All NATO, including US, 'totally committed' to keeping Ukraine in fight, Rutte says
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte holds a press conference ahead of a NATO summit, in The Hague, Netherlands June 23, 2025. REUTERS/Yves Herman
BRUSSELS (Reuters) -The whole of NATO, including the United States, is "totally committed" to keeping Ukraine in the fight against Russia's invasion, alliance Secretary General Mark Rutte told Reuters in an interview on Wednesday.
Speaking at the end of a summit of NATO leaders in The Hague, Rutte also said nobody in NATO was naive about Russia and
all alliance members "have more or less the same assessment" of Moscow.
U.S. President Donald Trump's more conciliatory stance towards Russia in his efforts to bring an end to the war in Ukraine has prompted questions about U.S. commitments to Kyiv.
"The whole of NATO, including the United States, is totally committed to keep Ukraine in the fight, to make sure that if there is a peace deal, that peace deal - or the ceasefire - will be lasting, will be durable," Rutte said.
He said the clear direction of travel was that Europeans would be responsible for more of the military aid to Ukraine.
But he said the United States would still be "very much involved with intelligence-sharing, with also practical military support" including potentially air defence systems.
"I think there will still be a huge, big American involvement," Rutte said.
The Trump administration has also told Europeans that they must take over primary responsibility for their own security, rather than relying on the United States through NATO.
Rutte said this process would be possible as Europeans had committed to spending more on defence, and it would be "well-organised" to avoid any gaps that Russia could exploit.
"I've had these discussions in Washington over the last couple of months," he said.
"For years, the U.S. has said 'we have to pivot more towards Asia'. Now that the Europeans are stepping up, that also makes it possible," he said.
"You will see that what the U.S. is delivering to NATO in terms of capabilities will gradually come down. But there's also total clarity from the U.S. that they don't want any capability gaps to emerge in Europe," Rutte said.
(Reporting by Andrew Gray;Editing by Sudip Kar-Gupta and Sandra Maler)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
33 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Trump hails ‘monumental win' as Nato agrees to hike defence spending to 5pc of GDP
THE HAGUE, June 26 — Nato countries agreed Wednesday to massively ramp up their defence spending to satisfy US President Donald Trump, who hailed it as a 'monumental win' for America — and reaffirmed his country's commitment to protect its European allies. Trump cut a jubilant figure after Nato's 32 countries agreed to his headline target of five per cent of GDP on defence spending following two days of talks in The Hague. Taking credit for a 'fantastic' outcome that 'no one really thought possible', Trump described the spending hike as 'a monumental win for the United States'. Trump also signed off on a final declaration confirming an 'ironclad commitment' to Nato's collective defence pledge that an attack on one is an attack on all — a reassuring move for European countries worried about Russia. The US leader has repeatedly suggested Washington could withhold protection from European countries unwilling to spend more on defence. The compromise hatched by Nato sees countries promise to dedicate 3.5 per cent of GDP to core military spending by 2035, and a further 1.5 to broader security-related areas such as infrastructure. Spain had been refusing to agree and while it signed the pledge it has said it thinks it can fulfil Nato's demands while spending less — Trump threatening on Wednesday to hit its trade interests in response. But the pledge endorsed in The Hague allows Trump to claim triumph, while in practice providing wiggle room for cash-strapped governments in Europe. 'Couldn't have been nicer' Everything was choreographed at the gathering to keep the volatile US president on board: from chopping back the official part of the meeting, to putting him up overnight in the royal palace. Underpinning the leaders' discussions on defence was Moscow's invasion of Ukraine, with the summit's final statement referring to the 'long-term threat posed by Russia to Euro-Atlantic security'. Though its language was watered down from previous years, the declaration also said allies would continue to support Ukraine, 'whose security contributes to ours', and allies will be allowed to use money from the new pledge for military aid for Kyiv. Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky played a less central role than at previous summits — with leaders wary of any embarrassment after an infamous row with Trump during a visit to the Oval Office. But the US president did meet the war-torn country's leader on the summit sidelines, declaring afterwards the encounter 'couldn't have been nicer' and Zelensky hailing a 'substantive' meeting. Trump also said he was talking to Russian President Vladimir Putin about the war, adding: 'I think progress is being made.' British Prime Minister Keir Starmer also met Zelensky along with a group of other European leaders, saying afterwards he hoped to 'use the momentum from the summit to continue to step up support for Ukraine'. Nato chief Mark Rutte, also present at the Starmer meeting, renewed a promise that Ukraine's bid for membership remained 'irreversible', but the summit statement avoided any mention of Kyiv's push to join after Trump ruled it out. 'Not a rip-off' Trump had rattled allies on the summit's eve by appearing to cast some doubt on the validity of Nato's mutual defence clause — known as Article Five of the alliance treaty. But the pledge was reaffirmed unequivocally in the summit's final statement — and Trump drove the point home at his closing press conference. 'I came here because it was something I'm supposed to be doing,' Trump said in closing remarks to the press, when pressed on the mutual defence clause known as Article Five. 'But I left here a little bit differently,' said the US leader — who was visibly delighted at the red carpet welcome and the praise lavished on him by Nato's Rutte among others. 'Without the United States, they couldn't really have Nato. Wouldn't work,' Trump said. 'It will in the future, because now they're paying much more money.' — AFP
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Trump: US to hold nuclear talks with Iran next week after ‘obliterating' strikes
ISTANBUL, June 26 — US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday he would likely seek a commitment from Iran to end its nuclear ambitions at talks next week and credited US strikes on Iran with bringing a swift end to the war between Israel and Tehran. Trump said his decision to unleash huge bunker-busting bombs in Sunday's attack had devastated Iran's nuclear programme and called the outcome 'a victory for everybody'. 'It was very severe. It was obliteration,' he said, shrugging off an initial assessment by the US Defense Intelligence Agency that Iran's path to building a nuclear weapon may have been set back only by months. Meanwhile, anxious Iranians and Israelis sought to resume normal life after 12 days of the most intense confrontation ever between the two foes and a ceasefire that took effect Tuesday. Speaking in The Hague where he attended a Nato summit on Wednesday, Trump said he did not see Iran again engaging in nuclear weapons development. Tehran has for decades denied accusations by Western leaders that it is seeking nuclear arms. 'We're going to talk to them next week, with Iran. We may sign an agreement. I don't know. To me, I don't think it's that necessary,' Trump said. 'I'll tell you, the last thing they want to do is enrich anything right now. They want to recover,' he said, referring to Western accusations that Iran has been enriching uranium to near-weapons-grade purity. Later on Wednesday, US Central Intelligence Agency Director John Ratcliffe said in a statement that the US air strikes had 'severely damaged' Iran's nuclear programme, but he stopped short of declaring that the programme had been destroyed. The agency confirmed a 'body of credible evidence' that several key Iranian facilities were destroyed and would take years to rebuild, he said. Israel's nuclear agency assessed the strikes had 'set back Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years'. The White House also circulated the Israeli assessment, although Trump said he was not relying on Israeli intelligence. Trump said he was confident Tehran would pursue a diplomatic path towards reconciliation. The president gave no details on the discussions next week such as the venue and participants. If Iran tried to rebuild its nuclear programme, 'we won't let that happen. Number one, militarily we won't,' he said, adding that he thought 'we'll end up having something of a relationship with Iran' to resolve the issue. The head of the UN's nuclear watchdog, Rafael Grossi, dismissed what he called the 'hourglass approach' of assessing damage to Iran's nuclear programme in terms of months needed to rebuild as besides the point for an issue that needed a long-term solution. 'In any case, the technological knowledge is there and the industrial capacity is there. That, no one can deny. So we need to work together with them,' he said. His priority was returning international inspectors to Iranian nuclear sites, which he said was the only way to find out precisely what state they were in. Iran president hints at domestic reforms Israel's bombing campaign, launched with a surprise attack on June 13, wiped out the top echelon of Iran's military leadership and killed leading nuclear scientists. Iran responded with missiles that pierced Israel's defences in large numbers for the first time. Iranian authorities said 627 people were killed and nearly 5,000 injured in Iran, where the extent of the damage could not be independently confirmed because of tight restrictions on media. Twenty-eight people were killed in Israel. Israel claimed to have achieved its goals of destroying Iran's nuclear sites and missiles; Iran claimed to have forced the end of the war by penetrating Israeli defences. Israel's demonstration that it could target Iran's senior leadership seemingly at will posed perhaps the biggest challenge yet for Iran's clerical rulers, at a critical juncture when they must find a successor for Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, now 86 and in power for 36 years. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, a relative moderate elected last year in a challenge to years of dominance by hardliners, said it could result in reform. 'This war and the empathy that it fostered between the people and officials is an opportunity to change the outlook of management and the behaviour of officials so that they can create unity,' he said in a statement carried by state media. Still, Iran's authorities moved swiftly to demonstrate their control. The judiciary announced the execution of three men on Wednesday convicted of collaborating with Israel's Mossad spy agency and smuggling equipment used in an assassination. Iran had arrested 700 people accused of ties with Israel during the conflict, the state-affiliated Nournews reported. During the war, both Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Trump publicly suggested that it could end with the toppling of Iran's entire system of clerical rule, established in its 1979 revolution. But after the ceasefire, Trump said he did not want to see 'regime change' in Iran, which he said would bring chaos at a time when he wanted the situation to settle down. Relief, apprehension, exhaustion In both Iran and Israel, residents expressed relief at the end of the fighting, but also apprehension. 'We came back after the ceasefire was announced. People are relieved that the war has stopped, but there's a lot of uncertainty about what comes next,' said Farah, 67, who returned to Tehran from nearby Lavasan, where she had fled to escape Israeli bombing. In Tel Aviv, Rony Hoter-Ishay Meyer, 38, said the war's end brought mixed emotions: relief that children could return to school and normal life resume, but exhaustion from the stress. 'Those past two weeks were catastrophic in Israel, and we are very much exhausted and we need to get back to our normal energy.' — Reuters
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
CIA says intelligence indicates Iran's nuclear programme severely damaged
WASHINGTON: Central Intelligence Agency Director John Ratcliffe said credible intelligence suggested recent US strikes had severely damaged Iran's nuclear programme, which could take years to rebuild. "This includes new intelligence from a historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years," Ratcliffe said in a statement. US President Donald Trump was reported as saying on Wednesday that US strikes led to the "total obliteration" of Iran's nuclear capabilities and set the country's atomic programme back "decades", while Israel said it was still early to fully assess the damage. Over a 12-day conflict, Israel pounded Iranian nuclear and military sites while Iran launched waves of missiles at its foe during their deadliest-ever confrontation. The United States joined the fray in support of its ally, hitting two nuclear facilities with massive bunker-buster bombs over the weekend, while a guided missile from a submarine struck a third. But leaked US intelligence cast doubt on the damage caused by American strikes, saying they had set back Tehran's nuclear programme by just a few months.
