logo
Trump Administration escalates crackdown on international students

Trump Administration escalates crackdown on international students

Hans Indiaa day ago

Across the country, foreign students are caught in a whirlwind of lawsuits, counteractions, reversals, and widespread uncertainty as the Trump administration intensifies its efforts to restrict international enrollment.
What's the latest?
On Wednesday, a federal judge extended an injunction preventing the administration's recent effort to bar Harvard from admitting students born outside the United States. Since March, U.S. authorities have canceled or revoked the visas of at least 4,700 international students, and several high-profile individuals have even been detained. In the last fortnight, scattered injunctions have protected students in multiple states, and some detained scholars have been released from Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody. At the same time, the State Department confirmed it is 'aggressively' targeting additional Chinese academics over national security concerns.
Despite setbacks in the courts, the administration has pursued new policies. An internal State Department cable obtained by NBC News revealed that consulates have halted scheduling new student visa interviews. Concurrently, officials are preparing to widen social media vetting of visa applicants. Shortly thereafter, Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that the government intends to revoke visas held by Chinese students 'with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields.' Details regarding which academic disciplines qualify as 'critical' or what constitutes links to the CCP remain unclear. When pressed, State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce emphasized that visa procedures are confidential but asserted that these measures protect U.S. interests: 'We use every tool that we have to vet and to make sure we know who's coming in,' she said. 'In this particular case, the United States is putting America first by beginning to revoke visas of Chinese students as warranted.'
How did the administration revoke students' visas and statuses?
For months, universities and their international enrollees scrambled to understand why visas were abruptly terminated without warning. In late April, the Department of Homeland Security disclosed that it had run the names of 1.3 million foreign-born students through the FBI's National Crime Information Center (NCIC). That search generated approximately 6,400 'hits,' and many of those flagged saw their records expunged from the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS), which tracks all nonimmigrant students and exchange visitors.
Civil rights and immigration experts warned that using NCIC risked false positives, since the database depends on voluntary local reporting and does not always update final case outcomes. At an April hearing, Justice Department attorney Elizabeth D. Kurlan acknowledged these concerns, stating that ICE would no longer terminate students' statuses based solely on NCIC findings. She assured the court that, pending a new review process, students whose SEVIS records were canceled would have their legal status reinstated.
Nevertheless, an internal memo circulated among SEVIS staff expanded the criteria for terminating a student's status. Effective immediately, any visa revocation issued by the State Department would automatically trigger termination of SEVIS status. While students generally have a right to due process before losing legal status, visa cancellation now itself suffices to end a student's authorized stay.
The administration has also zeroed in on students involved in pro-Palestinian protests. Columbia University student Mahmoud Khalil and Tufts University scholar Rümeysa Öztürk were both detained in March after participating in demonstrations; Öztürk was released from ICE custody weeks later. At a March news conference, Rubio vowed, 'Every time I find one of these lunatics, I take away their visas.'
Has anyone successfully challenged the administration?
From Georgia to South Dakota, international students have won court victories, with judges blocking the government's attempts to strip their legal status. Last week, a federal court issued a nationwide injunction preventing the administration from terminating the statuses of students enrolled at any U.S. university. This is the first ruling to offer relief to foreign students across all campuses.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trade deal with India likely in not-too-distant future: US Commerce Secretary
Trade deal with India likely in not-too-distant future: US Commerce Secretary

India Today

time23 minutes ago

  • India Today

Trade deal with India likely in not-too-distant future: US Commerce Secretary

US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has expressed strong optimism regarding the imminent finalisation of a trade deal between India and the United States, saying that an agreement could be reached in the "not-too-distant future".Secretary Lutnick highlighted that both nations have found a common ground that "really works for both countries," suggesting a breakthrough in long-standing negotiations.'You should expect a deal between the United States and India in the not-too-distant future... When they put the right person in India, put the right person on the other side of the table, and we've managed (that), I think," Lutnick said at the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum's Leadership Summit in The two countries intensified trade deal discussions after US President Donald Trump recently announced reciprocal tariffs on nations accused of causing trade imbalances, including India. However, the tariffs were later paused for 90 days, except for remarks, delivered at the eighth edition of the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum (USISPF) in Washington, underscore a significant push by the Trump administration to expedite trade US Commerce Secretary's remarks came just days after reports suggested that India is seeking a complete exemption from the additional 26 per cent tariff imposed by the United States on its goods, as both sides race to finalise an interim trade deal before July 8. The remarks also follow President Trump's claim that India had offered the US a tariff-free trade deal, a statement New Delhi rejected, clarifying that discussions are still ongoing to reach a win-win Monday, Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal said India and the US desire to give preferential market access to each other's businesses and teams of both countries are working together on the proposed bilateral trade agreement."Both countries are committed to work together, both countries desire to give preferential access to each other's businesses and we are working towards the bilateral trade agreement," Goyal said. In February, US President Trump and Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi announced plans to negotiate the first tranche or phase of a mutually beneficial, multi-sector Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) by fall (September-October) of 2025. It is aimed at more than doubling the bilateral trade to USD 500 billion by 2030 from the current level of USD 191 billion.

Donald Trump asks US Supreme Court to allow mass federal layoffs
Donald Trump asks US Supreme Court to allow mass federal layoffs

Time of India

time25 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Donald Trump asks US Supreme Court to allow mass federal layoffs

Donald Trump's administration asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday to halt a judicial order blocking mass job cuts and the restructuring of agencies, part of the Republican president's campaign to downsize and reshape the federal government. The Justice Department's request came after San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge Susan Illston blocked large-scale federal layoffs , known as " reductions in force ," in a May 22 ruling siding with a group of unions, non-profit groups and local governments that challenged the administration. The case involves the U.S. Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Health and Human Services, State, Treasury and Veterans Affairs, among others. Controlling the personnel of federal agencies "lies at the heartland" of the president's executive branch authority, the Justice Department said in the filing. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Dermatologista recomenda: simples truque elimina o fungo facilmente Acabe com o Fungo Undo "The Constitution does not erect a presumption against presidential control of agency staffing, and the president does not need special permission from Congress to exercise core Article II powers," the filing said, referring to the constitution's section delineating presidential authority. The Supreme Court requested a response by the plaintiffs in the case to the administration's filing by June 9. Live Events Trump directed federal agencies in February to "promptly undertake preparations to initiate large-scale reductions in force" as part of his administration's restructuring plans. Illston wrote in her ruling that Trump had exceeded his authority in ordering the downsizing. "As history demonstrates, the president may broadly restructure federal agencies only when authorized by Congress," Illston wrote. Illston on May 9 had initially blocked about 20 agencies from making mass layoffs for two weeks and ordered the reinstatement of workers who had lost their jobs. She continued most of that relief in her May 22 ruling. The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a 2-1 ruling on May 30 denied the Trump administration 's request to halt the judge's ruling. The 9th Circuit said the administration had not shown that it would suffer an irreparable injury if the judge's order remained in place and that the plaintiffs were likely to prevail in their lawsuit. "The executive order at issue here far exceeds the president's supervisory powers under the Constitution," the 9th Circuit wrote, calling the administration's actions "an unprecedented attempted restructuring of the federal government and its operations." Trump's administration has sought relief from the Supreme Court in a growing number of cases following rulings by lower courts impeding various policies since he returned to office in January.

Shashi Tharoor shuts down Trump's India-Pak claim with a flourish: ‘No one needed to persuade us'
Shashi Tharoor shuts down Trump's India-Pak claim with a flourish: ‘No one needed to persuade us'

Mint

time27 minutes ago

  • Mint

Shashi Tharoor shuts down Trump's India-Pak claim with a flourish: ‘No one needed to persuade us'

Shashi Tharoor shuts down Trump's India-Pak claim with a flourish: 'No one needed to persuade us' "We have enormous respect for the American presidency, and we will speak with that respect in mind. But broadly speaking, our understanding is a bit different... No one needed to persuade us to stop. We had already said to stop. If there was any persuasion by the American president or his senior officials, it would have been persuasion of the Pakistanis. They would have had to be persuaded. We don't need to be persuaded because we don't want war. We want to focus on development. That's the basic message," says Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, as the delegation he is leading will be in the US for its last leg of the visit. More details are being added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store