
Man sentenced to 10 years in prison for killing 34-year-old homeless man in downtown Spokane
May 22—A 22-year-old who beat a sleeping homeless man to death with a large rock nearly four years ago in downtown Spokane was sentenced Thursday to more than 10 years in prison.
Aaron R. Holder pleaded guilty as charged Thursday to second-degree murder in the death of 34-year-old Justin Combs before Spokane County Superior Court Judge Andrew Van Winkle handed down the 123-month sentence, recommended by the prosecution and defense.
Court documents indicate a woman came across an injured man, identified as Combs, the morning of June 7, 2021, outside the Intermodal Center, 221 W. First Ave. She notified security, who called the police.
A police officer found Combs severely injured and bleeding from his head inside a sleeping bag. He assisted with first aid until medics arrived.
Combs died at Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center 10 days after the assault.
A detective noted blood stains on the sidewalk and scuff marks consistent with a rock impacting it, according to documents. A large piece of basalt rock, which had a blood stain and sleeping bag filler stuck to it, also had scratches consistent with hitting the sidewalk.
Police believe Holder used the rock, which weighed about 51 pounds, to beat Combs.
Surveillance video from a nearby business showed a thin white man, roughly 20 years old, with brown hair, light gray sweatpants, a blue or purple hoodie and a colored blanket approach Combs at 5:43 a.m. while he was sleeping on the sidewalk.
The man appeared to be going through Combs' belongings or moving the sleeping bag to see who was inside before leaving the area.
At 5:51 a.m., the man returned, walked by Combs and then away from the area again. Six minutes later, the man returned to Combs yet again. He picked up a heavy rock and threw it at the head area of the sleeping bag while Combs appeared to be sleeping inside, the video showed.
The man ran away but returned seconds later, picked up the heavy object and threw it three more times at the head area of the sleeping bag. The man then dragged Combs out of view of the camera before walking away.
Police initially linked Samual Tesch-Villa, who was 19 at the time, to the killing. He was arrested the month after the June 7 beating and charged with first-degree murder. Prosecutors dropped the murder charge in December of that year after they couldn't locate a key witness, according to a previous Spokesman-Review story.
Documents say Tesch-Villa was arrested based on statements from "associates in his life at the time." Tesch-Villa maintained his innocence, and physical evidence did not support him being a suspect, police said in documents.
On Jan. 8, 2024, a police officer spotted Tesch-Villa, who had a misdemeanor warrant , documents say.
Tesch-Villa told the officer he knew Holder killed Combs because Holder apologized to him for Tesch-Villa's time spent in jail. Police arrested Holder Jan. 10, 2024, for misdemeanor warrants, and he's been incarcerated since then.
Holder initially declined to speak to police about the homicide before confessing to the killing, court records say.
He admitted to being in front of the Wolfe Apartments, which is across from the Intermodal Center, because his mother would sometimes stay there. During his interview with police, Holder watched the video of the assault and cried, documents say.
He told police he did not know Combs and would not or could not explain why he killed him, documents say. Holder asked police what kind of punishment he was facing.
The standard sentence range for Holder was about 10 to 18 years in prison, but Spokane County Deputy Prosecutor Jonathan Degen said Thursday that Holder, who was 18 at the time of the killing, could have asked for a sentence well below the standard range because of mitigating factors for youth. The defense also explored a "diminished capacity" defense because of Holder's mental health.
Degen said Holder was initially found incompetent to stand trial, sent to Eastern State Hospital for competency restoration and then deemed competent.
Because of the "risks" that could lead to a lesser sentence, Degen said they settled on the low end of the standard range.
Holder has no prior felony convictions, and his attorney, David Lund, said he was homeless at the time of the killing.
Holder, who wore yellow Spokane County Jail clothing, declined to give a statement to the court. Combs' father appeared virtually on a screen in court and declined to give a victim impact statement.
Van Winkle ordered Holder to serve three years of probation when he's released from prison. Holder will also have to undergo mental health and substance abuse evaluations and adhere to any recommended treatment.
Van Winkle said the low-end sentence was appropriate, especially given Holder's mental condition and his young age. He said one of the primary goals is rehabilitation and transforming Holder into a productive member of society.
"You've got an opportunity here," Van Winkle said. "Don't waste it."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
5 hours ago
- USA Today
Diddy trial updates: Sean Combs' lawyers grill witnesses as harrowing abuse claims emerge
Diddy trial updates: Sean Combs' lawyers grill witnesses as harrowing abuse claims emerge Show Caption Hide Caption Diddy's former assistant 'Mia' says mentor caused PTSD Diddy's ex-assistant, a woman going by the pseudonym "Mia," returned to court and spoke out against her former boss. This story contains graphic descriptions that some readers may find disturbing. Despite mounting allegations of sexual and physical abuse, attorneys for Sean "Diddy" Combs are pushing back against the abuse claims amid the hip-hop mogul's criminal trial. Heading into its fifth week, the sweeping federal sex-crimes case resumed in Manhattan court on June 2 after Combs' legal team grilled the Grammy-winning rapper's former assistant, a woman going by the pseudonym "Mia," during cross-examination on May 30. The anonymous witness painted a picture of long-term emotional and professional manipulation, which Combs' attorneys challenged with past social media posts she made about Combs. The defense's direct approach became a point of contention in court, as seen in a 40-minute disagreement between Combs' lawyers and prosecutors about showing a video of Mia singing "Happy Birthday" to Combs. Judge Arun Subramanian watched the video but precluded it as evidence and said the relevance is minimal. Similar to other former employees of Combs, Mia has described a workplace dynamic in which Combs allegedly made repeated threats to maintain control. The ex-assistant, who worked for Combs from 2009-2017, also claims the Bad Boy Records founder sexually assaulted her on multiple occasions. Combs, 55, was arrested in September 2024 and charged with sex trafficking, racketeering and transportation to engage in prostitution. He has pleaded not guilty. Diddy on trial newsletter: Step inside the courtroom as music mogul faces sex-crimes charges. What are the charges against Diddy? Combs is facing federal sex-crimes and trafficking charges in a sprawling lawsuit that has eroded his status as a power player and kingmaker in the entertainment industry. He was arrested in September 2024 and later charged with racketeering, sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution. The rapper has pleaded not guilty to all five counts against him. What is racketeering? Racketeering is the participation in an illegal scheme under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Statute, or RICO, as a way for the U.S. government to prosecute organizations that contribute to criminal activity. Using RICO law, which is typically aimed at targeting multi-person criminal organizations, prosecutors allege that Combs coerced victims, some of whom they say were sex workers, through intimidation and narcotics to participate in "freak offs" — sometimes dayslong sex performances that federal prosecutors allege they have video of. Where can I watch the Diddy trial? The trial will not be televised, as cameras are typically not allowed in federal criminal trial proceedings. USA TODAY will be reporting live from the courtroom. Sign up for our newsletter for more updates. Contributing: USA TODAY staff If you are a survivor of sexual assault, RAINN offers support through the National Sexual Assault Hotline at (4673) and and en Español If you or someone you know is a victim of domestic violence, call the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-799-7233 or text "START" to 88788.

USA Today
7 hours ago
- USA Today
Diddy trial and Macron shove reveal our blind spots about domestic violence
Diddy trial and Macron shove reveal our blind spots about domestic violence | Opinion The Diddy video perpetuates one of the most harmful stereotypes about domestic violence: that abusers are people who simply 'lose control' in moments of rage. Show Caption Hide Caption Former stylist for Cassie testifies of more alleged abuse by Combs Deonte Nash, a friend and stylist of Cassie Ventura Fine, testified in Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal trial of more alleged abuse by Combs against Fine. In March 2016, hip-hop mogul Sean "Diddy" Combs was caught on camera violently assaulting singer Casandra "Cassie" Ventura Fine in a Los Angeles hotel hallway – kicking, dragging and throwing objects at her as she tried to escape. The video, which surfaced amid federal investigations into Combs, validated years of allegations that many had dismissed or ignored. But recent trial revelations have exposed something even more chilling: the extensive web of control that kept Ventura Fine silent for years. Meanwhile, cameras recently captured a different moment: French President Emmanuel Macron apparently being shoved by his wife, first lady Brigitte Macron, while preparing to leave a plane in Vietnam. Social media erupted with jokes and memes, treating the incident as amusing fodder. These two incidents – one undeniably violent, the other dismissed as trivial – reveal our dangerous blind spots about domestic violence. As a lawyer who represents survivors and their children, I see how these misconceptions play out every day in courtrooms across America, with devastating consequences. Abusers don't simply 'lose control' The Combs video perpetuates one of the most harmful stereotypes about domestic violence: that abusers are people who simply "lose control" in moments of rage. But watch that footage again. Notice how he checks for witnesses. See how he methodically prevents her escape. This isn't someone out of control – this is calculated dominance. Domestic violence is never about anger management. It's about power and control. Opinion: I work with sex trafficking victims. Here's how Diddy's trial could help them. Abusers are extraordinarily in control, employing a deliberate pattern of behavior designed to dominate their partners. The violence we see – whether it's a kick in a hotel hallway or a shove on an airplane – is just the visible tip of a much larger iceberg. Most physical violence also experience economic abuse and emotional manipulation. The Combs trial has illuminated just how comprehensive his control seemed: He allegedly monitored the movements of the singer known as Cassie, controlled her singing career, isolated her from support systems and made it clear that defying him would have consequences not just for her but for anyone close to her. In 2019, the singer entered contracts to end her business relationship with Combs and married trainer Alex Fine. When Ventura Fine dated rapper Kid Cudi, whose real name is Scott Mescudi, Combs didn't just express jealousy, Mescudi testified May 22. Mescudi accused Combs of having a Molotov cocktail thrown at his car. This would be part of a pattern of using terror to maintain absolute control. It is the abuser's playbook: Create dependency, erode self-worth, eliminate escape routes. Physical violence is merely one tool in a comprehensive strategy of control. Why the singer Cassie couldn't just leave The inevitable question always emerges: "Why didn't she just leave?" Ventura Fine, who at 19 met then-37-year-old Combs in 2005 and soon signed to his music label Bad Boy Records, stayed for more than a decade. The answer lies in understanding how abusers systematically trap their victims. Her silence wasn't weakness; it was survival. She understood what many critics don't – that leaving an abuser with unlimited resources and a proven willingness to terrorize isn't just difficult, it's dangerous. For most survivors, the barriers are just as real if less glamorous – shared children, financial dependence, immigration status or simply having nowhere safe to go. Opinion: Cassie's Diddy trial testimony shows sexual assault survivors how to take power back The most dangerous time for a victim is when they try to leave. Women escaping abusive relationships face a 75% greater risk of severe violence or death. Abusers escalate because leaving represents the ultimate loss of control. That hotel footage? It was captured as Ventura Fine was apparently trying to escape. The pattern is heartbreakingly predictable. The Macron incident highlights another critical issue: our failure to recognize that domestic violence can affect anyone, regardless of gender, wealth or status. The footage has become comedy material, with countless memes treating potential intimate partner violence as amusing evidence of a "normal" marriage. This response reveals how poorly we understand the dynamics of intimate partner violence when men are victims. Male victims face unique barriers: societal expectations of masculinity, fear of not being believed and a support system designed primarily for women. When we mock or minimize potential violence against men, we reinforce the shame that keeps all victims silent. Perhaps nowhere is our misunderstanding of domestic violence more dangerous than in family courts. Despite everything we know about the patterns of abuse, family courts award joint or sole custody to fathers accused of domestic violence approximately 70% of the time. Judges, operating under the presumption that children need both parents, often minimize or dismiss evidence of abuse. The consequences are deadly. Since 2008, more than 900 children involved in contested custody cases have been killed, most by fathers who had previously abused their mothers. Search 'murder suicide' in your local news website and you will find a shocking number of children and mothers slain by fathers who had full or shared custody of their children each year. But most stories are less headline-worthy. Research confirms what advocates have long known: Abusers use children as tools of continued control. They seek custody at twice the rate of nonabusive parents ‒ not out of love, but as a means to maintain power over their victims. Yet courts, clinging to the ideal of "friendly co-parenting" and often, the law requiring it, force survivors to maintain contact with their abusers. We also know that children who have experienced domestic violence in the home – in any form – have outcomes as poor as children who have been the direct target of the abuse. Yet we continue to perpetuate the myth that once parents separate, the abuser transforms into a healthy co-parent. Domestic violence is about so much more than visible bruises. It's about the systematic dismantling of a person's autonomy, the calculated destruction of their support systems and the weaponization of love, children and financial security. The Combs case shows us what validation looks like – video evidence that confirms what Ventura Fine said all along, and trial revelations that suggest the calculated nature of his control. Her years of silence weren't complicity; they were strategic survival in the face of credible threats to herself and those she loved. But most survivors don't have surveillance footage or high-profile trials. They have their truth and a system that too often fails to believe them, or believes them but issues paradoxical custody orders. As these cases fade from headlines, the real work continues in courtrooms and shelters across the country. We need judges trained to recognize coercive control, not just physical violence. We need custody laws that prioritize safety and healthy parenting over the fiction of "equal parenting" with an abuser. We need supervised visitation services that don't force victims to coordinate with their abusers. And we need a society that understands domestic violence as a pattern of power and control, not isolated incidents of anger. The camera caught Combs in that hotel hallway. Another one caught a shove on an airplane ramp that was turned into a joke. But for every moment captured on video – whether it's met with horror or humor – there are millions happening behind closed doors. Until we fundamentally change how we understand and respond to domestic violence, those victims remain trapped – not by locked doors, but by a system that fails to see the bars. Dale Margolin Cecka is an assistant professor of law and the director of the Family Violence Litigation Clinic at the Albany Law School.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Could Trump pardon Diddy and end his trial?
Sean "Diddy" Combs is being tried in a New York courtroom for racketeering and sexual trafficking. Could that daily drama vanish instantly if President Donald Trump pardoned the embattled rapper? "Yes, it could," says Brian Kalt, law professor at Michigan State University College of Law, who focuses on legal issues and the presidency. According to Kalt, Trump — who appears to be in the middle of a pardoning spree — would be within his presidential rights to extend a preemptive pardon to fellow New Yorker Combs, who has been described by witnesses so far as violent and abusive. "These are federal charges (against Combs), so that's the main limit. The matter has be federal, it has to be criminal vs. civil, and related to something that's already been done," says Kalt. "But the person doesn't have to even be charged yet, or convicted. The Supreme Court has said preemptive pardons are OK." Trump weighed in on the possibility Friday, May 30, in the Oval Office. "Nobody's asked" about a pardon, the president said. "But I know people are thinking about it. I know they're thinking about it. I think some people have been very close to asking." Trump added, "I haven't spoken to him in years. He really liked me a lot." 'Nobody's asked': President Trump doesn't rule out pardoning Sean 'Diddy' Combs Typically, one of the last gestures from an outgoing president is a pardon. In President Joe Biden's final days in office, he famously pardoned his son, Hunter, convicted of federal gun felonies and federal tax charges. At the end of Trump's first term, he granted clemency to political allies such as Roger Stone, found guilty of obstructing a congressional investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and related offenses. But pardons can take place during a president's term, says Kalt. The right was established in Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 of the Constitution, which among other things gives the president "power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment." Kalt says the power to pardon is derived from the British monarch's historic right and stems from a recognition that criminal law was often too harsh, and it was important to have a safety valve. "The president was the best person to be that safety valve because of his political accountability," he says. But that's where things get murky, he adds, noting that Republican lawmakers "don't appear willing to hold the president accountable" for granting pardons, meaning they aren't costing him in terms of political capital. In contrast, President Gerald Ford's controversial pardoning of disgraced President Richard Nixon was perceived so negatively "that it probably cost Ford re-election in 1976," Kalt says. In just over 100 days since taking office, Trump has issued pardons to a broad range of personalities. They include Todd and Julie Chrisley, stars of the reality show "Chrisley Knows Best," who were convicted in 2022 of swindling $36 million from Atlanta banks and being tax evaders, and rapper NBA YoungBoy, who in 2024 was sentenced to two years in prison for weapons possession. He also pardoned former Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich, convicted of wire fraud and extortion, and Jan. 6 participant and "Bob's Burgers" actor Jay Johnston. The reason many presidents issue pardons at the end of their terms is precisely to avoid political fallout, says Kalt. In that sense, Trump's brash approach suggests he has no concerns about such ramifications. "I don't agree with these pardons on their merits, but the fact that he did them when he is politically accountable as opposed to slinking out the door does add some legitimacy to them in that sense," he says. "With pardons, you don't need Congress, you wave your magic wand and it happens. You can see the appeal for a president, particularly one like Trump." One can also see the appeal for those such as Combs, whose ordeal could end instantly should Trump's pardon "wand" wave his way. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Will Trump pardon Diddy? Trial could end, experts say