
Can NATO Keep Trump On-message About Russia Threat?
When leaders from NATO's 32 countries gather for a summit in The Hague next week, most want to send a clear message: Russia is the main threat to their alliance.
But the loudest voice in the room likely won't be on the same page.
Since coming back to office, US President Donald Trump has upended the West's approach towards Russia's war on Ukraine by undercutting Kyiv and opening the door to closer ties with Moscow.
While the volatile leader has expressed some frustration with Russia's Vladimir Putin for refusing a ceasefire, he has steered clear of punishing the Kremlin.
At a G7 summit this week Trump made waves by saying the group of industrialised countries should never have expelled Russia.
Ahead of the Hague gathering, diplomats at NATO have been wrangling over a five-paragraph summit statement, with many countries pressing for a full-throated assertion of the menace from Moscow.
That, they say, will help explain the main thrust of the meeting: an agreement for countries to ramp up defence spending to satisfy Trump's demand for it to reach five percent of GDP.
Since the Kremlin launched its 2022 invasion of Ukraine, the alliance has called Russia "the most significant and direct threat to allies' security and to peace and stability in the Euro-Atlantic area".
But this time around the United States -- backed up by Moscow-friendly Hungary and Slovakia -- has been intent on watering that down.
Diplomats have been juggling with variants such as referring to "threats, including Russia" or mentioning "the long-term threat posed by Russia to Euro-Atlantic security".
The verbal nuances may seem slight, but they mean a lot to those countries being asked to massively ramp up spending and those on NATO's eastern flank most threatened by the Kremlin.
NATO has warned that Russia could be ready to attack an alliance country within five years.
"If we can get Trump to sign off on calling Russia a long-term threat then that would be a good result," a senior European diplomat told AFP.
As US peace efforts between Russia and Ukraine have stalled, the diplomat said that Washington appeared to have "moved a centimetre in our direction" on taking a stronger stance on Russia.
"Of course more hawkish countries want to go further -- but just getting Trump to agree that would still be fine," the diplomat said.
Part of the US reasoning is that Washington is more worried about the threat China poses worldwide -- and that Russia is more a problem just in Europe.
"Russia is the near threat," said US ambassador to NATO Matthew Whitaker.
"But China is obviously a big challenge for all of us, and we need to be allied and address those threats as well."
Camille Grand of the European Council on Foreign Relations said that beneath the diplomatic fine-tuning, NATO was being confronted by a "fundamental question".
"How does the United States view Russia?" he said. "So far we haven't really got an answer."
Even if NATO does opt for stronger wording on Moscow, there is always the possibility that Trump could show up in The Hague and directly contradict it.
But the debate could come into sharper focus in the months after the summit when the United States could announce a pull-back of forces in Europe as part of a review of its global deployments.
One area where Washington appears clearly not on board with most other allies is on backing Ukraine.
Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky is set to attend on the sidelines of the summit but his involvement is being kept to a minimum to avoid a bust-up with Trump.
Diplomats said there should be a reference in the summit statement linking new defence spending to helping Ukraine -- but there will be no talk of Kyiv's long-term push to join NATO.
"The US does not see Ukrainian security as essential to European security," said Kurt Volker, a former US ambassador to NATO.
"Our European allies do, so they feel that if Putin is allowed to prevail in Ukraine, or if Ukraine does not survive as a sovereign, independent state, they are at risk." The Hague is preparing to host NATO leaders for a summit focused on ramping up the alliance's defences against the threat from Russia AFP

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
an hour ago
- DW
US travel ban brings more despair to Afghans in Pakistan – DW – 06/19/2025
06/19/2025 June 19, 2025 Millions Afghan refugees are stuck in Pakistan, waiting to move on to a third country. DW met one family who thought they were about to head to the US before this month's abrupt shift in US policy and president Trump's travel ban for Afghans. Pakistan, meanwhile, is scaling up deportations.


DW
3 hours ago
- DW
US court allows Trump to retain control of National Guard – DW – 06/20/2025
The court said that while Trump did not have unlimited powers to take over California's guard, his administration had a rationale to do so. Trump hailed the decision as a "BIG WIN" online. A US appeals court on Thursday ruled that US President Donald Trump can continue his control over National Guard troops in Los Angeles for now, despite objections from the state's governor. In a unanimous ruling, a three-judge bench said that Trump's "failure to issue the federalization order directly 'through' the Governor of California does not limit his otherwise lawful authority to call up the National Guard." Court says there was defensible rationale for deployment The 38-page document said that while a president did not have unchecked power to take over a state's guard, Trump's administration had presented enough defensible rationale for doing so. It added that the president was within his rights when he mobilized 4,000 members of the national guard into service for 60 days to protect "federal personnel performing federal functions" and to protect federal property. The ruling halts the decision of a lower court last week that ordered Trump to return the control of California's National Guard to Governor Gavin Newsom. Newsom has criticized Trump's decision to send in troops to LA to quell anti-immigration protests, calling it an authoritarian move. Trump also sent 700 US marines to LA despite objections from local authorities as he claimed they had lost control of the city. Trump military parade met with 'No Kings' rallies across US To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Trump celebrates 'big win' The US President took to his social media platform and said: "All over the United States, if our Cities, and our people, need protection, we are the ones to give it to them should State and Local Police be unable, for whatever reason, to get the job done." He hailed the ruling as a "great decision" and a "BIG WIN," while misspelling Newsom's name and calling him incompetent. Meanwhile, Newsom took to X, focusing on the portion of the ruling which said the US President's powers were not unfettered. "Donald Trump is not a king and not above the law," he wrote. "Tonight, the court rightly rejected Trump's claim that he can do whatever he wants with the National Guard and not have to explain himself to a court. We will not let this authoritarian use of military soldiers against citizens go unchecked." Edited by: Kieran Burke


Local Germany
3 hours ago
- Local Germany
European countries announce joint action against Russia's 'shadow fleet'
According to a statement from Denmark's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, representatives of Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Sweden and the United Kingdom had met to discuss the issue on Thursday. "We have agreed to further strengthen our cooperation and ensure a joint and coordinated approach by our national authorities to address Russia's shadow fleet," the statement said. The countries had committed to "compile a common set of guidelines in line with international law to promote responsible behaviour at sea, strengthen compliance with international law, and ensure transparency across maritime operations." Security analysts say Russia is operating a large "shadow fleet" of hundreds of vessels, seeking to dodge the sanctions Western nations imposed on its oil exports over the war in Ukraine. Several undersea Baltic cables were damaged last year, with many experts calling it part of a "hybrid war" carried out by Russia against Western countries. "If vessels fail to fly a valid flag in the Baltic Sea and the North Sea, we will take appropriate action within international law," the statement said. Advertisement It added that "stateless vessels, including those falsely claiming to fly a flag," lack a responsible flag state and do not have the same rights entitled to them under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). In January, NATO announced the deployment of ships, aircraft and drones in a Baltic Sea operation in response to damage to several submarine cables, but the operation requires considerable human and material resources. In the face of these threats, the transatlantic organisation wants to strengthen its fleet of unmanned surveillance ships in the Baltic Sea as part of its operation "Task Force X".