Betts, top overall seed UCLA look for March Madness success in Elite Eight meeting with LSU
Betts, top overall seed UCLA look for March Madness success in Elite Eight meeting with LSU
LSU head coach Kim Mulkey, left, speaks with guards Flau'Jae Johnson, center, and Shayeann Day-Wilson during the first half in the Sweet 16 of the NCAA college basketball tournament against North Carolina State, Friday, March 28, 2025, in Spokane, Wash. (AP Photo/Young Kwak)
LSU forward Sa'Myah Smith (5) and forward Aneesah Morrow (24) celebrate after their win over North Carolina State in the Sweet 16 of the NCAA college basketball tournament, Friday, March 28, 2025, in Spokane, Wash. (AP Photo/Young Kwak)
LSU forward Aneesah Morrow (24) reacts after getting a rebound during the second half in the Sweet 16 of the NCAA college basketball tournament against North Carolina State, Friday, March 28, 2025, in Spokane, Wash. (AP Photo/Jenny Kane)
UCLA center Lauren Betts reacts during the second half of a game against Richmond in the second round of the NCAA college basketball tournament Sunday, March 23, 2025, in Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Eric Thayer)
UCLA center Lauren Betts (51) celebrates with forward Kendall Dudley (22) during the second half of a game against Richmond in the second round of the NCAA college basketball tournament Sunday, March 23, 2025, in Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Eric Thayer)
UCLA center Lauren Betts (51) controls the ball while pressured by Mississippi forward Starr Jacobs during the first half in the Sweet 16 of the NCAA college basketball tournament, Friday, March 28, 2025, in Spokane, Wash. (AP Photo/Young Kwak)
UCLA center Lauren Betts (51) controls the ball while pressured by Mississippi forward Starr Jacobs during the first half in the Sweet 16 of the NCAA college basketball tournament, Friday, March 28, 2025, in Spokane, Wash. (AP Photo/Young Kwak)
LSU head coach Kim Mulkey, left, speaks with guards Flau'Jae Johnson, center, and Shayeann Day-Wilson during the first half in the Sweet 16 of the NCAA college basketball tournament against North Carolina State, Friday, March 28, 2025, in Spokane, Wash. (AP Photo/Young Kwak)
LSU forward Sa'Myah Smith (5) and forward Aneesah Morrow (24) celebrate after their win over North Carolina State in the Sweet 16 of the NCAA college basketball tournament, Friday, March 28, 2025, in Spokane, Wash. (AP Photo/Young Kwak)
LSU forward Aneesah Morrow (24) reacts after getting a rebound during the second half in the Sweet 16 of the NCAA college basketball tournament against North Carolina State, Friday, March 28, 2025, in Spokane, Wash. (AP Photo/Jenny Kane)
UCLA center Lauren Betts reacts during the second half of a game against Richmond in the second round of the NCAA college basketball tournament Sunday, March 23, 2025, in Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Eric Thayer)
UCLA center Lauren Betts (51) celebrates with forward Kendall Dudley (22) during the second half of a game against Richmond in the second round of the NCAA college basketball tournament Sunday, March 23, 2025, in Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Eric Thayer)
UCLA center Lauren Betts (51) controls the ball while pressured by Mississippi forward Starr Jacobs during the first half in the Sweet 16 of the NCAA college basketball tournament, Friday, March 28, 2025, in Spokane, Wash. (AP Photo/Young Kwak)
With back-to-back games of at least 30 points and 10 or more rebounds, UCLA center Lauren Betts certainly appears unstoppable. But, LSU has thwarted the Bruins before — in the Sweet 16 of last years women's NCAA Tournament.
They'll get a rematch on Sunday, this time in the Elite Eight.
Advertisement
UCLA (33-2), the overall No. 1 seed, advanced with a 76-62 victory over Mississippi on Friday night, the Bruins' first trip to the regional finals since 2018.
Betts scored 31 points on efficient 15-of-16 shooting and added 10 rebounds and three blocks. The 6-foot-7 All-America similarly had 30 points and 14 rebounds in the Bruins' second-round 84-67 victory over Richmond.
She's one of just three players to have multiple games with at least 30 points and 10 rebounds in the tournament in the last 25 seasons.
'She is so talented,' LSU coach Kim Mulkey said of Betts. 'Just watching her from high school to today, it's amazing how good she is. Certainly her height is an advantage and we're not going to grow that tall overnight.'
Advertisement
The third-seeded Tigers (31-4) defeated N.C. State 80-73 in Friday's other regional semifinal. Aneesah Morrow had 30 points and 19 rebounds, for her 30th double-double this season and the 104th of her career.
The 6-foot-1 forward is one of two women in NCAA history with more than 100 double-doubles. She's also the only player in the country with more than 600 points and 450 rebounds this season.
'The way in which she exerts her dominance on the offensive glass and then really being crafty around the rim or attacking from the high post off the dribble,' UCLA coach Cori Close said about Morrow. 'That's going to be our challenge, to try to mitigate that and to get them out of rhythm.'
LSU, which won the national title two years ago under Mulkey, reached the Elite Eight for the third consecutive season. Mulkey also led Baylor to three national titles.
Advertisement
'They're a really physical, really aggressive team,' Betts said. 'Obviously matching up against Morrow, she's going to be super physical and want to get every single rebound. So just making sure that we come out with that mentality that we're just not going to let that happen and we're going attack from the very beginning."
In last year's Sweet 16, Flau'jae Johnson had 24 points and 12 rebounds and Angel Reese had her 26th double-double of the season before fouling out to give LSU a 78-69 win over the Bruins.
Betts had 14 points and 17 rebounds in that game.
Afterward, Reese — who has since moved on to the WNBA — called the brash and confident Tigers the 'good villains.' LSU went on to lose to Caitlin Clark and Iowa 94-87 in the Elite Eight.
Advertisement
Betts has improved since last year, when she `almost got too good too quick," Close said.
'I knew last year she could become that, but now she's equipped from the inside out to sustain that,' Close said. 'She's just an amazing player on both sides of the ball and she makes everybody else around her better.'
Johnson's Status
In Friday night's game, Johnson finished with a season-low three points on 1-of-8 shooting and sat for final five minutes after falling hard in a sprint for a loose ball with an N.C. State player. She was escorted to the sideline and given eye drops by LSU's trainers.
Advertisement
Mulkey said Johnson was 'good to go' for Sunday's game.
'I feel good,' Johnson said on Saturday. 'I think her elbow just hit me in my eye, and I couldn't really focus my eyes. I was seeing double. I was trying to get back in the game, and then I was like, `I can't see,' so I just sat down. But I'm good."
___
AP March Madness bracket: https://apnews.com/hub/ncaa-womens-bracket and coverage: https://apnews.com/hub/march-madness Get poll alerts and updates on the AP Top 25 throughout the season. Sign up here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
17 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Wimbledon announces record $73M prize fund and $4M for singles champions
LONDON (AP) — Wimbledon's prize money has risen to a record 53.5 million pounds (about $73 million) and the singles champions will each earn three million pounds ($4 million), All England Club officials announced on Thursday. The total amount is 3.5 million pounds ($6.8 million) more than last year, an increase of 7% — and exactly twice the pot handed out to competitors at the grass-court Grand Slam 10 years ago. 'We're immensely proud of the fact that if you look back 10 years, you can see the increase over that period and 7% this year,' All England chair Deborah Jevans said. 'And we have listened to the players, we have engaged with the players.' The 2025 winners' checks represent an 11.1% jump on last year's prizes for the men's and women's singles champions and comes amid growing player demands for a bigger share of grand slam profits. Players who lose in the first round of singles will get 66,000 pounds, up 10% year on year. 'The focus on just the prize money at four events, the Grand Slams, does not get to the heart of what the challenge is for tennis,' Jevans added. 'The challenge with tennis is the fact that the players don't have an offseason which they want, they have increasing injuries that they're speaking about, and we've always said that we as Wimbledon are willing to engage and talk with the tours to try and find solutions, and that door remains open.' Wimbledon starts on June 30 and runs until July 13. For the first time in the oldest Grand Slam, line judges will be replaced with electronic line-calling. ___ AP tennis:
Hamilton Spectator
41 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Germany picks experienced squad for Euro 2025 but leaves out two critics
RUST, Germany (AP) — Germany has retained 11 players who reached the 2022 Women's European Championship final for Euro 2025. There's no place for two prominent critics of coach Christian Wück. The 23-player squad announced on Thursday is captained by Bayern Munich's Giulia Gwinn, one of the returning players from the team which lost to England in the 2022 final . North Carolina Courage defender Felicitas Rauch and Eintracht Frankfurt forward Nicole Anyomi were in the 2022 squad but aren't this time. Both have previously criticized Wück for what they called a lack of communication around his decision not to pick them for earlier squads. Rauch was among 12 players included in a reserve list on Thursday. The 20-year-old forward Cora Zicai is considered one of Germany's brightest young players after scoring two goals in her three national team games. Germany starts its Euro 2025 campaign in Switzerland on July 4 with a group game against Poland followed by Denmark on July 8 and Sweden on July 12. Since the last Euros, Germany suffered its worst ever World Cup result in 2023 with elimination in the group stage, but rebounded to win the bronze medal at last year's Paris Olympics. ___ AP soccer:
Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
Schools Can Pay Their Athletes—and College Sports Will Never Be the Same
College sports are dying, college sports are dead, college sports aren't about college anymore—it's Christmas in June for anyone feeling apocalyptic about the state of college sports, now that a settlement has been approved allowing schools to directly pay their athletes. This isn't a salary, technically. This is compensation from schools to athletes for use of their 'name, image, likeness,' but it's not a measly NIL like a burly offensive lineman getting all the bratwurst he can eat. This is a real paycheck, directly from the college. It's really happening—for Division I schools that have opted in. It's set to start July 1. 'A new beginning,' NCAA boss Charlie Baker called it. Is it going to work? Will it cannonball Olympic and nonrevenue sports? How does it square with Title IX? Will it withstand legal challenges? Will it all fall apart? I have no idea! Neither does anyone else! Hold on to your helmets, everyone. We're all jumping off the diving board together. (I will now pause 90 seconds for you to climb the ladder and jump off the diving board with the rest of us.) The settlement of this class action—House vs. NCAA, in which current and former athletes sought name, image and likeness opportunities and a share of athletic department revenue—had been in the works for a while. On Friday, a federal judge signed off on the $2.6 billion settlement, which includes back pay to litigants but also creates a revenue-sharing system 'in which each Division I school will be able to distribute roughly $20 million a year to their athletes,' the Journal reported. That's right. Colleges can chop up $20 million and split it among their jocks. It will take some getting used to. Naturally, the revenue sharing is already provoking some to bemoan the demise of 'amateurism' and the college sports landscape. But schools have to be oblivious to not see who's to blame: They are! College sports did this to itself. The NCAA and its member schools set professionalization into motion with decades of arrogance and denial about the bountiful but warped economy they built around the games we love to watch. When college sports started chasing every dollar as a market-driven business—and frankly, there's a case that college sports has always been a business—paying athletes became inevitable. The bigger the money got, the harder the system was to defend. When college sports started indulging in the $10 million dollar coach, the billion-dollar television deal, the megabuck locker rooms and the assistant to the assistant strength coach making more than a surgeon, the hypocrisy was easy to see. Everyone was making a buck, except the talent on the field. It's why the Supreme Court more or less reacted to the NCAA's claims of amateur status with the following: Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. Public opinion shifted, too. A decade ago, I'd write about proposals to pay athletes and I could hear the jeering a mile away. Boooooooo! That's not what college sports are about, man! Eventually, those big-dollar media deals, private jets and Pop-Tart Bowls caught up with college sports. It was hard to argue there was anything amateurish about it anymore. Now schools will have to figure it out for themselves. I mean that literally: schools and conferences are navigating a new wilderness in which they are permitted to directly compensate athletes—but without a precedent or a clear road map. Yikes. We do know a few things: The bulk of those $20 million allotments are expected to go to high-revenue sports like football and men's basketball—that's where the money's coming from, after all. Other beneficiaries may be growing sports like women's basketball and softball. The settlement also attempts to inject some calm into the craziness around name, image and likeness. The revenue sharing payments will come from the schools, and third party NIL deals over $600 will be subject to review by 'NIL Go,' an oversight group overseen by Deloitte. The idea here is to put outside NIL deals under a microscope—find out what player deals are legitimate arrangements, and what are booster largesses masquerading as NIL. Good luck! Enforcement will be a headache. So will the invariable league challenges. Defenders of the settlement maintain it shouldn't be entangled with Title IX protections against gender discrimination. Already there are parties who want to argue. Also unknown is the impact on nonrevenue Olympic sports. Do schools start eliminating or rolling back certain sports because they're not big contributors to the bottom line? Possible! We'll see. The new setup isn't free of denial, either. While colleges are now entitled to pay athletes, the system still resists the idea that athletes are employees. Good luck with that, too. There will likely be challenges to the revenue sharing system—is the proportion of revenue (22 percent) given to athletes a fair amount, or should it be renegotiated? Is it tantamount to a salary cap? It's hard to not see this heading in the direction of classifying athletes as employees, and eventually, collective bargaining. If you're lying down on a couch right now with a bag of ice on your head, I understand. It's a lot. It's confusing. Imagine being an athletic director in 2025. No job has changed more. A new day is here. It might not be the apocalypse, but college sports will never be the same. Write to Jason Gay at
