logo
Trump departs G7 early as Israel-Iran conflict shows signs of intensifying

Trump departs G7 early as Israel-Iran conflict shows signs of intensifying

World leaders had gathered in Canada with the specific goal of helping to defuse a series of global pressure points, only to be disrupted by a showdown over Iran's nuclear programme that could escalate in dangerous and uncontrollable ways.
Israel launched an aerial bombardment campaign against Iran four days ago.
At the summit, Mr Trump warned that Tehran needs to curb its nuclear programme before it is 'too late'.
He said Iranian leaders would 'like to talk' but they had already had 60 days to reach an agreement on their nuclear ambitions and failed to do so before the Israeli aerial assault began.
'They have to make a deal,' he said.
Asked what it would take for the US to get involved in the conflict militarily, Mr Trump said on Monday morning: 'I don't want to talk about that.'
But by Monday afternoon, Mr Trump warned ominously on social media, 'Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!'
Shortly after that, Mr Trump decided to leave the summit and skip a series of Tuesday meetings that would address the ongoing war in Ukraine and global trade issues.
As Mr Trump posed for a picture on Monday evening with the other G7 leaders, he said simply: 'I have to be back, very important.'
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, the host, said: 'I am very grateful for the president's presence and I fully understand.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

World Business Report  US-China trade tensions may benefit South East Asia
World Business Report  US-China trade tensions may benefit South East Asia

BBC News

time31 minutes ago

  • BBC News

World Business Report US-China trade tensions may benefit South East Asia

The countdown continues to trade deals with Washington. Ahead of President Trump's threatened tariff hikes next month, we're hearing from South East Asia, and looking at complaints that Chinese firms may be dumping goods, undermining regional economies. Also in the show, the disruption to aviation from the Iran-Israel conflict. And why Chinese officials are being ordered to drink less? You can contact us on WhatsApp or send us a voicenote: +44 330 678 3033.

Companies ask Supreme Court to quickly hear Trump tariffs challenge
Companies ask Supreme Court to quickly hear Trump tariffs challenge

NBC News

time33 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Companies ask Supreme Court to quickly hear Trump tariffs challenge

WASHINGTON — Two educational toy companies on Tuesday asked the Supreme Court to quickly take up their challenge to tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump. The companies, Learning Resources and hand2mind, filed a joint appeal arguing that Trump had no power to impose the tariffs on goods from China under a law called the International Economic Powers Act. They asked the court to leapfrog over a federal appeals court, which has yet to rule on the case, and agree to take the dispute up this month so it can schedule oral arguments this fall, possibly as early as September. A federal judge in Washington had ruled the tariffs were unlawful, but that ruling is on hold. In a separate case, the Court of International Trade ruled against the administration over the president's tariffs authority. That decision is also blocked for now, meaning all the tariffs remain in effect while litigation continues. "Even as these punishing tariffs cause American businesses and consumers to bleed billions of dollars each month, there will be no relief any time soon," the toy companies' lawyers said in court papers. The issue is one of national consequence that the Supreme Court has to decide, they added, noting that it concerns whether the president can "unilaterally reshape the national economy and global trade policy."

Starmer hits back at Badenoch over grooming scandal, claiming Tories did nothing
Starmer hits back at Badenoch over grooming scandal, claiming Tories did nothing

The Independent

time44 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Starmer hits back at Badenoch over grooming scandal, claiming Tories did nothing

The Prime Minister has suggested Kemi Badenoch did nothing about grooming gangs when the Tories were in power, as a political war of words erupted after a major report in the scandal was published. Sir Keir Starmer asked 'why on earth' Mrs Badenoch did not bring forward a mandatory duty for authorities to report child sexual exploitation when she was a minister. 'Why didn't you do it? Why didn't you say one word about it?' he added in a message to the Opposition leader, as he spoke to reporters at the G7 summit in Canada. Sir Keir's rebuttal came after the Tory leader called a Westminster press conference, where she said was 'not doing politics now', but criticised people who sought to 'tone police those who are pointing out when something has gone wrong'. As he spoke to reporters at the summit in the Canadian Rockies, the PM also contrasted his time working as England and Wales' chief prosecutor, and his initial years as an MP when he called for mandatory reporting, with Mrs Badenoch's time in Government. 'Kemi Badenoch, I think, if I remember rightly, was the minister for children and for women, and I think the record will show that she didn't raise the question of grooming once when she was in power, not once, not one word from the dispatch box on any of this,' the Prime Minister told reporters. ' Chris Philp (the shadow home secretary), I think, went to 300-plus meetings when he was in his position in the Home Office and at not one of those meetings did he raise the question of grooming. 'So, I know there's some discussion of this 'far-right bandwagon'. I was actually calling out politicians, nobody else, politicians who in power had said and done nothing, who are now making the claims that they make.' Asked if Mrs Badenoch was now weaponising the issue, he said there used to be a time with more cross-party consensus and that the focus should be on individual victims. 'I mean, the question for Kemi Badenoch is, why on earth didn't you, you were in power, you had all the tools at your disposal. 'I was calling even then for mandatory reporting. Why didn't you do it? Why didn't you say one word about it?' Speaking at a press conference alongside grooming gang survivors and campaigners, the Conservative leader earlier said: 'I do think that we should take the politics out of it. But who was it that said when we raised this issue that we were pandering to the far right? That's what brought the politics into it.' Her comments follow an interview in which Baroness Louise Casey told the BBC she was 'disappointed' by the Opposition's response to her review of the grooming gangs scandal. She said: 'We need to change some laws, we need to do a national criminal investigation, we need to get on with a national inquiry with local footprint in it and ideally wouldn't it be great if everybody came behind that and backed you?' She added: 'I felt the Opposition could have just been a bit, you know, yes we will all come together behind you. 'Maybe there's still time to do that. I think it's just so important that they do.' Mrs Badenoch said her party did back a national inquiry into the scandal, and had been calling for one 'for six months'. Shadow home secretary Mr Philp said the Conservatives wanted the inquiry to take two years, focus on 'all 50 towns affected' and 'look at the role of ethnicity in the cover-up'. But appearing in front of the Commons Home Affairs Committee on Tuesday morning, Baroness Casey urged people to 'keep calm' on the subject of ethnicity. Baroness Casey's report, published on Monday, found the ethnicity of perpetrators had been 'shied away from', with data not recorded for two-thirds of offenders. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper told MPs that officials had dodged the issue of ethnicity among groups of sex offenders for fear of being called racist, and called for 'much more robust national data'. Baroness Casey also told the Home Affairs Committee that a national inquiry should be done within three years, rather than the two called for by the Conservatives. She believed three years would be 'achievable' to carry out the national and local inquiries. The crossbench peer also urged for local areas to 'think carefully' about not being open to scrutiny and to change. On the five local inquiries announced in January, she said 'only Oldham bit the bullet', adding: 'My understanding is nobody else volunteered for that. So that tells you something, doesn't it? It tells you something, and it doesn't tell you something I certainly would want to hear if I was a victim.' Safeguarding minister Jess Phillips also told the Home Affairs Committee on Tuesday 'I don't want to hang about' over implementing Baroness Casey's 12 recommendations and that a figure is being worked up on how much it will cost to carry out the changes. She also said a national inquiry will not delay reforms from being introduced. 'I will not wait and, and I have to say the department hasn't waited for findings of an inquiry to be getting on with the work that needs doing,' she said. 'Whether that's…the task force that leads on this, whether that's other interventions that we fund in the policing space, or the support space, that those things all go on.' A Downing Street spokesman said the format and chairperson of the inquiry would be set out at a later date, adding that it would have the power to compel people to give evidence. He added that the Government had accepted all of Baroness Casey's recommendations, including making it mandatory for the police to collect data on the ethnicity of suspects.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store