Letters to the Editor: Elgin not at fault for cancellation of this year's Juneteenth event
Elgin not at fault for cancellation of this year's Juneteenth event
I am writing to express my disappointment with the article published in The Courier-News on March 11 titled, ' Organizers cancel Elgin's Juneteenth event after date it wanted was given to Michelada Festival.' The headline, along with key omissions in the article, malign the city of Elgin's reputation by creating an unfair implication that the city is being uncooperative and is at fault for the Juneteenth event's cancellation.
The article omitted crucial information the city conveyed to the reporter stating that for the past three years, the African American Coalition of Kane County had held its Juneteenth Festival in Festival Park on the weekend of or before June 19. This year, AACKC requested the weekend after Juneteenth. AACKC's request to change the weekend of its event now conflicts with the weekend on which the Michelada Festival was conducted last year and has been requested again for this summer by that event's organizers. The city offered AACKC alternatives, including the use of Festival Park on the weekend before Juneteenth or the Wing Park Band Shell area on their preferred weekend. AACKC declined these options.
The article states that a peaceful protest is planned in response to the event's 'forced cancellation.' There was no forced cancellation — AACKC made the decision not to proceed with the alternatives offered by the city.
The city told AACKC that going forward, it will refrain from scheduling special events at Festival Park or other alternative venues on the weekends immediately before or after June 19 until AACKC selects its preferred weekend for future Juneteenth celebrations. As a cosponsor of the Juneteenth Festival, the city remains committed to working with AACKC to ensure a successful 2026 event.
I am hoping that future coverage of such matters reflects a more balanced perspective. Thank you for allowing me to clarify these details.
Submit letters to the editor via email to suburbanletters@tribpub.com. Please include your name, address and town of residence for publication. We also need your phone number and email address for confirmation. Letters should be no more than 250 to 300 words.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Don't let Trump rain on the nation's parade
The heart of the nation's civic calendar is the period between Memorial Day, honoring those who gave their last breath, and Independence Day, when the country drew its first. In between, there is Juneteenth, the newest federal holiday that commemorates the end of slavery and a second founding. Flag Day is June 14, marking the anniversary of the adoption of the Stars and Stripes. That date is also the birthday of the U.S. Army, which turns 250 this year. And the day is Donald Trump's birthday, too, which stamps the president's uncritical and theatrical brand of patriotism at the center of a bigger conversation about pride in America. This year, Trump will get the parade that he's long desired. The Army's historic milestone provides the occasion for a mile-long military procession to wind its way through the nation's capital on Saturday. This will be the first such event in three decades, and the first not associated with a presidential inauguration or victory in war. Given this rarity and the coincidence of dates — the flag, the Army and Trump all sharing a birthday — the parade has taken on more meaning than just the celebration of an institution. Democratic lawmakers have accused Trump of hijacking the historical anniversaries in service of his own ego and political benefit. There's bipartisan angst about the parade's hefty price tag of up to $45 million, and mayoral concerns that damage to city streets could cost $16 million. Some of Trump's supporters anticipate a glorious spectacle, seeing the convergence of birth dates as evidence of his consecration: 'Providential,' as current U.S. chief of protocol Monica Crowley describes it. 'Hand of God, for sure.' All the bickering and zealotry are enough to make real patriots lose their religion — however many of them remain. Patriotism is on the decline in the United States, and the word itself has become contentious. It's perceived as partisan, and there's a generational divide, with younger Americans having far less attachment to the label and the idea. Its most garish displays are often associated with an intolerant love-it-or-leave-it nationalism. It seems fickle in practice — voters feel more patriotic when their candidate wins the White House; it surges, not in peaceful times, but immediately after an attack. And the honorific is assigned frivolously, given alike by presidents to soldiers who died defending the Constitution and to Jan. 6 convicts who violated it by storming the Capitol. These realities have stigmatized the whole concept, undermining what it means anymore to be proud of the country. National holidays and commemorations are inherently political; they communicate which people and moments to honor. And rituals are good for nations; they offer meaning and connection that signal our willingness to belong. But though few things spell civic pride like a parade, when politics co-opts the ritual and treats it like religion, it's as likely to create believers as it is heathens. And the most divisive politicians tell the country who is which, fashioning themselves as saints in the process. No wonder fewer of us identify as patriots. But does it also mean fewer of us should be proud of our country? Not in agreement with its actions or proud of its choices on any given day, but proud of its journey over time. Proud of the many people who fought for equality, and of the cultures and ideas they gave life to. And proud of its progress, even where work remains. In 1852, Frederick Douglass's historic speech asked: 'What to the slave is the Fourth of July?' What to the enslaved would Juneteenth National Independence Day mean, signed into law while a Black woman was vice president? Today wouldn't be their heaven, but it's a far better nation than the one they knew, maybe even better than one they thought possible. I think they would be proud. We should be, too — no matter which party holds the White House, and no matter which brand of patriotism predominates. They would definitely throw a parade. Newly emancipated men and women held the earliest Memorial Day observance in May 1865 in Charleston, South Carolina, honoring fallen Union soldiers by singing an ode to the flag, 'The Star-Spangled Banner,' and marshaling a parade of 10,000 people. A few weeks later, on June 19, the Army informed the last corner of Texas of slavery's end. Juneteenth has been filled with festivals and parades ever since. At the heart of our calendar are people of all colors from all places who felt pride in their history despite experiencing injustice, and who found pride in America though they had reasons not to. Real patriots know there is room for both shame and pride; they meet the former with a fighting spirit and the latter with a celebratory one. As it happens, the Army is central to all the national observances in these civic six weeks. Older than the nation by a year, its history is likewise imperfect, but its 250 years of service is more than worthy of commemoration. The flag and the country have also earned their anniversaries. And their critiques and protests, too. White House planners expect paradegoers will spontaneously serenade the president for his birthday, flags streaming and battle tanks tracking down Constitution Avenue. But president and parade and politics aside, there's no shame in being proud of the people and institutions — in uniform and out — who have fought to make America live better, and help it see another year.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘We're living in the dumbest timeline' — Gov. Cox comments on SLC Sego pride flags
SALT LAKE CITY (ABC4) — Governor Cox commented on Salt Lake City's Sego pride flags in his monthly press conference Tuesday, calling them and the Utah law that banned pride and other unofficial flags 'dumb.' Governor Cox was asked if he supported the official flags that Salt Lake City adopted in response to Utah , the law that from being displayed on government property and at public schools. Previously, Cox called H.B. 77 the . Cox allowed the law to go into effect without his signature, and he did not veto the bill because it passed with a veto-proof majority. 'I don't support [the bill]. They're dumb flags, and it was a dumb bill,' Cox said. He clarified that he was referring to the Sego pride flags in Salt Lake City. Gov. Cox's pick to head new state records office gets OK from Senate panel despite criticism In response to H.B. 77, Salt Lake City adopted pride and Juneteenth designs as official flags for the city in . These flags allow the city to circumvent the law banning pride flags and other unofficial flags because they are now official city flags. The Sego Celebration, Belonging, and Visibility flags are meant to honor Juneteenth and Black and African American residents, LGBTQIA residents, and transgender residents respectively. 'It's ridiculous. I feel bad for the Japanese Americans. I feel bad for the Polynesian Americans… I mean, who are we leaving out here?' Cox said. 'I'm sure they [Salt Lake City Council] feel great that they got around this dumb law, and they did it with dumb flags. The whole thing's dumb.' Cox offered his thoughts on what both the state and cities should do instead of squabbling over pride flags. 'We should raise the American flag, and let's unify around that. It's a great flag, represents everyone, and the legislature doesn't need to be in everybody's business all the time,' he said. 'We're living in the dumbest timeline right now, that's all I can say,' Cox concluded. RSL hoping to make a run in second half of season Utah lawmakers oppose AI regulation in Trump's 'Big, beautiful bill' 'Somebody has to stop it:' Gov. Cox defends Trump's decision to deploy troops to LA 'We're living in the dumbest timeline' — Gov. Cox comments on SLC Sego pride flags Calif. governor asks court to block Trump administration from using troops in immigration raids Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Dumb flags' and a ‘dumb bill': Utah governor rolls his eyes at SLC's workaround of flag ban
Flags adopted as official banners of Salt Lake City, circumventing the state's ban on most flags being displayed at government buildings and schools, hang outside the Salt Lake City and County building on Wednesday, May 7, 2025. The official city flags include the Salt Lake City flag, pride flag, Juneteenth flag and transgender flag. (McKenzie Romero/Utah News Dispatch) 'Dumb.' That was the word Utah Gov. Spencer Cox used Tuesday to express his annoyance with a new law that bans certain flags in schools and government buildings while also criticizing Salt Lake City leaders' move to circumvent the ban by adopting pride and other flags symbolizing diversity and inclusion as official city banners. 'They're dumb flags and it was a dumb bill,' Cox said curtly when asked during his monthly PBS Utah news conference about Salt Lake City's response to the flag ban. Salt Lake City adopts new banners, sidestepping pride flag ban Last month, hours before the new flag ban law took effect in Utah, Salt Lake City Mayor Erin Mendenhall unveiled a proposal to adopt three new city flags: a rainbow one symbolizing support for LGBTQ+ communities, a pink and white one for transgender people, and a red and blue one emulating the Juneteenth flag — all with Salt Lake City's official white sego lily symbol. That evening, the City Council voted unanimously to adopt the flags. Cox allowed HB77, the bill Utah lawmakers passed aimed at banning many flags — including pride or LGBTQ+ flags — from schools and all government buildings to become law without his signature. The bill made Utah the first state in the nation to enact such a sweeping flag ban. Though he let it become law, Cox wasn't a fan of HB77. He described it in a letter as 'one of the most divisive bills of the session' and lamented that it didn't result in a compromise. Supporters of the flag ban, sponsored by Rep. Trevor Lee, R-Layton, have argued it was meant to promote 'political neutrality' in government spaces. But critics argued the broad ban would invite free speech litigation while also leaving some Utahns, especially the LGBTQ+ community, feeling unwelcome and erased. Cox could have vetoed the bill, but he indicated in his letter that it would likely have been overridden by the Republican-supermajority Utah Legislature. Instead, he urged lawmakers to 'consider commonsense solutions that address the bill's numerous flaws.' While Cox said he agreed with the 'underlying intent' to bring 'political neutrality to the classroom,' he also wrote 'unfortunately, this bill does not do that.' 'As tired as Utahns are of politically divisive symbols, I think they are also tired of culture war bills that don't solve the problems they intend to fix,' Cox wrote in his letter. On Tuesday, Cox called the ongoing debate over the flag ban and Salt Lake City leaders' response 'ridiculous.' As Sundance leaves, Utah Gov. Cox allows first-in-the-nation flag ban to become law without his pen 'You know, I feel bad for Japanese Americans. I feel bad for Polynesian Americans. I mean, who are we leaving out, here?' Cox said of Salt Lake City's new banners. 'I'm sure they feel great that they got around this dumb law, and they did it with dumb flags. The whole thing's dumb.' Pressed on what he thinks should be done instead, Cox said, 'We should raise the American flag, and let's unify around that. It's a great flag. It represents everyone. And the Legislature doesn't need to be in everybody's business all the time.' Cox let out an exasperated laugh before adding: 'we're living in the dumbest timeline right now. That's all I can say.' In response to a request for comment on Tuesday, a spokesperson for the Salt Lake City Mayor's Office said 'we've had an overwhelmingly positive response' from Salt Lake City residents for the newly adopted city banners. Lee, in a post on X responding to Cox's comments on Tuesday, wrote: 'So the bill to stop the divide and get everyone to raise one flag… was dumb?' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
