The chill on speech during COVID-19 hurt the country
Get The Gavel
A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr.
Enter Email
Sign Up
If you weren't all in with masks and isolation, you were a spreader of a killer virus. I wore masks, but I also bought a propane heater and served Thanksgiving dinner in my backyard. After attending a Christmas Eve gathering, I found out the next day that someone there had tested positive afterward. That news upset some family members who came to my house on Christmas. They trusted the science of complete isolation — a science that is disputed in the new book 'In Covid's Wake: How Our Politics Failed Us,' by Stephen Macedo and Frances Lee.
Advertisement
With COVID-19, the big chill on speech came from the left. But putting a chill on speech is a bipartisan exercise and not limited to talk about a pandemic. Three decades ago, the late journalist and social commentator Nat Hentoff tracked it in a book titled 'Free Speech for Me — But Not for Thee: How the American Left and Right Relentlessly Censor Each Other.' Today, the censorship continues.
For example, from the left: If you say 'All Lives Matter' instead of 'Black Lives Matter,' you are racist. If you have doubts about the participation of transgender women in sports, you are transphobic. If you question the amount of money sent to Ukraine to aid it in its battle against Russia, you are a Putin puppet. If you think Kamala Harris would have benefitted from a running mate who did not trim the truth like Tim Walz did, you are making a false equivalence with a president who rarely speaks the truth.
Advertisement
From the right: If you don't think every undocumented immigrant should be immediately deported, you are welcoming rapists and murderers into the county. If you think college students should be able to peacefully protest in favor of a Palestinian state, or, if you express doubt about the extent of Israel's military response after the Oct. 6, 2023 attack on their country — you are antisemitic. If you think it's wrong to blame a plane crash on diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts before an investigation into it is complete, you are a left-wing nut.
When there is no middle ground, there is no civil conversation. And without civil conversation, there is what we have now, an angry country filled with snarling citizens. On one side, there are Democrats who refuse
It takes leadership to stake out rational middle ground and make the case for it to the public. I have no proof, only hope, that voters are hungry for it. While President Trump achieved victory by claiming the extreme right, there is some evidence the pendulum is ready to swing toward the reasonable center. That is illustrated by the shift in public opinion on the issue of transgender women in sports. I would like to think that at some point, public opinion will also shift against those who took down the images of women and non-white service members from Department of Defense websites.
Advertisement
Meanwhile, as we mark this fifth anniversary of the COVID-19 pandemic, imagine if Trump had handled the pandemic differently. Imagine if he had not gone to war with Dr. Anthony Fauci, the former infectious disease chief, but worked quietly behind the scenes to encourage free and open discussion about the best way to address the pandemic. What if he had not predicted the virus would 'miraculously' disappear or suggested that household disinfectant was the antidote?
On COVID-19, Trump failed the leadership test. But as Scharfenberg wrote, 'The trouble was that too many liberals lumped these absurdities together with legitimate skepticism.' As president, Joe Biden also failed to challenge the prevailing thinking.
Elected officials like Baker did what they could to get it right. If it turned out to be wrong, it was because of an unhealthy campaign to squelch healthy debate. There's a lesson in that — if only we could learn from it.
Joan Vennochi is a Globe columnist. She can be reached at
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
18 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
‘Everything is uncertain now': Venezuelan travelers blindsided by travel ban
For Venezuelan travelers the past few days have been filled with uncertainty, fear and confusion — not to mention the financial toll. Since the Trump administration issued a travel ban barring nationals from 12 countries including Venezuela, Venezuelans both in and outside the U.S. have scrambled to reschedule flights — some moved them earlier, others delaying plans. Some wanted to arrive before the ban kicked in on Monday. Others wanted to waitto travel out of fear that Customs and Border Protections would be revoking visas. And for families that were hoping for reunification pending an upcoming appointment to get a visa, plans have been canceled. Among those who changed plans to beat the travel ban was José Malave and his family. READ MORE: What you need to know about Trump's travel ban on Cuba, Haiti and Venezuela Malave had booked a flight with his wife, Estefanía Ramírez, their 10-month-old baby, and his mother-in-law from Mexico City, where they currently reside, to New York City. The trip was meant to reunite his wife with her brothers, whom she hadn't seen in over a decade. The family had scheduled the trip six months in advance for June 12 — just three days after the travel ban was set to take effect. But on June 4, when the White House proclamation was made public, their plans were thrown into chaos. 'We moved our flight to June 8, a day before the travel ban took effect, terrified that once it started we wouldn't be allowed into the U.S.,' Malave said. 'We were scared and distressed, but luckily, we were able to enter without any issues at customs, though the financial impact has been huge.' The family had to spend an extra $800 to change the flights. Malave, 33, and Ramírez, 32, both computer programmers, are naturalized Mexican citizens. However, they travel using their U.S. tourist visas, which are stamped in their Venezuelan passports. Their 10-month-old son is a born Mexican citizen with a U.S. visa in his Mexican passport, while Ramírez's mother holds only Venezuelan citizenship. Malave expressed deep frustration with the abruptness of the travel ban — and he takes great offense to the implications it makes about Venezuelans. Trump's proclamation states that the measure is a way to protect the United States from terrorism and crime, and that the designated countries lack screening and vetting information for travelers. 'This proclamation affects everyone, no matter their background. It should've taken effect with more notice,' he said. 'People are interpreting it differently, and Venezuelans are caught in the middle.' He feels heartbroken, unsure of how to plan for the future. 'Everything is uncertain now. We had planned to spend Christmas in New York, maybe take our son to Disney — but those dreams are shattered. We don't even know if we'll be able to travel again on our Venezuelan passports.' 'We don't know when, or if, we'll see our family again. This is the reality Venezuelans face, even outside of Venezuela.' While Malave's family was able to reschedule their flights and reunite with their relatives, many others may never get the chance to reunite with their loved ones in the U.S. Karla Flores is a Venezuelan who has has lived in Woodbridge, Va., for the past three years. She planned to take her mother, Mercedes, from Venezuela to Spain in order to apply for a U.S. tourist visa, where the application process is faster than in Colombia. Since the Nicolás Maduro regime severed diplomatic relations with the United States in 2019 after President Trump, during his first term, recognized opposition leader Juan Guaidó as Venezuela's interim president, the U.S. consular office for Venezuelan visa applications now operates out of Bogotá, Colombia. But it has a year-long backlog. Flores said her mother is living alone and struggling with health issues. Flores left Venezuela eight years ago—that was the last time she saw her mother, who is 75. Now the hope for a reunion seems lost. 'We have uncertainty and profound sadness,' Flores said. 'We don't understand why we have to go through this.' Fear of having visas revoked The U.S. State Department clarified on Sunday that the travel ban does not apply to individuals holding valid visas issued before June 9. However, for many Venezuelans with current tourist, business, or student visas, and flights scheduled just days away, the clarification came too late to ease their fears. Confusion and anxiety had already set in, with travelers uncertain about whether they would be denied entry at the border — or worse, have their visas revoked. Venezuelans living in Maracaibo, in the western state of Zulia—about 700 kilometers from Caracas—often travel overland for more than three hours to reach Colombian border cities before flying from Bogotá to U.S. destinations like Miami. There have been no direct flights between Venezuela and the United States since 2019, when the Trump administration suspended air service. As a result, what was once a three-hour flight from Caracas to Miami has become a costly and time-consuming journey, often taking longer than a flight to Europe. On Monday, Venezuelan passengers at Bogotá's airport reported unusually slow and thorough security screenings. Aleika Áñez, co-owner of Kunana Travel, a Venezuelan travel agency with 34 years of experience said her clients reported that there were delays leaving Colombian airports. 'A customer who traveled on Monday said the check-in process was more rigorous at the airline counter because they held Venezuelan passports,' she said but despite the uncertainty, many Venezuelans flying from Colombia to Miami have been able to enter the U.S. 'without incident.' Many are waiting to see how Venezuelans are treated at immigration checkpoints this week, she said. Entry to the U.S. ultimately depends on the discretion of customs officers. Eduardo, a 36-year-old Venezuelan living in Mexico since 2015, has postponed his July trip to Los Angeles. Fearing it could jeopardize his chances of entering the U.S., he asked the Herald to withhold his full name. Eduardo had hoped to reunite with his brother, whom he hasn't seen in years since both fled Venezuela, but now worries that traveling on his Venezuelan passport is too risky. 'I suspended my trip because of all the uncertainty surrounding this situation,' he said. Another Venezuelan, Carlos, a 40-year-old lawyer who has a tourism and business visa, decided to postpone his flight from Maracaibo to Atlanta after hearing the news. 'It cost $1,900, and I wasn't willing to risk both my money and my visa,' he told the Herald. Carlos, who requested to not use his full name as well, plans to consult his travel agency later this week and buy his ticket if the situation stabilizes. 'If everything calms down, I'll go ahead and purchase it,' he said.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Democracy Forward' Compilation Features Tracks From Michael Stipe, Wilco, Brandi Carlile, John Prine and Tyler Childers
The 20-track Democracy Forward double album will feature songs from R.E.M. singer Michael Stipe, Wilco, Tyler Childers, Brandi Carlile, Brittany Howard and Jason Isbell and the 400 Unit and many more on a compilation focused on democracy, resilience and courage. The collection is a partnership between literary magazine The Bitter Southerner and national legal organization Democracy Forward. 'The work of Democracy Forward ensures that people and communities – that all of us – are heard and that our rights are protected,' said Skye Perryman, President & CEO of Democracy Forward in a statement about the collection that will be release on vinyl the week of July 3; pre-sales begin today here. More from Billboard Cardi B Blasts Donald Trump's 'Dictatorship Vibe' Over ICE Raids & National Guard Deployment Cloonee Postpones L.A. Shows Amid ICE Raids: 'I Will Not Throw a Party Whilst the Latino People Who Have Supported Me in This City Are Hurting' Leon Thomas' 'Mutt' Snatches Third Radio Crown of 2025 'At a time when so many communities across the nation are hurting and being targeted, music, art, and expression helps to bring people together in community, which creates the conditions for courage,' read the statement. 'We are incredibly grateful to the artists who have dedicated their music to support the American people's rights and our democracy during this consequential time. Each of us has a role to play in strengthening our democracy, and every voice matters.' Proceeds from the album will benefit Democracy Forward's work, which includes free representation for people and communities in defense of their constitutional rights. Since the second inauguration of President Donald Trump, Democracy Forward said in the statement that it has been focused on 'some of the most significant issues affecting people, families, and communities to confront anti-democratic extremism head-on. From stopping the federal funding freeze, to blocking the decimation of the Department of Education, to protecting religious liberty, to safeguarding due process, to stopping DOGE and Musk from taking Americans' sensitive and personal data, and more – Democracy Forward has won court orders for people and is just getting started.' The album will open with Stipe's new original spoken word piece 'Invocation.' The singer and activist said in a statement, 'We believe in the importance of our democracy and also our ability to save it. The world is depending on us. This fight is not over. The day is not done.' Since Democracy Forward's formation in 2016, the Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit has taken the Trump administration to court more than 100 times and worked with dozens of prominent groups to combat some of the administration's actions by partnering with organizations including: Abortion Fund of Ohio, National Immigrant Justice Center, National Parks Conservation Association, Alliance For Justice, National Resources Defense Council, New York Civil Liberties Union, American Federation of Teachers, Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence and the Southern Poverty Law Center. The album announcement comes as Trump is attempting to muscle through his so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill,' a proposed tax and spending package that aims to permanently extend the president's big tax cuts for the nation's wealthiest individuals, as well as make deep cuts to social programs including Medicaid and food aid and roll back a wide variety of environmental regulations and green energy initiatives in an effort to focus on climate-warming fossil fuels. It also coincided with Trump's provocative deployment of 2,000 California National Guard troops to Los Angeles on Monday (June 9) — without the consent of Gov. Gavin Newsom — in order to quell demonstrations against Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids in the city. Check out the track list for Democracy Forward below. Michael Stipe – 'Invocation' (new) Sierra Ferrell –'American Dreaming' Wilco – 'Cruel Country' Tyler Childers – 'Long Violent History' Brandi Carlile – 'Speak Your Mind' Hurray for the Riff Raff – 'Colossus of Roads' Brittany Howard – 'Another Day Tunde Abebimpe – 'People' Kevin Morby and Waxahatchee – 'Farewell Transmission' Fruit Bats – 'A Lingering Love' Jason Isbell and the 400 Unit – 'Something More Than Free' (Live from the ACL Live) She Returns From War – 'Ruthless' John Prine – 'Your Flag Decal Won't Get You Into Heaven' (Live at Fifth Peg Chicago) S.G. Goodman – 'Satellite' Allison Russell (featuring Brandi Carlile) – 'You're Not Alone' Langhorne Slim – 'Life is Confusing' Blue Mountain – 'Jimmy Carter' Danielle Ponder – 'So Long' Jim James – 'Here in Spirit' Michael Stipe and Big Red Machine – 'No Time For Love Like Now' Best of Billboard Chart Rewind: In 1989, New Kids on the Block Were 'Hangin' Tough' at No. 1 Janet Jackson's Biggest Billboard Hot 100 Hits H.E.R. & Chris Brown 'Come Through' to No. 1 on Adult R&B Airplay Chart
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Don't cut Pell grants for part-time students
Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up The House-passed bill would only give the maximum Pell grant to students taking 15 credits a semester (generally five classes). Students attending school less than half-time, who are earning less than 7.5 credits, would not be eligible for any Pell money. Advertisement The change would disproportionately affect students at community colleges and other two-year institutions. According to the Advertisement At Northern Essex Community College, President Lane Glenn said two-thirds of students attend part-time and the most common number of credits taken in a semester is six. 'Students tend to be older, not just out of high school, and they're balancing jobs and families with going to school,' Glenn said. The What the shift would mean practically for Massachusetts' community college students would be up to state policy makers. Massachusetts this year started offering universal free community college. But the state has a 'last-dollar' program, which means students must first apply for federal financial aid, then the state covers any remaining cost. If the federal government cuts aid amounts, the Legislature and governor will have to decide whether to replace the federal funding with state money — a large expense for state taxpayers — or to change the eligibility for free community college by aligning it with federal funding standards. If they choose the latter route, students currently taking just two courses a semester would have to either push themselves to take more credits, pay for school themselves, or drop out. 'A change in a law isn't going to change their ability to spend more hours studying,' said David Baime, senior vice president for government relations at the American Association of Community Colleges. 'We think this would force many [students] to stop attending our institutions.' Advertisement This isn't just a Massachusetts or a blue state issue. Around According to the Changing the threshold for the maximum grant from 12 credits a semester to 15 credits a semester would result in about half of current Pell enrollees receiving smaller grants, according to the CBO. Those two provisions combined are In a separate budget bill, Trump One rationale for the policy shift is that But there's no evidence that cutting aid for a student who is working or caring for a child or aging parent will get them to take more classes, rather than force them to drop out altogether. If they do drop out, that has long-term implications for both the student and the workforce. Advertisement The main motivation for the Pell changes appears to simply be cost-cutting, at the expense of those students who need the money the most. The Senate should reject these proposals. Editorials represent the views of the Boston Globe Editorial Board. Follow us
