It sure looks like Mark Cuban is on board with Elon Musk's idea of a new political party
Mark Cuban and Elon Musk don't always agree on politics.
However, Cuban appeared to like Musk's idea for a new political party for "the middle."
Musk proposed the idea on X amid his ongoing feud with President Donald Trump.
Billionaires Mark Cuban and Elon Musk seem to have found some common ground.
As the Tesla CEO's relationship with President Donald Trump blows up in real time on social media amid their clash over the "Big Beautiful Bill," Musk proposed creating a new political party for "the middle."
"Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?" Musk asked in an X poll on Thursday.
Cuban, who has sparred with Musk on X multiple times on subjects ranging from DEI to Trump, appeared to endorse the idea, responding to Musk's post with three check marks.
Cuban did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Business Insider.
That Cuban is attracted to the idea of a new political party may not come as a surprise.
The former "Shark Tank" star and Cost Plus Drugs founder has previously expressed his dismay with both political parties. He once described himself as "socially centrist" while "very fiscally conservative."
During the 2024 election, Cuban campaigned heavily for former Vice President Kamala Harris, previously telling BI that he liked that she's "not an ideologue" and supporting her pro-business stance.
In January, when journalist Matthew Yglesias proposed a 2028 presidential run for Cuban, BI asked the billionaire if he'd seriously consider the proposal.
"No," Cuban responded.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Cathie Wood Adds Elon Musk's Neuralink to ARK Fund as Trump Alliance Crumbles
ARKX just added Neuralink. Cathie Wood reposted it. And now the Musk- Trump feud has another wrinkle. Confident Investing Starts Here: On June 5, ARK Funds publicly announced that its ARK Venture Fund — ARKVX (ARKVX) — has invested in Neuralink, Elon Musk's brain-interface company, as part of its Series E funding round. The post, shared to X and reposted by Cathie Wood herself, ranks Neuralink as the fund's #2 holding, right behind SpaceX and ahead of OpenAI, xAI, and Anthropic. Neuralink is labeled 'NEW' on the portfolio chart. But what's not new is the growing friction between Elon Musk and Donald Trump. Support for Musk as Trump Turns Cold? Cathie Wood didn't say anything when she reposted ARK's announcement, but the timing is hard to ignore. The Trump-Musk split has dominated headlines for days, with Trump reportedly calling Musk 'crazy,' threatening to cut federal contracts, and even considering selling his red Tesla as a public break with the billionaire. At the same time, here's one of Musk's most high-profile supporters, Wood, amplifying news of her fund backing Neuralink, an Elon-run company often viewed as his most speculative moonshot. So, is this a portfolio move — or a power statement? It's worth noting that Neuralink's Series E round hasn't been officially disclosed in terms of size, valuation, or lead investor. But ARK's decision to highlight the company so prominently, especially in the top three alongside SpaceX and OpenAI, sends a message: they're still betting on Elon. The Holdings Breakdown SpaceX Neuralink (new) OpenAI xAI Hammerspace Anthropic Lambda Labs That's four Elon-affiliated ventures (SpaceX, Neuralink, xAI, and OpenAI — he was a co-founder) in the top seven. And they're ahead of Anthropic and Lambda Labs, two rising players in the AI arms race that often compete directly with Musk's initiatives. No one's saying Cathie Wood is choosing Musk over Trump. But with Neuralink now sitting in ARKVX's #2 slot — and with Wood herself boosting the news — the investment world may be saying plenty without a single word. Investors can track Elon Musk on TipRanks. Click on the image below to find out more.
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Americans are questioning the value of a college degree. Trump is joining the debate.
President Donald Trump wants to tweak a traditionalfeature of the American dream: a college degree. Trump has continued to escalate his battle with Harvard University, threatening to cut off the Ivy League school from federal funding if it does not meet the administration's demands, which include eliminating diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives and cracking down on campus activism. The latest threat against Harvard, however, floated shifting funding to trade schools, an alternative path to a four-year college degree. "I am considering taking Three Billion Dollars of Grant Money away from a very antisemitic Harvard, and giving it to TRADE SCHOOLS all across our land," Trump wrote in a May 26 post on Truth Social. "What a great investment that would be for the USA, and so badly needed!!!" The White House's press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, added onto the president's comments in an interview with Fox News: "Apprenticeships, electricians, plumbers, we need more of those in our country, and less LGBTQ graduate majors from Harvard University. And that's what this administration's position is." Over the past few years, a growing number of Americans have started to question the value of a college degree due to high costs and a tough labor market, making trade schools and apprenticeships a favorable alternative. It marks a shift in the standard American dream, in which a four-year college degree had been viewed as a step to middle-class success. However, Jon Fansmith, assistant vice president of government relations at the American Council on Education, told Business Insider that taking funding away from Harvard and other research institutions isn't the answer to boosting investment in trade schools. "The money that he is talking about withholding from Harvard is money that Congress provided to research agencies to perform advanced scientific and biomedical research," Fansmith said, adding that Harvard earned grant money because "they had the best researchers, the best laboratory facilities, the best understanding of how to advance that science," he continued. "You can't simply take that money and use it for another purpose." Madi Biedermann, deputy assistant secretary for communications at the Department of Education, told BI that "American universities that are committed to their academic mission, protect students on campus, and follow all federal laws will have no problem accessing generous taxpayer support for their programs." 'Two very separate stories' Higher education doesn't have the same draw that it once did. Some Gen Zers previously told BI that despite being taught that college was the primary path to success, they felt they could make a living by directly entering the workforce or going to trade school. Please help BI improve our Business, Tech, and Innovation coverage by sharing a bit about your role — it will help us tailor content that matters most to people like you. What is your job title? (1 of 2) Entry level position Project manager Management Senior management Executive management Student Self-employed Retired Other Continue By providing this information, you agree that Business Insider may use this data to improve your site experience and for targeted advertising. By continuing you agree that you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy . That's why Trump's push to invest more in trade schools is important, Fansmith said — they help Americans get a stable career to support themselves and their families, and the federal government can help support those schools by asking Congress to approve more funding, not redirecting the funding unilaterally. "There are two stories here. One is this administration's attack on Harvard, and the other is, what is the role of trade schools, and is there a need for more support for trade schools? And as much as the president's trying to conflate the two, those are two very separate stories," Fansmith said. While Trump's big spending bill proposes some provisions to expand Pell grant eligibility to short-term programs, it does not detail a significant funding increase for trade schools. The Trump administration's rhetorical focus on trade schools isn't new. Before he won the 2024 election, Linda McMahon, now Trump's education secretary, wrote an opinion piece in The Hill advocating for the expansion of Pell Grant eligibility to workforce training programs. "Our educational system must offer clear and viable pathways to the American Dream aside from four-year degrees," she wrote. Trump also signed an executive order on April 23 to strengthen and expand workforce development and apprenticeships programs, which McMahon called a "significant step in ensuring every American can live their American Dream." Congress' role in rethinking education For years, Democratic lawmakers have been pushing for greater access to postsecondary education options, like free community college, and there has been bipartisan agreement on the need to boost apprenticeships and workforce programs without redirecting funding from higher education institutions. Amid the heightened focus on alternatives to a four-year college degree, the New York Federal Reserve said in a recent report that college still pays off; the median worker with a college degree earns about $80,000 a year, compared to $47,000 for a worker with just a high school diploma. Trump hasn't yet implemented his idea to redirect Harvard's federal funding to trade schools, and it's unclear how, or if, he will attempt to follow through. While he has already withheld billions of dollars from Harvard and other schools across the country for failing to meet his administration's political demands, the moves have been met with lawsuits, and Fansmith said it's likely more legal action would ensue should Trump attempt to move around funding without congressional approval. "We're talking about spending money that Congress said would go to support really critically needed research into things like cancer and Alzheimer's and diabetes, and other things that impact everyday Americans' lives, and give it to trade schools," Fansmith said. "Trade schools are great schools. They have lots of benefits. They deserve a lot of federal support, but not just to make a political point at the expense of Harvard." Jason Altmire, president and CEO of Career Education Colleges and Universities — a group that represents for-profit colleges — said in a statement that Trump's focus on trade schools "is an investment in America's workforce." "The best way to support trade schools is to reduce the regulatory burden facing private career schools while increasing funding that allows students interested in the trades to choose the highest quality school," Altmire said.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
These are the 5 most popular Stocks and Shares ISA investments right now!
Investing in a Stocks and Shares ISA continues to be one of the best tax-efficient ways for UK investors to build wealth. But a recurring challenge is deciding which companies to buy shares in. Fortunately, with insights from Hargreaves Lansdown, we can see exactly which stocks are proving to be the most popular. And right now, the top five are: Nvidia Rolls-Royce Holdings Tesla MicroStrategy Glencore (LSE:GLEN) Given these stocks must be popular for a good reason, should investors simply be following the crowd and snapping up shares themselves? Of course not! In the stock market, popularity rarely results in market-beating returns. This is largely because by the time a stock has become popular, most of the unrealised gains have already been baked into the share price. However, that doesn't mean these are necessarily bad businesses. Blindly following the fact is likely going to end in disappointment. However, researching further could reveal interesting opportunities for the future once the hype dies down and a potentially more attractive price emerges. Let's zoom in on Glencore. The mining giant has had quite a rough ride lately, with its share price tumbling by over 40% in the last 12 months. However since April, the stock has finally started slowly moving back in the right direction. This change in attitude comes on the back of the group's first-quarter production report for 2025. While copper production levels have kicked off slowly, management expects this to improve drastically throughout the rest of the year. At the same time, cobalt production – a critical ingredient for lithium-ion batteries – has surged by 44%. And thanks to the group's 2024 Elk Valley Resources acquisition, steelmaking coal production skyrocketed by almost 500%! These gains are being offset by lower production volumes of gold, silver, nickel and, as previously mentioned, copper. However, despite these headwinds, management's reiterated its full-year guidance. Glencore produces critical metals and materials for high-demand technologies such as electric vehicles, data centres, industrial infrastructure, and renewable energy. And this reassertion of targets, along with the stock's low price point, seems to have sparked some early recovery excitement from investors. So much so that analyst consensus is currently projecting a potential 40% share price gain over the next 12 months. However, while this may indeed be a valuable opportunity. There are still some notable risks that investors must consider beyond commodity price fluctuations. ESG investors are hardly fond of management's move to bolster its coal mining operations in the takeover of Elk Valley Resources, opening the door to reputational risk. At the same time, China remains one of Glencore's key customer markets. Should the tariff dispute between the US and China continue, a resulting economic slowdown (particularly in electronics) could adversely impact Glencore's revenue and earnings. The latter risk seems to be the biggest threat right now, in my opinion. And while investing early during a recovery story can be lucrative, it's possible we haven't seen the bottom yet. Therefore, while international trade disputes between the US and China continue, this isn't a stock I'm rushing to add to my Stocks and Shares ISA, even though it's seemingly a popular investment right now. As for the other businesses on this list, research and due diligence are critical to understanding both the risks and potential rewards. The post These are the 5 most popular Stocks and Shares ISA investments right now! appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool Zaven Boyrazian has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Nvidia, Rolls-Royce Plc, and Tesla. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025
