logo
Kennedy's vaccine panel votes to remove preservative long targeted by activists

Kennedy's vaccine panel votes to remove preservative long targeted by activists

Politico5 hours ago

ATLANTA — A panel of vaccine advisers selected by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. voted Thursday to recommend that no one get a flu vaccine that contains thimerosal — a preservative that has long been a target of the anti-vaccine movement and Kennedy himself.
Five members voted to recommend that no children, pregnant women, or adult get any flu vaccine with thimerosal. If the CDC adopts the recommendation, it will mark one of the first major changes in federal vaccine guidance and access as Kennedy embarks on his goal of remaking immunization policy in his image.
'The risk from influenza is so much greater than the non-existent, as far as we know, risk from thimerosal,' said Dr. Cody Meissner, the only panel member who voted no. 'I would hate for a person not to receive the influenza vaccine because the only available preparation is with thimerosal.'
The CDC director usually needs to endorse the recommendations before they are official. But Kennedy will likely be the one to endorse these recommendations because there is currently no CDC director or acting director.
The decision came after a presentation from Lyn Redwood, a former president of the Kennedy-founded anti-vaccine group Children's Health Defense, who identified herself as a 'private citizen.' The Washington Post reported Wednesday that Kennedy had hired Redwood to work in the CDC's vaccine safety office.
The HHS directory lists Redwood as an 'expert' in the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health. Department spokespeople and Redwood didn't respond to requests for comment on Redwood's role.
Redwood's presentation largely argued that thimerosal, a preservative that has been used in vaccines since the 1930s, should be removed from the products because of safety concerns.
The CDC website says that there is 'no evidence of harm caused by the low doses of thimerosal in vaccines, except for minor reactions like redness and swelling at the injection site.'
A CDC background document for members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, posted by the agency on Tuesday and later removed from its website, also diverges from Redwood's conclusion, arguing there is overwhelming evidence that thimerosal-containing vaccines do not cause neurological problems. ACIP member Dr. Robert Malone said the document was removed because 'it was not authorized by the office of the secretary.'
Redwood's presentation argued there is evidence that thimerosal can cause serious complications, especially for pregnant women.
'The fact that thimerosal from vaccines has been documented to raise blood mercury levels over known thresholds where developmental effects have been documented to occur during the first few months of life, means that particular 'windows of vulnerability' may have been breached,' Redwood said.
Thimerosal continues to be used as a preservative in multi-dose vaccine vials to inhibit germ growth, but the vast majority of FDA-licensed flu vaccines are already thimerosal-free — 96 percent of all flu vaccines in the U.S. last season didn't contain the preservative, according to the CDC document removed from the website. It was largely removed from childhood vaccines in 2001, and several pediatric products — including the measles, mumps and rubella and varicella shots — never included the ingredient.
In 1999, the FDA and CDC announced plans to work with manufacturers to reduce or remove thimerosal from vaccines as a precautionary measure. But the move was a precautionary measure, and further research has identified no link between the ingredient and neurological defects.
Several ACIP members agreed with Redwood, including committee Chair Martin Kulldorff, who argued that while the level of thimerosal in vaccines may be safe, it could contribute to high cumulative mercury exposure.
But Meissner, a pediatrics professor at Dartmouth College's medical school, pushed back strongly against Redwood's assertion.
'I'm not quite sure how to respond to this presentation,' Meissner said. He went on to note that thimerosal is metabolized into ethylmercury and thiosalicylate, not methylmercury, which is found in fish and shellfish and is highly toxic to humans.
'Ethylmercury is excreted much more quickly from the body, and is not associated with the high neurotoxicity that methylmercury has,' Meissner noted.
'Of all the issues that I think ACIP needs to focus on, this is not a big issue,' he added.
Many public health experts on the call also pushed back.
Jason Goldman of the American College of Physicians asked whether the committee would get an 'actual CDC presentation done by staff, scientists, physicians and those who are subject matter experts with accurate, peer-reviewed scientific data or the ability for the committee to review [the data]' or if they would just hear 'layperson presentations.'
Separately, the panel also recommended the updated influenza vaccine for the upcoming fall and winter season. Six members voted to approve, while Vicky Pebsworth, a public health scientist and nurse who's served on the board of an anti-vaccine group, abstained.
Members of the press were not allowed to leave the press area, largely preventing them from speaking with the members of the committee. Kulldorff declined to answer questions following the meeting.
'This committee strongly supports the use of vaccines and other counter measures predicated on evidence-based medicine, including rigorous evaluation and expansive credible scientific data for both safety and efficacy,' the committee said in a statement after the meeting concluded. 'All stakeholders, including healthcare providers, parents, children, schools, nursing homes, insurance providers, public health agencies, manufacturers and the rare few who may be harmed by recommended interventions need to have understandable, digestible, scientifically correct information.'
The CDC's vaccine advisory committee may consider at its next meeting a proposal to advise against giving a combination shot against measles and chickenpox to children under 4, Kulldorff said Thursday after delivering a presentation on the product.
Under the current childhood immunization schedule, the CDC recommends that children receive two doses of the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine and the varicella vaccine — the first between 12 and 15 months and the second between 4 and 6 years of age. An MMR-chickenpox combination vaccine, known as MMRV, may be used, but the agency advises that the first dose be administered as two separate shots.
ACIP updated its recommendation in 2009 to recommend separate MMR and varicella vaccinations for younger children due to an increased risk of febrile seizures in children under 2 who received the combination shot compared with those who got the two distinct vaccines. Fever-induced seizures are common in young children — the CDC estimates the risk at 5 percent — but don't cause permanent harm.
'A proposed recommendation — we're not going to vote on that this time, but possibly at the next meeting — could be that, as there exists a safer, equally effective alternative, the MMRV vaccine should not be administered to children under the age of 47 months,' Kulldorff said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Pharoah's Curse Once Killed Archaeologists. Now It Could Help Fight Cancer.
The Pharoah's Curse Once Killed Archaeologists. Now It Could Help Fight Cancer.

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The Pharoah's Curse Once Killed Archaeologists. Now It Could Help Fight Cancer.

"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." The toxic fungus Aspergillus flavus—known as the 'Pharaoh's Curse' due to its role in the deaths of archaeologists who opened the Tomb of Tutankhamun in the 1920s—could have cancer-fighting abilities. A new study developed ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides (RiPPs), which produced novel structures of interlocking rings called 'asperigimycins.' When combined with a lipid, these asperigimycins disrupted cell division in leukemia cancer cells, and were as effective as FDA-approved therapies that have treated the disease for decades. Fungi hold a prominent place in the history of medicine. Discovered in 1928, the world's first antibiotic—penicillin–was derived from a simple mold, and since then, fungi have made their way into the ingredient lists of all kinds of immunosuppressants and cholesterol-lowering drugs. Some fungi with psychoactive properties are even being introduced in states across the U.S. as therapeutic tools. However, not all fungi are medicinally helpful, and one of the more cursed members of the kingdom Fungi is Aspergillus flavus. A true microbial villain, this toxic fungus can produce aflatoxins, which can cause a variety of health issues and even death. The fungus garnered the cryptic nickname 'Pharaoh's Curse' due to it being linked to the deaths of several archeologists who opened ancient tombs around the world, including the famous discovery of the Tomb of Tutankhamun in the 1920s. However, a new study published in the journal Nature Chemical Biology analyzes a wholly different aspect of this fungal villain—it's cancer-fighting properties. The group of scientists led by researchers at the University of Pennsylvania (Penn) modified A. flavus and found molecules that formed a unique structure of interlocking rings, which they named 'asperigimycins.' When mixed with human leukemia cancer cells, these molecules—described as a class of ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides, or RiPPs—were effective at knocking them out of commission. When the researchers added lipids (fatty molecules) to the mixture, the 'Pharaoh's Curse' transformed into a microbial blessing that worked as effectively as the FDA-approved drugs that've treated leukemia for decades. 'Fungi gave us penicillin,' Sherry Gao, senior author of the paper from Penn, said in a press statement. 'These results show that many more medicines derived from natural products remain to be found.' To better understand the properties of these RiPPs, the scientists selectively turned genes in the leukemia cells on and off. In doing so, they found that the SLC46A3 gene was crucial for the asperigimycins to enter the cancerous cells in enough numbers to be effective. The added lipid impacts how that gene transported chemicals into the cells, increasing their potency. However, the research team confirmed that these RiPPs were only useful against leukemia cells, and appeared to have no impact on breast, liver, or lung cancer cells. So, its usefulness is specific. Once in the cells, the asperigimycins prevent cell division, which is the process by which cancer spreads. 'Cancer cells divide uncontrollably,' Gao said in a press statement. 'These compounds block the formation of microtubules, which are essential for cell division." The hope is to soon move testing of these compounds into animal models, and then continue onward to human trials in an effort to develop a new method of treating deadly cancers. 'Nature has given us this incredible pharmacy,' Gao said in a press statement. 'It's up to us to uncover its secrets. As engineers, we're excited to keep exploring, learning from nature and using that knowledge to design better solutions.' What once was a pharaoh's curse might one day turn out to be an oncologist's blessing. You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?

Charting a Path Through Common Mood Disorders: Medication and Evaluation Insights
Charting a Path Through Common Mood Disorders: Medication and Evaluation Insights

Time Business News

timean hour ago

  • Time Business News

Charting a Path Through Common Mood Disorders: Medication and Evaluation Insights

Mental health challenges like depression, anxiety, ADHD, and bipolar disorder are more common than many realize. Understanding the importance of proper evaluation and treatment is key for individuals and parents seeking real solutions. As Gimel Health's precision psychiatry practice in New Jersey demonstrates, combining thorough diagnosis with personalized medication strategies leads to the most meaningful progress. An accurate Depression Evaluation goes far beyond ticking off a checklist. Effective assessments explore: Symptom severity and patterns over time Possible Resistant Depression Co‑existing conditions like anxiety or ADHD At Gimel Health, providers trained in molecular and cellular biology evaluate less‑obvious contributors to depression, such as inflammation or sleep disorders, as part of a holistic clinical review. Such depth avoids 'one‑size‑fits‑all' approaches and helps guide the choice of New Depression Medication or augmentative strategies. First‑line options like SSRIs or SNRIs can be highly effective. But for Resistant Depression, options expand to include augmentation (e.g., bupropion) or novel agents like esketamine. The key lies in careful monitoring and tailoring based on biological markers and patient response—exactly the kind of approach offered at Gimel Health. Recent FDA approvals, Esketamine (nasal spray) and Brexanolone, provide hope for those unresponsive to standard medications. These represent a shift toward faster onset and targeted mechanisms, reinforcing how precision medicine can redefine treatment for resistant cases. Treating Bipolar Depression Medication calls for mood stabilizers (e.g., lithium, lamotrigine) or atypical antipsychotics. Untreated, these phases can spiral into severe depression or mania. Personalized protocols—such as those at Gimel Health—balance efficacy with tolerability and track both mood and cognitive outcomes. Treatment for Mania centers on mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics. Providers should adjust dosing to prevent cycle shifts, like rapid cycling or mixed states. Regular evaluation of side effects and mental acuity is vital, ensuring stabilization without cognitive bluntness. ADHD Medications for Adults often include stimulant medications and non‑stimulants (e.g., atomoxetine), paired with behavioral support. Adult ADHD Treatment must be individualized and carefully managed—especially when other mood disorders are present. Gimel Health addresses ADHD within broader mental health contexts, benefiting from providers trained in dual diagnosis. ADHD and Bipolar disorder frequently co-occur—requiring nuanced diagnosis to differentiate attention issues from hypomania. Treatment protocols typically begin with mood stabilization before cautiously introducing ADHD medication. Resistant Depression Management: Some people don't respond to SSRIs or SNRIs. Integrating newer options and precise dosing based on biomarkers is essential. Complex Presentations: When ADHD and Bipolar overlap—or when anxiety and mood disorders coexist—misdiagnosis is common unless providers apply a structured, multidimensional evaluation. Avoiding Unintended Consequences: Introducing stimulants during mania can backfire. A phased, monitored approach is safest. Navigating mental health challenges like ADHD, bipolar disorder, and depression requires more than just symptom management, it demands insight, compassion, and a treatment plan tailored to each unique individual. Whether you're seeking clarity through a Depression Evaluation, exploring options for Medication for Anxiety and Depression, or looking into Adult ADHD Treatment, finding the right support is crucial. At facilities like Gimel Health, patients benefit from a precision-based approach that integrates cutting-edge science with deeply personalized care. From managing Resistant Depression to balancing co-occurring conditions like ADHD and Bipolar, their providers focus on uncovering the root causes and crafting treatment strategies that evolve with your needs. Mental health struggles can feel overwhelming, but they don't have to be a life sentence. With the right support system, accurate diagnosis, and thoughtful care. Whether that involves Bipolar Depression Medication, ADHD Medications for Adults, or Treatment for Mania, transformation is possible. The first step is understanding that progress isn't linear, and healing is deeply personal. What works for one person may not work for another—and that's exactly why precision psychiatry exists. By choosing a provider who sees you as more than your symptoms, you're choosing a future defined not by limitation, but by potential. So if you or someone you love is struggling, know this: real, sustainable change is possible—and it starts with the decision to pursue something better. TIME BUSINESS NEWS

Anti-vaccine activist presents data to RFK Jr.'s reshaped CDC advisory panel
Anti-vaccine activist presents data to RFK Jr.'s reshaped CDC advisory panel

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Anti-vaccine activist presents data to RFK Jr.'s reshaped CDC advisory panel

A longtime anti-vaccine activist gave a presentation at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's vaccine advisory committee meeting Thursday on an issue that has long been considered settled science. It was perhaps the clearest sign of how meetings of the panel, called the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, have already changed drastically under Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who recently fired all 17 members of the panel and replaced them with a group of his own appointees. The presenter, nurse practitioner Lyn Redwood, is the president emerita of Children's Health Defense, the anti-vaccine group founded by Kennedy. Her presentation focused on thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative that had previously been used in some vaccines. Since 2001, however, nearly all vaccines made in the United States contain no thimerosal or only trace amounts. The exception is the multi-dose flu shot vials, though most flu shots now come in single-dose packaging that doesn't contain the preservative. Anti-vaccine activists have long claimed that thimerosal is linked to autism, but the link has been widely debunked. Redwood referenced 'neurodevelopmental disorders' rather than autism in her presentation, but after the presentation asserted links between thimerosal and brain inflammation, which she called 'one of the hallmarks that we see in autism.' A background briefing document that was available on the CDC's website Tuesday said that a summary of studies found 'no association between prenatal exposure to thimerosal-containing vaccinations and autism spectrum disorder in children.' The document was taken down Wednesday without explanation. ACIP member Dr. Robert Malone said Thursday during the meeting that, based on his understanding, 'that article was not authorized by the Office of the Secretary and has been removed.' Dr. David Higgins, a pediatrician and preventive medicine specialist at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, decried the document's removal. 'Decades of evidence were ignored or even hidden,' said Higgins, who wasn't a part of the meeting. 'That's not being transparent. That's not scientific integrity.' Following the presentation, the committee voted 5-1 to recommend that children, adults and pregnant women get single-dose thimerosal-free flu vaccines. One member, Vicky Pebsworth, abstained. Before ACIP recommendations are implemented, the CDC director must sign off on them. However, there is currently no director in place as the nominee for the position, Susan Monarez, awaits confirmation by the Senate. In the absence of a director, Kennedy has the authority to adopt the ACIP's recommendations. ACIP recommendations do not mean the multi-dose vials are banned; for that to happen the Food and Drug Administration would need to revoke approval. Thimerosal-free flu shots account for the majority of the doses given in the U.S. Just 4%-5% of flu vaccines used during the 2024-2025 season were multi-dose, thimerosal-containing vaccines, Tracey Beth Høeg, a special advisor to the FDA commissioner, said during the meeting. Dr. Cody Meissner, a pediatrician, was the lone dissenting vote. 'The risk from influenza is so much greater than the nonexistent, as far as we know, risk from thimerosal,' Meissner said of his vote. 'I would hate for a person not to receive the influenza vaccine because the only available preparation contains thimerosal. I find that very hard to justify.' Meissner had initially followed up Redwood's presentation by saying he wasn't sure how to respond to it. 'This is an old issue that has been addressed in the past,' he said. Multiple infectious disease experts said on a Thursday press call following the ACIP meeting that multi-dose vaccines can be useful for vaccinating large groups such as workers. The decision not to recommend thimerosal-containing vaccines could also dissuade other countries — where multi-dose vials are more common — from using them, thereby reducing vaccine access, they added. Dr. Sean O'Leary, the American Academy of Pediatrics' liaison to ACIP, called Redwood's presentation 'unprecedented.' 'That was a highly-biased presentation full of cherry-picked data and junk science,' O'Leary said. 'The vast majority of it wasn't actually relevant to thimerosal in vaccines.' O'Leary told reporters in a call on Thursday that the AAP chose not to participate in the meeting, which it usually does. 'This meeting showcased an ACIP that has drifted so far from its long-standing focus on science, evidence and public health. When that focus returns, we will, too,' he said. Higgins, the Colorado pediatrician who was not part of the meeting, said, 'it's outrageous that a decision as consequential as this would be decided based on a single presentation from someone who arguably is not an expert in the field.' Redwood's presentation also triggered a slew of responses from representatives of major medical organizations participating in the meeting, who questioned the veracity of the data presented and asked to see credible scientific evidence. 'Will there be an actual CDC presentation done by staff scientists, physicians and those who are subject matter experts with accurate, peer-reviewed scientific data,' Dr. Jason Goldman, American College of Physicians' liaison to ACIP, asked the committee, 'or will we have lay person presentations only?' Committee Chair Martin Kulldorff, a biostatistician who has criticized pandemic lockdowns and Covid vaccines, scolded those representatives for their pushback. 'I think it's inappropriate to dismiss a presentation just because the person does not have a Ph.D., or an MD,' he said. 'There are a lot of knowledgeable people who we would like to hear from, and we want to hear from a variety of viewpoints. And I think today's discussion is a very good example that we have received input from a variety of people on this topic.' In a separate vote, the committee reaffirmed the existing recommendation that people ages 6 months and older should get annual flu shots, with six votes in favor. Pebsworth again chose to abstain. Earlier Thursday, the committee voted on whether to recommend an RSV drug for infants younger than 8 months. Five members voted in favor and two voted against, providing the majority vote needed for the recommendation to pass. The drug up for a vote Thursday, clesrovimab, is a monoclonal antibody injection that can prevent lower respiratory disease in infants during or before their first RSV season, which typically starts in the fall and peaks in the winter. RSV leads to up to 300 deaths a year among those younger than 5 in the U.S. A dramatic spike in severe RSV overwhelmed children's hospitals in late 2022. Clesrovimab was approved by the Food and Drug Administration earlier this month. A similar drug, nirsevimab, has also been approved for infants and some young children since 2023. A vaccine for pregnant women that also protects newborns is approved as well. Meissner, who was part of the committee's work group on RSV, fielded questions from fellow members about the trial data and the disease itself. He explained how newborns' tiny airways put them at higher risk for severe illness. That risk, he said, falls in their second year of life, when the airways are larger. The work group determined that the drug was effective at preventing severe RSV in young infants and had a favorable safety profile. 'These are truly remarkable products. They are safe and they're effective,' Meissner said. 'The FDA has spent an enormous amount of time looking at safety and efficacy.' Despite this, two members of the group, Retsef Levi and Vicky Pebsworth, questioned the drug's safety and voted not to recommend it. This article was originally published on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store