logo
Israel's 'Qatargate' scandal deepens with arrest of Netanyahu aides

Israel's 'Qatargate' scandal deepens with arrest of Netanyahu aides

Middle East Eye01-04-2025

Israeli police arrested two close advisers of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday, as the so-called 'Qatargate' scandal deepened in Israel.
Jonathan Urich, Netanyahu's senior media advisor, and Eli Feldstein, his military spokesperson, were arrested as part of an investigation into ties between the Israeli prime minister's office and Qatari officials.
The two officials were arrested on suspicion of contact with a foreign agent, money laundering, accepting bribes, fraud, and breach of trust.
Netanyahu, who was in court on Monday testifying in his own corruption and fraud cases, was forced to leave the courtroom to testify in the affair involving his confidants.
In addition to Netanyahu, a journalist, whose name cannot currently be published, was summoned for questioning on suspicion of involvement in the affair. According to Haaretz, the police will soon summon other journalists accused of being involved.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
As of today, the investigation is under a gag order, so many details have not yet been disclosed. But according to reports in Israel, Urich, Feldstein and other suspects are alleged to have sent messages to journalists on behalf of the Qatari government. The messages allegedly looked as though they were sent on behalf of the Israeli prime minister's office.
Eran Etzion, a former deputy head of the National Security Council, told Middle East Eye that it was still too early to determine the severity of the affair, but 'to the extent that Urich and Feldstein worked in the prime minister's office and for officials in Qatar, they have been exposed to classified material'.
'At the highest legal level, it could be the use of double agents in the prime minister's office, which would be defined as harm to state security and treason,' two of the most serious accusations in Israel.
'Qatargate'
The affair, dubbed 'Qatargate' by the Israeli media, was first exposed by Haaretz in November.
According to the Israeli newspaper, Urich, Netanyahu's longtime adviser, and Srulik Einhorn, another adviser to the prime minister, were employed by Qatar ahead of the 2022 World Cup, which the Gulf state hosted.
The two, through Perception, their media consulting firm, allegedly provided services to whitewash Qatar's reputation and brand it as a country that aspires to achieve 'peace and stability in the world'.
In addition, they worked to promote the country's public relations in Israel by inviting Israeli journalists to Qatar.
'For a long time, Netanyahu has been waging an all-out war against the law enforcement system'
- Eran Etzion, former deputy head of Israel's National Security Council
In February, Channel 12 News revealed that Netanyahu's military spokesman, Feldstein, was also involved in the affair.
According to the report, Feldstein was employed by a private company funded by Qatar to improve its image in Israel vis a vis its role in the negotiations between Israel and Hamas, which Qatar is mediating.
Feldstein has also been arrested in the past on suspicion of delivering classified documents relating to Hamas to the Jewish Chronicle, a British newspaper, and Bild, the German newspaper.
These briefings were intended to boost Netanyahu's image and were aimed at influencing Israeli public opinion in relation to his handling of the release of hostages held by Hamas in Gaza.
It later turned out that the reports published by Bild and the Jewish Chronicle were false. The Jewish Chronicle was forced as a result to remove a series of articles from its website, sparking a row that led to the resignation of four of its most prominent columnists and to questions being asked about the involvement of Robbie Gibb, a non-executive director at the BBC.
Last month, Channel 13 revealed that as part of Feldstein's work for Qatar during the war on Gaza, he organised a visit to Qatar by Zvika Klein, the editor-in-chief of the right-wing Jerusalem Post newspaper.
Feldstein, who was not paid by the Israeli prime minister's office while working there, was reportedly employed by Jay Footlik, an American lobbyist who works for the Qatari government.
Netanyahu against the Shin Bet
Following the many press reports on this, attorney general Gali Baharav-Miara ordered the opening of a criminal investigation at the end of last month, following a 'security check' conducted by the Shin Bet, Israel's internal security agency.
Regarding Netanyahu, Etzion said, 'If he knew about the employment of his aides by Qatar, then he is in [a] bad situation, and if he didn't, then his situation is no less serious.'
'Netanyahu has his back to the wall. He is desperate, dangerous and unrestrained'
- Eran Etzion
'For a long time, Netanyahu has been waging an all-out war against the law enforcement system. Now, law enforcement agencies are weakened,' Etzion said. 'If in the past such accusations would have led to the prime minister's resignation, today this is not the case.'
'It is difficult to estimate the extent to which the law enforcement agencies will succeed or make the effort to render Netanyahu's tenure as prime minister untenable.'
Netanyahu has categorically rejected the accusations against his advisers. A statement issued by his party, Likud, called the investigation "a new low in the political hunt to bring down a right-wing prime minister and to prevent the dismissal of the failed head of the Shin Bet".
"This is not an investigation, this is not law enforcement. This is an attempt to assassinate democracy and an attempt to replace the will of the people with the rule of the bureaucrats," the Likud statement continued.
Earlier this month, Netanyahu announced his intention to fire Shin Bet chief Ronen Bar, in what is perceived in Israel as an attempt to thwart the intelligence agency's further investigation into the affair.
The dismissal of the head of the Shin Bet was frozen by the Supreme Court pending a hearing at the beginning of next month.
Since the 'Qatargate' affair came to light, Netanyahu has been promoting messages like those of his close ally, US President Donald Trump, about how the "Deep State" is involved in running the country.
In a recent TikTok video, Netanyahu said that the "leftist" Deep State wants "me and the government to be a flower pot".
Gaza genocide: How the hell did this happen, asks Pankaj Mishra Read More »
Yesterday, Netanyahu released a video in which he said that he was "amazed, I mean, I understood that there was a political investigation here, but I didn't know to what extent. They are holding Jonathan Urich and Eli Feldstein hostage".
Netanyahu's response has drawn criticism in Israel, including from families of those held captive by Hamas, considering his use of the word "hostage" in reference to his advisers.
"Netanyahu does not have the absolute support of all the members of the coalition in this affair," Etzion told MEE. Avi Dichter, agriculture minister and former head of the Shin Bet, said the scandal is serious and needs to be investigated.
"Netanyahu has his back to the wall," Etzion said. "He is desperate, dangerous and unrestrained. His entire system of considerations is based on this."
Netanyahu will not hesitate to 'carry out military moves in order to remove the affair from the public agenda', Etzion told MEE.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hamas must hand over its weapons, Mahmoud Abbas tells Emmanuel Macron in a letter
Hamas must hand over its weapons, Mahmoud Abbas tells Emmanuel Macron in a letter

The National

time40 minutes ago

  • The National

Hamas must hand over its weapons, Mahmoud Abbas tells Emmanuel Macron in a letter

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas said Hamas must hand over its weapons and international forces could be posted in the Palestinian territories, in a letter to French President Emmanuel Macron a week ahead of a Saudi-French conference on a two-state solution, the French presidency said on Tuesday. Mr Abbas condemned the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack on southern Israel, and called on all hostages to be released and pledges further reforms, the Elysee Palace said, ahead of a conference next week at which Paris could become the most prominent western power to back recognition of an independent Palestinian state. The letter to Mr Macron, who is working on organising an international conference with Saudi Arabia to discuss recognition of Palestine, contains 'unprecedented' pledges, Mr Macron's office said, without elaborating. 'Hamas will no longer rule Gaza and must hand over its weapons and military capabilities to the Palestinian Security Forces, which will oversee their removal outside the Occupied Palestinian territory, with Arab and international support,' the French leader's office quoted Mr Abbas as having written in the letter. He said he was 'ready to invite Arab and international forces to be deployed as part of a stabilisation/protection mission with a (UN) Security Council mandate'. The Elysse Palace said it welcomed 'concrete and unprecedented commitments, demonstrating a real willingness to move towards the implementation of the two-state solution'. French officials have said Mr Macron is leaning towards recognising a Palestinian state ahead of the UN conference which France and Saudi Arabia are co-hosting from June 17-20. Mr Macron has said he is 'determined' to recognise a Palestinian state, but also set out several conditions, including the 'demilitarisation' of Hamas. The conference at UN headquarters will aim to resurrect the idea of a two-state solution – Israel currently controls large parts of the Palestinian territories. The PA exercises limited self rule in parts of the Israeli-occupied West Bank but lost control of Gaza to its rivals Hamas since 2007. It has previously condemned Hamas for the attack that led to the Gaza war and has called for the militant group to be disarmed in a future settlement. Israel has said it will not accept any role for the PA in Gaza after the war and has denounced countries that consider recognising Palestinian independence, which it says would reward Hamas for its attacks. Yasser Arafat in 2004.

Rights group files legal challenge to remove Hamas from UK terror list
Rights group files legal challenge to remove Hamas from UK terror list

Middle East Eye

timean hour ago

  • Middle East Eye

Rights group files legal challenge to remove Hamas from UK terror list

A British rights group has filed a second legal application calling on the UK government to remove the Palestinian militant group Hamas from a list of proscribed terrorist organisations. Cage International said on Tuesday it had instructed lawyers to appeal the decision in 2021 by former UK Home Secretary Priti Patel to proscribe Hamas in its entirety. The proscription of Hamas predates its current war with Israel in Gaza, where the group has been the de facto authority since winning Palestinian elections in 2006, and the Hamas-led attacks in southern Israel in October 2023. Hamas' military wing, the Qassam Brigades, was proscribed by the UK more than two decades ago. But Patel decided to extend the ban to the whole organisation, arguing there was no longer a distinction between the political and military wings of the group. Proscribing a group as a terrorist organisation automatically creates several criminal offences for anyone who is a group member, who wears or publishes the group's symbols, expresses or invites support for the group, or organises a meeting to support it. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Section 4 of the UK Terrorism Act allows any person affected by an organisation's proscription to apply to the home secretary for its de-proscription. Cage, an advocacy group that campaigns on behalf of people affected by counterterrorism policies, is using this clause to lodge its application over concerns its clients, who are mostly British Muslims, have been disproportionately targeted in an "unjust, politically charged manner" as a consequence of Hamas being added to the list of banned organisations. As part of its submission, Cage included 26 case studies involving clients who, it says, have been adversely impacted by the proscription of Hamas. These cases span a wide range of public and professional settings and highlight what the group describes as the overreach of counterterror legislation. The case studies include university students and a lecturer investigated and sanctioned for re-sharing publicly available media headlines related to Hamas. According to Cage, some of its clients also faced the threat of expulsion, visa revocation, or extended disciplinary procedures for allegedly supporting Hamas. The Home Office did not respond to Middle East Eye's request for comment at the time of writing. Muhammad Rabbani, managing director of Cage, said the de-proscription of Hamas is "about reckoning with a political and diplomatic reality in addition to remedying the discriminatory application and abuse of power". "Our case studies show a consistent pattern of arrests and harassment with unsuccessful prosecution, that left victims with lasting damage," Rabbani told Middle East Eye. "Ultimately, the continued proscription of Hamas is violating long-established freedoms enshrined in British law." Why I support the UK taking a more nuanced position on Hamas Read More » Cage's application comes months after Hamas launched its own appeal against its proscription in the UK. Legal papers seen by MEE revealed that Mousa Abu Marzouk, the head of Hamas' foreign relations office, had instructed lawyers to take up the case. Fahad Ansari, the director of Riverway Law, which is leading the challenge; Daniel Grutters, a barrister at One Pump Court Chambers; and Franck Magennis, a barrister at Garden Court Chambers, submitted a 106-page application to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper claiming the decision "pursued explicitly political objectives by a politically compromised Secretary of State". The lawyers involved in the case stressed that Hamas did not pay them or the experts and lawyers who provided evidence for its submission, as it is illegal to receive funds from a group designated as a terrorist organisation. The home secretary has 90 days to respond to Hamas and Cage's applications. As part of her powers as home secretary, Cooper also has the discretion to add or remove any group engaged in armed conflict from the list of proscribed organisations. If the home secretary rejects the application, Hamas could appeal to the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission, where the decision can be challenged on judicial review grounds.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store