logo
Vigil held in Glasgow for Amen Teklay, 15, as boy charged over death

Vigil held in Glasgow for Amen Teklay, 15, as boy charged over death

The Guardian09-03-2025

Amen Teklay, a 'remarkable' teenager who loved music and was light on his feet on the football pitch, was remembered by friends and family on Sunday afternoon at a vigil near his family home in Scotstoun, Glasgow.
A crowd of more than 100 mainly younger people gathered to pay their respects to the 15-year-old Eritrean refugee, who died on Wednesday night in the St George's Cross area of the city, in the park where he played football.
Police Scotland has charged a 14-year-old in connection with Amen's death. He will appear at Glasgow sheriff court tomorrow. A 15-year-old has also been arrested.
Amen lived with his father and sister in the west of Glasgow, which has one of the UK's largest asylum seeker and refugee communities. He had recently been granted right to remain status by the Home Office.
Leading the vigil, Jamie O'Neill, Amen's support worker at Kingsway Community Connections, said the boy's friends had approached him with a plan to hold a gathering. Some present wore made T-shirts reading 'Forever 15' and others released balloons into the clear spring sky to muted applause.
O'Neill said that he had first met Amen, a keen footballer who was 'an unpredictable player and very light on his feet', on the park's pitch and that last year Amen had taken part in a campaign to save the green space after local people objected to redevelopment plans.
He emphasised that the event was a moment for the community to support one another and celebrate Amen, cautioning against speculation on social media.
Amen's father and older sister attended the vigil and O'Neill read out a statement on his father's behalf in which he expressed 'heartfelt gratitude' for the support his family had received from across the city, which had brought some comfort 'despite our overwhelming sadness'.
'Amen was a remarkable young man who was loved by everyone that knew him. This city is our home and it is only be working together that we can make it safe,' he said. 'His death is not only a tragedy for our family but also for the families of those responsible. This cycle of violence must end.'
Amen's sister, 17-year-old Delina, told BBC Scotland News previously that he had hopes of gaining UK citizenship and becoming either a basketball player, a doctor or an engineer. She said he was a 'really sweet person, so kind and so bright'.
Amen was a pupil at St Thomas Aquinas Catholic secondary school in Jordanhill. Claire McInally, its headteacher, said the teenager had shown 'great promise' and that his death was a 'shock to the school community'.
DCI Campbell Jackson said: 'Our thoughts remain with Amen's family and friends at this very difficult time. I would also like to thank the community for their support so far. Our investigation continues and I would ask anyone, who may have information which could help us and who has not yet come forward, to please contact us.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Long-awaited Casey grooming gang review links illegal migration with exploitation of British girls
Long-awaited Casey grooming gang review links illegal migration with exploitation of British girls

The Sun

time5 hours ago

  • The Sun

Long-awaited Casey grooming gang review links illegal migration with exploitation of British girls

A DAMNING review into rape gangs will directly link illegal migration with the exploitation of British girls, The Sun can reveal. The Home Office is expected to publish the long-awaited National Audit on Group-Based Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse next week. 1 A source familiar with the report said its author, Baroness Louise Casey, specifically links illegal migration with the violence perpetrated against vulnerable girls. The Sun understands there are fears in the Home Office that knowledge of the link between undocumented arrivals and grooming gangs could trigger more civil unrest. The Home Office today refused to deny the involvement of illegal migration in the Casey report. A government spokesperson said: 'Nothing is more important than protecting vulnerable children, and we are determined to crack down on vile grooming gangs once and for all. 'That's why we ordered a rapid national audit to uncover the true scale of this horrific abuse. 'This report – alongside our response – will be published shortly.' The Casey review was tasked with building a 'national picture of what is known about current group-based child sexual exploitation' and to 'identify local and national trends'. It will also 'provide an assessment of what is known about the demographics of grooming gangs and their victims, including ethnicity'. It comes as a grooming gang have been found guilty of raping and abusing two teen girls in Rochdale in a five-year reign of terror. The seven men "passed" the victims around for sex and preyed on them in squalid flats and car parks in the town. They groomed the girls from the age of 13 and made them their "sex slaves" by plying them with gifts, including alcohol and drugs. The victims both had "deeply troubled home lives", which meant they were easy prey for the fiends. During a five-year horror ordeal, the girls were expected to have sex "whenever and wherever" the defendants and other men wanted. As well as flats and car parks, the predators abused the teens on rancid mattresses, in cars, alleyways and disused warehouses. Mohammed Zahid, 64, Kasir Bashir, 50, Mushtaq Ahmed, 66, Roheez Khan, 39, Mohammed Shahzad, 43, Nisar Hussain, 43, and Naheem Akram, 48, were today convicted. Three of the abusers, Zahid, Ahmed and Bashir were born in Pakistan and worked as stallholders on Rochdale's indoor market. Father-of-three Zahid - known as Boss Man - gave free underwear from his lingerie stall to both victims. He was previously jailed for five years after he engaged in sexual activity in 2006 with a 15-year-old girl who he met when she visited his stall to buy tights for school.

I know the ingredients of Ulster's riots only too well
I know the ingredients of Ulster's riots only too well

The Herald Scotland

time7 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

I know the ingredients of Ulster's riots only too well

When I saw images of the homes of immigrant families in Ballymena with loyalist flags placed in their windows to ward off racist mobs, and fearful handmade posters reading 'I work in a care home', I felt as if I was back there. It was all so horribly, desperately, familiar. I grew up about ten miles from the epicentre of the anti-immigrant rioting, in my hometown Antrim. Ballymena and Antrim are like twins. Same people, same problems, same hate. Loyalism runs strong here, as it does in other towns where violence spread: Larne, Portadown, Newtownabbey, Carrickfergus. As a young reporter, I covered crime and terrorism in these places. Read more from Neil Mackay: Back then, the towns of County Antrim were dominated by loyalist paramilitaries. Other areas had Republican gunmen and the IRA. Where I grew up, the UVF and UDA were in charge. Though there's always exceptions to the rule. Republican areas had loyalist pockets, and vice versa. Nothing is ever simple in the north of Ireland. My own family history was far from simple. On my maternal side, it was all Irish, Republican and Catholic. On the paternal side, all British, Loyalist and Protestant. Only in a place like Northern Ireland could the term 'mixed marriage' exist into the 21st century. So I got to know what makes both sides tick. I learned to understand – not accept, just understand – their hatreds. When I learned enough, I'd had enough. That's why I left and have lived in Scotland these last 30 years. I couldn't bear the place anymore. Though, in my heart, I still love its beauty, and its people. When my people are good – on both sides – they're very, very good. When they're bad, they're monsters. There's a terrible truth about what has happened in Northern Ireland, which might help folk in Scotland, bewildered by the labyrinthine history and tribal complexity of my country, understand the deep roots of recent events. Read more: The truth lies in what's called the 'siege mentality' of Ulster's loyalists. I deliberately differentiate between loyalism and unionism. Unionism is a perfectly respectable, mainstream political position. Loyalism has much darker shades to it. Everything is on a spectrum in Northern Ireland. There is, after all, a world of difference between an Irish nationalist who believes in gaining a United Ireland through democratic means, and an advocate of the IRA and armed republicanism. Loyalism's siege mentality has deep roots in the past. It goes back to the Plantation of Ulster in the 1600s, when mostly Scottish Protestants settled lands once owned by Irish Catholics. In effect, Ireland became the first 'British' colony, and Ulster was ground zero. To take someone's land you must fight them, and that means you must kill them and they'll kill you back. To kill people, you must learn to hate them. Therein lies the source of loyalism's siege mentality. Loyalists just never felt safe on the land they took. Why would someone from Ireland, like me, have a name like 'Mackay'? The plantation is your answer. Sometime, long ago, my paternal Scottish ancestors colonised the land which my maternal Irish ancestors owned. Siege mentality requires a sense of your own supremacy. You must think: this is my land, nobody else deserves it. Wars and bloodshed have come and gone, but such ancestral traits are hard to shake. All of us carry some burden inherited from our grandfathers and grandmothers. The Troubles are over. Such a ghastly euphemism for what it was: an ethnic civil war of neighbour against neighbour. But grievance and supremacy linger on. To many hardline loyalists, this land is still their land and nobody can claim any right to it; others do not belong, just as Catholics once didn't belong. You can see how such deep psychological currents can easily wash up against the shores of present-day racism and anti-immigrant hate. Thus, all those loyalist flags placed in immigrant windows; thus, all those signs saying 'we're local, we work in care homes'. It was an attempt to say 'we don't threaten you', 'we aren't here to take what you believe is yours'. Even after the riots began, politicians from the hardline Traditional Unionist Voice party talked of 'the influx of Roma' and 'very real grievances' among the people of Ballymena. So far, it appears that loyalist paramilitaries are not orchestrating the violence. Yet. Though the burning of homes has called to mind images of loyalist mobs burning Catholics out of Belfast at the start of the Troubles: the trigger for the arrival of the British army. Aaron Edwards, a Northern Irish security analyst and author who I know and whose work on loyalism I respect, says the absence of loyalist paramilitaries 'may not last for long'. The areas where rioting happened are poor. It is easy for violent men to exploit marginalisation and deprivation. Evidently, supremacy and poverty are a combustible mix. Nor can we forget the long links between loyalist terrorists and the British far-right. That truth came roaring into sight during last summer's far-right riots, which spread from England to Ulster. These are dangerous times in Northern Ireland, where violence and hatred are never far from the surface. What we're seeing may look very new – very 21st century – but the tragedy is that this is a very old toxin still poisoning the country that I both love and loathe.

Chef wins £20,000 payout after boss 'ranted about unreliable Mexicans'
Chef wins £20,000 payout after boss 'ranted about unreliable Mexicans'

Metro

time10 hours ago

  • Metro

Chef wins £20,000 payout after boss 'ranted about unreliable Mexicans'

The former head chef of a gastropub has been awarded £20,000 after his boss allegedly threatened to get him deported and made comments about 'unreliable Mexicans'. Cesar Omar Perez Vargas, who is of Mexican origin, walked out of the Pot Kiln in Thatcham, Berkshire, after things 'came to a head' during a busy shift in August 2022. A tribunal heard the kitchen had recently gone from four chefs to two and he was told to serve 60 diners one day after agreeing to cook for no more than 45. He told owner Francis Rockcliff the workload was 'unreasonable' and he 'could not bear the pressure anymore', walking out after Mr Rockcliff dismissed his concerns. Mr Perez Vargas said the owner followed him out of the premises and told him: 'I knew that you Mexicans were not reliable people. I will call the Home Office and make sure that they send you back to the country that you belong.' The chef, who has a husband, also claimed Mr Rockcliff threatened to tell officials he had been 'sexually harassing all the male staff'. Mr Rockcliff returned to the restaurant to see out the shift but later drove to Mr Perez Vargas' home to collect keys for the restaurant. Mr Perez Vargas' husband told the panel he went to the door to hand the keys over while his partner remained inside, saying Mr Rockcliff then screamed: 'He doesn't belong here. I will report to the Home Office and make sure he'll be deported back to his country,' Mr Rockcliff denied making racist comments, but admitted he told Mr Perez Vargas that if he 'was so unhappy, which was something that I did not understand, why didn't he go back to Mexico'. He also accepted saying 'something along the lines that he had heard the claimant had been sexually harassing staff', the panel heard. The tribunal found neither man was 'likely to be a reliable narrator of the events'. But the judges said they were 'satisfied that something along the lines of the things that the claimant complains about occurred' on the basis of Mr Rockcliff's responses to the panel. The panel heard he sent a text message to another member of staff the day after the fallout saying: 'I'm changing the kitchen culture. I finally lost all the dinosaurs/old brigade chefs to my great relief. 'I'm not sure that Eastern Europeans or Latin Americans have an innate understanding of English regional cookery and/or Mediterranean classic cuisine.' He also wrote a social media post saying classically-trained chefs were 'people with sautéed egos who have lost their mojo for the love of cooking and who have overcooked their wallets for fame over food'. More Trending While Mr Rockcliff denied the comments were 'directed' at Mr Perez Vargas, the tribunal found anyone who was familiar with the situation would know 'exactly who they were referring to'. The tribunal accepted Mr Rockcliff was not racist and did not discriminate against Mr Perez Vargas. But it said his behaviour was 'offensive' and 'problematic' and found it amounted to harassment related to race and sexual orientation. Mr Perez Vargas, who had worked at the Pot Kiln for nearly three yeras, was was awarded £20,444.24 in compensation. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store