Israel's 'Qatargate' scandal deepens with arrest of Netanyahu aides
Israeli police arrested two close advisers of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday, as the so-called 'Qatargate' scandal deepened in Israel.
Jonathan Urich, Netanyahu's senior media advisor, and Eli Feldstein, his military spokesperson, were arrested as part of an investigation into ties between the Israeli prime minister's office and Qatari officials.
The two officials were arrested on suspicion of contact with a foreign agent, money laundering, accepting bribes, fraud, and breach of trust.
Netanyahu, who was in court on Monday testifying in his own corruption and fraud cases, was forced to leave the courtroom to testify in the affair involving his confidants.
In addition to Netanyahu, a journalist, whose name cannot currently be published, was summoned for questioning on suspicion of involvement in the affair. According to Haaretz, the police will soon summon other journalists accused of being involved.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
As of today, the investigation is under a gag order, so many details have not yet been disclosed. But according to reports in Israel, Urich, Feldstein and other suspects are alleged to have sent messages to journalists on behalf of the Qatari government. The messages allegedly looked as though they were sent on behalf of the Israeli prime minister's office.
Eran Etzion, a former deputy head of the National Security Council, told Middle East Eye that it was still too early to determine the severity of the affair, but 'to the extent that Urich and Feldstein worked in the prime minister's office and for officials in Qatar, they have been exposed to classified material'.
'At the highest legal level, it could be the use of double agents in the prime minister's office, which would be defined as harm to state security and treason,' two of the most serious accusations in Israel.
'Qatargate'
The affair, dubbed 'Qatargate' by the Israeli media, was first exposed by Haaretz in November.
According to the Israeli newspaper, Urich, Netanyahu's longtime adviser, and Srulik Einhorn, another adviser to the prime minister, were employed by Qatar ahead of the 2022 World Cup, which the Gulf state hosted.
The two, through Perception, their media consulting firm, allegedly provided services to whitewash Qatar's reputation and brand it as a country that aspires to achieve 'peace and stability in the world'.
In addition, they worked to promote the country's public relations in Israel by inviting Israeli journalists to Qatar.
'For a long time, Netanyahu has been waging an all-out war against the law enforcement system'
- Eran Etzion, former deputy head of Israel's National Security Council
In February, Channel 12 News revealed that Netanyahu's military spokesman, Feldstein, was also involved in the affair.
According to the report, Feldstein was employed by a private company funded by Qatar to improve its image in Israel vis a vis its role in the negotiations between Israel and Hamas, which Qatar is mediating.
Feldstein has also been arrested in the past on suspicion of delivering classified documents relating to Hamas to the Jewish Chronicle, a British newspaper, and Bild, the German newspaper.
These briefings were intended to boost Netanyahu's image and were aimed at influencing Israeli public opinion in relation to his handling of the release of hostages held by Hamas in Gaza.
It later turned out that the reports published by Bild and the Jewish Chronicle were false. The Jewish Chronicle was forced as a result to remove a series of articles from its website, sparking a row that led to the resignation of four of its most prominent columnists and to questions being asked about the involvement of Robbie Gibb, a non-executive director at the BBC.
Last month, Channel 13 revealed that as part of Feldstein's work for Qatar during the war on Gaza, he organised a visit to Qatar by Zvika Klein, the editor-in-chief of the right-wing Jerusalem Post newspaper.
Feldstein, who was not paid by the Israeli prime minister's office while working there, was reportedly employed by Jay Footlik, an American lobbyist who works for the Qatari government.
Netanyahu against the Shin Bet
Following the many press reports on this, attorney general Gali Baharav-Miara ordered the opening of a criminal investigation at the end of last month, following a 'security check' conducted by the Shin Bet, Israel's internal security agency.
Regarding Netanyahu, Etzion said, 'If he knew about the employment of his aides by Qatar, then he is in [a] bad situation, and if he didn't, then his situation is no less serious.'
'Netanyahu has his back to the wall. He is desperate, dangerous and unrestrained'
- Eran Etzion
'For a long time, Netanyahu has been waging an all-out war against the law enforcement system. Now, law enforcement agencies are weakened,' Etzion said. 'If in the past such accusations would have led to the prime minister's resignation, today this is not the case.'
'It is difficult to estimate the extent to which the law enforcement agencies will succeed or make the effort to render Netanyahu's tenure as prime minister untenable.'
Netanyahu has categorically rejected the accusations against his advisers. A statement issued by his party, Likud, called the investigation "a new low in the political hunt to bring down a right-wing prime minister and to prevent the dismissal of the failed head of the Shin Bet".
"This is not an investigation, this is not law enforcement. This is an attempt to assassinate democracy and an attempt to replace the will of the people with the rule of the bureaucrats," the Likud statement continued.
Earlier this month, Netanyahu announced his intention to fire Shin Bet chief Ronen Bar, in what is perceived in Israel as an attempt to thwart the intelligence agency's further investigation into the affair.
The dismissal of the head of the Shin Bet was frozen by the Supreme Court pending a hearing at the beginning of next month.
Since the 'Qatargate' affair came to light, Netanyahu has been promoting messages like those of his close ally, US President Donald Trump, about how the "Deep State" is involved in running the country.
In a recent TikTok video, Netanyahu said that the "leftist" Deep State wants "me and the government to be a flower pot".
Gaza genocide: How the hell did this happen, asks Pankaj Mishra Read More »
Yesterday, Netanyahu released a video in which he said that he was "amazed, I mean, I understood that there was a political investigation here, but I didn't know to what extent. They are holding Jonathan Urich and Eli Feldstein hostage".
Netanyahu's response has drawn criticism in Israel, including from families of those held captive by Hamas, considering his use of the word "hostage" in reference to his advisers.
"Netanyahu does not have the absolute support of all the members of the coalition in this affair," Etzion told MEE. Avi Dichter, agriculture minister and former head of the Shin Bet, said the scandal is serious and needs to be investigated.
"Netanyahu has his back to the wall," Etzion said. "He is desperate, dangerous and unrestrained. His entire system of considerations is based on this."
Netanyahu will not hesitate to 'carry out military moves in order to remove the affair from the public agenda', Etzion told MEE.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Argentina's embassy to move to Jerusalem in 2026, President says
Javier Milei, who made the announcement in the Knesset, has been supportive of Israel amid the war in Gaza and votes in its favour at the UN
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
US warns countries not to join French, Saudi UN conference on Palestine: Report
The US is lobbying foreign governments not to attend a UN conference next week sponsored by France and Saudi Arabia on a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, according to a US diplomatic cable reported by Reuters. The cable, sent to countries on Tuesday, warns them against taking "anti-Israel actions" and says attending the conference would be viewed by Washington as acting against US foreign policy interests. France, a permanent member of the UN Security Council, is a US ally in Nato. Saudi Arabia is one of the US's closest Middle East partners. US President Donald Trump was feted during a May visit to Riyadh, where Saudi Arabia signed billions of dollars of investment deals with the US. France and Saudi Arabia are co-hosting the gathering between 17 and 20 June in New York. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "We are urging governments not to participate in the conference, which we view as counterproductive to ongoing, life-saving efforts to end the war in Gaza and free hostages," the cable says, according to Reuters. "The United States opposes any steps that would unilaterally recognise a conjectural Palestinian state, which adds significant legal and political obstacles to the eventual resolution of the conflict and could coerce Israel during a war, thereby supporting its enemies,' it added. France had been lobbying the UK and other European allies to recognise a Palestinian state at the conference. However, Middle East Eye reported in June that the US has warned Britain and France against recognising a Palestinian state at the conference. At the same time, Arab states have been urging them to proceed with the move, sources told MEE. In late May, United Nations member states held consultations in preparation for the conference, during which the Arab Group urged states to recognise Palestinian statehood. The Arab Group said they would measure the success of the conference by whether significant states recognise Palestine, sources in the UK Foreign Office told MEE. Since the 1950s, successive American administrations have stated that their ultimate goal in ending the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is a two-state solution. Many experts and diplomats have earmarked occupied East Jerusalem, the occupied West Bank and Gaza, which Israel seized from Egypt and Jordan in the 1967 war, as the heartland of a future Palestinian state. But US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee told Bloomberg News on Tuesday that a Palestinian state in the occupied West Bank was no longer a US policy goal. He said Israel's 'Muslim neighbours' could give up their land to create one. According to the cable, the US said that "unilaterally recognizing a Palestinian state would effectively render Oct. 7 Palestinian Independence Day'. Hamas led an attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, killing around 1,200 people. Israel responded by launching a devastating assault on Gaza that has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, mainly women and children, and reduced the enclave to rubble. The US cable also said Washington was working with Egypt and Qatar to reach a ceasefire in Gaza and free the captives there. "This conference undermines these delicate negotiations and emboldens Hamas at a time when the terrorist group has rejected proposals by the negotiators that Israel has accepted,' it said. The Trump administration pushed Israel to agree to a three-phase ceasefire with Hamas in January. Israel broke that agreement by refusing to begin talks on ending the war permanently and unilaterally resumed attacking Gaza.
Middle East Eye
4 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Could David Cameron be prosecuted for threatening the ICC?
David Cameron, the former British foreign secretary, may be liable for prosecution under international law and within the UK for his attempts to obstruct the work of the International Criminal Court (ICC), experts have said. Middle East Eye revealed on Monday that Cameron privately threatened Karim Khan, the British chief prosecutor at the ICC, in April 2024 to defund and withdraw from the ICC if it issued arrest warrants for Israeli leaders. "A threat against the ICC, direct or indirect, is an obstruction of justice," Francesca Albanese, the UN's special rapporteur on Palestine, told MEE's live show on Tuesday. "It's incredibly serious that someone in a position of power might have had the audacity to do that." And Professor Sergey Vasiliev of the Open University of the Netherlands reacted: "If the reports are confirmed, David Cameron did cross the legal line when he threatened the Prosector with all kinds of consequences for applying for the warrants. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "This is a serious matter that shows Cameron's utter lack of respect for the ICC's judicial and prosecutorial independence." What did David Cameron do? Cameron, then foreign secretary in Rishi Sunak's Conservative government, made the threat on 23 April 2024 during a heated phone call with Khan. Cameron told Khan that the UK would "defund the court and withdraw from the Rome Statute" if the ICC issued warrants for Israeli leaders. At the time, Khan and his team of lawyers were preparing arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his then-defence minister, Yoav Gallant, as well as for Hamas leaders Yahya Sinwar, Ismail Haniyeh and Mohammed Deif. Khan's office applied for warrants on 20 May, less than a month after the phone call. 'Per the reported dialogue, David Cameron clearly seeks to pressure the ICC Prosecutor's decision regarding whether to pursue warrants for Israeli officials' - Professor Tom Dannenbaum Six months later, on 21 November, the warrants were approved by a panel of judges, officially charging Netanyahu and Gallant with war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in Gaza since October 2023. MEE revealed details of the call based on information from several sources, including former staff in Khan's office familiar with the conversation and who have seen the minutes of the meeting. Cameron, a former British prime minister who was appointed foreign secretary by Sunak in November 2023, told Khan that applying for warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant would be "like dropping a hydrogen bomb". He said Khan was "on the brink of making a huge mistake" and that "the world is not ready for this". The report has drawn condemnation from British MPs who called for an investigation into Cameron's actions. Cameron has not responded to multiple requests for comment. Approached by MEE for a response to the exchange with Cameron, Khan said on Monday: "I have no comment to make at this time." What's the background to David Cameron's demands? The Conservative government was accused last year of being behind the delay in the ICC's issuance of arrest warrants against Israeli and Hamas officials, after filing a request with the pre-trial chamber to challenge the court's jurisdiction on Israeli nationals. The request prompted dozens of submissions from other states, but was later dropped by the Labour government, which came to power in July 2024. The revelations about Cameron came after the administration of US President Donald Trump said last week that it would sanction four ICC judges for investigations into the US and its ally Israel. In February, Khan was the first ICC official to be the target of US sanctions, carried out under an executive order issued shortly after Trump took office. The revelations also follow Khan's decision to take a leave of absence pending a UN-led investigation into alleged sexual misconduct, an accusation denied by his lawyers. What are the legal risks for Cameron? The ICC, established by the Rome Statute in 2002, is the only permanent international court that prosecutes individuals for war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. It has 125 signatories, including the UK and all EU countries, though Hungary has officially begun the withdrawal process. Leading international law experts have told Middle East Eye that Cameron's behaviour is an attack on judicial independence, and is prohibited under the Rome Statute and British law as an obstruction of justice. Professor Tom Dannenbaum of the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy said that, in general, the UK is entitled to withdraw from the ICC, and, upon exit, would then cease its financial contribution. Exclusive: David Cameron threatened to withdraw UK from ICC over Israel war crimes probe Read More » Additionally, as a state party to the Rome Statute, the UK can advocate budget cuts within the Assembly of States Parties, the court's governing body, without having to pull out. But, he said, the issue here arises before any such withdrawal or defunding. "The problem here is David Cameron's reported threat to condition possible UK action or inaction in those respects on the decisions of the ICC Prosecutor regarding whom to investigate and prosecute," said Dannenbaum. "That threat is deeply concerning. The rule of law depends on prosecutors' insulation from political pressure in their identification of individuals for investigation and prosecution,. That is true at the ICC just as it is in domestic systems of criminal justice." Under what law could Cameron be charged? The four experts MEE spoke to said the ICC could charge Cameron, given the nature of the phone call with Khan, based on Article 70 of the Rome Statute, which prohibits offences against the administration of justice. These include "impeding, intimidating or corruptly influencing an official of the Court for the purpose of forcing or persuading the official not to perform, or to perform improperly, his or her duties; and retaliating against an official of the Court on account of duties performed by that or another official." Dannenbaum argued that Cameron's threat to withdraw the UK from the ICC and defund the court may amount to "corruptly influencing an official of the Court for the purpose of … persuading the official not to perform, or to perform improperly, his or her duties". Although this particular provision has never been litigated before the ICC, Dannenbaum said, the relevant offence of "corruptly influencing a witness" has. "That case law indicates that 'corruptly influencing' includes 'pressuring' the protected person in a way 'capable of influencing the nature' of their contribution and thereby 'compromising' it, with the term 'corruptly' signifying the aim of 'contaminating' the person's contribution," Dannenbaum explained. "Per the reported dialogue, David Cameron clearly seeks to pressure the ICC Prosecutor's decision regarding whether to pursue warrants for Israeli officials. It is possible that this pressure would be understood to have been designed to 'contaminate' the Prosecutor's decision, although that concept may be less clear here than it is in the context of witness testimony. "Considerations regarding state withdrawal and budget cuts are plausibly 'capable' of influencing such decisions, albeit that the Prosecutor appears to have resisted the pressure in the case at hand." Given the above points, Dannenbaum concluded that Cameron's conduct may be consistent with the prohibited offences against the administration of justice listed under Article 70. The court has jurisdiction over Article 70 offences, irrespective of the nationality or location of the accused. What penalty could Cameron face? If successfully charged, Cameron is likely to face an arrest warrant by the court and, if convicted, could be sentenced to up to five years of imprisonment in The Hague or a fine. However, given the vulnerability of the ICC, with Trump's sanctions and Khan's leave of absence, Vasiliev suggested that Cameron's prosecution in The Hague would be "rather unlikely. "The ICC could in principle open the investigation into these allegations under Article 70 or request the UK to do so (or the UK could do so on its own). Whether this will in fact be done, is a big question." Could Cameron be prosecuted in the UK? Toby Cadman, a British barrister and international law expert, said that if the allegations are substantiated by clear evidence, then Cameron could be investigated at an international and domestic level "provided there's political will". Francesca Albanese: David Cameron could be criminally liable for threatening ICC Read More » In the UK, an investigation could be opened for the common law offence of obstruction or perverting the course of justice or the common law offence of misconduct in public offence, he said. An investigation in the UK can be carried out in accordance with Section 54 of the ICC Act 2001, which is based on Article 70 of the Rome Statute. The attorney general's consent would be required for any prosecution to go ahead. "It is quite clear that the allegation is serious and if the UK is committed to maintaining a system based on the rule of law with full respect for the state's international treaty obligations it should open an investigation and if the evidence supports it, bring charges," Cadman told MEE. Could Cameron be prosecuted outside the UK? But Vasiliev suggested that Cameron's prosecution before the courts of other states would be precluded by his functional immunity - the protection granted to senior officials if an alleged offence was committed during their official duties. "Cameron has a functional immunity for that act as he uttered those threats in the exercise of his official functions, and there is no exception to such immunity applicable in foreign courts for offences against the integrity of judicial system," Vasiliev argued. "The prosecution authorities of other states parties therefore will not eagerly pursue such a case."
