logo
The Good, The Tough And The Tricky – What You Need To Know About UPSC CSE Prelims 2025

The Good, The Tough And The Tricky – What You Need To Know About UPSC CSE Prelims 2025

India.com27-05-2025

New Delhi: The UPSC CSE Prelims 2025 is over. Those who appeared in the examination were of the view it was not a cakewalk at all. They are still reeling from the mental gymnastics which took place on exam day. So, were this year's papers brutal or was it just another routine UPSC brain teaser?
Let's dissect the nuances of the paper. Here are eight takeaways to help you recalibrate, regroup and even smile through the madness.
1. A Bit of a Treat (or Was It?)
Let's begin with the paper of Art & Culture and History. The section, for once, appeared like a friendly embrace from UPSC. There were 16 questions, including a good chunk on Modern Indian History. The questions gave the impression that the Commission was in a generous mood this year.
But wait. You might be thinking that it was all smooth sailing. No, it was not so. The UPSC tossed in a curveball and asked a question with regard to fruits and their Portuguese origins. The aspirants said it was not exactly in the textbook. The absence of any question on Buddhism surprised many. The commission might have saved it next year. Simple and almost celebratory queries related to the 'Dancing Girl' of the Indus Valley were refreshing for many.
Experts are of that it was the easiest section, but 'easy' may not serve a respite. It has perhaps raised the competition.
2. Familiar Faces in Tricky Disguises
Polity this year was apparently simple but practically complex While the section revolved around Centre-State relations, the Constitution, the Presidency, etc, statement-based questions were the real devil in disguise.
Though the commission asked about governors, Parliament and the President, yet did not appear in the mood for basic answers. Tricky statements were tossed, leaving the aspirants second-guessing themselves. The candidates said the routine question format – 'how many of the above statements are correct?' – made the section more time-consuming than expected.
3. More Than Just Theory
Those who were anticipating that they would sail through the Economy section based on their theoretical knowledge only were perhaps wrong. The UPSC, this year, added a bit of arithmetic to the usual economic theory. So, knowing the fiscal deficit was not sufficient, the aspirants had to calculate it too. A little dash of numbers caught many off guard, particularly since economic concepts tend to confuse even the best of us.
From green economy (lithium and strategic minerals) to RBI regulations, stocks and agricultural tax exemptions, the commission sought to test candidates' knowledge on everything. So, understanding how the world works was more important this year than learning formulas.
4. Buzzwords, Basics and Mind Games
The Science and Technology section was also designed almost in the same way that can be summed up as 'all you need to know, but do you really understand?' The section had 17 questions that covered everything from UAVs to Majorana 1, Electric Vehicles and deep learning. The section did not only focused on current affairs, it also dug deep into fundamental concepts.
The questions were not straightforward. Even if one knew the material, the way it was phrased was designed to him/her second-guess everything.
5. Smooth But Short
The section on International Relations, this year, was the odd one out. Only five covered everything such as the BIMSTEC, the NATO and the BRICS. UPSC candidates are expected to be well-versed in these topics.
The only curveball was a question about the EU's Nature Restoration Law, a difficult topic for those who do not track climate diplomacy.
6. The Fun Corner
Known for throwing surprise, the UPSC asked about Kho Kho and Chess. But for those who were keeping a close eye on current affairs, these section would not have tough. The question on AI summits and the Gandhi Peace Prize also should not surprise anyone.
The takeaway – never ignore 'miscellaneous' section during revision. Some of the most unexpected points came from topics that are often overlooked.
7. UPSC's Favorite Power Combo
The questions in the Geography and Environment/Ecology section this year were a mix of current affairs and static. The focus appeared to be on environmental issues of global importance and geography.
Those who had meticulously gone through current affairs and NCERTs will probably breeze through this. There were questions based on maps apparently to test grasp on world geography. The environment-related questions were equally substantial and made the section a must-master zone.
8. The Qualifying Gauntlet
For years, the CSAT has been the paper that everyone loves to hate. This year too, it lived up to its reputation. Though it is meant to be a qualifying paper, yet it felt like a strategic elimination round. It was not at all 10th-grade math. It was so tough and tricky that it made many stuck.
So, in short, was the paper as a whole tough? The answer is – when the last time anyone called a UPSC Prelims paper 'easy'. It always gives surprises and causes stress. This year's paper too was a full-on storm.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Indian diaspora to benefit as Canada proposes expansion of citizenship by descent
Indian diaspora to benefit as Canada proposes expansion of citizenship by descent

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Indian diaspora to benefit as Canada proposes expansion of citizenship by descent

In a significant move expected to benefit the Indian diaspora and other immigrant communities, the Canadian government has introduced a new bill to remove the existing limit on citizenship by descent. The legislation, titled Bill C-3, was presented in Parliament on Thursday by Immigration Minister Lena Metlege Diab, as per a report by Lubna Kably in the Times of India. The current rule, introduced in 2009, restricts Canadian citizenship by descent to only the first generation born outside Canada. This means that a Canadian citizen who was themselves born outside Canada could not pass on their citizenship to a child born abroad. Similarly, they could not apply for direct citizenship for a child adopted overseas. The proposed bill aims to change this. According to Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada ( IRCC ), 'As a result of the first-generation limit to citizenship by descent for individuals born abroad, most Canadian citizens who are citizens by descent cannot pass on citizenship to their child born or adopted outside Canada. The current first-generation limit to citizenship no longer reflects how Canadian families live today—here at home and around the world—and the values that define our country.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Infertile Man Visits Orphanage And Hears, 'Hi Daddy.' Then He Realizes His Late Wife's Cruel Lies Crowdy Fan Undo As per Lubna's report in TOI, the issue has drawn legal scrutiny in recent years. In January 2024, a Canadian court ruled the first-generation limit unconstitutional. The government chose not to appeal the ruling. Although similar legislation was proposed in March 2024 by then-Immigration Minister Marc Miller, it did not pass, prompting its reintroduction this week. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) If passed, Bill C-3 would automatically grant citizenship to individuals who would have been eligible if not for the earlier restrictions. It also proposes a new system under which Canadian parents born abroad can pass on citizenship to their foreign-born children—provided the parent has lived in Canada for at least 1,095 days (or three years) before the child's birth or adoption. Live Events You Might Also Like: Canada's new bill to grant citizenship to thousands of people Ken Nickel-Lane, managing director of an immigration services firm, said to The Times of India, 'While Bill C-3 certainly addresses and rectifies a fault, or faults in the current Citizenship Act which certainly is warranted and just, it may face challenges given current public opinion towards immigration.' He added that the bill might put pressure on immigration quotas, potentially affecting temporary foreign workers critical to infrastructure and housing development. The IRCC has confirmed that, 'If the bill passes both Houses of Parliament and receives Royal Assent, we will work as quickly as possible to bring the changes into effect.' For many Indian-origin Canadians with children or adopted children born outside Canada, the bill—if passed—will mark a major shift in access to citizenship and legal status. You Might Also Like: Canada's first Express Entry draw under new Immigration Minister invites 277 applications

"Germans showed greatest sympathy, agreed military response was needed": MJ Akbar on Operation Sindoor
"Germans showed greatest sympathy, agreed military response was needed": MJ Akbar on Operation Sindoor

India Gazette

time2 hours ago

  • India Gazette

"Germans showed greatest sympathy, agreed military response was needed": MJ Akbar on Operation Sindoor

Berlin [Germany], June 7 (ANI): Former Former Union Minister MJ Akbar, who is part of the all-party delegation led by BJP MP Ravi Shankar Prasad, said on Friday that Germany has shown strong sympathy and understanding for the pain India suffered in the recent Pahalgam terror attack, and agreed that a military response was necessary. Akbar is currently in Berlin as part of India's diplomatic outreach to explain the country's zero-tolerance policy on terrorism. The delegation met with German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock and several members of the German Parliament (Bundestag) during their visit. Speaking to ANI, Akbar said, 'The Germans so far have shown the greatest amount of sympathy, but equally important, the understanding of the tragedy and the anguish the Indian people have faced. ' He added that during his meeting with the German Foreign Minister, he recalled a quote from Otto von Bismarck, the first Chancellor of Germany, to explain India's military response to the terror attack. 'In the meeting with the German Foreign Affairs Minister, I said I am reminded of a quote of Bismarck -- 'A conquering army at the border will not be stopped by eloquence'. The Germans understood immediately and agreed that an important military response was needed. With the parliamentary delegation before that, I asked them, 'What would you have done?' and they nodded, that yes, we would have responded,' Akbar said. He further said that the current crisis caused by terrorism is also a chance for India and Germany to build a stronger strategic partnership. 'In my view, a crisis can also be an opportunity. This is an opportunity for India and Germany to strengthen their strategic relationship, because it can only be built on a shared understanding of the nature of the enemy,' he added. Earlier on Friday, the delegation held a series of meetings with Bundestag members and representatives from major German think tanks. The discussions focused on counterterrorism, regional stability, and global cooperation. One of the notable voices in the dialogue was Jurgen Hardt, a member of the German Parliament and the spokesperson for foreign policy of the CDU/CSU parliamentary group. He acknowledged regional threats from Pakistan and stressed the importance of peaceful conflict resolution. 'We see the terror threat coming from Pakistan, and we have asked the Pakistani government to eliminate terror groups in their country. We hope for a peaceful solution. We encourage the Indian government to do it diplomatically. Hopefully, the conflict between India and Pakistan can be calmed,' Hardt said. He condemned the Pahalgam terror attack and expressed hope that India would also find peaceful ways to handle such situations, while understanding the reasoning behind Operation Sindoor. With high-level participation across parties and institutions, the visit reinforced the shared values and mutual trust that underpin the India-Germany relationship. From counterterrorism and nuclear restraint to economic engagement and geopolitical dialogue, both sides signalled a clear commitment to a rules-based global order and a collaborative future. (ANI)

Today in Politics: All eyes on INDIA bloc as it looks to fill gap with NCP(SP) over special session demand
Today in Politics: All eyes on INDIA bloc as it looks to fill gap with NCP(SP) over special session demand

Indian Express

time5 hours ago

  • Indian Express

Today in Politics: All eyes on INDIA bloc as it looks to fill gap with NCP(SP) over special session demand

Cracks seem to be appearing between one main constituent of the Opposition INDIA bloc and the others over the demand for a special session of Parliament to discuss Operation Sindoor. Interesting to see would be how the Opposition alliance mends the differences. On Friday, NCP(SP) Baramati MP Supriya Sule, who was a apart of one of the all-party delegations who went abroad to put forward India's stand in the aftermath of Operation Sindoor, told The Indian Express that the Congress had approached her to join the bandwagon in demanding a special session of Parliament over the issue but she had refused saying that it was a time to be united and not play 'petty politics'. 'While I was abroad as a part of the delegation, the Congress contacted me. I said I cannot join them as I am away and told them to wait till all the delegations return. I told them, let's have a meeting and decide after I return, but it happened before I returned. That is why I could not sign the letter to the Prime Minister,' Sule told The Indian Express. Sule's remarks come close on the heels of 16 Opposition parties writing to Prime Minister Narendra Modi demanding a special session, saying 'there are serious questions facing the nation about the terror attack, killing of civilians in Poonch, Uri and Rajouri, the ceasefire announcements, and the implications on our national security and foreign policy'. The NCP(SP) was not a signatory. They also come amid the rising 'closeness' between NCP patriarch Sharad Pawar and his estranged nephew and NCP chief Ajit Pawar. In the recent past, the two leaders have been seen sharing the stage at multiple events. Earlier, the senior Pawar, who has served as the Union Defence Minister, had categorically said that his party would not demand a special session of Parliament over Operation Sindoor as 'some things were not meant to be discussed in public'. On the other hand, Sule said the country comes first and India must send a message to the world that we are united against any terror attack. 'Pawar sahab had made it very clear. We were expecting that when the July session comes, hopefully everything will be settled by then, then we can definitely debate it. Because in a vibrant democracy, every issue must be debated, but there has to be a right time for it.' Sule said her party would 'definitely ask' the government questions during the Monsoon session. 'Of course, I think India will ask questions, not just the NCP (SP). India will ask questions. India wants to know a lot of answers. It is not just about the NCP (SP), India wants to know.' UK foreign secretary to visit India Aiming to further strengthen UK-India ties, UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy will be on a two-day India visit starting Friday. During his visit, he is scheduled to hold talks with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and External Affairs Minister. He will also hold talks with Union Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal. – With PTI inputs

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store