
New WSU report sheds light on health of Washington's news industry
May 3—For more than three decades, journalism advocates worldwide have celebrated May 3 as World Press Freedom Day.
The day marks the anniversary of the Windhoek Declaration of 1991, which promoted a free and independent press in Africa. It is meant to celebrate the importance of a free and independent press and raise awareness of the threats journalists around the world face.
"World Press Freedom Day is a great reminder about the importance of journalism and some of the issues that are facing journalists today," said Jennifer Henrichsen, an assistant professor at the Edward R. Murrow College of Communication at Washington State University. "Whether physical or digital attacks or partisan politics, we know that journalism has been in crisis for a long time, and both at the national and international level."
According to a Pew Research study published in 2021, newsroom employment in the United States has fallen by 26% since 2008. According to data compiled by the Local News Initiative at the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University, more than 3,200 newspapers have gone out of business since 2005, with more than two per week folding, on average.
While the decline of the journalism industry nationally has been well-documented, Henrichsen and a group of professors at the Murrow School recently published the most complete review of the health of journalism in Washington.
The report, "From News Deserts to Nonprofit Resilience: Assessing the Health of Washington's Local News Ecosystem," examines the decline of Washington state's news industry, and offers suggestions to policymakers about what could be done to revive it.
"This is the most comprehensive study to date of Washington and is also a benchmark for us in the state," Henrichsen said. "So our intention is to survey outlets moving forward to try to get a sense of trends."
The report surveyed news outlets and interviewed journalists and civic leaders to study the health of journalism in Washington, and found a system in decline.
"Unfortunately, the reports of local news crises across the state, anecdotal or research-based, seem to be mirroring what we found in Washington state as well," said Pawel Popiel, an assistant professor at Murrow College.
According to the findings, only 170 outlets across the state provide daily news coverage, with about half of these outlets running on an annual budget of $250,000 or less.
The report found that two counties — Skamania and Ferry — qualify as news deserts, which means they lack a consistent and credible news source for local information. Additionally, five counties only have one news outlet, while five others only have two outlets.
"So it's actually a problem facing Washington writ large, to a large extent, because the number of outlets is important for understanding the types of media diversity that exist in a particular area," Henrichsen said.
The lack of outlets providing local coverage also means there's a lack of media diversity, according to Popiel. Media diversity, he said, is essential for competitive coverage, a wider array of opinions and to ensure a built-in resilience in the system.
"This is a problem that plagues both rural and sort of sparser areas as much as urban ones," Popiel said.
Other outlets throughout the state, the study found, struggle to hire and retain staff due to declining budgets, which can be partially attributed to a decrease in ad revenue.
The lack of staff to adequately report on a coverage area means that outlets are often left to make tough decisions when deciding what to cover. For example, an outlet may have to choose whether to cover a local school board meeting or report on a car crash that is causing a delay across town.
"You have to make really hard choices when you have so few staff," Henrichsen said. "And that, of course, has implications for the type of information that gets covered and the type of information that people can obtain to go about their daily lives."
The report, which was meant to provide a snapshot of the journalism industry, examined data collected between November 2023 and December 2024, which means a recent announcement that the Cowles family plans to donate The Spokesman-Review to a recently formed Spokane-based community nonprofit organization was not discussed.
"The nonprofit model provides hope and optimism to many who care about the future of local journalism because it can provide a sustainable funding model that allows for enhanced accountability reporting," Henrichsen said.
But the model isn't a "silver bullet," she said.
"Nonprofit outlets also face challenges and closures, as evidenced by the recent shuttering of the prominent nonprofit startup, the Houston Landing, and require ongoing innovation and attention to audiences, if they are going to be sustainable and successful long-term," Henrichsen said.
The plan calls for Publisher Stacey Cowles and his family's Cowles Co. to transfer ownership of the newspaper and award a $2 million matching grant to the nonprofit, called the Comma Community Journalism Lab, which was founded by current Spokesman-Review Executive Editor Rob Curley.
While the report examined the decline in Washington's news industry, it also offered suggestions for policymakers to support it. Those include ensuring that local journalism is "viewed as a public good which is necessary for a healthy democracy," Henrichsen said.
The recommendations also include making news subscriptions and business advertising in local outlets federally tax deductible, providing outlets tax credits to hire reporters, and providing direct subsidies to news outlets.
"When you think about the threats facing local news from resource constraints to dwindling subscriptions to a sort of collapsing talent pipeline that draws journalists in to a public that may not be informed about the journalism crisis to legal and other attacks against journalists themselves and news outlets, the range of solutions has to be comprehensive to fully address what is ultimately a structural, systemic problem," Popiel said.
In recent years, federal and state lawmakers have sought to throw the journalism industry a lifeline, to varying degrees of success.
This year, the Legislature considered imposing a surcharge on large search engines and social media companies with a gross income of $5 million or more, with the tax capped at $6 million a year. The Office of Financial Management estimated the tax would raise $27 million in fiscal year 2027, and an additional $102 million between 2027 and 2031, with the funds distributed to print, digital and broadcast media outlets.
While the proposal died in committee, the report examines "how additional funding mechanisms are necessary to try to ensure that this crisis of resources can be ameliorated so that journalism can be strengthened in the state," Henrichsen said.
A program that has found more support from lawmakers is a two-year fellowship program through the Murrow College.
Under the program, journalists in the early stages of their careers are placed in newsrooms throughout the state, including The Spokesman-Review and Spokane Public Radio, to cover underreported beats, which include voting rights, housing and rural issues, among others.
In 2023, the Legislature appropriated $2.4 million for its operation, and the state budget currently under review by Gov. Bob Ferguson includes additional funds for the program, though it would receive about half of its previous funding level.
"The true measure of journalism isn't whether it pleases people in civic life, but whether it empowers them with information," said Ben Shors, chair of the Department of Journalism and Media Production. "So that's sort of the baseline that we need to understand, that a free and functioning press is not a luxury in civic life in Washington state, it's a necessity, and it requires maintenance, and it requires investment, and it has to not just for the journalists who work in those jobs, but for the citizens who live in those communities."
Editors note: This article has been updated to reflect that Pawel Popiel is an assistant professor, not an associate professor.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Amid ICE Sweeps and Travel Bans, Here's How to Support Black Immigrants in Atlanta
While non-Black Latino immigrants became the focus of many of the protests held in cities across the country in response to Immigration and Customs Enforcement actions this week, Atlanta's Black immigrant community — the fourth largest in the country — is refusing to take a back seat. Pew Research estimates around 200,000 Black immigrants, mostly from Jamaica, Haiti, and Nigeria, call metro Atlanta home. Black immigrants often find themselves simultaneously ignored and under a spotlight because of how racialized anti-immigrant political sentiment has become. Read More: Atlanta Immigration Protests Draws Hundreds Amid Tear Gas and Fireworks Black immigrants, who may be Latin, Caribbean, or African, must navigate a specific set of challenges with how both race and immigration status impact their daily lives. The Black Alliance for Just Immigration works to advocate for and empower immigrants from across the African diaspora. In addition to local chapters in Georgia, California, New York, and Arizona, BAJI's legal resources and clinics are available virtually for anyone in need. Their legal and policy staff provide regular breakdowns of President Donald Trump's latest immigration-related executive orders and host a bi-weekly asylum support webinar. Local chapters are run by BAJIs staff organizers who host events and training relevant to the community. Atlanta chapter organizers recently held a workshop at the Congolese Community of Atlanta's general assembly meeting on the public charge rule. A policy implemented by the Department of Homeland Security in 2022 that disqualifies an immigrant from obtaining a green card if it is deemed they are likely to become dependent on public benefits in the future. Capital B Atlanta spoke with Nana Gyamfi, BAJI's executive director, about the current political climate and the intersection of Black and immigrant identity. Nana Gyamfi: I think Black immigrants need to be aware that our blackness adds another very critical level to the type of profiling that we are subjected to. Even in diverse places like Atlanta, New York, or Chicago, we are still being left out of conversations on the impact of the federal immigration crackdown. What we know from the data, as well as anecdotal experiences, is that most law enforcement interactions with Black immigrants begin as racial profiling that then goes down another road when the officer hears an accent or realizes there is a language barrier. As a result, Black migrants are detained, deported and held in solitary confinement at a disproportionately higher rate. One example is the new travel ban, where eight out of 12 banned countries — and three out of the seven partially banned countries — are Black or African. That doesn't even include banned countries with large Black populations, like Cuba and Venezuela. So even though most people are focused on the Muslim element, the face of the ban is really a Black face. Immigrant folks [need to be] really clear about what their rights are and exercise those rights. Whether they are green card holders, have temporary protective status, if they're an international student, on a work visa, or even undocumented. They have basic rights that are afforded by the Constitution of the United States. It's really important that they know, for example, not to sign anything. There are situations where an immigrant is presented with a document and told, 'If you want to leave, if you want to see your kids, if you want to get back to your spouse, if you want to be able to work, then you need to sign.' Law enforcement will tell them, 'If you sign this, we'll let you go, things will be easier for you.' This happens particularly to Black immigrants who don't speak English as a first language or at all. People have unknowingly signed voluntary deportation papers, or an acknowledgement that they are someone who they aren't without knowing. It's really important that people understand the right to remain silent is not just verbal, it is also written. Make it clear that you don't want to talk and that you're not going to sign anything. Read More: Black Immigrants in Atlanta Mobilize Amid Rising Deportation Threats Ask for an attorney. Whether you have one or not, you're not entitled to one, but you are entitled to ask for one. Don't consent to any searches or produce any documents. Don't do anything that can be perceived as you going along with providing information, because you have a right not to. No, immigrants have the same rights across the board. The difference in a sanctuary city is that local law enforcement is not supposed to act as an extension of immigration enforcement. But what we are seeing now in sanctuary cities like Los Angeles is that local law enforcement may not be acting like ICE, but they are certainly playing backup to ICE and other federal agents that are engaged in immigration enforcement. In Georgia, local law enforcement is directly engaged in immigration enforcement. But the rights of immigrants haven't changed. This piece is so important for people like me, who have immigrant parents but were born here and have U.S. citizenship, which gives us the capacity to move in a more privileged way. It's really important for us to also know those rights and to help to remind folks that we see being questioned or detained. In Atlanta metro, that isn't just ICE, but also includes local law enforcement that has been contracted to work alongside them. Read More: Black Immigrants in Atlanta Face New Risks As Trump Signs Laken Riley Act Immigration Court is also public, so people can go down there and support the people who are doing what they're supposed to do and showing up for their court dates. People who are employers, [and] heads of churches, schools, and hospitals, can also do their part to protect the human rights and dignity of immigrants as they are in those spaces. It doesn't matter that this administration has declared those places are no longer protected, because the protection comes from us as a community. The post Amid ICE Sweeps and Travel Bans, Here's How to Support Black Immigrants in Atlanta appeared first on Capital B News - Atlanta.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Opinion of US has worsened in countries around world in last year, survey shows
Barely one-third of people polled across 24 countries say they have confidence in Donald Trump as a world leader, with most describing the US president as 'arrogant' and 'dangerous', and relatively few as 'honest'. The survey of more than 28,000 people by the Pew Research Center also found that opinions of the US had worsened over the past year in more than half the countries polled – including falls of 20-plus points in Mexico, Sweden, Poland and Canada. In the UK, the figure had dropped from 54% to 50%. Asked how much confidence they had in Trump to 'do the right thing in world affairs', just 34% of respondents across the two dozen countries expressed some degree of confidence in him, with 62% saying they had little or no confidence. Only in five countries did a majority say they had 'some' or 'a lot' of confidence in Trump to do the right thing: Nigeria (79%), Kenya (74%), Israel (69%), Hungary (53%) and India (52%). In the other 19, opinions of the US president, who returned to the White House in January, were negative. In Mexico, 91% said they had 'not too much' or 'no confidence at all' in Trump, followed by Sweden (85%), Germany (81%), Spain (80%) and Turkey (80%). There, and in Australia, Canada, France and the Netherlands, 'none at all' was the majority view. In the UK, 47% said they had no confidence at all and another 15% not too much. Clear majorities across all countries also expressed little or no confidence in Trump's ability to handle specific issues: US immigration, the Russia-Ukraine war, US-China relations, the global economy, the Middle East and climate change. Across all issues, confidence was again particularly low in neighbouring Mexico (14%) and Canada (26%), but also in Turkey (16%), Australia (23%) and many EU member states including France (25%), Germany (25%), Spain (22%) and Sweden (22%). The figure for the UK was 34%. Across all countries, respondents were least confident about Trump's handling of the climate crisis (21%). US immigration policies were the area where they saw him doing best – though even there, only 36% expressed confidence. In nine of the 11 Nato members polled, six in 10 or more people did not trust Trump's handling of the Russia-Ukraine war, while similar shares in Japan and South Korea (and 77% in Australia) felt the same about Trump and US-China relations. Asked which personal characteristics described Trump, the most common choice (80%) was 'arrogant'. About two-thirds picked 'dangerous' and about 40% chose 'understands complex problems', 'diplomatic' and 'well-qualified to be president'. About two-thirds across all countries also said the word 'honest' did not describe Trump. But the same proportion said he was a 'strong leader', a share that has increased in countries where he is relatively popular, and in those where he is not. The survey, carried out between 8 January and 26 April, also found strong ideological and partisan divides in views of Trump, with right-leaning voters tending to view him much more favourably than those on the left – and also more than in his first term. In Israel, 93% of people who considered themselves right-leaning expressed confidence in Trump, against 21% of those on the left. Supporters of far-right and rightwing populist parties in Europe also tended to be markedly more positive in their verdict. In Hungary, 88% of those with a favourable view of the ruling Fidesz party had confidence in Trump, against 27% among those who viewed the party negatively. In Germany, 56% of AfD supporters approved of Trump, compared with just 8% of those who opposed the far-right party. The same was true in Poland of Law & Justice voters and in the UK of Reform voters (both 62%), but confidence in Trump was far lower among PVV voters in the Netherlands (43%), National Rally voters in France (39%) and Sweden Democrats voters (31%). The survey also found that confidence in Trump was significantly higher among men than among women in 17 of the 24 countries polled, ranging from a 19-point gap in Sweden (5% for women versus 24% for men) through 17 points in the UK (28% versus 45%), 12 points in France (16% versus 28%) to eight in Spain (15% versus 23%). Overall ratings of the US had declined in 15 countries since last spring, the survey found, and were broadly unchanged in six others. Only in Israel, Nigeria and Turkey were respondents more likely to give the US a more favourable rating than last year. Across the 24 countries, 49% of respondents had a favourable overall view of the US and an identical share had an unfavourable view. About 50% median said American democracy was working well, but 46% said it was working poorly. • The study polled people in Argentina, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Israel, Italy, Japan, Kenya, Mexico, the Netherlands, Nigeria, Poland, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United Kingdom
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Southern Baptists move to end same-sex marriage in the US
Southern Baptists, whose faith includes over 12 million members in the US, have endorsed a ban to end same-sex marriage in America. The moment marks the first time the group has officially opposed the ruling in Obergefell v Hodges, the 2015 landmark Supreme Court case backing same-sex marriage. The votes on Tuesday came during the annual Southern Baptist Convention in Dallas, Texas, attended by over 10,000 church representatives. Experts say the evangelical group's values have increasingly shifted to align with the Christian right, a branch of conservatism that has gained momentum under US President Donald Trump. The Southern Baptists' resolution does not use the word "ban" directly. Instead, it calls for the "overturning of laws and court rulings, including Obergefell v. Hodges, that defy God's design for marriage and family". The resolution also calls "for laws that affirm marriage between one man and one woman". Any legal reversal of the Supreme Court's Obergefell decision would not lead automatically to a nationwide ban of same-sex marriage. Thirty-six states had already legalised same-sex marriage at the time of the ruling, and nearly 70% of Americans still support it, polls show. "What we're trying to do is keep the conversation alive," Andrew Walker, an ethicist at a Southern Baptist seminary in Kentucky who wrote the resolution, told the New York Times. Although the resolution is non-binding, it comes from a large, influential faction of President Trump's base and sends a direct message to the White House. Eighty-five percent of white evangelical Protestants are likely to be Republican voters, according to a 2024 Pew Research survey. "I think there is a confidence that (Trump) will have their backs," Kristin Du Mez, a Calvin University history professor specializing in religion and politics, told the BBC. "In some ways, it's an uphill battle," she said. "But I do think they sense that there's been this shift, that there may be a window opening, and that they think this is the right time to press this issue." She described a "transactional element" to the relationship between evangelicals and Trump, whose Supreme Court nominations helped end national abortion rights. Evangelicals also played a "very prominent" role overturning Roe v Wade, the landmark Supreme Court ruling that protected abortion for nearly 50 years before it was overturned in 2022, said Ms Du Mez. She said she believes evangelicals may be using the same blueprint to end same-sex marriage. "I know some of the leaders have pointed to Roe v Wade as a model of the need to play the long game," she said. Trump's message on same-sex marriage has been mixed over the years, telling CNN in 2015 that he supported "traditional marriage" then, in a 60 Minutes interview in 2016, saying he was "fine" with same-sex marriage. In his second term, however, he has launched a campaign against diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) with multiple directives targeting LGBTQ groups. This includes banning transgender people from serving the military, and revoking a Biden-era executive order preventing discrimination "on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation". Fear and anxiety in LGBTQ communities have grown as a result, leading some international organisations to boycott World Pride in Washington DC this year. And although public support largely remains behind same-sex marriage, the Southern Baptists' resolution has added to LGBTQ groups' sense of alarm. "This is a very visible example of how attacks on the LGBTQ+ community as a whole have intensified, even as politicians take aim at transgender people as a tactic to divide us," Laurel Powell, Human Rights Campaign communications director, said in a statement to the BBC. "We will never stop fighting to love who we love and be who we are."