
Russia's New Jet-Engine Drone Aims To Break Through Ukrainian Defenses
In the early stages of the Russia-Ukraine war, many analysts predicted that Russia would rely heavily on hypersonic missiles to strike key Ukrainian targets. However, the use of hypersonics has been fairly limited due to their high cost, supply chain constraints, and modest battlefield effectiveness. As a result, Russia has increasingly turned to loitering munitions in its strategic bombing campaigns. These weapons are inexpensive, flexible, and becoming more advanced. Earlier this month, Ukraine's Main Directorate of Intelligence of the Ministry of Defence reported the appearance of a new Russian loitering munition known as the Banderol. Its distinguishing feature is the use of a jet engine, unlike other loitering munitions of similar size, which typically rely on piston engines.
According to Ukrainian officials, the Russian military recently deployed the Banderol in strikes on the Odesa region. The Banderol's jet engine reportedly allows it to reach speeds between 400 and 500 kilometers per hour, while flying higher and further than traditional loitering munitions. The use of jet engines in such devices is not entirely new. During World War II, Germany developed the V-1 missile, which also relied on a jet engine, although that system lacked the navigational control seen in modern loitering munitions. More recently, the Iranians have developed the Shahed-238 loitering munition, which the Banderol is believed to replicate.
As with any newly deployed military system, many of the Banderol's technical specifications remain unknown, including its range and payload. The drone appears approximately similar in size to the Geran-2, Russia's version of the Iranian Shahed-136, suggesting a comparable payload. Meanwhile, its jet engine likely provides an extended range and the ability to fly at higher altitudes. According to the Ukrainian Ministry of Defence, the drone was developed by Kronshtadt JSC and KT Unmanned Systems JSC. Although the exact date of its first use is unclear, sightings have become more frequent over the past month, especially as part of a series of strikes on Odesa.
Russia's decision to use a jet engine on the Banderol is a logical one, as it enables the drone to cover greater distances more efficiently. This extended range allows Russia to strike deeper into Ukraine, including targets in the city of Odesa. Further, the increased range lets Russia launch drones from farther within its own territory, reducing the risk of Ukrainian attacks on airbases and launch sites. Ukraine has been targeting Russian drone staging areas in recent months. The added range not only increases operational flexibility but also makes it harder for Ukraine to anticipate attack patterns.
Another major advantage of the jet engine is that it allows the Banderol to fly at higher altitudes than traditional loitering munitions. Flying at higher elevations helps the drone evade the short-range air defense systems commonly used against such weapons. More significantly, it reduces the drone's vulnerability to Ukrainian electronic warfare (EW) systems, which currently disable a significant portion of Russian loitering munitions. Since EW signals attenuate with distance, a higher-flying drone is better able to differentiate between jamming signals and its own command and navigation signals.
Russia does have other systems with comparable range and resistance to Ukrainian jamming, such as the Kinzhal hypersonic missile. However, these systems are costly and face production challenges due to Western sanctions. The Banderol should avoid many of these issues, as it appears similar to the Iranian Shahed-236, making it easier to source components from Iran. It also likely shares electronic components with the Geran-2 and other Russian loitering munitions. For the jet engine, Russia can draw on its well-established aviation industry. The current price tag for this drone would be similar to the Shahed-236, which is estimated to cost $1.4M. While more expensive than a piston-based loitering munition, the Banderol is still significant less than a Kinzhal missile, which costs an estimated $1oM.
This relatively low cost is critical. Russia's current missile strategy relies on overwhelming Ukrainian air defenses with large quantities of projectiles. Further, the introduction of a new loitering munition into strike packages, especially one that flies faster and at different altitudes, will further complicate Ukraine's ability to detect and neutralize incoming attacks.
Russia appears to be having success with the Banderol, which is not surprising. Its capabilities allow it to bypass many Ukrainian air defenses and strike targets deep within the country. As a result, its use can be expected to increase. However, as with every new technology introduced in this war, these advantages are temporary. As Ukraine adapts its air defense systems and strategies, the Banderol's effectiveness will diminish. Regardless, the system provides Russia with a valuable capability at a critical point in the war.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
16 minutes ago
- USA Today
Cheap, fast and armed: U.S. looks to thwart Ukraine-style drone swarms
Cheap, fast and armed: U.S. looks to thwart Ukraine-style drone swarms Ukraine recently used inexpensive drones to inflict serious damage to Russia's strategic bomber fleet in an audacious attack. Show Caption Hide Caption Ukrainian drone attack hits Russian air force bases A large scale Ukrainian drone attack hit multiple Russian air force bases, significantly setting Russia back. A senior U.S. military official said it was only a matter of time before drones were used in a "mass casualty event" in the U.S. Last year, the military tallied 350 drone incursions on domestic bases. Most were thought to be the work of hobbyists who strayed into restricted airspace. WASHINGTON − Cheap weaponized drones pose a threat to military bases and civilians, leading a senior military official to predict they'll be used soon to inflict a 'mass-casualty event.' Ukraine underscored the risk to advanced military powers on June 1 when its inexpensive drones damaged or destroyed strategic warplanes across Russia. U.S. military bases, and targets like major sports events, share similar vulnerabilities, officials say. Neither the Pentagon, nor the militaries of other developed countries, has figured out how to defend against swarms of small drones packed with explosives, according to the military official, who has been briefed on counter-drone efforts but was not authorized to speak publicly. More: Russia's 'Pearl Harbor': What to know about Ukraine's audacious drone strike We're not even close, the official said. No one is. The threat from drones to military isn't just overseas. Last year, the military tallied 350 drone incursions on domestic bases, according to U.S. Northern Command. Most of those were probably hobbyists who strayed into restricted airspace, the defense official said. Some, however, could have been from foreign adversaries spying on the military. And some wonder if they could have carried explosives. More: Ukraine drone attack shows familiar-looking drones can be terrifying weapons How does the Pentagon, which spends nearly a trillion dollars a year on defense, have such a vulnerability? What's being done to address it, and how future of drone warfare plays out gains greater and greater urgency for lawmakers and military planners as technology improves almost daily. For the better part of two decades, the Pentagon had unmatched superiority in drone technology. Early in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Predator and later Reaper drones armed with Hellfire missiles allowed pilots in dark bases in the Nevada desert to attack militant targets in the Middle East. A Reaper costs about $28 million, according to the Congressional Research Service. For a fraction of that cost today, a small drone can be weaponized and flown to its target and deliver devastating effects, too. 'At a cost of a mere tens of thousands of dollars, Ukraine inflicted billions in damage, potentially setting back Russia's bomber capabilities for years,' Army Secretary Dan Driscoll testified to Congress this week. 'The world saw in near-real time how readily available technology can disrupt established power dynamics.' Ukraine has been at the forefront of militarized drone development. By necessity, it needs a cheap alternative to thwart Russia, a country with a far larger military force that has advantages in conventional weapons like warplanes, tanks and artillery. Ukraine deployed first-person view, or FPV drones, in its attack on the Russian airfields. FPV drones allow a pilot with a headset to steer the aircraft to its target. That technology has proliferated and gotten relatively cheap in recent years. You can buy an FPV drone on Amazon for under $700. The Ukrainian military has refined technology for small drones and improves nearly weekly to offset Russian countermeasures, the defense official said. Fatal attack The Pentagon is painfully aware of the threat. In January 2024 militants in Jordan launched a drone attack on an outpost in the desert as soldiers slept in their quarters. Three died when the drone slammed into their building. Realizing the urgency of the threat, the Pentagon began funneling hundreds of millions of dollars into counter-drone weaponry. That includes electronic jamming devices that can sever the link between the operator and the drone, rendering it harmless. Small missiles can be fired at drones at a distance, and shotgun-type weapons can be used for those closer in, the official said. Even nets can be used to snag drones in the air before they reach their target. Defending against a swarm of small drones is a tough problem, the official said. There's no simple solution. On Capitol Hill, Sen. Roger Wicker, the Republican chairman of the Armed Services Committee, assured Army officials that Congress is prepared to spend billions on drone defense. Before senators and Army officials retreated to discuss the drone threat in secret, Driscoll raised another alarm about the threat. 'We are not doing enough,' he said. 'The current status quo is not sufficient.'

21 minutes ago
Russian strikes on Ukraine overnight kill 7 and injure at least 41
LONDON -- At least seven people were killed and 41 others were injured in massive Russian strikes across Ukraine overnight, which targeted civilian and energy infrastructure, Ukrainian authorities said Saturday morning. "Russia continues its terror against civilians," Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha said in a social media post on Saturday morning. "Hundreds of drones and missiles rained down on Ukraine overnight. Kharkiv had a particularly terrible night." In the northeastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv, Russian strikes killed three people and injured another 21. Among those injured was an infant and a 14-year-old girl, according to Kharkiv Mayor Ihor Terekhov. An additional person was injured in the city of Kupyansk, southeast of Kharkiv, in the surrounding region, according to Kharkiv Oblast Gov. Oleh Syniehubov. Russia attacked Kharkiv with 48 drones, five guided aerial bombs, four MLRS and three missiles, targeting homes and civilian infrastructure facilities in the city's Kyivskyi and Osnovianskyi districts, according to Syniehubov. Meanwhile, Russian strikes killed two people -- a married couple, aged 56 and 54 -- in the southern Ukrainian port city of Kherson and injured another 10 people in the surrounding region, according to Kherson Oblast Gov. Olexandr Prokudin. In eastern Ukraine's Donetsk Oblast, two people were killed and eight others were injured in Russian strikes, according to Gov. Vadym Filashkin. And in northeastern Ukraine's Sumy Oblast, Russian strikes injured one person, according to the regional administration. Across Ukraine overnight, Russia launched a total of 215 projectiles -- 206 drones, two ballistic missiles, six guided aircraft missiles and one cruise missile -- of which 174 were neutralized, according to the Ukrainian Air Force. "There were strikes throughout Ukraine -- in the Donetsk, Dnipro, Ternopil, Odesa, and other regions," the foreign minister said. "People were injured and killed, and the energy infrastructure was also damaged." Sybiha added: "To put an end to Russia's killing and destruction, more pressure on Moscow is required, as are more steps to strengthen Ukraine. Russia is a terrorist state, and it must be called such. It has already done more than enough to earn this title."
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ukraine says it shot down Russian Su-35 fighter jet
KYIV (Reuters) -Ukraine's air forces shot down a Russian Su-35 fighter jet on Saturday morning, the Ukrainian military said. "This morning, on June 7, 2025, as a result of a successful Air Force operation in the Kursk direction, a Russian Su-35 fighter jet was shot down," the military said on the Telegram messenger. It gave no more details. Russian forces have not yet commented on the matter while Reuters could not independently verify the report. Ukraine's security agency, the SBU, conducted a large drone attack on over 40 Russian military aircraft last week, damaging or destroying tens of Tu-95 and Tu-22 strategic bombers, which Russia uses to fire long-range missiles at Ukraine.