travel and work more freely between the UK and EU. The far right portrays this as a betrayal of the need to crack down on immigration. Critics also point out that the new agreement does nothing to stem the small boats crisis, as more than 36,000 migrants made their way across the English Channel in 2024. Immigration is a hot button issue and a challenge that Prime Minister Keir Starmer, like his predecessors, is struggling to address. As much as farmers will be happy, fishermen may not be, as the fisheries part was the most controversial component. European fishing boats will receive another 12 years of access to British waters in exchange for easing some trade frictions. This agreement augurs a more mature relationship that is focused less on separation and more on maximizing the partnership Chris Doyle The Brexit divide will not disappear, but this agreement augurs a more mature relationship that is focused less on separation and more on cooperation and maximizing the UK-EU partnership. Idealistic Brexiteers have been too determined to oppose the EU no matter what and they may have overestimated the public's appetite for rehashing the same old tired debates of the past. Devout Europhiles, found mainly among the ranks of the Liberal Democrats, will dream of a full remarriage. This cannot be ruled out, but few would argue it is imminent. Starmer, despite being pro-European, knows he does not have the mandate and has yet to show the sort of boldness required to make such a dramatic move. A slow rebalancing of this crucial relationship could be an effective reset. The detail is all still being worked on, but it signifies a more grown-up approach free from the ideological shortsightedness of previous debates. It has pragmatism written all over it. For the Starmer government, this is welcome news, coming as it does in the wake of a free trade deal with India and an agreement on tariffs with the US. Starmer has had a tough first year, but he will hope these international deals will reverse some of the negativity toward his administration.
