Fellow Missourians: Are you getting what you voted for?
(Ianm35/iStock Images).
The governor and the Missouri legislature have been in session for over six weeks, and many of their policy proposals and priorities are beginning to take center stage.
Now is the time to become engaged and remain vigilant.
Are their priorities the same as yours? Are you pleased with their actions so far?
If not, make your sentiments known, especially to those you voted for.
There are multiple ways to do that, from making a telephone call, writing a letter, sending an email or scheduling a personal visit. You can also elicit others who share your views or concerns — friends, family, neighbors, political action groups, news publications, etc. — to join you in getting your elected officials' attention.
While it is early in the legislative session, there are many issues, actions and proposals commanding lots of attention and effort.
Many are primarily politically motivated or driven by special interests versus what is in the best interests of the citizens of Missouri. They also can be deemed as a diversionary tactic when you consider some of the other major challenges and issues we face as a state.
Take the focus on DEI programs, for example.
While the Trump administration is determined to remove every DEI program in departments and agencies that receive federal dollars, the governor through an executive order and the Missouri House through a bill seeking to ban all DEI programs in state agencies.
The actions are being taken under the guise that the elimination of DEI programs will ensure equal access and opportunity for all Missourians. The governor said in a press release: 'Our state agencies must operate under a framework that ensures fairness, equal opportunity, and merit-based decision-making.'
'This order reaffirms Missouri's commitment to a constitutional, color-blind approach that serves all citizens fairly.'
Has Missouri or this nation ever been color-blind and operated under a framework that ensures fairness, equal opportunity for all its citizens based on merit?
Hardly.
Did DEI programs significantly reduce or eliminate discriminatory practices against Blacks?
Certainly not.
Just look around in your workplace, your school, your neighborhood, in the broader landscape and many other areas of American life. What do you see? What has been your experience?
More importantly, what measures will the governor and legislature enact to ensure that constitutional, color-blind practices are actually being adhered to in governmental agencies that are supported by Black taxpayers' dollars?
What recourse is available to Black Missourians when the governmental agencies, whose services they pay for and rely on, are comfortable marginalizing and discriminating against them?
Did you vote for the governor and your representative because one of their first priorities was to eliminate DEI programs? Did they even campaign that it would be?
What about their other legislative priorities that are emerging in addition to getting rid of DEI programs?
Criminalizing certain drag shows that could be witnessed by children, and providing tax credits for parents who choose to home school or send their children to private schools — are these issue areas that stand to harm or benefit most Missourians?
Wouldn't it make more sense to focus on ensuring the support of the many foster children who may be at risk for sexual abuse and other harmful conditions? What legislative initiatives are being pursued to improve student performance and achievement in public schools, and to blunt the impact should the Trump administration eliminate the Department of Education?
What about major legislative actions and bills that could impact a large segment of Missourians, such as farmers.
Agriculture is the number one industry in the state. Yet farmers stand to be harmed by a bill being proposed to increase taxes if they participate in solar or wind energy production. In a time when alternate forms of energy are in demand to fight climate change, why penalize farmers who are trying to provide it.
Is it for political reasons? Is it to fall in line with a national agenda which is designed to abandon any climate change efforts to use clean energy and to increase the use of fossil fuels instead?
What about the potentially devastating impact on Missouri soybean farmers that could result because of the swift decimation and disembowelment of the USAID department by the Trump administration's DOGE initiative? Soybeans are the No. 1 crop in Missouri, covering over five million acres every year.
The potentially negative economic impact of proposed and threatened tariffs on many of the produce and cattle farmers across the state is unknown, but no doubt looms heavily in terms of not only maintaining their livelihood, but advancing it.
What are the legislators you voted for going to do about it? In Jefferson City or Washington?
What is being done to address or mitigate the potential harm other DOGE random, erratic, irrational dissolution, or funding cuts for programs will have on many Missourians?
While the Trump administration claims that they will not cut Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare, there is a proposal circulating in Congress to cut the federal contribution to the states' expanded Medicaid programs. Millions of recipients will be negatively affected.
There is also growing concern that the Congressional proposed budget will include massive cuts to Medicaidthat will harm children, people with disabilities, rural Americans, and seniors.
What are the legislators whom you voted for doing about it?
Are you contacting them to find out?
There are so many issues and actions being thrown at us on a daily basis. While alarming and daunting, now is not the time to tune out or ignore what is going on in our state or in Washington.
You voted for your representatives for one or more reasons. Are their actions meeting your needs and expectations?
If they are not, we only have ourselves to blame.
In the future, what will we do about it?

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
8 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
ABC News Drops Correspondent Terry Moran Over Anti-Trump Post
By Updated on Save Walt Disney Co. 's ABC News division said it parted ways with Washington-based correspondent Terry Moran over comments he made on social media over the weekend about President Donald Trump and White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller. Moran had been suspended after calling both Trump and Miller, a key player in the administration's immigration policy, a ' world class hater.' An immigration crackdown in Los Angeles has sparked protests in America's second-largest city, prompting the administration to send in federal troops.


New York Post
10 minutes ago
- New York Post
Newsom goes scorched earth against Trump in address accusing prez of ‘brazen abuse of power'
California Gov. Gavin Newsom ripped into President Trump Tuesday for a 'brazen abuse of power' by deploying troops to Los Angeles and claimed his political rival is intentionally causing ongoing chaos in the city. The Democratic governor heightened his feud with Trump during a Tuesday night address while pleading with protesters to remain peaceful as the city grapples with outright lawlessness and Mayor Karen Bass imposed a curfew in the downtown area to clamp down on rioting and looting. Anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement demonstrations began last Friday in response to federal raids against illegal migrants in the West Coast city and quickly spiraled out of control – leading Trump to deploy 4,000 National Guard troops, and then 700 United States Marines over Newsom's objections. 3 Newsom issued a rebuke of Trump on Tuesday night. AP 'This brazen abuse of power by a sitting president inflamed a combustible situation, putting our people, our officers, and even our National Guard at risk,' Newsom argued. 'That's when the downward spiral began. He doubled down on his dangerous National Guard deployment by fanning the flames even harder. And the president, he did it on purpose.' Newsom insisted while there was violence when protests first erupted, local authorities largely had the situation under control before Trump stepped in. Trump's actions spurred unrest and placed 'theatrics over public safety,' the left gov. claimed. Newsom has filed legal actions to stop the controversial deployment. While Newsom was issuing a defiant rebuke against Trump, the president vowed to 'liberate' Los Angeles while delivering a speech at Fort Bragg Tuesday. 3 Broken glass lies on the floor of a cannabis store after it was looted in LA. REUTERS He said the federal government would 'use every asset at our disposal to quell violence and restore law and order.' The two have been lobbing attacks at each other since the weekend as Los Angeles has faced a mix of fiery protests, looting, vandalism and clashes with police. Newsom stressed authorities have already arrested more than 200 people and are looking to take more into custody. 3 The rioting has led to a curfew in part of the city. Toby Canham for NY Post He pleaded with protesters not to turn to violence. 'If you incite violence – and I want to be clear about this – if you incite violence or destroy our communities, you're going to be held to account. That type of criminal behavior will not be tolerated, full stop.' With Post wires
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jack Ciattarelli wins NJ Republican primary for NJ governor, AP projects
TRENTON - Jack Ciattarelli, the Trump-endorsed former state assemblymember, wins the Republican primary race for New Jersey governor, AP projects. Ciattarelli will fight to flip New Jersey red in the November election to replace incumbent Gov. Phil Murphy. Because the New Jersey gubernatorial race is one of the first major elections since Donald Trump's return to the White House, there's a tremendous amount at stake simply through public perception. This is a breaking news update. Watch live election coverage in the media player above, and stay with us as this story develops. Jack Ciattarelli, a moderate establishment figure in the Republican field, is making his third bid for New Jersey governor. Ciattarelli, a former member of the state's Assembly, initially ran for the New Jersey Governor's office in 2017 – he came in second place in the Republican Party gubernatorial primary, with 31% of the vote. His second attempt in 2021 proved more successful; Ciattarelli won the Republican Party gubernatorial primary, but lost the general election to incumbent Murphy. He received 48% of the vote to Murphy's 51%. In his third run, he received an endorsement from President Trump, even though he's received accusations of being a "never-Trumper" from the party's far right. His campaign focused on New Jersey's affordability crisis – his plan includes capping property taxes at 1% of a home's assessed value and reducing state spending by 30%. Ciattarelli has pledged to end New Jersey's Immigrant Trust Directive on his first day in office, allowing local police to cooperate with federal officials on civil immigration matters. He also plans to direct the attorney general to cease lawsuits against the Trump administration. In an NJ Now interview, Ciattarelli expressed willingness to work with President Trump while maintaining the ability to oppose policies detrimental to the state.