A Trump Siege at the C.D.C. and Atlanta's ‘Global Health Capital'
The picketers who gathered along Clifton Road in Atlanta on Tuesday, just outside the guarded gates of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, had chosen familiar ground for protesters furious over issues ranging from animal research to vaccines.
But Tuesday's demonstration was unusual: Hundreds of people had gathered to champion the jobs of public health workers, days after the C.D.C. began cutting about 10 percent of its work force.
Outside of the Washington, D.C., area, few places are at higher risk from the Trump administration's budgetary ax than Atlanta's concentrated medical corridor, east of downtown, where the C.D.C., Emory University and its scientific research empire, and a large Veterans Affairs hospital practically bump up against each other. Billions of dollars flow through the campuses each year, helping to employ thousands of people.
But at risk is more than jobs and dollars. It is stature. A city that has long prided itself on business acumen and a sacred role in the civil rights movement has also cherished the status conferred on it by its centrality to public health and medical science.
'Atlanta really has seen itself as a global health capital of the world — at worst, one of several global health capitals,' said Dr. Mark Rosenberg, a former C.D.C. official who was the president of the Atlanta-based nonprofit Task Force for Global Health.
Now, the potential weakening of the nation's public health system threatens to hollow out Atlanta's influence. And for a place like Atlanta, where it is common to see someone with C.D.C. ties in the preschool pickup line, at church or at the hair salon, the cuts are tearing at a generations-long bastion of shared prestige.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
19 minutes ago
Climate change leads to spread of infection-causing fungi, scientists say
Climate change may be putting millions more people at risk from an infection-causing fungi, which is likely spreading due to warming global temperatures, scientists say. There will likely be an increased risk of infection due to harmful fungi in the coming years due to climate change, according to researchers from the University of Manchester. The scientists mapped the effects of rising temperatures on global distribution of three infection-causing fungi under different climate scenarios through 2100: Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillus niger, according to the paper, which has been published on preprint platform Research Square and not yet been peer-reviewed. Aspergillus, a fungal mold that thrives in warm, damp climates, is already found worldwide -- including in the U.S. -- and can impact humans, animals, livestock and plants. But current emissions projections indicate that within 15 years a "significant spread" of certain fungal pathogens could occur in Europe and beyond, the researchers said. Under this scenario, the spread of A. flavus could increase by 16%, putting 1 million more people in Europe at risk of infection, according to the paper. Another fungus, A. fumigatus, could increase by 77.5% and potentially expose 9 million people in Europe, the researchers said. A. fumigatus affects the lungs and is one of the most common pathogens responsible for life-threatening infections in humans, according to the paper. Fungal spores transported through the air can cause infections in humans when inhaled -- especially for vulnerable populations and people with weakened immune systems and lung disease, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Fungi are "incredibly adaptable organisms" that allow them to colonize new geographies and survive environment changes, the researchers said. The emergence and spread of the fungus Candida auris has also occurred as a result of warming temperatures, Van Rhijn said. "Changes in environmental factors, such as humidity and extreme weather events, will change habitats and drive fungal adaptation and spread," Norman van Rhijn, professor at the University of Manchester's School of Biological Sciences and lead author of the paper, said in a statement. The trend is especially concerning due to a rise in antifungal resistance -- driven by the use of fungicides in agriculture to protect crops -- as well as a "severe lack" of treatment options for fungal infections, the researchers said. But fungi are relatively under researched compared to viruses and parasites, Van Rhijn said. Less than 10% of up to 3.8 million species have been described, the researchers said. "Raising awareness and developing effective interventions for fungal pathogens will be essential to mitigate the consequences of this," he said.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Providence cuts 600 roles amid restructuring
This story was originally published on Healthcare Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Healthcare Dive newsletter. Renton, Washington-based nonprofit Providence cut 600 jobs this week in a business-wide restructuring. In a statement Thursday, the troubled system said proposed cuts to Medicare and Medicaid, ongoing payment denials and delays from insurers, and higher labor and supply costs necessitated the cuts. The layoffs affect less than 1% of Providence's total workforce and impact mostly nonclinical, administrative functions, Providence said. However, some patient care roles were impacted. By its own account, Providence has had a difficult start to 2025. The 51-hospital system began the year by streamlining and reducing its executive team by 46 positions. Providence's new CEO, Erik Wexler, said the cuts were necessary as the system prioritized 'focus and discipline.' Then in April, the health system said it would freeze nonclinical hiring and cut some discretionary spending, including nonessential travel and future sponsorship of major league sports teams, due to a 'perfect storm' of economic pressures. At the time, Wexler said he had hoped Providence, which hasn't posted a profit in four years, would break even in 2025. 'We were on track to finally break even this year. But just as we were nearing that goal, the external economic conditions in 2025 took a sudden turn,' Wexler said in an April email to staff. Pressures include cuts to Medicare and Medicaid, which Wexler said have cost the health system $500 million. Additional cuts proposed by Congress could cost the system an additional $1 billion annually. Tariffs could also cause supply costs to shoot up by tens of millions of dollars. The health system is also taking a hit from new state-level regulations, including stronger charity care laws and staffing legislation in Oregon, according to a financial report. The regulations have decreased revenue and driven up staffing costs. Other one-time costs include impacts from a 46-day nurses strike in Oregon and lost revenue from the Los Angeles wildfires. The expenses have taken a toll: Operating revenues rose by 1% year over year during the first quarter, while operating expenses increased by 6%. Providence said the most recent layoffs are part of the health system's effort to restore its finances. 'These difficult but necessary steps are part of a comprehensive approach to financial sustainability that will enable our family of organizations to better reinvest in and revitalize the front lines of care, including the people, programs, equipment and facilities needed to serve our communities,' Providence COO Darryl Elmouchi said in a statement. Other nonprofits have recently conducted large, swift rounds of layoffs. Boston-based Mass General Brigham laid off 1,500 employees in two rounds conducted over a matter of weeks. In contrast, Providence cut executive roles and froze hiring before conducting its own mass layoffs. The phased-in approach may have allowed the health system to be more precise about where it reduced headcount, however, drawing out workforce changes over several months holds risks for employee morale, said Andy Challenger, senior vice president of outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas. 'It does have a legitimate effect on people's psyche, on their morale and on their willingness to stay at the company,' Challenger said. 'While you can be a lot more precise as an organization if you do your cuts that way — you can take the scalpel to [layoffs] instead of a butcher's knife and make sure that you're not overcutting... you can also create a real culture of panic for months and months on end.' Recommended Reading Providence freezes nonclinical hiring amid financial 'perfect storm' Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Our film imagined a post-Roe nightmare. Then it came true
When I first met Amy in the emergency room, she had a minor laceration on her finger. She claimed it was from an accident in the kitchen, but her cowering posture, downcast eyes and hesitant responses to basic questions suggested there was more to her visit than she was letting on. Amy reminds me of the girls I grew up with. Delicate, but exhausted and under pressure. She works long hours at a convenience store with a manager who offers no flexibility. Determined to save enough for college classes toward her degree, Amy has also shouldered the responsibility of supporting her mother, who has grown dependent on painkillers. She cleans homes to cover unexpected expenses, like becoming pregnant after a condom broke during sex, but she was unable to scrape together enough cash to purchase the morning-after pill. On June 3, the Trump administration revoked guidance that required hospitals to provide emergency abortions for patients in need. This national directive was issued in 2022 by the Biden administration, using the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA), after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, and it was intended to assist women facing medical emergencies and other serious complications. The Trump administration's action is just the latest salvo in an ongoing battle, one in which reproductive freedom seems to be losing ground every day. The mood, among both doctors and patients, is one of persistent uncertainty and fear. Here in the emergency room, Amy and I both feel it. The cut on Amy's finger was a ruse — a desperate act to access care. She is pregnant and doesn't want to be. But in our state, abortion is illegal. As an emergency physician, I tell her – quietly – that if she travels to another state, she can receive proper care. She'll need to budget a certain amount of cash for travel expenses. We keep this conversation between us. The possibility of this scene has become all too familiar a worry in real life, but the truth is that Amy isn't real. And I'm not really an emergency physician, I just play one in a movie. A few months after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade on June 24, 2022, while we were both still attending journalism school at New York University, my friend Nate Hilgartner approached me about a film he wanted to write and direct about the ethical implications of a post-Roe world. He had me in mind to play a doctor in a rural town torn between her duty to help her patient and the imperative to obey restrictive new laws. It would be an American horror story, he told me. At the time, it seemed prophetic but impossible, a bit of artful exaggeration to warn against a dystopian tendency. Today, it's our reality, and in some ways, things are worse. The consequences of a woman not receiving the reproductive healthcare of her choice could lead someone like our fictional protagonist to lose her ability to create a life on her own terms, trapping her in a cycle of poverty with a lack of education. In Georgia, a pregnant woman who has been declared brain-dead is being kept on life support until her baby can be delivered. Across the country, women have been turned away from emergency rooms after suffering ectopic pregnancies, which require an emergency abortion to prevent potentially fatal outcomes. Doctors have been reprimanded and fined, including Caitlin Bernard, an OB-GYN from Indiana, who performed an abortion on a 10-year-old rape victim denied an abortion in Ohio. Three years ago, all of this would have sounded like fiction, a fever-dream storyline out of The Handmaid's Tale. An investigation by ProPublica in December 2024 revealed that doctors in states with abortion bans often feel abandoned by lawyers and hospital leaders when seeking guidance on how to proceed with patients in emergencies. Since information about managing the bans in each state have been provided only on a 'need-to-know' basis, many doctors are left to navigate alternative options on their own, with some becoming too afraid to offer care, fearing professional and personal consequences. Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Oreg.) described the situation as doctors 'playing lawyer' and lawyers 'playing doctor,' leaving pregnant women facing life-or-death situations caught in the middle. Experts warn that the decision to eliminate access to emergency life-saving abortions will further exacerbate the crisis for doctors. The Trump administration's order to revoke emergency abortions sends a clear message to women who lack adequate resources to afford proper care. EMTALA, enacted in 1986, was designed to protect patients and ensure they receive stabilizing emergency care, regardless of their insurance status or ability to pay. While all pregnant women benefited from this law, it now appears that only those with sufficient health care and life circumstances will be able to survive potential emergencies. I am a writer and an actor, not a doctor. But for a time I imagined what it was like to be seated across from a woman scared and uncertain about the choices she could make about her body. Amy may not be real, but her plight is. Many of us may not admit it, but we've had our scares, moments where we've had to seriously consider the possibility of what we'd do if confronted with a pregnancy we weren't ready to have. At an age where I contemplate my own reproductive future, I am given pause: How can anyone assume there will never be complications in their pregnancy? Stories like Amy's aren't just about the right to make decisions about our bodies; they're also about the painful truth that those choices often come with a cost. When we set out to make this film, No Choice, we hoped to imagine a plausible future — not to prophesy our present reality. We could never have predicted just how quickly real-world headlines would not only validate our story, but outpace its darkest possibilities. Making a film was just one of many actions we hope other people will take to challenge the belief that a woman's body belongs to the state, not to herself. No Choice premieres in Los Angeles at the Dances With Films festival on June 23 — just one day shy of the third anniversary marking the fall of Roe v. Wade.
