Windsor Framework structures ineffective and overly bureaucratic
Mr Robinson said that the post-Brexit trading deal could never be effective until fundamental issues around lack of consent from unionists are addressed.
The House of Lords Northern Ireland Scrutiny Committee has been holding evidence sessions examining the operation of the framework.
The Windsor Framework was agreed between the UK and the EU in 2023, amending the Northern Ireland Protocol. It governs post-Brexit trading arrangements in the region.
The DUP later reached the Safeguarding the Union deal with the previous UK government to further reduce some checks and paperwork on goods moving from the rest of the UK into Northern Ireland, leading to the restoration of the powersharing Executive at Stormont last year.
However, many unionists remain opposed to the framework, stating it creates a new regulatory border within the United Kingdom and because Northern Ireland continues to follow some EU laws relating to goods.
During his appearance before the committee, Mr Robinson was asked to assess the extent to which voices in Northern Ireland could be heard through the structures of the framework.
He said: 'I don't have a lot of faith in the current structures.
'When you consider the ability for politicians, parliamentarians, stakeholders, businesses, to engage with them.
'The structures around the Windsor Framework, though they may have evolved, are ineffective, opaque and overly bureaucratic.
The UK and EU agreed the Windsor Framework in 2023 (PA)
'They frustrate the ability for ordinary, routine and at times complex and serious engagement to either satisfy, resolve or ameliorate some of the harmful impositions that Northern Ireland finds itself in under these arrangements.'
The DUP leader added: 'I believe it cannot ever be effective until the fundamentals are resolved around the imposition that Northern Ireland was placed in without the consent of any elected unionist in Northern Ireland, without the consent of party colleagues in Westminster.'
In December, MLAs at Stormont voted to continue with the current arrangements for at least another four years in a democratic consent motion, which was part of the arrangements agreed between the UK and the EU.
However, unlike other votes at Stormont, there was no requirement for cross-community support for the motion.
Mr Robinson told peers: 'Though we have gone through a cycle of a parliamentary vote in Assembly terms in December of 2024, an inversion of cross-community protections.
'A false choice, do you wish this imposition to continue for a period of eight years or four years with a potential review.
'I don't believe they have been effective at all and if the Government were serious about increasing the opportunity to have voices heard and engage fundamentally in the propositions that are causing material impact, both constitutionally and practically in Northern Ireland, then they wouldn't only find an effective mechanism for that engagement but they would look at the fundamentals.'
He added: 'We have at the heart of this an agreement between the UK and the EU where they decide what is going to happen to Northern Ireland without any recourse to the citizenry of Northern Ireland or the elected representatives.
'Then you have the attempt or the added aspects of inclusion and participation but without any substantial or meaningful outworkings of that participation or inclusion.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
28 minutes ago
- Wales Online
Eluned Morgan says she will hold UK Government's feet to fire on funding promise
Eluned Morgan says she will hold UK Government's feet to fire on funding promise The First Minister says she has received categorical assurances that control of post EU funding will return to Wales First Minister Eluned Morgan. (Image: WalesOnline/Rob Browne ) First Minister Eluned Morgan said she will hold the UK Government's 'feet to the fire' after receiving what she said are categorical assurances that Sir Keir Starmer will follow through on a manifesto pledge of returning the running of post EU structural funding to the Welsh Government. What became the Shared Prosperity Fund, which will from next year will be known as the Local Growth Fund, was established by the former Tory Government of Boris Johnson as a replacement for the loss of structural funding from the EU following Brexit to some of the most deprived communities in the UK, including the Valleys and west Wales. EU structural funding was administered by the Welsh Government via the Welsh European Funding Office (WEFO). With lobbying from then Welsh Secretary, Alun Cairns, the decision was taken that the post EU funding would bypass the Welsh Government and go straight to local authorities who were able to bid for funding for local based projects. Sir Keir Starmer first pledged a return of control to the Welsh Government when addressing the Welsh Labour's annual conference in 2023. It was also confirmed in the party's General Election manifesto last year. Confusion over the role of the Welsh Government in running of the fund was created in the spending review documentation last week from Chancellor Rachel Reeves setting out UK Government departmental spending settlements for the next three financial years starting next April. It clearly highlighted a role for the Wales Office and the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) in partnership with the Welsh Government on post EU structural funding. Article continues below It says: 'As one of the representatives for the nations, the Wales Office will work with the MHCLG to implement the new local growth fund, working in partnership with the Welsh Government. This will ensure that this funding is spent on projects that matter to the people of Wales and will drive growth across the country.' Similar language was also used in the documentation for Scotland nod Northern Ireland. Over the last week the Welsh Government has been seeking clarification, with the First Minister now saying she has received assurances from the Welsh Secretary Jo Stevens and Chief Secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones - although she didn't mention Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government Angela Rayner. At a meeting of the Senedd committee for culture, communications, Welsh language, sport and international relations, Blaenau Gwent Labour MS Alun Davies said the spending review reference had seemingly broken the manifesto pledge by the Prime Minister on repatriating powers back to Wales. In response Ms Morgan said:'Just to make it clear I am not accepting what was put in there (spending review) in the way it has been interpreted. I have had a categorical assurance from the Secretary of State for Wales that this will be decided and managed by the Welsh Government. "This was a commitment by the Prime Minister on the stage of the Labour Party conference and I have made it absolutely clear that we will be holding their feet to the fire on this. And I am actually more confident that we are going to get to the place that I want to be, because I have been given those reassurances and it is something I also made clear in a meeting last week in front of the First Secretary to the Treasury (Darren Jones). In response Mr Davies said he very much welcomed the clarification. In the spending review it was confirmed that Wales will get an allocation of £630m over a three year period from April next year from the MHCLG's local growth fund. Wales getting a 22% allocation of the total funding available. If it was allocated to Wales under the Barnet Formula it would only receive around 5%. A UK Goverment source said 'Wales got the best deal on growth funding of any U nation. Every penny and the overall share of Wales' fund was protected. We are wholly committed to delivering Keir Starmer's pledge to restore the decision making role to Welsh Goverment.' Article continues below If the Welsh Government is to control the fund it will need to set up a delivery team as well as setting priorities for investment. A Welsh Government spokesman said; 'We will ensure this £630m funding has greater impact than the legacy Shared Prosperity fund. "We will continue to discuss the detail of this funding with the UK Government and will decide how it is used to support our economic ambitions and bring prosperity to all parts of Wales.'
Reuters
34 minutes ago
- Reuters
Political feuding could harm Poland's investment appeal, business leader says
WARSAW, June 18 (Reuters) - Poland's appeal to foreign investors could suffer if a power struggle between its liberal government and newly elected conservative president deepens in the next years, the leader of a leading employers' group, Lewiatan, told Reuters. Eurosceptic historian Karol Nawrocki, backed by right-wing opposition parties, defeated government candidate Rafal Trzaskowski in a June 1 presidential vote, dealing a blow to Prime Minister Donald Tusk's plan to consolidate power and steer Poland fully back onto a European Union-oriented course. Nawrocki's veto powers could stymie any reform drive by Tusk, whose popularity has already eroded, partly due to his failure to deliver on key electoral pledges such as judicial reform or big tax cuts, since taking power in 2023. The threat of continued political infighting would create "a climate of uncertainty" for investors, Lewiatan head Maciej Witucki said, adding to worries over geopolitics, the looming threat of tariffs and Poland's deteriorating public finances. "Today, there is a lot of capital in the world, but this capital is looking for safe places. And places where the authorities fight among themselves are not safe," Witucki said in an interview. Poland's stock of inward foreign direct investment had risen tenfold from 2000 till 2023 to $335.54 billion, based on UNCTAD data, though the pace of inflows slowed in 2023, reflecting wider trends elsewhere in central Europe. Credit rating agencies have said lowering the EU's second-highest budget deficit could face challenges following Nawrocki's election triumph, as it will likely curb the government's appetite for budget cuts. Witucki said the stalemate could also complicate efforts to import more foreign workers, with most of Poland's main parties during the election campaign opposing or showing caution about immigration from outside the EU. Poland is hoping to modernise its economy with billions in EU funding, but Witucki said this could prove difficult without "selective and smart" immigration. Poland's jobless rate is already among the lowest in the EU, while its birth rate also ranks among the worst in the bloc. "We will not build highways, we will not build nuclear power plants without external workers," Witucki said. "We also do not have enough bricklayers, welders and other experts to carry out all these projects on our own." Alluding to the nearly one million Ukrainians who have settled in Poland since Russia's 2022 invasion, Witucki added: "We cannot count on Ukrainians because they, I hope, will be rebuilding Ukraine."
North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
EU diplomat warns that Russia has a plan for long-term aggression against Europe
'Russia is already a direct threat to the European Union,' EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said. She listed a series of Russian airspace violations, provocative military exercises, and attacks on energy grids, pipelines and undersea cables. Ms Kallas noted that Russia is already spending more on defence than the EU's 27 nations combined, and this year will invest more 'on defence than its own healthcare, education and social policy combined'. 'This is a long-term plan for a long-term aggression. You don't spend that much on (the) military, if you do not plan to use it,' Ms Kallas told EU politicians in Strasbourg, France. 'Europe is under attack and our continent sits in a world becoming more dangerous,' she added. Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte has said that Russia is producing as much weapons and ammunition in three months as the 32 allies together make in a year. He believes that Russia could be in a position to launch an attack on a Nato ally by the end of the decade. The acts of sabotage and cyber attacks are mostly aimed at undermining European support for Ukraine, military officers and experts have said. But concern is mounting in Europe that Russia could try to test Nato's Article 5 security guarantee — the pledge that an attack on any one of the allies would be met with a collective response from all 32. In 2021, Nato allies acknowledged that significant and cumulative cyber attacks might, in certain circumstances, also be considered an armed attack that could lead them to invoke Article 5, but so far no action has been taken. With the Trump administration now turning its sights on security challenges in the Middle East and China, Europe has been left to fend for itself, and for Ukraine, and finds itself in a more precarious position. Last week, the head of Germany's foreign intelligence service (BND), Bruno Kahl, warned against underestimating Russian intentions toward the West and Nato. 'We are very certain, and we have intelligence evidence for this, that Ukraine is just a step on the path to the West,' Mr Kahl told the Table Today podcast on June 9, according to German news agency dpa. Russia's goal is to expand its sphere of influence westward, the BND chief said. 'They want to catapult Nato back to the state it was in at the end of the 1990s. They want to kick America out of Europe, and they'll use any means to achieve that,' Mr Kahl said. He warned that 'this must be nipped in the bud,' and that deterrence is the 'most bloodless way' to prevent war. Nato countries are set to agree a new defence investment pledge at a summit in the Netherlands next week, pouring billions of dollars more into security-related spending.
