PSP's Kebun Baru and Marymount candidates promise community initiatives, help with rising costs
ST20250424_202592400913 Kua Chee Siong/ hspsp24/ Mr Tony Tan, 55, candidate for Kebun Baru SMC PSP's first ever physical rally for residents of Marymount SMC, Kebun Baru SMC, held at the Catholic High School located in Bishan Street 22, on April 24, 2025. The Straits Times
SINGAPORE – If elected to Parliament, PSP's candidate for Kebun Baru SMC, Mr Tony Tan, says he will be a 'full-time MP'.
These were among the campaign promises that Mr Tan made as he spoke to the media during a walkabout at Mayflower Market and Food Centre on April 27.
'The first thing that I want to pledge (to do) is that if given this opportunity to serve, I'll be doing this full-time,' said Mr Tan, co-founder of a private education and gaming firm. His opponent in the single-seat ward, incumbent PAP MP Henry Kwek runs an investment firm.
Mr Tan, is a former Singapore Armed Forces scholarship holder with a background in engineering. He is married to Ms Poa, who is the party's first vice-chairperson.
As part of his manifesto for Kebun Baru, Mr Tan also proposed several initiatives for the area, including a programme in the morning for elderly residents, that involves home visits especially for those living alone, and activities in the evening to foster community spirit, such as table tennis sessions.
While walking the ground, Mr Tan said that he has noticed that more can be done in terms of cleanliness, taking note of Blk 115 at Ang Mo Kio Avenue 4 - under the Kebun Baru ward - which houses assisted living facilities in particular.
'I would like to know when was the last time (Mr Kwek) visited block 115 ... Has he actually interacted with the residents there, and has he checked the cleanliness of 115,' asked Mr Tan.
Mr Tan also repeated the PSP's call to debate policies with opponents, adding that he hoped to at least get a reply from Mr Kwek on the proposed debate and discussion on policies.
Accompanying him on the walkabout was PSP founder and chairman Tan Cheng Bock, who will be contesting the redrawn West Coast-Jurong West GRC against the PAP team anchored by National Development Minister Desmond Lee. Dr Tan also spent the earlier part of the morning walking the ground with PSP candidate for Marymount Jeffrey Khoo.
Mr Khoo, chief executive of a regional risk consulting firm, was part of the PSP A-Team, that was fielded in the 2020 polls in West Coast GRC.
The PSP team then lost with 48.32 per cent of the vote against the PAP team's 51.68 per cent – making it the narrowest win for the ruling party in the 2020 election.
Addressing media at a walkabout at Shunfu Mart wet market and hawker centre in Marymount SMC , Dr Tan took aim at the government's foreign talent policy, adding that more needs to be done to put the interests of Singaporeans first.
On April 26, Mr Khoo's opponent, PAP incumbent MP Gan Siow Huang had said that the PSP's call for 'Singaporean-first policies' failed to take into account factors like the country's size and lack of natural resources. She had also criticised the PSP proposal for a $2,250 minimum monthly wage, calling it 'the easy way out'.
Mr Khoo said: 'To be very clear, PSP is not against foreign talent, but the key word must be talent. We definitely need some to come in. But no matter what happens, we have to take care of our own first.'
If elected, Mr Khoo also said he plans to hold regular town halls to give residents more platforms for feedback.
He also proposed mentorship programmes to link younger people with senior residents.
Elisha Tushara is a correspondent at The Straits Times specialising in Singapore's education landscape.
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
17 hours ago
- Straits Times
Hear Me Out: Has the swing against elitism gone too far?
An art installation at the Padang. Vocal naysayers recently accused the Government's SG Culture Pass initiative of being the very thing it counteracted: elitism. PHOTO: ST FILE Hear Me Out: Has the swing against elitism gone too far? SINGAPORE – At a time when most people understand that the personal is political, individual views have become a battleground of virtue – equality, good; hierarchy, bad. Elitism? The worst possible kind of social evil. Yet, take a step back from this instinctive repulsion and there might be benefits to muddying the waters. Elitism, the belief that an elite group, however defined, should be entitled to the reins of power has been the norm throughout much of history. Whether it is the clergy, kings with their divine right, the Confucian scholar or today's fintech bros, there have been groups in each time period that societies tend to value and reward. It was only with increasing democratisation, and a growing disenfranchisement at the chasm between the top and the rest, that elitism has become a byword for undeserved privilege and gross injustice. This brief trip back in time is not to rehabilitate elitism, but to show that the current period against it – or at least one that pays lip service to not believing in an elite class – may be an aberrant one. In the West, this has been taken to extremes, manifesting in a debilitating disregard fo r e xperts and fatal results during the Covid-19 pandemic against the advice of doctors to vaccinate. In Singapore, it is the elite schools that are targeted, in the idealistic slogan that every school is a good school. Though, for perplexing reasons, this scepticism has not yet been extended to the natural reverence the majority of Singaporeans harbour for lawyers and doctors. Their expertise is assumed to be universally applicable – a mentality that has narrowed parents and students' conception of what success looks like. In any case, the ills of elitism have been thoroughly aired, including the type of entitled, discompassionate divas that it ends up producing. The very consensus of who deserves to be elite has also fractured. I wonder, though, if this enmity has led to some unexpected side effects. This is a train of thought sparked by recent reactions to the Government's SG Culture Pass initiative set out during the Budget statement in 2025. Self-sabotage Under the scheme, $100 would be given t o Si ngaporeans aged 18 and above for the consumption of the local arts, redeemable from September. One would expect rejoicing, but there was uproar from a group of vocal naysayers. They accused the credits of being the very thing it counteracted: elitism. Why? Because the money could be better spent on support for groceries. This, I thought, was a case of anti-elitism as self-sabotage. Central to this worldview was that the arts is an elitist activity patronised only by the rich and the hyper-educated aesthete, when one type of activity for the elite and one for the others is exactly the sort of segregation and self-limiting mentality that perpetuates divides. There was no sense that this $100 in credits was a way of making the perceived barrier more permeable. To put it in context, the Government also announced $800 in CDC vouchers. This was bread for all, and roses too. Yet another potentially problematic by-product is that the word 'elite' has since been tainted by association. No one dares lay claim to the word 'elite', or acknowledge that someone else may be elite in his or her field. The rare exemption is perhaps in sports, where athletes accept the cut-throat nature of their competition, and where non-athletes are so tangibly outside their league that there is no point in pretending otherwise. This is not in itself a problem – elite is after all just a word – though I find no easy replacement term that can immediately convey excellence to the same degree. But it incidentally comes at a time when there is a general reluctance to impose any kind of objective standard, supplemented by that compassionate but useless invention: the consolation prize. This applies to things: Is no one taste now better than another? As well as people, where so many takes on social media are considered equally valid, measured just by virality. It is the kind of ChatGPT mentality where how often something is repeated or the number of clicks on a website can influence results, with no regard to its truth value. The war against elitism may have come at the expense of standards and good sense. Reclaiming elite This impulse to drag discourse to the same level – usually downwards – has the right intentions, timely given that, for so long, highly selective elitist standards have been imposed as objective metrics. To right the ship so discourse is levelled upwards though, perhaps elite can be thought of as separate from elitism, rehabilitated without the corresponding concentration of resources and power. This should be expanded so that who is elite becomes not just about education but also because of other qualities – role models people can aspire to in different contexts. What constitutes an elite has always been reliant on man-made barometers, negotiated by the community. There should be no shame in aspiring to be elite. Anti-elitism should not mean an absence of the elite, but that all who put their heart and minds to it should have a fair shot at claiming its pedigree, or getting closer to it. It is a lifelong dusting off of mediocrity, and it begins with first recognising what is good. Hear Me Out is a new series where young journalists (over)share on topics ranging from navigating friendships to self-loathing, and the occasional intrusive thought. Check out the Headstart chatbot for answers to your questions on careers and work trends.
Straits Times
18 hours ago
- Straits Times
S'pore embassy in Washington seeking US clarification on Harvard's visa ban
SINGAPORE - Singapore's embassy in Washington has been seeking clarification from the US State Department and Department of Homeland Security on President Donald Trump's directive prohibiting foreigners from entering the country to study at Harvard University. The embassy is hoping for clarity from US authorities in the next few days, including on whether there will be any delay in the processing of visas for Singaporeans hoping to study in the US, Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan said on June 7. In a zoom call with Singapore media to wrap up his five-day visit to Washington, he noted that many current and prospective students looking to study in the United States had expressed their concern to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs over potential visa delays. Asked to elaborate on contingencies being planned should Singaporean students find themselves unable to proceeds with their plans to study in the US, he said the Government is trying to find solutions to deal with the worst case scenario where students are not able to physically study in Boston. 'We've got some ideas for how we can help them to, in a sense, deal with that eventuality without impairing their academic and professional progress,' said Dr Balakrishnan. 'For others who are not yet here, who have not yet secured visas, you may also need to have backup plans, but my main point is we will stay in touch, and we will continue to keep you informed.' Dr Balakrishnan noted that Singapore's ambassador to the US Lui Tuck Yew has also held a virtual town hall with students currently studying in Harvard. In the virtual town hall on May 30, Mr Lui told Singaporean students at Harvard that the Republic's autonomous universities can offer them placements if they wish to discontinue their studies in the US and return home. A Ministry of Education spokesperson said this message was shared with affected students so they could consider returning to Singapore as a possible option to continue their studies. There are six autonomous universities here: National University of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore Management University, Singapore University of Social Sciences, Singapore University of Technology and Design and Singapore Institute of Technology. University statistics show that there are currently 151 Singaporean students in Harvard. Among them are 12 Public Service Commission scholarship holders. Foreign students at Harvard were thrown into limbo after Mr Trump's administration announced on May 22 that it had revoked Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Programme certification with immediate effect. The nearly 6,800 international students in the Ivy League college were given an ultimatum to either transfer to another institution, or face deportation. A federal judge later blocked the move, with the Trump administration rolling back its stance on May 29 and giving Harvard 30 days to submit evidence contesting the administration's plan to revoke the school's right to enrol international students. International students make up more than a quarter of Harvard's student body, but Mr Trump said the university should cap its international intake at 15 per cent. Dr Balakrishnan said the situation confronting international students stems from domestic political issues within the US. But students, including from Singapore, can become affected as collateral damage, and there will be a period of uncertainty of at least a few days or weeks. 'Nevertheless, we will continue to pursue this with the American authorities, and I hope we'll be able to find suitable solutions for our students who want to pursue educational opportunities in the United States.' At a macro level, it remains in both Singapore and the US' interests to keep opportunities open for Singaporeans who want to study and work in the US to expand their domain experience and their networks, he added. 'So this is an issue that we will continue to pursue with the State Department.' Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
AsiaOne
2 days ago
- AsiaOne
Singaporean Harvard undergrads can take up places in local unis if they choose to return , Singapore News
SINGAPORE — Singaporean students who are currently undergraduates at Harvard University have been told that autonomous universities here can offer them placements if they wish to discontinue their studies in the US and return home, owing to recent developments. Lui Tuck Yew, the Republic's ambassador to the US, said this during a virtual town hall with the affected students on May 30, The Straits Times has learnt. In response to queries from ST, a Ministry of Education spokesperson said the Republic's autonomous universities "stand ready to support Singaporean students in Harvard if they wish to continue their studies in Singapore". The spokesperson added that this message was shared with affected students so they could consider returning to Singapore as a possible option to continue their studies. There are six autonomous universities here: National University of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore Management University, Singapore University of Social Sciences, Singapore University of Technology and Design and Singapore Institute of Technology. University statistics show that there are currently 151 Singaporean students in Harvard. Among them are 12 Public Service Commission scholarship holders. The studies of foreign students at Harvard were thrown into limbo after US President Donald Trump's administration announced on May 22 that it had revoked Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Programme certification with immediate effect. The nearly 6,800 international students in the Ivy League college were given an ultimatum to either transfer to another institution, or face deportation. A federal judge later blocked the move, with the Trump administration rolling back its stance on May 29 and giving Harvard 30 days to submit evidence contesting the administration's plan to revoke the school's right to enrol international students. International students make up more than a quarter of Harvard's student body, but Trump said the university should cap its international intake at 15 per cent. The administration's targeting of Harvard is part of a wider crackdown on universities based on several allegations, including claims of anti-Semitism and anti-white bias, which have been used as leverage to pressure the schools into enacting policy changes. On June 4, Trump kept up the pressure on the world's wealthiest university by signing a proclamation targeting foreign students at Harvard. Besides suspending the entry of foreign nationals looking to study or take part in exchange programmes at Harvard, the order also directed the Secretary of State to consider revoking existing student visas for current Harvard students who "meet the proclamation's criteria". It does not apply to foreign nationals attending other US universities on student exchange programmes and also exempts those whose entry is deemed to be in the interest of the US. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) had said on May 27 that it is monitoring the impact on the academic prospects of Singaporean students, with the Singapore Embassy in Washington engaging the US State Department and Department of Homeland Security. The ministry had also set up support structures for affected students, including a group communication channel hosted by MFA's Consular Department and the Singapore Global Network. ST has contacted the Singapore Embassy in Washington for more information. Since the crackdown on Harvard, the Trump administration has also taken greater steps to stymie the intake of international students into the US. In an internal cable that was reported by Politico on May 27, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio had directed all overseas missions to stop scheduling new appointments for student and exchange visa applicants. The State Department also plans to issue guidelines on "expanded social media vetting", with only visa appointments that have already been scheduled set to be honoured. The extent of the social media vetting, as well as a timeline for rolling it out, has not been disclosed yet. [[nid:718316]] This article was first published in The Straits Times . Permission required for reproduction.
