logo
NATO summit: Rutte says US 'committed' to Article 5 – DW – 06/25/2025

NATO summit: Rutte says US 'committed' to Article 5 – DW – 06/25/2025

DW5 hours ago

NATO chief Mark Rutte said that the US is "totally committed" to the alliance's key Article 5 clause. His comments come a day after Trump appeared to be ambiguous on the mutual defense clause. DW has the latestNATO allies are expected to agree on a historic defense spending pledge on the last day of the alliance's summit, currently underway in The Hague.
Before the day's proceedings began, Secretary General Mark Rutte stressed that the US was "totally committed" to NATO and its Article 5 clause.
These are the latest developments concerning the NATO summit on Wednesday, 25.06.2025.
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said that there was no alternative to higher defense spending in view of ongoing threats.
"Given our long-term threat of Russia, but also the massive build-up of the military in China, and the fact that North Korea, China and Iran are supporting the war effort in Ukraine, it's really important we spend more. So that will be number one on the agenda today," Rutte told journalists before heading to meet NATO leaders on Wednesday.
The Dutch politician also stressed that the United States was "totally committed" to NATO's Article 5, the alliance's mutual defence clause.
"For me, there is absolute clarity that the United States has totally committed to NATO, totally committed to Article 5," Rutte said.
Rutte's remarks came after US President Donald Trump appeared to signal his doubts on the clause on the previous day.
Trump had refused to comment on the key Article 5 clause, which says that an attack on one member is an attack on all.
"Depends on your definition. There's numerous definitions of Article 5," he said while addressing reporters on Tuesday. The president added that he was "committed" to being a "friend."
The ongoing NATO summit in The Hague has entered its second and final day.
Yesterday, US President Donald Trump arrived in the Dutch city hoping for a breakthrough in his long-standing demand for European allies to increase defense spending.
Members of the US-dominated military alliance are expected to hike their defense spending to 5% of their economic output.
We'll be back tomorrow morning with the latest updates here.
US President Donald Trump is in The Hague for the NATO summit, where defense leaders are expected to raise their defense spending to 5% of their national output.
This could be a big win for the US president who has for years asked European allies to contribute to their national security.
Trump has had a rocky relationship with NATO leaders, suggesting at times the US may not defend allies who do not contribute enough to defense spending.
Asked whether the US remains committed to NATO's Article 5 clause, Trump told reporters on Air Force One (on his way to Europe) that: "Depends on your definition. There are numerous definitions of Article 5. You know that, right? But I'm committed to being their friends."
Still, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte praised Trump in a personal letter the US leader shared to his Truth Social account.
Another big topic will be Russia's war in Ukraine. Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy were at the Dutch royal palace for dinner together earlier this evening as well.
But Trump was seated next to like-minded Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni. Their table is shared by Dutch King Willem-Alexander and Mark Rutte.
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said he has no doubt about the US commitment to the alliance's Article 5 mutual defense clause.
"I have no doubt that the US is totally committed to NATO, totally committed to Article 5," Rutte told reporters in The Hague.
He made the remarks after President Donald Trump, on his way to a summit of NATO leaders, said there were "numerous" definitions of Article 5 of the Washington Treaty,
Asked later to clarify, Trump said he was "committed to saving lives. I'm committed to life and safety. And I'm going to give you an exact definition when I get there."
The EU's top foreign policy representative Kaja Kallas spoke to DW's Alexandra von Nahmen on the sidelines of the NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands, on Tuesday, where the diplomat said member states, "can help Ukraine more if they invest more in defense."
Kallas said US President Donald Trump has been cajoling NATO states to spend more on defense, "for quite some time." But, she added: "Many didn't just listen, but now, we are in the security situation that we are. And most of the European countries have realized that we actually need to do this."
"Times have changed," said Kallas when asked about the fact that Ukraine was not going to be at the top of the NATO agenda this week. "But for Europe, Ukraine is our top priority. And that's why we are committing to helping Ukraine. We are committed to putting more pressure on Russia so that they would also want peace."
Asked why Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who will be at the summit, won't play a larger role, she simply said, "you know why."
Kallas also spoke of the need to put defense production into high gear. "We are also cooperating with the Ukraine defense industry because they have actually created the defense industry from scratch," said Kallas, adding that the Ukrainians have been "very creative and very innovative" and that "there's a lot we can learn from them."
Ukraine has been keen on joining NATO as well as the European Union. Its NATO aspirations look highly unlikely to feature prominently in The Hague.
Still, Kallas did not close the door on Ukraine's EU bid, saying: "We also have the European [Council] summit coming up this week. We should move with the enlargement track because that is the hope for the Ukrainian people. We need to show that Europe is their family."
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
As NATO leaders increase defense spending, they must also commit to upholding human rights and international humanitarian law, Amnesty International Secretary General Agnes Callamard told DW.
'What counts is the safety and the security of the people, and that cannot just be done through an increase in defense budgets. It must be done by recentering NATO, the UN, and the international community on what matters: the protection of international law,' Callamard said during an interview with DW in The Hague.
Member states are expected to agree on a target of spending 5% of gross domestic product on defense, with 3.5% allocated to core military expenditures and another 1.5% directed toward areas such as infrastructure and cybersecurity.
Callamard emphasized that the financial burden should not fall solely on ordinary citizens.
'The brunt of this 5% increase must be carried by the corporate actors who are going to benefit from the increase in defense spending,' she told DW correspondent Jack Parrock.
Amnesty International is participating in the NATO Public Forum, which runs parallel to the summit and brings together leaders, officials, security experts, academics, journalists, and NGOs.
'So far, here at the NATO summit, I have not heard one reference to the suffering of the people. Yet Ukrainians are suffering, Palestinians are suffering, Israelis are suffering, Iranians are suffering. We're counting deaths by the thousands and thousands,' Callamard said.
US President Donald Trump says he is heading to the NATO summit expecting a calmer atmosphere than recent events in the Middle East.
"Heading to NATO where, at worst, it will be a much calmer period than what I just went through with Israel and Iran. I look forward to seeing all of my very good European friends, and others. Hopefully, much will be accomplished!" Trump posted on the social media platform X.
Germany's 2025 budget includes funding for 10,000 new military positions and about 1,000 additional civilian posts, the Defense Ministry has said.
"We will invest massively in the Bundeswehr," Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said. "After decades of neglecting the Bundeswehr, dangerous security gaps have emerged that we must continue to close."
The minister called the news "today's message from Berlin" as he headed to the NATO summit in The Hague.
"NATO partners' expectations of Germany are high, and quite rightly so," Pistorius added. He confirmed that major investments in air defense were planned.
The defense budget is expected to more than double by 2029, rising to €152.8 billion, according to current budget planning.
Chancellor Friedrich Merz has said Berlin plans to turn its Bundeswehr into Europe's strongest army.
Pistorius has previously said that Germany could need up to 60,000 more troops.
As the NATO summit in The Hague is expected to focus on a single issue — a massive increase in defense spending across the alliance — many of Ukraine's strongest supporters fear the gathering may prove disappointing for Kyiv.
President Volodymyr Zelenskyy arrived on Tuesday and is holding bilateral meetings on the sidelines of the summit.
"For us, it is the most important thing to see NATO and EU countries united," he said, standing alongside NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, and European Council President Antonio Costa. The four leaders met to coordinate their positions ahead of a dinner hosted by the Dutch King.
US President Donald Trump will also be in attendance; however, he will not be seated next to the Ukrainian president, a source told DW. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump said he was probably going to meet Zelenskyy in The Hague.
However, the Ukrainian leader is not invited to participate in a closed-door leaders' session planned for Wednesday.
This stands in stark contrast to the prominent role Zelenskyy played at previous NATO summits in Washington D.C., and Vilnius, and is most likely the result of Trump's antipathy toward the Ukrainian president.
US President Donald Trump has sown doubt on his commitment to NATO's core mutual defense pledge as he departed for the key summit in the Netherlands.
The two-day summit — opening with a dinner hosted by the Dutch King Willem-Alexander — aims to reassure the US leader on defense spending commitments. Trump's return to office has reignited fears he could undermine the transatlantic alliance.
Asked en route aboard Air Force One whether he remained committed to NATO's Article Five mutual defense clause, Trump said, "Depends on your definition. There's numerous definitions of Article Five," adding only that he was "committed to being their friends."
NATO members have scrambled to meet his demands by agreeing to spend 3.5% of GDP on core military needs by 2035, with an additional 1.5% dedicated to broader security areas such as cyber defense and infrastructure.
Alliance officials insist the buildup is essential to deter Russia, warning that Moscow could recover from its war losses in Ukraine and pose a renewed threat within five years.
Europe has finally awakened in response to Russia's war against Ukraine, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen says, describing a generational shift in the continent's security posture.
"All of Europe is facing a changing international landscape as we've just heard, rightly so," she told reporters ahead of a two-day summit of the alliance in The Hague. "The security architecture that we relied on for decades can no longer be taken for granted. It is a once in a generation tectonic shift."
Von der Leyen said recent actions by European states would have seemed "unthinkable just a year ago."
"The Europe of defense has finally awakened," she added. "Tomorrow, the summit will set indeed historic new spending targets for NATO allies."
The NATO military alliance's chief Mark Rutte has said it is "unthinkable" that Russia should manage to "outproduce" the Western defence alliance.
"We need to do more," Rutte stressed at a defence industry forum ahead of a crunch leaders' summit in The Hague.
"It is simply unthinkable that Russia, with an economy 25 times smaller than NATO's, should be able to outproduce and outgun us," the NATO chief stressed. "We must spend more to prevent war. We must win this new war of production."
Rutte also said European allies should not be concerned over the United States' commitment to NATO, despite criticism of the alliance from US President Donald Trump.
Speaking ahead of a two-day gathering in The Hague, Netherlands, Rutte said: "There is total commitment by the US president and the US senior leadership to NATO," Rutte told a public forum before the formal opening of the summit.
The summit and its final statement will be short and focused on heeding Trump's call to spend 5% of GDP on defense — a big jump from the current 2% goal.
Rutte described the spending issue as a "this huge pebble in the shoe" and a "huge irritant."
"We are not spending enough as Europeans and Canadians, and they want us to equalize with what the US is spending," he said.
Meanwhile, Rutte said he "cannot predict" when the three-year war in Ukraine will end.
Russia has cited Ukraine's desire to join NATO as one of the reasons why it launched a full-scale invasion of its neighbor in 2022.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
While the escalation in the Middle East will be high on NATO summit's docket, the spotlight is on a massive increase in defense spending. This comes in response to pressure form US President Donald Trump. Read our full explainer here.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Sees 'Progress' On Gaza, Raising Hopes For Ceasefire
Trump Sees 'Progress' On Gaza, Raising Hopes For Ceasefire

Int'l Business Times

time36 minutes ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Trump Sees 'Progress' On Gaza, Raising Hopes For Ceasefire

US President Donald Trump said Wednesday that "great progress" was being made to end the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza as a new ceasefire push began more than 20 months since the start of the conflict. "I think great progress is being made on Gaza," Trump told reporters ahead of a NATO summit in the Netherlands, adding that his special envoy Steve Witkoff had told him "Gaza is very close." He linked his optimism about imminent "very good news" for the Gaza Strip to a ceasefire agreed on Tuesday between Israel and Hamas backer Iran to end their 12-day war. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has also suggested that Israel's blitz of Iran's nuclear and missile facilities, as well as its security forces linked to overseas militant groups, could help end the Gaza conflict. Netanyahu faces growing calls from opposition politicians, relatives of hostages being held in Gaza and even members of his ruling coalition to bring an end to the fighting, triggered by Palestinian militant group Hamas's October 7, 2023 attack. Key mediator Qatar announced Tuesday that it would launch a new push for a ceasefire, with Hamas on Wednesday saying talks had "intensified". "Our communications with the brother mediators in Egypt and Qatar have not stopped and have intensified in recent hours," Hamas official Taher al-Nunu told AFP. He cautioned, however, that the group had "not yet received any new proposals" to end the war. The Israeli government declined to comment on any new ceasefire talks beyond saying that efforts to return Israeli hostages in Gaza were ongoing "on the battlefield and via negotiations". Israel sent forces into Gaza to root out Iran-linked Hamas and rescue hostages after the Hamas attack that resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. Israel's military campaign has killed at least 56,156 people, also mostly civilians, according to the health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza. The United Nations considers its figures reliable. The latest Israeli military losses led to rare criticism of the war effort by the leader of the ultra-Orthodox United Torah Judaism party, a partner in Netanyahu's coalition government. "I still don't understand why we are fighting there... Soldiers are getting killed all the time," lawmaker Moshe Gafni told a hearing in the Israeli parliament on Wednesday. The slain soldiers were from the Israeli combat engineering corps and were conducting a reconnaissance mission in the Khan Yunis area in southern Gaza when their vehicle was targeted with an explosive device, according to a military statement. The Hostages and Missing Families Forum, the main group representing relatives of those held in Gaza, endorsed Gafni's criticism of the war. "On this difficult morning, Gafni tells it like it is... The war in Gaza has run its course, it is being conducted with no clear purpose and no concrete plan," the group said in a statement. Of the 251 hostages seized by Palestinian militants during the Hamas attack, 49 are still held in Gaza including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. Rights groups say Gaza and its population of more than two million face famine-like conditions due to Israeli restrictions, with near-daily deaths of people queuing for food aid. Gaza's civil defence agency said Wednesday that Israeli fire killed at least another 20 people, including six who were waiting for aid. Civil defence spokesman Mahmud Bassal told AFP that a crowd of aid-seekers was hit by Israeli "bullets and tank shells" in an area of central Gaza where Palestinians have gathered each night in the hope of collecting rations. Contacted by AFP, the Israeli military said it was "not aware of any incident this morning with casualties in the central Gaza Strip". The United Nations on Tuesday condemned the "weaponisation of food" in Gaza and slammed a US- and Israeli-backed foundation that has largely replaced established humanitarian organisations there. The privately run Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) was brought into the Palestinian territory at the end of May but its operations have been marred by chaotic scenes, deaths and neutrality concerns. The GHF has denied responsibility for deaths near its aid points. The Gaza health ministry says that since late May, nearly 550 people have been killed near aid centres while seeking scarce supplies. The civil defence agency said Israeli forces killed 46 people waiting for aid on Tuesday. Smoke rising from the Bureij area following an Israeli air strike in the central Gaza Strip AFP A campaign group representing families of Israeli hostages in Gaza called for an end to the war AFP Palestinians carry parcels collected from a food aid distribution point set up by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation AFP

Fact check: Did NATO expansion drive Russia to war? – DW – 06/25/2025
Fact check: Did NATO expansion drive Russia to war? – DW – 06/25/2025

DW

timean hour ago

  • DW

Fact check: Did NATO expansion drive Russia to war? – DW – 06/25/2025

NATO has allegedly deceived and disrespected Russia by expanding into Eastern Europe, threatening Moscow's interests. That, at least, is how the Kremlin has justified its war in Ukraine. But is there any truth to it? NATO leaders have gathered in The Hague in the Netherlands on June 24 and 25 to discuss the topic of increased defense spending, and support for Ukraine will be high on the the agenda. Russia's invasion of Ukraine is now well into its fourth year. As the fighting drags on, the United States has increasingly demanded that its NATO allies shoulder a greater share of the costs of funding the alliance, whose members have been providing significant military and financial support to Kyiv. In the past four years, NATO has been a target of false narratives time and again. DW Fact Check looked at some of the most common claims. However, for the Russian President Vladimir Putin, NATO itself represents a threat to Russian national security — especially since its post-Cold War expansion into Eastern Europe, which includes countries that had formerly been part of the Soviet Union or at least in the Soviet sphere of influence. The prospect of Ukraine, a country with even stronger historical and cultural ties to Russia, drawing closer to or even joining NATO — or indeed the European Union — has been cited by Putin as justification for Russian interference in Ukraine since 2014 and the so-called "special military operation" launched in February 2022. As early as March 2000, speaking to the BBC in one of his first interviews as Russian president, Putin insisted that he was not opposed to NATO but stressed concerns about the alliance's eastward expansion, which by that point had already seen Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic join as members. Despite NATO's insistence that the alliance was purely defensive, Putin was not convinced. He considers the expansion a breach of trust in the wake of the so-called "Two Plus Four Agreement," the September 1990 settlement regulating the reunification of West and East Germany (the "two") and signed by the four allied powers which had occupied Germany at the end of World War II: the United States, the United Kingdom, France and the Soviet Union. According to Putin, the Western powers had promised that NATO would not expand eastwards into territory formerly controlled by the Soviet Union. NATO has always denied this claim. The Treaty on the Final Settlement with Respect to Germany, or the Two Plus Four Agreement, made it clear that no foreign (meaning non-German) troops or nuclear weapons were to be permanently stationed on the territory of the former East Germany. But the German Interior Ministry states that the deal made "no binding assertions regarding the eastward expansion of NATO or the admission of other members." But what informal promises and statements were made, what exactly they entailed and how they are to be interpreted has been the subject of heated debate among both politicians and historians ever since. Speaking at the Munich Security Conference in 2007, Putin quoted former NATO Secretary-General Manfred Wörner who said in a speech in Brussels in May 1990: "The fact alone that we are prepared not to station NATO forces beyond the borders of the Federal Republic [of Germany] gives the Soviet Union firm security guarantees." As a 2016 German government position paper on the topic points out, however: "Neither in this speech nor at any other point did [Wörner] declare that there would be no eastward expansion of NATO." For Putin and his allies, two other well-documented comments made by senior German and US politicians in February 1990 are of particular importance: former US Secretary of State James Baker's proposal to Communist Party General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev of "assurances that NATO's jurisdiction would not shift one inch eastward from its present position," and former West German Foreign Minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher's commitment to a "non-expansion of NATO." According to Tim Geiger of the Leibniz Institute for Contemporary History, however, these words should not be taken out of context. Writing on behalf of the German Armed Forces, the Bundeswehr, Geiger argues that Baker's and Genscher's suggestions merely serve to demonstrate the lengths to which the West German foreign ministry was willing to go at the time to accommodate Soviet concerns regarding German reunification, but had never constituted German or American foreign policy. Indeed, he points out that, within two months, both US President George H. W. Bush and West German Chancellor Helmut Kohl had dismissed the ideas as unworkable since they contravened a country's right of freedom to select alliances. This argument is also made by Jim Townsend, senior fellow at the CNAS Transatlantic Security Program, who worked both for and with NATO in various roles throughout the 1990s. "It was all about Germany and German unification," he told DW. Gorbachev himself confirmed as much in an October 2014 interview in which he stated: "The topic of 'NATO expansion' was not discussed at all … Not a single Eastern European country raised the issue, not even after the Warsaw Pact ceased to exist in 1991. Western leaders didn't bring it up, either." But that's not enough for Joshua Shifrinson, associate professor of international politics at the University of Maryland, who told DW that Gorbachev's apparent rejection of Putin's theory has also been taken out of context. Indeed, the former Soviet president also said in the same 2014 interview that the first eastward expansion of NATO in the 1990s was "a big mistake from the very beginning," and "definitely a violation of the spirit of the statements and assurances made to us in 1990." Among the sources analyzed by Shifrinson are the previously classified minutes of a meeting of the chief US, British, French and German ambassadors to NATO in March 1991, also reported by , in which the German representative Jürgen Chrobog said: "We had made it clear during the Two Plus Four negotiations that we would not extend NATO beyond the [River] Elbe. We could not therefore offer membership of NATO to Poland and the others." According to the minutes of the meeting, photos of which DW has also seen, none of Chrobog's colleagues objected. Indeed, France's Raymond Seitz even added: "We had made it clear to the Soviet Union — in Two Plus Four and in other exchanges — that we would not take advantage of the Soviet withdrawal from Eastern Europe." For Shifrinson, this is proof that NATO had not just committed to keeping foreign troops out of eastern Germany, but that "people were thinking about the future of Eastern Europe in general." Benjamin Friedman, who also analyzes relations between Russia and NATO for the US think tank Defense Priorities, added: "The United States didn't make some solemn promise that we would never expand NATO, but we certainly gave the Russians that impression and I think that upset them." Regardless of the ongoing debate, said Shifrinson, "it's incontrovertibly true that Russia invaded Ukraine. You can acknowledge that assurances were given and later abrogated and still not justify Russian behavior." "The expansion or prospect of expansion [of NATO] to Ukraine was a huge cause, not the only one, but a huge cause of the war," said Friedman. "There's a difference between making a statement about causality and a statement about guilt or moral responsibility." Townsend, who after stints at the Pentagon and NATO, moved to the Atlantic Council think tank, also sees Russia as the clear aggressor. "We didn't do anything to upset the Russians, we were very careful about that, and they gave us the green light during those days," he said. "It wasn't until Putin's speech that he gave at the Munich Security Conference that they suddenly had a problem." If NATO has made any mistake, in Townsend's mind, it's a very different one. "If there was any kind of actions that NATO took, [that might have destabilized the European security architecture], it was by not getting strong enough."

Trump Insists Iran Nuclear Programme Set Back 'Decades'
Trump Insists Iran Nuclear Programme Set Back 'Decades'

Int'l Business Times

time3 hours ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Trump Insists Iran Nuclear Programme Set Back 'Decades'

President Donald Trump insisted Wednesday that US strikes led to the "total obliteration" of Iran's nuclear capabilities and set the country's atomic programme back "decades", while Israel said it was still early to fully assess the damage. Over a 12-day conflict, Israel pounded Iranian nuclear and military sites while Iran launched waves of missiles at its foe during their deadliest-ever confrontation. The United States joined the fray in support of its ally, hitting two nuclear facilities with massive bunker-buster bombs over the weekend, while a guided missile from a submarine struck a third. But leaked US intelligence cast doubt on the damage caused by American strikes, saying they had set back Tehran's nuclear programme by just a few months. "They're not going to be building bombs for a long time," said Trump, adding that the strikes had set back the programme by "decades" and that the Iran-Israel ceasefire that he declared was going "very well". Earlier, Israel's military said it was "still early" to assess the damage caused to Iran's nuclear programme. "I believe we have delivered a significant hit to the nuclear programme, and I can also say that we have delayed it by several years," said Israeli military spokesman Brigadier General Effie Defrin. The head of Israel's military, Eyal Zamir, on Tuesday said Israel and the United States had set back Iran's nuclear programme "by years". But US media on Tuesday cited people familiar with the Defense Intelligence Agency intelligence report as saying the American strikes did not fully eliminate Iran's centrifuges or enriched uranium stockpiles. The strikes sealed off entrances to some facilities without destroying underground buildings, according to the report. Israel had said its bombing campaign, which began on June 13, was aimed at preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, an ambition Tehran has consistently denied. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in an address to the nation after the ceasefire, announced that "we have thwarted Iran's nuclear project". "And if anyone in Iran tries to rebuild it, we will act with the same determination, with the same intensity, to foil any attempt," he said. Iranian lawmakers on Wednesday voted in favour of suspending cooperation with the United Nations' nuclear watchdog, according to state TV. "The International Atomic Energy Agency, which refused to even marginally condemn the attack on Iran's nuclear facilities, put its international credibility up for auction," parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said, according to the broadcaster. The decision to suspend cooperation with the IAEA still requires the approval of the Guardian Council, a body empowered to vet legislation. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said Tuesday his country was willing to return to negotiations over its nuclear programme, but that it would continue to "assert its legitimate rights" to the peaceful use of atomic energy. In an interview with the Al Araby Al Jadeed news outlet, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities would have "serious and profound repercussions" on the country's future. He said Iran remained committed to the Non-Proliferation Treaty but that it had failed "protect us or our nuclear programme", adding that Iran's approach towards the non-proliferation regime "will undergo changes", without elaborating. While Iran and Israel have been locked in a shadow war for decades, their 12-day conflict was by far the most destructive confrontation between them. Israeli strikes hit nuclear and military targets -- killing scientists and senior military figures -- as well as residential areas, prompting waves of Iranian missile fire on Israel. The war culminated in US strikes on underground Iranian nuclear sites using bunker-busting bombs -- which Israel lacks -- followed by an Iranian reprisal targeting a US military facility in Qatar, the largest in the Middle East. Trump shrugged off that response as "weak", thanking Tehran for giving advance notice and announcing the contours of the ceasefire just hours later. Some Israelis welcomed the truce. "Finally, we can sleep peacefully. We feel better, less worried, for the kids, for the family. And I hope it stays that way. That's the most important," Yossi Bin, a 45-year-old engineer in Tel Aviv, told AFP. In Iran, people remained uncertain whether the peace would hold. Amir, 28, fled from Tehran to the Caspian Sea coast and told AFP by phone, "I really don't know... about the ceasefire but honestly, I don't think things will return to normal." Israeli strikes on Iran killed at least 610 civilians and wounded more than 4,700, according to the health ministry. Iran's attacks on Israel killed 28 people, according to official figures and rescuers. Some Israelis welcomed the prospect of a truce AFP Iraqi supporters of Iran celebrated in Baghdad following the start of a truce AFP The truce has allowed a return to normal life in Israel AFP A satellite picture provided by Maxar Technologies shows air strike damage on tunnel entrances at Isfahan nuclear enrichment facility in central Iran on June 22, 2025 AFP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store