Why childcare providers will be forced to limit funded places and increase prices
Financial pressures will force childcare providers across England to limit the number of Government-funded places on offer to parents and increase prices, Early Years Alliance (EYA) has warned.
The charity said early years settings face a 'perfect storm of challenges' citing national insurance and minimum wage rises as key factors that 'many will not be able to survive'.
A survey of 1,155 senior staff in nurseries, preschools and childminders in England paints a stark picture of the sector's struggles.
It found 59 per cent of providers are likely to either reduce the number of funded places they offer for three and four-year-olds or they could opt out of offering funded places for this age group entirely.
More than nine in 10 (94 per cent) said their setting is likely to increase fees for non-Government funded hours over the next year, while more than three in four (77 per cent) said they are likely to introduce or increase charges for optional extras – such as nappies, meals and trips.
Nearly three in 10 (28 per cent) said they are likely to permanently close the entire setting over the next year, the poll suggested.
The findings come as the Government's expansion of funded childcare for working parents is being rolled out in England.
Working parents of children older than nine months are now able to access 15 hours of funded childcare, before the full rollout of 30 hours a week to all eligible families in September.
Among the survey respondents currently offering funded places for two-year-olds, 18 per cent said they are likely to reduce the number of funded places they offer, while a further 5 per cent said they could opt out of the scheme entirely.
The EYA survey – carried out online between March 4 and 11 – found that only around a third (36 per cent) of providers currently offering funded two-year-old places for working families are planning to extend all these places from 15 hours to 30 hours a week from September.
Of the settings currently offering funded under-twos places, only 41 per cent are planning to increase all 15-hour places to 30-hour places, according to the poll.
National insurance rises, minimum wage increases and updated rules on additional charges were the main reasons cited by senior staff in settings for considering reducing or opting out of funded places.
Last month, the Department for Education (DfE) updated its statutory guidance for local authorities in England to protect parents from paying additional charges on top of the Government's funded childcare offer.
It said parents should not face 'mandatory' charges for extras as a condition of accessing a funded childcare place and a local authority 'should intervene' if a childcare provider does this.
Councils should ensure settings are aware they can charge parents for extras, but these charges 'must be voluntary' for families, it added.
One provider who took part in the survey said: 'Currently, we are struggling to stay afloat.
'The funding we receive from our local authority isn't enough and with the parents only taking their eligible hours and not being able to charge extras, it's looking likely we may close.'
Another said: 'We cannot run at a loss year on year. The increases this year in staffing costs (NI and living wage) plus the increases in energy, rent, food and resources mean the setting is no longer sustainable unless we reduce funded places and increase our fees.'
The EYA is calling on the Government to increase investment into the early years to ensure providers are able to meet rising cost pressures while keeping parent fees as low as possible.
It has said early years providers should be exempt from the national insurance changes, or they should be compensated in full for the increases.
Neil Leitch, chief executive of the EYA, said: 'These survey findings should set alarm bells ringing across Government.
'At a time when ministers are looking to significantly expand the early entitlement scheme, we have a huge proportion of providers warning that the exact opposite is likely, with many forced to limit funded places or opt out of the offers entirely due to unsustainable financial pressures.
'While we of course recognise the need to ensure clarity and transparency for parents when it comes to additional charges for entitlement places, the fact is that this updated guidance has been implemented against a backdrop of severe and sustained underfunding, which the Government has yet to address, or even acknowledge.
'Add to this the impact of upcoming increases in both national insurance contributions and the national minimum and living wage, and you have a perfect storm of challenges for early years providers - one that many will not be able to survive.
'It is one thing to recognise the importance of the early years, but it is quite another to deliver the financial and practical support that settings need – and make no mistake, our sector needs it now.
'We therefore urge the Government to work with the sector and ensure that the early years gets the investment it needs to deliver on the promise made to parents – before we reach the point of no return.'
Neil O'Brien, shadow education minister, said: ' Rachel Reeves 's jobs tax is set to raise costs for providers significantly, costs that are inevitably going to be passed onto parents with higher fees as the sector sees little-to-no government support to compensate for the consequences of their decisions.
'At the end of the day, parents will be forced out of the workforce by these costs, hurting our economy even more.
'Once again, it is ideology over national interest with this Labour government.'
Department for Education spokesperson said: 'Giving every child the best start in life is central to our mission to break the unfair link between background and success, and through our Plan for Change, we'll get thousands more children school-ready by age five.
'That's why, despite having to take tough decisions to fix the foundations of the economy, we are raising spending on the early years entitlements to over £8 billion next year and we have announced the largest ever uplift to the early years pupil premium, increasing the rate by over 45 per cent compared to 2024-25.
'On top of this, we have recently announced details of a targeted £75 million grant to support the increase to 30 government-funded hours from September, alongside our strengthened guidance to make sure that parents do not face unfair charges to access a place.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
Japan says emergency rice imports, other options considered to stabilise prices
TOKYO, June 6 (Reuters) - Japan said on Friday that "all options" were being considered to stabilise rice prices, including the use of up to 100,000 metric tons of tariff-free staple rice the government imports a year, and further emergency imports beyond that quota. The doubling of rice prices since last year has become a major concern for consumers as well as policymakers ahead of key elections in Tokyo and nationwide in June and July. The government has so far earmarked about 600,000 metric tons of rice for release from its emergency stockpile in an effort to lower prices. Koizumi has said he was ready to release the entire stock - or another 300,000 tons - as needed, but it remains to be seen how much that would help prices fall. "If you look at other products, (emergency imports) are something that we naturally turn to. When bird flu causes a shortage of eggs, for example, we've imported from Brazil," Japan's Agriculture Minister Shinjiro Koizumi told a press conference. "Maybe rice has always been seen as sacred ground but we have to drop that thinking and consider all options to achieve stable prices." Japan has a limit of 100,000 metric tons a year of tariff-free "minimum access" staple rice imports, as agreed with the World Trade Organisation. As homegrown rice prices have soared, demand for cheaper, foreign-made rice has surged, even for imports outside this tariff-free quota. Rice prices in Japanese supermarkets averaged 4,260 yen ($29.62) per 5 kg (11 pounds) in the week to May 25, about double the level from a year earlier. Shortly after taking over as agriculture minister last month, Koizumi ended the slow and cumbersome distribution method of stockpiled rice to cooperatives and wholesalers via auction. The emergency rice is now being sold directly to retailers, which are generally selling it for about 2,000 yen per 5 kg. How much average rice prices come down across the market and what further policies, if any, are taken will remain in focus as Japan approaches crucial elections. ($1 = 143.8100 yen)
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
‘Vast Majority' of new homes will have solar panels, says Miliband
Builders could be required to install solar panels on the 'vast majority' of new homes in England, according to Energy Secretary Ed Miliband. It comes a month after Downing Street confirmed the panels should be installed on as many new properties as possible amid speculation that ministers will make them a mandatory requirement on new builds by 2027. Speaking to the BBC, Mr Miliband described the proposed policy as 'just common sense' and said the panels should be 'almost universal' on English homes. Changes to regulations will be laid out in the Future Homes Standard, due to be published later this year. The previous Conservative Government considered a proposal that would have mandated rooftop solar panels to cover 40% of a building's ground area or equivalent. 'The problem about the previous system was that it said you would had to have a certain percentage of coverage of solar panels, but if you couldn't achieve that percentage, you didn't have to do anything at all,' Mr Miliband said. 'Under our plans, we are not going to say that. We are going to say even if you can't hit 40% you will still have to have some solar panels, except in rare, exceptional cases.' He added that the number of homes fitted with solar panels needed to be 'much higher'. The policy is estimated to add between £3,000 and £4,000 to the cost of construction, but to then save owners more than £1,000 on their annual energy bills, according to the Times, which first reported the change. Asked in May whether housebuilders would be legally required to fit the panels, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's official spokesman said: 'Of course we want to see solar panels on as many new homes as possible. 'The Future Homes Standard, which will be published in the coming months, will include measures to drive this, we're working on the detail of that and will provide an update on that in due course. 'But it's good news for householders who want lower energy bills.' Under the Government's new proposals, 80% of new builds would reportedly be required to have solar panels covering 40% of their ground area, while 19% would have slightly fewer because of exemptions, including roof pitch and overshading. Ministers last year rejected a private members' Bill aiming to force housebuilders to install solar panels on the roof of every new home, saying the proposals would potentially slow down construction and add to building manifesto included a pledge to build 1.5 million new homes over the course of the Parliament.
Pembrokeshire Herald
5 hours ago
- Pembrokeshire Herald
Sex offender built patio illegally on ancient priory ruins
David Chadwick calls for rail powers to be devolved to Wales after confirmation East-West Rail brings no funding uplift WELSH Liberal Democrat MP David Chadwick has criticised the UK Government after it confirmed that Wales will receive no additional funding from the £6.6 billion East-West Rail scheme, which runs entirely between Oxford and Cambridge in England. Mr Chadwick uncovered the detail through a written parliamentary question answered by the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport, Simon Lightwood. The project has been classified as an 'England and Wales' scheme, despite not including any infrastructure in Wales — a classification that prevents Wales from receiving a proportional share of funding through the Barnett formula. Not happy over rail funding: Liberal Democrat, David Chadwick MP The issue mirrors the controversy over HS2, which was also designated as benefiting both England and Wales, even though the line does not extend into Welsh territory. Independent estimates suggest Wales could have received over £360 million in consequential funding from East-West Rail if it had been classified as 'England only.' Broader estimates indicate that similar misclassifications over the past decade may have cost Wales more than £4 billion in potential funding. In the House of Commons, Mr Chadwick described the decision as 'shocking,' and renewed calls for the devolution of full rail infrastructure powers to the Senedd. He argued that only through devolution can Wales prevent future misallocations and ensure investment in local lines such as the Heart of Wales Line. Speaking after the exchange, Mr Chadwick said: 'It is simply indefensible that Wales continues to be frozen out of hundreds of millions in rail funding for projects that do not lay a single centimetre of track in our country. We saw this with HS2, with Northern Powerhouse Rail, and now again with East-West Rail. Time after time, Wales is left behind.' He added: 'Wales must be able to invest properly in its own rail network. That includes delivering serious improvements to the Heart of Wales Line, which has been neglected for decades. This line is a lifeline for rural communities, supporting jobs, education and tourism, and it deserves the same level of ambition and investment as rail services elsewhere in the UK.' While critics point to a pattern of funding disparities, the UK Government maintains that major rail projects often bring broader economic benefits across the UK, including Wales — for example, through supply chains or job creation. However, Welsh politicians and transport experts have repeatedly argued that these indirect benefits do not match the level of direct investment seen in other parts of the union. The Welsh Government has long advocated for the devolution of rail infrastructure powers, which are currently reserved to Westminster. It has argued that devolution would enable more targeted investment in Wales's underfunded network — a view backed by a growing number of transport economists. Mr Chadwick and the Welsh Liberal Democrats continue to campaign for East-West Rail to be reclassified as an 'England only' scheme and for a fair funding settlement that reflects actual geographic delivery. They are also pressing for urgent investment in rural rail services, particularly the Heart of Wales Line, which connects Swansea to Shrewsbury via mid Wales.
