[Editorial] Conspicuous absence
Lee to skip NATO summit; concerns that Korea's dilplomatic lines may be doubted
President Lee Jae Myung will not attend the NATO summit scheduled for Tuesday and Wednesday in The Hague, Netherlands.
The presidential office cited domestic priorities and growing uncertainty in the Middle East. Lee had considered participating in the summit with hopes of meeting US President Donald Trump, but changed his position after the US strikes on nuclear sites in Iran.
It is true that uncertainty has increased in the international situation as the US attacked Iran and Iran vowed to retaliate.
Korea imports 72 percent of the oil it consumes from the Middle East. It would be hard for Seoul to antagonize the Middle East.
The Trump administration is expected to demand that US allies, including South Korea, increase their defense budgets. The demand will be burdensome. Even though Lee has skipped the summit, those issues remain unresolved, and Lee's first meeting with Trump will be delayed again.
Of course, it is important for Lee to stay at home to manage economic and domestic issues but it is questionable whether they are important enough to pass up the chance to get together with the leaders of the US and its major allies.
The NATO summit could also serve as an opportunity for South Korea to export its defense equipment and nuclear reactors to Europe and possibly join the post-war reconstruction of Ukraine. This would be consistent with Lee's pragmatic diplomacy that purports to prioritize national interests.
When the international situation gets tense and dangerous, it becomes important for national leaders to come together and figure out joint solutions. The world does not revolve around South Korea. Its president might as well have face-to-face talks with leaders of strong countries in the same ideological bloc.
Most of the 32 NATO members constitute the core of the Free World. The organization has emphasized joint responses to attempts by authoritarian countries such as Russia and China to expand their influence.
It has invited South Korea, Japan, Australia and New Zealand to its summit as its four partners in the Asia-Pacific region after Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
South Korea attended the summit for three straight years, but Lee decided to skip it this time.
South Korea's abrupt absence will be conspicuous. How will the US and NATO countries view Lee's absence, which comes just a few weeks after his administration was launched?
It is worrying that they might doubt Seoul's diplomatic lines. Russia, China and North Korea have criticized South Korea's attendance at the NATO summit.
North Korea has facilities that manufacture materials for nuclear bombs, with new facilities reportedly under construction.
Iran is reportedly several months away from securing the ability to make nuclear bombs, while the North is believed to possess about 50 nuclear warheads and it has vowed not to abandon its nuclear weapons.
China and Russia maintain close ties with the North. Last year, Moscow signed a treaty with Pyongyang, enabling it to intervene militarily on North Korea's side if a war breaks out on the Korean Peninsula.
In this dire situation, it is important to send a clear message that holds Pyongyang in check. To show the South stands by its allies and friends is a sure way to do it.
Some observers in Korea suspect that Lee might have followed the view that attending the NATO summit could alienate China and Russia. Several lawmakers of the ruling Democratic Party of Korea criticized the US for attacking Iran. If it is true that Lee shared that view, Seoul will have a tense and rocky relationship with Washington.
Shortly after Lee's presidential inauguration, the White House expressed concern about China's intervention and influence. Lee skipping the NATO summit might arouse doubt about the direction of South Korea's foreign policy. It is necessary to prevent such misgivings from growing.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
33 minutes ago
- Korea Herald
Foreign minister nominee puts peace through dialogue at top of agenda
Foreign Minister nominee Cho Hyun said Tuesday that establishing peace on the Korean Peninsula through dialogue will be a key priority of the Lee Jae Myung administration's foreign policy. "Inter-Korean issues are not something that can be addressed by a single ministry or resolved by one government alone," Cho told reporters during a doorstep interview following his nomination the previous day. Cho underscored that 'establishing peace on the Korean Peninsula — through the facilitation of US–North Korea dialogue — is one of the top priorities of the Lee Jae Myung administration's foreign and unification policy.' 'The Foreign Ministry will work closely with the United States and other allies to ensure that there are no obstacles in advancing such efforts,' he said, responding to a question about the ministry's role in supporting summit-level talks between Washington and Pyongyang. "Diplomacy is about pursuing peace and prosperity," he said. When asked whether he would visit the US as his first overseas destination after taking office, Cho said, 'We need to break free from the conventional thinking that the first overseas visit must be to the US.' 'Still, I think it will naturally turn out that way. As for top priorities, there are many, and they are all interconnected,' Cho added, responding to a question about which agenda should be prioritized if he visits the US. With regard to Lee's decision to skip the NATO summit, Cho responded, "It was the best possible decision given the high level of uncertainty on multiple fronts.' Cho, however, did not provide a definitive answer when asked how he would redefine ties with China and Russia amid growing challenges, including intensifying US–China competition and deepening military cooperation between Russia and North Korea, instead taking a cautious stance. 'This is a highly sensitive issue, and it should be considered alongside other major diplomatic matters," Cho said. "Of course, that's not to say that our relationship with China is unimportant — but rather that it must be examined and pursued within a broader context." On South Korea–Japan ties, Cho espoused a two-track approach: advancing overall relations while addressing contentious issues — mainly historical disputes stemming from Japan's colonial rule of Korea from 1910 to 1945 — through diplomacy. 'While we seek to advance Korea–Japan relations beyond conventional frameworks, we should quietly address sensitive issues through discreet diplomacy.' On the topic of urgent diplomatic tasks, Cho underscored, 'It's like the movie 'Everything Everywhere All at Once' — it's difficult to assign clear priorities at the moment.' "I feel a tremendous sense of responsibility as I take on the role of foreign minister at a time when the international landscape is extremely unstable," Cho said, reflecting on his nomination.
Korea Herald
an hour ago
- Korea Herald
Lee Jae Myung stresses peace on peninsula ahead of Korean War anniversary
President Lee Jae Myung said Tuesday, the day before the 75th anniversary of the outbreak of the 1950-53 Korean War, that national security could only be guaranteed when South Korea achieves peace on the peninsula. "When we think about the concept of national security, people tend to think that achieving it through a victory in a battle is important. But what's more important is that we win without a fight," Lee said at a Cabinet meeting he presided over at his office Tuesday. "National security will certainly be guaranteed in a situation when there is no need to fight, in other words, when peace prevails, and politics has a role to play in building peace," added the liberal president. Lee's remarks came a day before South Korea was to celebrate the anniversary of the Korean War, which broke out on June 25, 1950 following North Korea's invasion of South Korea. As the United Nations forces and the communist forces signed a ceasefire agreement on July 27, 1953, after about two years of negotiations, the two Koreas are still technically at war to this day. The tragic war has left behind about 1 million South Korean civilian casualties, while over 160,000 South Korean soldiers were either killed or missing. Lee, who assumed the presidency on June 4, is widely expected to make efforts at inter-Korean detente and resume Seoul's engagement with Pyongyang, like his liberal predecessors like Kim Dae-jung, Roh Moo-hyun and Moon Jae-in did. Lee's disgraced conservative predecessor Yoon Suk Yeol tended to take a hard-line stance against North Korea's provocations, and accused Pyongyang of heightening tensions on the Korean Peninsula. Pyongyang also amended its stance, calling South Korea a "hostile state," suspending inter-Korean military pact signed in 2018, destroying inter-Korean roads and railways and resuming propaganda broadcasts, among other things. Soon after his inauguration, Lee ordered a halt to South Korea's propaganda loudspeaker operation along the inter-Korean border. During the Cabinet meeting, Lee also pledged to compensate those who "made an extraordinary sacrifice" for their country. "At a moment when fighting against (enemies) is inevitable, it is mostly the helpless ordinary citizens who are at the front line. There are many instances when ordinary people sacrificed themselves in a fight to defend their communities," Lee said. He continued, "Come to think of this, I don't believe those who made an extraordinary sacrifice for their communities were rewarded correspondingly by the groups they belonged to," Lee said. This is aligned with Lee's speech to commemorate the Memorial Day on June 6. During that speech, delivered to an audience that included the bereaved families of Navy officers and commissioned officers who perished in a maritime patrol aircraft crash in Pohang, North Gyeongsang Province in May, and a firefighter who was killed during a massive fire in a tangerine warehouse in Jeju Island in 2023, Lee said, 'Extraordinary sacrifices made for the good of all deserve to be met with extraordinary rewards.' Also at the Cabinet meeting, Lee urged civil servants to shield the marginalized from external crises that stem from a recent conflict in the Middle East. "The entire world, including South Korea, is now in big trouble," Lee said. "A crisis inflicts a greater amount of pain to the people who are poor and helpless. As we discuss the measures to counter the consumer price hike and stabilize the cost of living, I hope the meeting could serve as an opportunity to minimize the damage to the marginalized with extra care."
Korea Herald
3 hours ago
- Korea Herald
NATO leaders gather for summit
THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — US President Donald Trump and his NATO counterparts were due to gather for a summit that could unite the world's biggest security organization around a new defense spending pledge or widen divisions among the 32 allies. Just a week ago, things had seemed rosy. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte was optimistic the European members and Canada would commit to invest at least as much of their economic growth on defense as the United States does for the first time. Then Spain rejected the new NATO target for each country to spend 5 percent of its gross domestic product on defense needs, calling it 'unreasonable.' Trump also insists on that figure. The alliance operates on a consensus that requires the backing of all 32 members. The following day, Trump said the US should not have to respect the goal. 'I don't think we should, but I think they should,' he said. Trump lashed out at Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez's government, saying, 'NATO is going to have to deal with Spain. Spain's been a very low payer." He also criticized Canada as 'a low payer.' Spain was the lowest spender in the alliance last year, directing less than 2 percent of its GDP on defense expenditure, while Canada was spending 1.45 percent, according to NATO figures. Then Trump ordered the bombing of nuclear installations in Iran . In 2003, the US-led war on Iraq deeply divided NATO, as France and Germany led opposition to the attack, while Britain and Spain joined the coalition. European allies and Canada also want Ukraine to be at the top of the summit agenda, but they are wary that Trump might not want President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to steal the limelight. The two-day summit in The Hague involves an informal dinner Tuesday and one working session Wednesday morning. A very short summit statement has been drafted to ensure the meeting is not derailed by fights over details and wording. Indeed, much about this NATO summit is brief, even though ripples could be felt for years. Founded in 1949, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization was formed by 12 nations to counter the threat to security in Europe posed by the Soviet Union during the Cold War, notably via a strong US presence on the continent. Dealing with Moscow is in its DNA. Keeping the peace outside the Euro-Atlantic area is not. NATO's ranks have grown to 32 countries since the Washington Treaty was signed 75 years ago. Sweden joined last year, worried by an increasingly aggressive Russia. NATO's collective security guarantee — Article 5 of the treaty — underpins its credibility. It's a political commitment by all countries to come to the aid of any member whose sovereignty or territory might be under attack. Trump has suggested he is committed to that pledge, but he has also sowed doubt about his intentions. He has said the US intends to remain a member of the alliance. The US is NATO's most powerful member. It spends much more on defense than any other ally and far outweighs its partners in terms of military muscle. Washington has traditionally driven the agenda but has stepped back under Trump. The US nuclear arsenal provides strategic deterrence against would-be adversaries. NATO's day-to-day work is led by Rutte, a former Dutch prime minister. As its top civilian official, he chairs almost weekly meetings of ambassadors in the North Atlantic Council at its Brussels headquarters. He chairs other 'NACs' at ministerial and leader levels. Rutte runs NATO headquarters, trying to foster consensus and to speak on behalf of all members. NATO's military headquarters is based nearby in Mons, Belgium. It is always run by a top US officer. With Trump demanding greater defense spending, it's unclear what role Ukraine will play at the summit. Zelenskyy has been invited, but it's unclear whether he will have a seat at NATO's table, although he may take part in Tuesday's dinner. Russia's war in Ukraine usually dominates such meetings. More broadly, NATO itself is not arming Ukraine. As an organization, it possesses no weapons of any kind. Collectively, it provides only non-lethal support — fuel, combat rations, medical supplies, body armor, and equipment to counter drones or mines. But individually, members do send arms. European allies provided 60 percent of the military support that Ukraine received in 2024. NATO coordinates those weapons deliveries via a hub on the Polish border and helps organize training for Ukrainian troops. A key part of the commitment for allies to defend one another is to deter Russia, or any other adversary, from attacking in the first place. Finland and Sweden joined NATO recently because of this concern. Under NATO's new military plans, 300,000 military personnel would be deployed within 30 days to counter any attack, whether it be on land, at sea, by air or in cyberspace. But experts doubt whether the allies could muster the troop numbers. It's not just about troop and equipment numbers. An adversary would be less likely to challenge NATO if it thought the allies would use the forces it controls. Trump's threats against US allies — including imposing tariffs on them — has weakened that deterrence. Due to high US defense spending over many years, the American armed forces have more personnel and superior weapons but also significant transportation and logistics assets. Other allies are starting to spend more, though. After years of cuts, NATO members committed to ramp up their national defense budgets in 2014 when Russia illegally annexed Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula. After Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the NATO allies agreed to make 2 percent of GDP the minimum spending level. Last year, 22 countries were expected to hit that target, up from only three a decade ago. In The Hague, the allies were expected to up the ante to 3.5 percent, plus a further 1.5 percent for things like improving roads, bridges, ports and airfields or preparing societies to deal with future conflicts. Whether they will now remains an open question.
