logo
Fill up High Court judges' vacancies expeditiously, SC tells govt

Fill up High Court judges' vacancies expeditiously, SC tells govt

The Hindu09-05-2025

The Supreme Court on Thursday (May 8, 2025) urged the Centre to clear recommendations made by the top court Collegium for High Court judges' appointments while noting that vacancies are affecting justice administration across the country.
'The Central government needs to act and ensure that the recommendations made by the Supreme Court Collegium for judge appointments are cleared expeditiously,' Justice A.S. Oka, who is also a Collegium member, said in an order.
The Bench, also comprising Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, was hearing a suo motu case highlighting the need to ease the process of bail, especially for undertrials. The court was concerned with the fact that there were over seven lakh criminal appeals pending in the High Courts.
A recent data published by the Supreme Court showed that 29 recommendations made by the Supreme Court Collegium to State High Courts since November 9, 2022 were pending with the government.
Explained | The clogged state of the Indian judiciary
Citing shortfall
The Bench took the case of the Allahabad High Court, which had only 79 working judges when the sanctioned strength was 160. There were over two lakh criminal appeals pending in the High Court.
In Bombay High Court, only 66 judges out of a total 94 were functioning. Delhi has only 41 judges while the Calcutta High Court has 44 when the sanctioned strengths were 60 and 72, respectively.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bangladesh anti-Sheikh Hasina student protester Newton Das found to be Bengal voter
Bangladesh anti-Sheikh Hasina student protester Newton Das found to be Bengal voter

Scroll.in

time38 minutes ago

  • Scroll.in

Bangladesh anti-Sheikh Hasina student protester Newton Das found to be Bengal voter

A man allegedly linked to the 2024 students' protests in Bangladesh was found to be a voter in West Bengal's Kakdwip Assembly constituency, The Hindu reported on Sunday. Several images of the man, identified as Newton Das, participating in the agitation in the neighbouring country were widely shared on social media. Das has claimed that he was an Indian citizen but acknowledged that he had actively participated in the protests in Bangladesh, The Hindu reported. 'I went to Bangladesh in 2024 for issues related to an ancestral property and got caught in the revolution,' The Hindu quoted Newton Das as saying in a video. 'I have been a voter in Kakdwip since 2014 but lost my voter card in 2017.' Newton Das said that he had received a fresh voter card in 2018 with the help of Trinamool Congress MLA Manturam Pakhira. He also claimed that he had voted for Pakhira, who represents Kakdwip, in the 2016 Assembly polls, The Hindu reported. The constituency is in South 24 Parganas district. 'This is a conspiracy against me by a particular community,' India Today quoted Newton Das as saying in the video. He did not specify whether he was currently in India or Bangladesh. His cousin Tapan Das, who resides in Kakdwip, claimed that Newton Das was born in Bangladesh and had exercised voting rights in both countries, The Hindu reported. Tapan Das claimed that his cousin had gone to Bangladesh after the Covid-19 pandemic to sell land and had not returned. 'Since he was born in Bangladesh, he is a voter of Bangladesh too,' The Hindu quoted Tapan Das as saying. 'It is his fault that he is registered as a voter in both the countries.' Kakdwip is close to the Sundarbans and India's border with Bangladesh. Political row The incident sparked a political row in the state. The Bharatiya Janata Party's West Bengal unit on Sunday criticised West Bengal's ruling Trinamool Congress claiming that a ' Bangladeshi protester ' was voting in both countries. 'Let that sink in,' the Hindutva party said on social media. 'This isn't an accident. This is the TMC blueprint – flood Bengal's voter rolls with illegal infiltrators and secure elections with ghost votes.' West Bengal 'isn't just lawless – it's compromised from within', the BJP claimed. BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari claimed that lakhs of Bangladesh citizens were registered as voters in the state, The Hindu reported. The Opposition leader claimed that an alleged member of Bangladeshi militant group Ansarullah Bangla was also enlisted as a voter in Murshidabad. West Bengal BJP chief Sukanta Majumdar on Saturday described the incident as an example of the 'so-called Egiye [progressive] Bangla Model'. 'The same Newton who was seen wielding a stick during Bangladesh's quota reform movement is now a registered voter in Kakdwip,' the BJP leader said on social media. 'Thousands of Bangladeshi 'Newtons' voting in Bengal – courtesy of [Chief Minister] Mamata Banerjee's infiltration theory and appeasement politics,' he alleged. 'With illegal voters and these lathi-wielders miscreants as her support base, she's not running West Bengal… she's scripting a blueprint for Greater Bangladesh.' The Trinamool Congress rejected the BJP's allegations and said that the responsibility for border security was with the Border Security Force, India Today reported. The Border Security Force reports to the Union home ministry. 'Whether these people come from land, water or air, the BSF and Union government are responsible,' The Hindu quoted Trinamool leader Kunal Ghosh as saying. 'The state administration will do its role for sure.' The state's ruling party also claimed that the Election Commission was complicit in voter list tampering. In February, Banerjee had accused the BJP of allegedly attempting to add residents of Gujarat, Rajasthan, Punjab and Haryana to West Bengal's voter lists. The chief minister had also accused the BJP of adding fake voters to electoral lists to win the Assembly elections in Delhi and Maharashtra. In 2024, weeks of widespread student-led protests in Bangladesh against Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and her Awami League government had led to her resignation and her fleeing to India on August 5. In August, weeks of student-led protests in Bangladesh against a controversial quota scheme for government jobs snowballed into a broader agitation against the Sheikh Hasina government.

SC refuses immediate hearing as Tamil Nadu accuses Centre of withholding over Rs 2,150 crore in school funds
SC refuses immediate hearing as Tamil Nadu accuses Centre of withholding over Rs 2,150 crore in school funds

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

SC refuses immediate hearing as Tamil Nadu accuses Centre of withholding over Rs 2,150 crore in school funds

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has declined an urgent hearing request from the Tamil Nadu government regarding their plea against the central government. The state claims that Rs 2,151 crore in central education funds under the Samagra Shiksha Scheme for 2024-2025 is being withheld by the Centre. The state government sought immediate intervention from the Supreme Court in this matter on Monday. The dispute centers around the allocation and disbursement of funds meant for education initiatives in Tamil Nadu under the federal education scheme. A bench comprising Justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Manmohan took note of the fact that the state government filed the petition in May alleging withholding of central funds for 2024 and this year also. "There is no urgency and it can be taken up after the 'partial working days' (the new name of summer vacation)," the bench said. In May, the Tamil Nadu government moved the top court against the Centre for allegedly withholding the funds. The DMK government's plea, filed against the Union Ministry of Education, invokes Article 131 of the Constitution which provides exclusive jurisdiction to the top court to hear pleas between the Centre and one or more states, or between one or more states. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo The state government alleged the Centre attempted to force the implementation of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 and the associated PM SHRI Schools Scheme which it strongly objected to, particularly the contentious three-language formula. The top court, therefore, was urged to declare that the NEP and the PM SHRI Schools Scheme are not binding on the plaintiff state unless and until a formal agreement is entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant for their implementation within Tamil Nadu . The lawsuit has also sought a declaration that the action of the Centre to link Tamil Nadu's entitlement to receive funds under the Samagra Shiksha Scheme to the implementation of the NEP, 2020, and the PM SHRI Schools Scheme within the state are unconstitutional, illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable . It has also urged the top court to declare the Centre's letters of February 23, 2024 and March 07, 2024 as illegal, null, void ab initio and not binding on the state government. The plea sought a direction to the Centre to pay "Rs 2,291,30,24,769 (two thousand two hundred and ninety-one crore thirty lakhs twenty-four thousand seven hundred and sixty-nine) within a time frame to be fixed by this court" along with a future interest of 6 per cent per annum on the "principal sum of Rs 2,151,59,61,000 (two thousand one hundred and fifty-one crore fifty nine lakh and sixty one thousand) from May 1, 2025 until realisation of the decree". The dispute stems from the non-release of central funds under the Scheme, a flagship centrally sponsored programme for school education aimed at universalising quality education. The Project Approval Board (PAB) of the Ministry of Education had approved a total outlay of Rs 3,585.99 crore for Tamil Nadu for FY 2024 25, of which the Union Government's committed 60 per cent share amounted to Rs 2,151.59 crore. The plea said despite this approval, no instalments have been disbursed by the Centre as yet. The Centre, it said, unilaterally linked the release of these funds to Tamil Nadu's full implementation of NEP 2020 and the signing of an MoU for the PM SHRI Schools Scheme, conditions which were neither part of the original Samagra Shiksha Scheme nor agreed upon by the state. The reason for such non-disbursement is that the defendant has linked the release of Samagra Shiksha Scheme funds with the implementation of national education policy and NEP exemplary PM SHRI Schools' Scheme despite the fact that these policy/scheme are separate schemes, it said. Referring to the impact of non-release of Samagra Shiksha funds, the plea said paying salaries was crucial in maintaining competent and motivated teachers and supporting staff. It directly impacts the quality of education provided to students and contributes to overall societal development by nurturing the next generation with the skills and knowledge needed for success, it added. PTI Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.

Taiwan wants to buy India's D4 anti-drone system? Taiwanese official calls reports ‘unconfirmed'
Taiwan wants to buy India's D4 anti-drone system? Taiwanese official calls reports ‘unconfirmed'

First Post

timean hour ago

  • First Post

Taiwan wants to buy India's D4 anti-drone system? Taiwanese official calls reports ‘unconfirmed'

In a statement to Firstpost, Taipei Economic and Cultural Center has clarified that the island nation has not released any official statement confirming its interest in India's D4 anti-drone system read more Last week, several media outlets reported that Taiwan has shown interest in purchasing India's state-of-the-art D4 anti-drone system, developed by the Defence Research and Developed Organisation (DRDO) and manufactured by Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL). The reports suggested that Taiwan's interest in the D4 system grew following its success in the Operation Sindoor where it jammed and neutralised Pakistani drones, including Turkish-supplied Bayraktar TB2 drones. Clarification from Taiwan However, the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center (TECC) in India has now clarified that the country's Ministry of National Defense has not released any official statement corroborating the same. The TECC in a statement to Firstpost stated that the Taiwanese government has not released any statement confirming any such interest. 'While these news reports have circulated, there has been no official corroboration from Taipei. Officials in Taiwan have not publicly commented on any potential defense acquisitions from India, including the D4 anti-drone system,' said Col. Huang Ming Chieh of TECC. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The statement also added that details regarding D4 anti-drone system's operational deployment and specific successes were not confirmed by the government of India and were only reported by media outlets. 'Details regarding its operational deployment and specific successes, including those attributed to 'Operation Sindoor,' are based on media reporting and have not been officially detailed by the Indian government,' it added. While the TECC didn't reject the reports in Indian media, it also refused to confirm them. 'Therefore, based on the current information available from official Taiwanese channels, the reports of an impending purchase of the Indian D4 anti-drone system by Taiwan remain unconfirmed. The TECC's statement underscores the lack of any official communication or planning regarding such a defense procurement,' said Huang in the statement. Significance of India-Taiwan defence ties A successful agreement with Taiwan could foster enhanced defence collaboration, possibly involving joint development of cutting-edge counter-drone systems. Moreover, amid China's assertive actions in the Indo-Pacific, India's strategic engagement with Taiwan could act as a vital counterbalance, transforming the region's security landscape.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store