First LNG ship bunkering hub in US Gulf Coast secures permits to start work
LONDON: A joint venture project developing the first marine fuel facility for liquefied natural gas in the US Gulf Coast has secured final permits and construction is expected to begin later this year, executives involved said on Monday.
The global shipping industry has been looking for fuel solutions to cut carbon emissions, with LNG seen as a cleaner alternative.
U.S. President Donald Trump's administration is seeking to expand LNG exports to help reduce Europe's dependency on Russian gas after Moscow's invasion of Ukraine three years ago.
U.S. LNG can be used as a marine fuel in U.S. ports and surrounding waters without export licences needed, which is emerging as a separate market that the project is looking to capitalise on.
The facility is located on the Texas City Ship Channel and the Galveston LNG Bunker Port (GLBP) company will supply LNG by fuel barge to the expanding fleet of LNG-fuelled vessels in the greater Houston-Galveston region, GLBP said.
GLBP is a joint venture between Houston based Pilot LNG and Seapath, a subsidiary of global business group Libra.
The total project's overall cost is estimated in the region of at least $300 million, Seapath said.
The project received the final authorisations from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Coast Guard.
Initial bunker deliveries are scheduled for the second half of 2027, Seapath said.
Global LNG: Asian spot LNG prices dip amid tepid demand
'After several years of challenging and complex work … we are now comfortably ahead in the marketplace to be the first dedicated LNG marine fuels supplier in the U.S. Gulf,' Seapath's president Josh Lubarsky added in a statement.
'We have made a significant financial commitment to this project and, over the course of the last few years, have positioned GLBP to be the foremost clean fuel supply hub in the Galveston Bay/Gulf region.'
The first phase of production at the 140-acre greenfield development will target 360,000 gallons per day (gpd), which will come online within approximately two years, with the second phase for a full production of 720,000 gpd, approximately eight to 12 months thereafter, Seapath said.
The GLBP project is the second dedicated LNG bunkering facility in the U.S. after Florida-headquartered joint venture JAX LNG, which operates a 360,000 gpd plant.
GLBP will also support Port Houston - the largest port for waterborne tonnage in the U.S., which has $906 billion in national economic value.
Libra Group, which has more than 50 years of maritime experience, also owns Lomar Shipping that operates a fleet of more than 40 vessels.
Libra's other maritime subsidiary, Americraft Marine, owns and operates a Jones Act shipyard in Florida - one of the few in the U.S. that is building crew transfer vessels to service the growing offshore wind industry, as well as tugboats and barges.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
15% hike in oil refining planned
Listen to article Pakistan is likely to increase its refining capacity by 15% by the year 2027 through plant upgrade projects, which are being executed under the Oil Refining Policy 2023, according to the Annual Plan for fiscal year 2025-26. For FY26, the targets for crude oil and natural gas production have been fixed at 24.24 million barrels and 1.24 trillion cubic feet (tcf), respectively. The target for local liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) supply has been set at 0.75 million tonnes. The shortfall in indigenous gas supplies will be bridged through liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports, which are estimated at 7.5 million tonnes. Both gas transmission and distribution companies – Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Limited (SNGPL) and Sui Southern Gas Company (SSGC) – have set goals of adding 116,270 new consumers and 2,770 km of transmission and distribution pipelines during FY26. During the year, efforts will be made to explore 14.8 million tonnes of local coal to count on domestic production and slash the import bill. To reduce reliance on imported fuels, which currently meet 30% of gas demand, and address infrastructure gaps, the Petroleum Division has prioritised three key initiatives for FY26, which is beginning in July. The scope of the Village Gasification project will be expanded to 81 villages near gas fields by laying 2,770 km of new pipelines. Adaptation, resilience strategies Under these programmes, energy efficiency projects will be kick-started during FY26. These projects include the Machike, Thalian and Taru Jabba White Oil Pipeline, which is termed environment-friendly. Pakistan's energy sector requires a transformative approach to address the challenges of energy security, affordability and sustainability. The Integrated Energy Planning Initiative, led by the Ministry of Planning and Development, aims to reshape the energy landscape through data-driven and analysis-based decision-making and policy formulation. During FY25, crude oil production stood at 23.55 million barrels against the target of 26.55 million barrels, while the production of natural gas was 1.08 tcf, lower than the target of 1.21 tcf. Local LPG supply came in at 0.73 million tonnes compared to the target of 0.79 million tonnes. In the outgoing year, a total of 35 wells (14 exploratory and 21 developmental) were drilled, significantly lower than the target of 67 wells (27 exploratory and 40 developmental). A target of 15.4 million tonnes had been set for coal exploration, of which 13.82 million tonnes were extracted, marking a 90% success rate. To bridge the gas demand-supply gap, around 7 million tonnes of LNG is expected to be imported by June 2025 against targeted imports of 8.85 million tonnes. The goal could not be achieved due to the failure of international suppliers to deliver LNG as per contractual agreements. Gas pipelines During fiscal year 2024-25, SNGPL and SSGC collectively added 20,061 new consumers (including domestic, commercial and industrial) compared to the target of 68,990 consumers. The two Sui companies also added 2,254 km of transmission and distribution pipelines against the target of 3,274 km. With the proposed allocation of Rs2,541 million for FY25, the Petroleum Division advanced activity on four ongoing projects. These included the expansion and upgrading of Pakistan Petroleum Corehouse to ensure sustainable operations and facilitate oil and gas exploration, the Strategic Underground Gas Storage project and the supply of gas to villages and localities falling within 5 km radius of gas-producing fields of SNGPL and SSGC.
Express Tribune
8 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Twilight of the Empire
US President Donald Trump gestures, as he departs for Pennsylvania, on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, DC, U.S., May 30, 2025. Photo: Reuters Listen to article As a series of trends and shocks cumulatively strain the old order, US President Donald Trump, even his critics must admit, possesses the fatal gift of locating the aching pulse of the nation, only to inflame it further with self-destructive measures while eroding Washington's global credibility. He sees the symptoms of American decline clearly: deindustrialisation, a brittle middle class, bloated trade deficits, and the political cost of endless wars. But he metabolises crisis into spectacle, grievance into doctrine, and interdependence into betrayal. For decades, the US has functioned as the imperial core of a global capital-recycling apparatus. The system has depended on the continuous inflow of surplus capital from export-heavy economies, including China and Germany, to America's debt-saturated financial architecture. The US trade deficit reached an eye-watering $1.1 trillion in 2023, a figure that dwarfs those of other peripheral or semi-peripheral economies like India. In this light, Trump's populist howl against the 'indignity' of the American people, dispossessed in the very belly of global wealth, is not entirely misplaced. His instinct that endless wars serve as spectacles to obscure the real mechanism of American hegemony – the global dollar-debt regime – is accurate in a crude, pre-theoretical sense. Since the late 1960s, when America ceased being a surplus nation, its geopolitical muscle has rested not on production but on its control of the dollar as the global reserve currency. The military-industrial complex is merely the theatrical wing of a deeper financial imperialism. However, Trump is radically mistaken in his belief that punitive tariffs and protectionist swagger will resurrect 'Middle America.' Tariffs, in the late neoliberal stage, cannot revive industrial capacity gutted by decades of offshoring and rentier capitalism. Instead, they risk destabilising the very mechanism whereby America's status as a debtor empire is transformed into an asset: the recycling of dollar-denominated debt into US capital markets. If that circuit is broken, the paper wealth of Wall Street and the speculative empires of Trump's own class will collapse. To materially uplift the working and lower-middle classes that fuelled his electoral resurgence, Trump would have to declare war not on China or Brussels, but on Manhattan and Malibu, hedge funds, private equity, and speculative real estate. 'Asymmetric interdependence' For much of the post-World War II period, what was marketed as 'globalisation' was, in fact, an imperial project cloaked in liberal universals. It was the projection of American state-capitalist hegemony through a scaffold of multilateral institutions – the IMF, World Bank, WTO, NATO – and the sacrosanct status of the dollar as the planetary currency-signifier. These were not neutral frameworks but instruments of asymmetric interdependence: the United States exported capital, debt, and ideology, while importing dependence, discipline, and surplus labour from the periphery and semi-periphery. The so-called "Washington Consensus" was never a consensus but a diktat. The system also functioned through a deeper ideological fantasy that free markets and global rule-based order were apolitical, universal, and benign. However, even most liberal-internationalist critiques warn the fantasy is fraying. The very interdependence that sustained US primacy is in retreat. Firms and governments worldwide need American consumers, capital markets, and alliances, giving Washington soft coercive power. Trump's tactics have upended that balance. By 'assailing interdependence,' the administration is chipping away at the very basis of American advantage. Robert Keohane and Joseph Nye argue that order depends on stable power balances, shared norms, and sustaining institutions. Trump has shaken all three. What follows is a deeper drift into disorder, one that won't resolve until Washington either reorients itself or is overtaken by a new dispensation. The plunge may already be underway. 'In his erratic and misguided effort to make the United States even more powerful, Trump may bring its period of dominance—what the American publisher Henry Luce first called 'the American century'—to an unceremonious end,' they write in a Foreign Affairs essay. The weaponisation of the global economy hollows out the very symbolic order the US once used to legitimate its rule. By shrinking its adversaries' strategic space, Washington also corrodes the interconnected lattice that once lent credibility and allure to its empire. A tariff here, a blacklist there, and the freezing of foreign bank reserves – each may win tactical advantage, but at the cost of eroding the trust that underpinned the liberal international order. After all, what merchant or government would dare anchor long-term plans to a system where every node can be severed by a presidential signature? Trump's disruption is risky for the US precisely because new economic blocs are emerging from the wreckage of Western hegemony. Many leaders of the Global South remember colonialism and feel the 21st century liberates them from Western diktats. Where the US once posed as the sole path to progress, China's tech power and Russia's security reach now appear less like threats and more like counterweights. On soft power's front, when natural disasters strike or epidemics spread, Western-style NGOs and media have lost some of their framing power, as Chinese and Russian aid convoys now appear on television alongside those from the Red Cross. The velvet-glove diplomacy of the Cold War years – teddy bears over bombers – has been largely replaced by quarantine diplomacy, vaccine pledges, and once-dominant American development agencies playing second fiddle to Belt-and-Road contracts. In May, a major Democracy Perception Index reported that majorities of people worldwide now see the US negatively. The pollster noted that after Trump's return to the White House, America's reputation 'took a particularly massive hit in EU countries' and fell sharply everywhere. Even NATO founder Anders Fogh Rasmussen sighed that the US' standing was 'unloved' across most of the world. By contrast, China's image is improving globally, even overtaking the US in overall favourability in most regions. At home, the US is cannibalising its future. Budget cuts to core research agencies like the NSF and NIH are hollowing out the very ecosystem that once drove American innovation. Labs shrink, fellowships vanish, and global talent turns to Beijing, Singapore, or the UAE – where funding flows and visas follow. Meanwhile, China invests aggressively in semiconductors, AI, and green tech, eroding the US edge. As Oxford's Carl Benedikt Frey puts it, Trump's agenda risks dismantling the pillars of US innovation. Technological leadership is not a birthright but is built. And Washington is letting it rot. Trump's move to turn tariff-penalties and export bans into blunt instruments has worried many that he was abandoning existing rules and undermining the soft power that Washington has spent decades building. Analysts argue that American power rests on a blend of hard force and attraction, even though this very soft power has enabled hard power interventions. Interdependence with trading partners and multilateral institutions generates US leverage, while global admiration for 'American culture and ideals' makes allies pliant, they argue. Trump's assault on trade pacts and international agencies undercuts the foundation of American power and accelerates the erosion of the postwar order. In principle, if American power were absolute, it could force partners into line indefinitely. In practice, aggressive trade measures are sowing resentments. Many countries have been party to US-led trade deals expecting mutual benefit – now they wonder if Washington will simply upend their exports to punish political stances. The WTO and other legal venues, for a long time arenas where small states could begrudge larger ones, are being largely sidelined. Without clear enforcement, the most vulnerable economies will look for alternative blocs or simply bribe each other to stay out of the US orbit. The cruellest irony is that by inflicting pain on others – or threatening to – the US is undermining the very goodwill and partnerships that underpinned its postwar hegemony. The writer is a Lahore-based senior journalist
Business Recorder
11 hours ago
- Business Recorder
US stocks edge higher on trade progress, inflation data
NEW YORK: Wall Street stocks edged higher early Wednesday after US and Chinese officials touted progress on trade talks and US consumer inflation rose modestly. US President Donald Trump said 'our deal with China is done' after two days of talks in London, while noting in a social media post that provisions on rare earths and allowing Chinese students at US universities were subject to presidential approval. Meanwhile, the US consumer price index came in at 2.4 percent from a year ago after a 2.3 percent reading in April, a modest uptick that analysts said still did not fully reflect the impact from Trump's tariffs. About five minutes into trading, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was flat at 42,861.97. Wall St muted as investors track progress of US-China trade talks The broad-based S&P 500 rose less than 0.1 percent to 6,041.15, while the tech-rich Nasdaq Composite Index gained 0.1 percent to 19,743.54. Peter Cardillo of Spartan Capital Securities described the developments as good news for stocks, but added that the inflation figures will probably not alter the Federal Reserve's wait-and-see posture on monetary policy. 'I still don't think that today's inflation data will change the minds of the Fed to remain cautious,' Cardillo said.
