Ben & Jerry's co-founder removed from RFK Jr. hearing for protesting
Ben & Jerry's co-founder Ben Cohen was removed from a Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee hearing featuring Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Wednesday for protesting.
About 15 minutes into the Wednesday hearing, protestors began to shout, and people were forced out of the room. Amid the chaos, Cohen is seen standing up in the seating area behind Kennedy and shouting, 'Congress pays for bombs.'
Shortly after, Cohen was taken away from where he was standing by a police officer but could still be heard yelling.
'I told Congress they're killing poor kids in Gaza by buying bombs, and they're paying for it by kicking poor kids off Medicaid in the US. This was the authorities' response,' Cohen said in a post on the social media platform X featuring footage of him being taken away by the officer.
Cohen has a history of political activism, previously being arrested for disorderly conduct in 2018 amid protesting the presence of F-35 fighter jets based in Vermont. He also supported Sen. Bernie Sanders's (I-Vt.) 2016 and 2020 bids for the presidency.
During the 2024 presidential campaign, Cohen and his Ben & Jerry's co-founder Jerry Greenfield unveiled the 'Kamala's Coconut Dream' ice cream flavor as part of a get-out-the-vote initiative for former Vice President Harris, referencing a popular meme at the time that came from comments the vice president had previously made.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
What My Son Taught Me About The Future Of Work
The next generation workforce in the age of AI courtsey Redd Francisco I asked my son, who is graduating from college in a few weeks, to join me on my podcast series (link here). It was a fun, and personal, conversation - but brought out a larger, broader insight: there is an entirely new generation of our future workforce coming in - and they grew up with AI. This is the graduating class of 2025. They approach generative AI tools like ChatGPT and Cursor - not just to complete assignments - but to prototype ideas, streamline workflows, and write code more efficiently. For them, these tools aren't novelties; they're extensions of how they learn and solve problems. They think differently, work differently, and expect more from the companies they're about to join. Reflecting on the conversation, it's obvious that their technology stack looks very different from ours; the applications they use reflect the evolving landscape of personal productivity, shaping how the next generation will operate in the workplace. What is also striking is their agility with AI - they don't get attached to a single tool or platform for life, instead, thrive in a dynamic environment where continuous learning and iteration are the norm - constantly trying, testing and evolving to the next. This adaptability - the willingness to experiment, learn, and adjust - is a hallmark of this generation. And while they know not to blindly trust every AI-generated response, they also aren't discouraged by the occasional 'hallucinations.' Instead, they have learned to live with them, to work around them by truly understanding their own role as a human in the loop. It's a mindset that acknowledges both the promise and the limitations of AI - a balance that will be critical for organizations navigating this shift. This new generation workforce have grown up in an era where AI isn't just a concept—it's a daily companion. They enter the workforce with an intuitive grasp of how technology can enhance productivity and creativity. Tools like large language models, low-code platforms, and automated assistants are second nature to them. Their mindset isn't 'Will AI help me do my job?' - it's 'How can we use AI to make this process better, faster, and more impactful?' This creates a fascinating contrast with many in the existing workforce - while we've been debating the potential of AI and cautiously experimenting with its applications, this new workforce expects AI to be embedded, accessible, and essential. And that's not a gap to be feared - it's an opportunity to accelerate transformation. This influx of digitally fluent, AI-native talent is a real opportunity for organizations. It's a chance to rethink not just how we work - but how we lead, manage, and empower teams. The companies that will thrive aren't the ones trying to retrofit AI into legacy processes; it will be the ones willing to embrace new workflows, delegate more decision-making to automated systems, and create space for innovation at every level. And it isn't just about technology; this is about culture. It's about fostering an environment where fresh ideas are not just heard but celebrated, where employees can challenge norms and contribute to building smarter, more agile businesses. For those of us in leadership, this is a pivotal moment - the newest members of our workforce aren't waiting for permission to use AI, they're bringing it with them. The good news is this shift gives us a chance to leap forward, to move beyond incremental improvements and embrace true transformation. It challenges us to think bigger about what our companies can achieve when we empower people with the tools and the mindset to innovate. But more importantly, it's a call to honor the human spirit behind the technology - to empower people with the tools and culture they need to thrive. So as we welcome this new generation of our youngest workforce across our corporations, let's ask ourselves: Are we ready to match their expectations? And create workspaces that don't just accommodate AI but are built for it? Because the future isn't something we're waiting for. It's already here – and walking in through our doors with the now-graduating class of digitally-fluent talent that just happened to grow up with AI.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
China says US is ‘provoking frictions' as tensions flare despite trade truce
China has accused the United States of 'provoking new economic and trade frictions' as it responded to US President Donald Trump's claims that Beijing had violated a trade truce agreed by the two nations last month, which paused their blistering tariff war. China was 'strictly implementing' the consensus of those trade talks, the Chinese Commerce Ministry said in a statement Monday, while blaming the US for taking steps that 'seriously undermine' the agreement. 'The United States has been unilaterally provoking new economic and trade frictions, exacerbating the uncertainty and instability of bilateral economic and trade relations,' the statement said. 'If the United States insists on its own way and continues to undermine China's interests, China will continue to take resolute and forceful measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests,' it added. The comments come after Trump on Friday said China had 'TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US.' In a post on Truth Social, the US president said that he made a fast deal with China to 'save them from what I thought was going to be a very bad situation.' He added: 'So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!' The back and forth spotlights a ratcheting up of tensions between the US and China just weeks after the two sides reached the surprise trade truce in Geneva, which significantly dialed down the hefty tariffs that each imposed on the other in April. That agreement gave the two sides a 90-day window to hash out a broader deal, an effort that now appears imperiled as each side accuses the other of working against the spirit of that agreement. US officials have described talks as 'stalled' and suggested that the involvement of Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping is needed to jumpstart progress. A key point of contention has been Beijing's export controls on rare earth minerals and associated products, which were imposed as part of its retaliation against Trump's 'reciprocal' tariffs on Chinese goods. Following the talks, US officials had expected China to ease export restrictions of those minerals, which are an essential part of everything from iPhones and electric vehicles to big-ticket weapons like F-35 fighter jets and missile systems. But the restrictions haven't been lifted, causing intense displeasure inside the Trump administration and prompting a recent series of measures imposed on China, three administration officials told CNN last week. Meanwhile, Beijing accused the US last month of 'undermining' the consensus reached in Geneva, after Washington warned companies against using AI chips made by its national tech champion Huawei. In a further escalation of tensions, the US then last week also moved to limit critical technology sales to China and restrict the number of Chinese students studying in the US –spotlighting how the scope of their competition is much broader than just trade. In the Monday statement, China's Commerce Ministry hit out at these measures, saying the US has 'successively introduced a number of discriminatory restrictive measures against China after the Geneva Economic and Trade Talks, including issuing AI chip export control guidelines, stopping the sale of chip design software to China, and announcing the revocation of Chinese student visas.' Beijing, as well as other Asian capitals, is also feeling the pressure of trade frictions at home. China's manufacturing activity shrank for a second month in May, an official survey showed on Saturday. Tariffs imposed this year on Chinese goods entering the US, its largest export market, currently stand at 30%, not including any pre-existing duties. Trump administration officials have homed in on China's controls on exports of rare earths in their assessments of China's compliance with the agreement reached in Geneva. The deal saw the two sides dial back during the 90-day grace period mutual tariffs that had soared to well over 100%. It also included an agreement from China to 'suspend or remove' non-tariff countermeasures taken against the US since April 2. China on April 4 imposed export controls on seven rare earth minerals and associated products in what was seen as a retaliation against Trump's duties on its goods. Its export control regime does not ban exports outright but requires government approval for each shipment regardless of destination, enabling greater control over a supply chain that China has come to dominate globally. That system appeared to remain in place last month following the talks, CNN reporting showed. During an interview that aired Sunday with CBS' Face the Nation, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said China was 'withholding some of the products that they agreed to release' in Geneva, referring to critical minerals. 'Maybe it's a glitch in the Chinese system, maybe it's intentional,' he added, noting that the issue would be 'ironed out' when Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping have a call, which Bessent said he believes will happen 'very soon.' The two leaders are known to have last spoken on January 17, days before Trump's inauguration. China has defended its export control regime, describing it last week as 'in line with international practices' and 'not targeted at specific countries.' When asked about its export controls on rare earth minerals, part of a wider category of critical minerals, during a regular press briefing Friday, a spokesperson for China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said Beijing was 'willing to strengthen dialogue and cooperation in the field of export controls with relevant countries and regions.'
News24
an hour ago
- News24
ANC may discipline Limpopo members who take disputes to court
Be among those who shape the future with knowledge. Uncover exclusive stories that captivate your mind and heart with our FREE 14-day subscription trial. Dive into a world of inspiration, learning, and empowerment. You can only trial once. Start your FREE trial now
