
Gym-goer claims he was kicked out of Crunch Fitness for wearing popular hat
A Wisconsin gym-goer has claimed he was kicked out of a Crunch Fitness franchise because he proudly displayed his support for President Donald Trump - though police say his ouster was a result of his harassing other members.
Michael Green, 42, is now suing the Fitness Ventures LLC - a Crunch franchisee with locations in 27 states, claiming he was discriminated against for wearing a 'Trump 2024' hat, the Independent reports.
Green admits in the lawsuit he still does not 'understand what happened' when he was escorted out of the Madison location on March 30.
But he has come to the conclusion 'someone at the gym had a perceived issue with me and decided to weaponize the police against me.'
'I had been wearing a pro-Trump hat during prior gym visits, but stopped du to the stares I would get from staff and members,' he wrote in the federal complaint he filed himself.
'Perhaps it was some kind of retaliation for being a Trump supporter, even worse a black Trump supporter in Dane County.'
Green is now arguing that the gym violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by 'engaging in discriminatory practices' against him.
He is seeking $75,000 in damages, which he says is 'enough that [it] may provide a deterrent from similar behavior in the future.'
According to his complaint, Green was working out at the gym on March 30 when he was suddenly 'approached by a staff member and two Madison Police officers.
'The staff member said that I was being "aggressive" to gym members,' he recounts. 'I still have no clue what exactly is going on, the staff member was extremely vague.'
He said he then asked if he could use the shower before he left, and was told that he couldn't - at which point he went into the locker room 'to change clothes as quickly as I could.'
As soon as he left the locker room, Green claims he was confronted by 'six to 10 Madison police officers.
'I asked them what was going on, they explained thy were called to make sure I left the premises, and I left as instructed.'
Once outside, though, Green claims he realized he had left some of his belongings inside the gym - and called the office to see if a staffer could give his items to one of the cops at the scene.
But the complaint says the officers soon left, and the Crunch employee told him to meet him at the gym entrance to pick up his stuff.
'While walking towards the gym, I flagged down a Madison Police officer and asked them if they could get my items instead of me approaching the gym,' Green wrote. '[T]he officer agreed.'
At that point, Green said he called the gym to tell the staff member that a police officer would be returning to collect the items rather than himself.
But the situation quickly escalated when Green complained abut the 'vulgar, racist stereotyping rap music' the gym plays, which he says 'paints African Americans in a fictional, terrible light.'
The staffer then allegedly denigrated black people - which Green responded to with a homophobic slur.
The police incident report obtained by the Independent, though, tells a completely different story.
It says police were dispatched to the gym on March 30 after an employee complained about a member who was allegedly 'causing a disturbance' and asked to have police standing by when staffers removed him.
The guest - Green - had allegedly 'approached other gym members and screamed and cursed at them' because he wanted to use their equipment.
The police report notes that members of the gym asked the manager to have Green removed, but did not want to file charges against him.
It also says that only two officers responded to the call - not the half dozen Green claimed - and they escorted him to the locker room, then stood outside as he gathered his belongings.
In the end, the police report says, officers told Green not to return to the gym for the remainder of the day and he was seen walking away.
'The case is closed on our end,' a Madison police spokeswoman told The Independent.
But this is not the first time Green has filed a discrimination lawsuit against a gym.
In fact, just two weeks before he filed the federal suit against Fitness Ventures LLC, he sued Anytime Fitness - making similar accusations.
In that suit, Green says he would repeatedly receive sneers from his fellow gym-goers for 'show[ing] my support of our president by wearing different types of Trump apparel such as hats, book bags, t-shirts, etc.'
Then on February 4, Green said another member snickered at him and told him 'I'm wondering why your black and you like Trump so much.'
Green claims in the lawsuit that he ignored the man and 'told him I'd train him instead of arguing with him.
'As I worked out, I explained to him what kind of exercises I was doing and why I was doing them. I did that throughout my workout,' he admits.
'At some point in the morning, one of the Anytime staff members showed up and asked me what was going on,' he continued.
'I explained to him that I was trying to train that guy so he could stop being concerned about my political leanings.... He told me that it was my fault that I chose to be pro-Trump, then he told me to stop bothering the guest.'
In the aftermath, Green said he complained to Anytime Fitness about the employee - and when he went to a different location later that day, he received a phone call from someone claiming to be the vice president of the gym.
The vice president informed him that he wanted to cancel Green's contract, but Green continued his workout.
By the time he was changing out of his exercise clothes, Green claimed Madison police came and escorted him out.
But Green decided to press matters and mentioned Richard Johnson, who he said was 'a young African American man that Madison police recently beat to death and used the Dane sheriff to help them attempt to cover it.
'Apparently that angered the cop, which set up a path for a rough night of abuse by law enforcement, starting with me bein arrested for trespassing,' he wrote.
Green did not name Madison police as a defendant in either lawsuit - and apparently came to the conclusion that the fault lies with Dane County (which he did not name as a defendant either).
He described the county in his latest suit as being 'extremely liberal' and derides the residents as being biased against conservatives.
'The anger I feel about this can only be overshadowed by an overall sense of sadness,' he writes.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Mommy influencer Emilie Kiser's desperate fight to stop video of son's death becoming public
Influencer Emilie Kiser has been fighting tirelessly to keep her late son's private records from becoming public, including tragic footage of the toddler's death. Kiser, a popular mommy blogger, lost her three-year-old son Trigg on May 18 - six days after he was found unresponsive in a backyard pool in Arizona. Before it was confirmed that Trigg, who was often featured in his mother's viral videos, was the child who died, many speculated online about him being the victim. Once news broke that he was the boy who drowned, a 'media frenzy' unleashed as internet sleuths and fans of Kiser took it upon themselves to request records - including videos - in relation to his death. This then prompted her to file a lawsuit just one week after his passing against several agencies in Maricopa County to block private information from getting out. On Wednesday, the Arizona Superior Court for Maricopa County ruled in her favor, granting her temporary confidentiality, meaning evidence will not be released while the court makes its final ruling on the tragedy. The 26-year-old mother's declaration 'reflects an intensely personal account of her grief and trauma' that was 'submitted to help the court understand her perspective - not for public consumption,' a source told In her motion, Kiser has specifically urged the court to keep not just detailed records of Trigg's death private, but also footage as '100+ public records requests' for the video have come in, according to the source. The intense amount of records requests 'only serves to satisfy morbid curiosity more than any type of justice,' they added. Kiser, who was not home at the time of the drowning, 'should not be forced to relive the aftermath through viral footage,' the source stated. 'The motions behind the push for release are concerning. In many cases, requests appear to be driven by monetization and notoriety, not accountability,' they continued. 'That is not a valid justification for invading a family's grief.' Since news of her legal filing came out, many online have speculated that Kiser chose to do so as a way to cover up information, but according to the source, that is completely false. 'Emilie has fully cooperated with investigators. The focus here is not on withholding information, but on safeguarding the dignity of a child and allowing a grieving family the space and privacy to heal.' The source also revealed chilling details on what Kiser and her family are going through as 'rabid fans' have swarmed her home and tried to reach out to them. 'Rabid fans and media have surrounded Emilie's home, filmed through her windows, and sent unsolicited packages' they said. Kiser has four million followers on TikTok and 1.7 million on Instagram, but according to the source, her 'public profile does not negate her right to privacy, nor does it make her son's death a matter for public consumption. 'Being online should not strip someone of basic human decency.' Following the tragic ordeal at the family's pool, a neighbor told that the influencer's house was swarmed with five police cars. Emergency responders arrived and performed life-saving efforts until Trigg was airlifted to Phoenix Children's Hospital for specialized care. Kiser hasn't posted since the tragedy, but her followers have continued to flood her accounts with messages of support and condolences before she turned off her comment sections. Meanwhile, her husband Brady Kiser, Trigg's father, made his accounts private following his death. Kiser or her legal representation haven't reviewed the police report, security camera footage, scene photos, 911 recording, or autopsy photos, per the lawsuit. Kiser and Brady first became parents in July 2021 when they welcomed their son Trigg. Just over two years later, in September 2024, the couple revealed they were expecting their second child. 'WE GOTTA BABY GROWING,' Kiser captioned a sonogram post. 'We can not wait to add another angel to our family. Whatever you are, we love you so much already.' In March, the Kiser family officially grew by one with the arrival of their second son, Theodore. 'Emilie is trying her best to be there for her surviving son, two-month-old Theodore. But every day is a battle,' the suit said.


Reuters
11 minutes ago
- Reuters
Dismay and disbelief as Trump bans visitors from a dozen countries
June 5 (Reuters) - Officials and residents in countries whose citizens will soon be banned from visiting the United States expressed dismay and disbelief on Thursday at President Donald Trump's new sweeping travel ban as his administration intensifies its immigration crackdown. Trump signed a proclamation on Wednesday barring citizens of 12 countries from entering the U.S. starting on Monday, asserting that the restrictions were necessary to protect against "foreign terrorists." The order was reminiscent of a similar move Trump implemented during his first term in office from 2017 to 2021, when he barred travelers from seven Muslim-majority nations. That directive faced court challenges and went through several iterations before the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the ban in 2018. Former President Joe Biden, a Democrat who succeeded Trump, repealed that ban in 2021, calling it "a stain on our national conscience." But the new ban is much more expansive and covers Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Citizens of seven other countries - Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela - will be partially restricted. A senior diplomat with the Sudanese Foreign Ministry, who asked not to be named, said Trump's justification did not stand up to scrutiny. "Sudanese people have never been known to pose a terrorist threat anywhere in the world," the official said. Chad President Mahamat Idriss Deby Itno said he had instructed his government to stop granting visas to U.S. citizens in response to Trump's action. "Chad has neither planes to offer nor billions of dollars to give, but Chad has its dignity and its pride," he said in a Facebook post, referring to countries such as Qatar, which gifted the U.S. a luxury airplane for Trump's use and promised to invest billions of dollars in the U.S. Afghans who worked for the U.S. or U.S.-funded projects and were hoping to resettle in the U.S. expressed fear that the travel ban would force them to return to their country, where they could face reprisal from the Taliban. Fatima, a 57-year-old Afghan women's rights defender waiting in Pakistan for her U.S. visa to be processed, had her dreams shattered overnight after Trump's order. "Unfortunately, the decisions made by President Trump turned all the hopes and beliefs of us into ashes," she told Reuters, asking that only her first name be published for security reasons. Trump said the countries subject to the most severe restrictions were determined to harbor a "large-scale presence of terrorists," fail to cooperate on visa security, have an inability to verify travelers' identities, as well as inadequate record-keeping of criminal histories and high rates of visa overstays in the United States. He cited Sunday's incident in Boulder, Colorado, in which an Egyptian national tossed a gasoline bomb into a crowd of pro-Israel demonstrators as an example of why the new curbs are needed. But Egypt was not part of the travel ban. "Because Egypt has been a country that we deal with very closely. They have things under control," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Thursday. When asked why he chose this moment to unveil the ban, he said: "It can't come soon enough." The visa ban takes effect on June 9 at 12:01 a.m. EDT (0401 GMT). Visas issued before that date will not be revoked, the order said. In total, just under 162,000 immigrant visas and temporary work, study, and travel visas were issued in fiscal year 2023 to nationals of the affected countries in the now banned visa categories, according to the Migration Policy Institute. The ban is likely to face legal challenges. But Stephen Yale-Loehr, a retired professor of immigration law at Cornell Law School, said he expected those lawsuits to face an uphill climb, because the latest ban contains various exemptions and cited specific security concerns with each country. The ban includes exemptions, such as for dual nationals, permanent residents, immigrant visas for immediate family members of U.S. citizens and athletes traveling for major sporting events like the World Cup. "Trump has learned from the mistakes of earlier travel bans," he said. Some foreign officials said they were prepared to work with the U.S. to address Trump's security concerns. "Somalia values its longstanding relationship with the United States and stands ready to engage in dialogue to address the concerns raised," Dahir Hassan Abdi, the Somali ambassador to the United States, said in a statement.


Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Musk is suffering from ‘Trump derangement syndrome,' US president suggests
Donald Trump accused Elon Musk of suffering from 'Trump derangement syndrome', as he signalled the official collapse of their once warm relationship. 'Elon and I had a great relationship,' Mr Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. 'I don't know if we will anymore.' His remarks illustrate the president's intense anger over the world's richest man's meddling with his legislative agenda after leaving the White House with a golden key and a warm televised send-off. Mr Musk immediately hit back, writing on his social media platform, X: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' he posted. 'Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.' Since stepping down as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency last week, Mr Musk has slammed Mr Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' as a 'disgusting abomination' for increasing the national debt. Discussion of their broken friendship overshadowed the president's Oval Office press conference with Friedrich Merz, Germany's new chancellor, as Mr Trump said his former ally was lashing out because he did not get his own way. He claimed the Tesla chief executive was upset that his ally had been rejected as the next administrator of Nasa and that the bill meant the end of tax breaks for electric vehicles worth billions to his company. 'He knew it better than almost anybody, and he never had a problem until right after he left,' he said. 'And if you saw the statements he made about me … he said the most beautiful things about me, and he hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that'll be next. 'I'm very disappointed in Elon.' Mr Trump added that Mr Musk was probably missing the Oval Office and the trappings of power. 'It's sort of Trump derangement syndrome, I guess they call it,' he said. 'But we have it with others too. 'They leave and they wake up in the morning, and the glamour is gone.' Mr Musk appeared in the Oval Office last Friday for his send-off. At the time, Mr Trump said he was 'not really leaving' and would continue to visit the White House. Things quickly unravelled when Mr Musk went on a six-hour X session on Tuesday night, posting his criticism of the bill, particularly that it does not do enough to cut federal spending. Independent analysts warn that its spending cuts are not balanced by tax breaks, with the result that the bill will add more than $2 trillion to the national debt during the next decade. Mr Musk kept up his attacks on Thursday, live tweeting during the president's Oval Office sit-down with Mr Merz. He rejected claims that he had supported the bill when he was at the White House. 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it,' he posted. Earlier, he resurfaced an old tweet of Mr Trump's. Wise words — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 And he continued as Mr Trump went on the attack, posting a message suggesting he might be amenable to a trimmed down version: 'Slim Beautiful Bill for the win.' The bill is crucial to Mr Trump's strategy. It contains much of his domestic policy agenda, as well as the campaign promises that propelled him to victory in last year's election, such as ending taxation on overtime and tips. This week, Mr Trump all but disappeared from view as he focused on meetings and phone calls to keep Republicans on side. The bill has already passed the House but faces a difficult passage through the Senate.