Meta Ray-Ban Smart Glasses could store voice recordings by default: What it means for users
Meta will now reportedly store voice recordings by default from users of its Ray-Ban smart glasses, removing the option to disable data collection—just as it prepares to launch the AI-powered glasses in India. The company notified customers of this privacy policy change via email, as reported byThe Verge, ahead of the glasses' official debut in the country.
Previously, users could choose not to have their voice interactions with Meta AI stored. Under the updated policy, however, voice recordings will likely be saved automatically when using the glasses' AI features. Users wishing to delete their recordings will need to do so manually through the device's settings.
'Meta AI with camera use is always enabled on your glasses unless you turn off 'Hey Meta,'' the company said in the email. 'Recordings of your voice are stored by default when using Meta AI and may be used to improve AI at Meta and other Meta products. The option to disable voice recordings storage is no longer available, but you can delete recordings anytime in Settings,' it added.
The updated policy also enables the glasses' camera use by default. According to Meta, photos and videos captured on the glasses will remain stored locally unless users engage Meta AI or cloud processing features. In those instances, media is uploaded to Meta's servers and may be used to 'improve Meta's services.'
This means that any images or videos shared via Instagram, Facebook, or other Meta platforms could be accessed by the company for product development purposes.
Despite removing the opt-out option for voice data storage, Meta maintains users retain control over their data—provided they turn off the 'Hey Meta' activation phrase. Doing so disables the hands-free AI features, limiting the smart glasses to basic camera and audio functions without AI interaction.
Meta's Ray-Ban smart glasses, first launched globally in September 2023, allow users to issue voice commands, take photos and videos, answer calls, send messages, play music, and even access live translation in supported languages including English, Spanish, French, and Italian.
First Published: 1 May 2025, 10:35 PM IST
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
38 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Google judge mulls softer remedies in US search antitrust case
A federal judge in Washington suggested on Friday he is considering making Alphabet's Google take less aggressive measures to restore competition in online search than the 10-year regime proposed by antitrust enforcers. U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta heard closing arguments on Friday at a trial on proposals to address Google's illegal monopoly in online search and related advertising. 'Ten years may seem like a short period, but in this space, a lot can change in weeks,' he said, citing recent developments such as ChatGPT maker OpenAI buying a device startup. The DOJ and a coalition of states want Google to share search data and cease multibillion-dollar payments to Apple and other smartphone makers to be the default search engine on new devices. At the hearing, the judge floated the possibility of limited data sharing and ending the payments only if other measures do not increase competition. He also grappled with the rise of artificial intelligence products that could replace traditional search engines. An alternate default search engine in Apple's Safari browser is unlikely to come from existing rival search engines like DuckDuckGo or Bing, the judge said. 'If anything it's going to be one of these AI companies that can do more than just search. And why? Because maybe people don't want 10 blue links anymore,' he said, referring to earlier iterations of Google's search engine. The case has already rattled Google's share price by exposing Apple's plans to offer AI-based search options. The trial began in April and Mehta has said he aims to rule by August. Antitrust enforcers are concerned about how Google's search monopoly gives it an advantage in AI products like Gemini and vice versa. Nick Turley, OpenAI's product head for ChatGPT, testified that the ChatGPT creator is years away from its goal of being able to use its own search technology to answer 80% of queries and that having access to Google search data would help it focus on improving ChatGPT. Turley also said OpenAI would be interested in buying Chrome if Google is forced to sell it. But Mehta questioned whether companies like OpenAI or Perplexity should be considered Google competitors who would be given access to any data Google is required to share, given that the case focused on search engine competitors. 'It seems to me you now want to kind of bring this other technology into the definition of general search engine markets that I am not sure quite fits,' the judge said to DOJ attorney Adam Severt. Severt replied that while the first part of the case focused on the past, the remedies must be forward-looking. John Schmidtlein, an attorney for Google, said at the hearing that while generative AI is influencing how search looks, Google has addressed any concerns about competition in AI by no longer entering exclusive agreements with wireless carriers and smartphone makers including Samsung Electronics , leaving them free to load rival search and AI apps on new devices. Schmidtlein argued it would be inappropriate to give successful AI companies like OpenAI technology that Google has spent 20 years perfecting. 'Coming to Google and asking Google for a handout when they are the market leader seems completely disproportionate to what this case is about,' he said.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
U.S. antitrust case against Google sees judge wrestling with far-reaching remedy proposals
The fate and fortunes of one of the world's most powerful tech companies now sit in the hands of a U.S. judge wrestling with whether to impose far-reaching changes upon Google in the wake of its dominant search engine being declared an illegal monopoly. U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta heard closing arguments Friday from Justice Department lawyers who argued that a radical shake-up is needed to promote a free and fair market. Their proposed remedies include a ban on Google paying to lock its search engine in as the default on smart devices and an order requiring the company to sell its Chrome browser. Google's legal team argued that only minor concessions are needed and urged Mehta not to unduly punish the company with a harsh ruling that could squelch future innovations. Google also argued that upheaval triggered by advances in artificial intelligence already is reshaping the search landscape, as conversational search options are rolling out from AI startups that are hoping to use the Department of Justice's four-and-half-year-old case to gain the upper hand in the next technological frontier. It was an argument that Mehta appeared to give serious consideration as he marveled at the speed at which the AI industry was growing. He also indicated he was still undecided on how much AI's potential to shake up the search market should be incorporated in his forthcoming ruling. 'This is what I've been struggling with,' Mehta said. Mehta spoke frequently at Friday's hearing, often asking probing and pointed questions to lawyers for both sides, while hinting that he was seeking a middle ground between the two camps' proposed remedies. 'We're not looking to kneecap Google,' the judge said, adding that the goal was to 'kickstart' competitors' ability to challenge the search giant's dominance. Mehta will spend much of the summer mulling a decision that he plans to issue before Labour Day. Google has already vowed to appeal the ruling that branded its search engine as a monopoly, a step it can't take until the judge orders a remedy. Google's attorney John Schmidtlein asked Mehta to put a 60-day delay on implementing any proposed changes, which Justice prosecutor David Dahlquist immediately objected to. 'We believe the market's waited long enough,' Dahlquist said. While both sides of this showdown agree that AI is an inflection point for the industry's future, they have disparate views on how the shift will affect Google. The Justice Department contends that AI technology by itself won't rein in Google's power, arguing additional legal restraints must be slapped on a search engine that's the main reason its parent company, Alphabet Inc., is valued at $2 trillion. Google has already been deploying AI to transform its search engine i nto an answer engine, an effort that has so far helped maintain its perch as the internet's main gateway despite inroads being made by alternatives from the likes of OpenAI and Perplexity. The Justice Department contends a divestiture of the Chrome browser that Google CEO Sundar Pichai helped build nearly 20 years ago would be among the most effective countermeasures against Google continuing to amass massive volumes of browser traffic and personal data that could be leveraged to retain its dominance in the AI era. Executives from both OpenAi and Perplexity testified last month that they would be eager bidders for the Chrome browser if Mehta orders its sale. The debate over Google's fate also has pulled in opinions from Apple, mobile app developers, legal scholars and startups. Apple, which collects more than $20 billion annually to make Google the default search engine on the iPhone and its other devices, filed briefs arguing against the Justice Department's proposed 10-year ban on such lucrative lock-in agreements. Apple told the judge that prohibiting the contracts would deprive the company of money that it funnels into its own research, and that the ban might even make Google even more powerful because the company would be able to hold onto its money while consumers would end up choosing its search engine anyway. The Cupertino, California, company also told the judge a ban wouldn't compel it to build its own search engine to compete against Google. In other filings, a group of legal scholars said the Justice Department's proposed divestiture of Chrome would be an improper penalty that would inject unwarranted government interference in a company's business. Meanwhile, former Federal Trade Commission officials James Cooper and Andrew Stivers warned that another proposal that would require Google to share its data with rival search engines 'does not account for the expectations users have developed over time regarding the privacy, security, and stewardship' of their personal information. Mehta said Friday that compared to some of the Justice Department's other proposals, there was 'less speculation' about what might happen in the broader market if Google were forced to divest of Chrome. Schmidtlein said that was untrue, and such a ruling would be a wild overreach. 'I think that would be inequitable in the extreme,' he said. Dahlquist mocked some of the arguments against divesting Chrome. 'Google thinks it's the only one who can invest things,' he said.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Vi loss narrows, gets approval to raise Rs 20,000 crore
Photo/Agencies NEW DELHI: Vodafone Idea on Friday reported a loss of Rs 7,166 crore for the fourth quarter of the last fiscal, against Rs 7,675 crore in the same period of 2023-24. The company's board also approved raising of Rs 20,000 crore to fund expansion. The company, reeling under a debt pile of over Rs 2 lakh crore, reported a revenue of Rs 11,014 crore in Q4 FY25 against Rs 10,609 crore in the same period of the previous fiscal. "Subject to the approval of shareholders' and / or other requisite regulatory, raising of funds in one or more tranches, either by way of FPO or private placement or through any other mode..., which may or may not be listed up to amount of Rs 20,000 crore," it said. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
