How India's Op Sindoor and Israel's Op Rising Lion were similar
A tenuous ceasefire holds for now between Israel and Iran after a 12-day war that began with Israeli jets striking Iranian nuclear sites. Israel's Operation Rising Lion came just weeks after India's Operation Sindoor. There are similarities on the ground and the way both countries crossed lines that were never crossed before.India's May 7 aerial attack on terror camps in Pakistan came after Pakistani and Pakistan-trained terrorists killed 26 civilians in Pahalgam, south Kashmir. Israel sent jets to target nuclear facilities inside Iran, a country whose leadership has threatened the very existence of the Jewish nation.While the India-Pakistan mini-war lasted for three days before the Pakistani DGMO sued for peace, the Israel-Iran war continued for 12 days. The damage to civilian infrastructure in the military conflict in the recent Middle East conflict was massive too.There are sharp contrasts in how both the operations were carried out, and in how the US engaged militarily by sending its B-2 stealth bombers. But the parallels between India's Op Sindoor and Israel's Op Rising Lion are remarkable too.1. INDIA, ISRAEL JETS STRUCK INSIDE ENEMY TERRITORY"India attacked terrorist camps and military infrastructure inside Pakistan using the Indian Air Force (IAF). Israel did the same inside Iran, using the Israeli Air Force (IAF) on a far bigger scale," defence expert Sandeep Unnithan tells India Today Digital.In India's case, this was the first time that its fighter planes hit targets in the heart of Pakistan -- in Punjab -- since the 1971 Indo-Pak War. Unlike Israeli fighters, Indian jets didn't cross over into Pakistan.Both the Indian and the Israeli air forces used precision-guided munitions to carry out the attacks."Obviously, the recent 88-hour India-Pakistan conflict was much more limited than the 12-day Israel-Iran conflict, but in terms of messaging there's a strong parallel," reads a post on X by author-columnist Sadanand Dhume.In both cases, says Dhume, "...One side (India, Israel) crossed previously uncrossed red lines, and inflicted much more damage than the other".2. THE IRAN, PAKISTAN N-FACTORThe nuclear factor is also common in both operations."Nuclear-armed Israel attacked Iran to prevent it from getting nuclear weapons. India attacked nuclear-armed Pakistan, and called out Pakistan's nuclear blackmail," explains Unnithan.With Operation Sindoor, India called out Pakistan's nuclear bluff and exposed the narrative that it was the nuclear weapons that prevented an all-out war between the two countries. The N-tag couldn't prevent the 25-minute operation when Indian fighter jets struck inside Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir.Israel's operation, later joined in by the US, was targeted at keeping Iran away from nuclear weapons.Though President Donald Trump claimed that Iran's sites targeted by the US had been "totally destroyed", American media outlets, quoting intel reports, said the setback was temporary.By targeting the Nur Khan airbase in Chaklala, India signalled it could decapitate Pakistan's nuclear command centre."Pakistan's deepest fear is of its nuclear command authority being decapitated. The missile strike on Nur Khan could have been interpreted... as a warning that India could do just that," The New York Times quoted a former US official familiar with Pakistan's nuclear programme as saying.3. IRAN, PAKISTAN AIR DEFENCES PUT OUT OF ACTIONAfter Pakistan targeted Indian defence and civilian areas, India retaliated and put its air defence and air bases out of action.Pakistan's China-made air defence systems failed miserably, and India used its indigenous BrahMos missiles to turn Pakistani military runways into Swiss cheese.By neutralising the air defence system at Lahore, India opened the skies over the Pakistani capital, showing it could strike at will.Israel didn't just indicate, but put Iranian air defences completely out of action. That was also the reason why the American B-2 bombers could go on a 37-hour mission to strike targets inside Iran.4. PAKISTAN AND IRAN'S PROXIESThere are similarities even in the pain points of India and Israel.Since the time it was created, Pakistan has tried to bleed India through proxy terror groups. Israel, too, has been a victim of Iran's non-state actors."India has accused Pakistan of rearing non-state actors like LeT and Jaish-e-Mohammed. Israel has accused Iran of rearing anti-Israeli proxies like Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis," says Unnithan.If the Pahalgam terror attack, carried out by The Resistance Front (a front for the LeT) made India carry out Op Sindoor, it was the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack in which over a thousand people were killed in Israel triggered the fresh cycle of violence that culminated in Operation Rising Lion.advertisementFrom tackling the proxies, both India and Israel went full hammer against the states sponsoring them.It was a doctrinal shift for India, while for Israel, it was a continuation of the 'Begin Doctrine' -- the willingness for anticipatory strikes against Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) capacities in perceived hostile nations.5. THE CEASEFIRE, TRUMP AND WARNING OF MORE ACTIONPresident Trump jumped to declare that his administration had brokered a truce between India and Pakistan, like he did in the case of Iran and Israel.India has rejected the claims, and said it was a call from the Pakistani DGMO on the afternoon of May 10 that led to the ceasefire.In the case of Iran and Israel, Trump's claims of a ceasefire was left in tatters after Iran fired missiles into Tel Aviv after the US President's claims of a truce and Israel said it would retaliate.Even in the India-Pakistan mini-war, Pakistan breached the ceasefire in the initial hours, sending in swarms of drones.The similarity in both operations continues despite the ceasefire pacts.India has asserted that Operation Sindoor hasn't ended, but remains suspended."The enemy [Pakistan] should not be under any illusion... Operation Sindoor is not over yet," Prime Minister Narendra Modi, adding that India's response to terror attacks would be decisive and uncompromising.Operation Sindoor is the new normal, as India would be treating any terror attack as an act of war against India.When asked on June 25 if the US would strike again if Iran rebuilt its nuclear enrichment programme, Trump responded by saying, "Sure", reported Reuters."Iran will not enrich -- the last thing they want to do is enrich," he said.Tehran insists on its right to a peaceful civilian nuclear programme.From the triggers to how they were carried out to the messaging, there are similarities in both India's Op Sindoor and Israel's Op Rising Lion.- EndsTune InMust Watch
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
17 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Khamenei's lawmaker slams ceasefire, says ‘Israel will attack Iran…'
Published on Jun 26, 2025 05:45 PM IST Just 48 hours after Iran and Israel agreed to a ceasefire, an Iranian lawmaker warns Israel may attack within 24 hours, calling the truce a 'strategic mistake.' Iran suspends cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog as tensions escalate over missing uranium and recent US strikes. Get the latest updates on the Iran-Israel conflict and nuclear crisis.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
18 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Salaam New York: Zohran Mamdani & a fusion of 3 cross-continental cultures
There has been a development in New York that challenges Donald Trump's America, where certain subjects – such as diversity, inclusion, immigrants, and Palestine – have become difficult to venture into. It is the primary victory of Zohran Kwame Mamdani in the mayoral election, one that makes him likely to become New York City's first Indian-American and first Muslim mayor if he wins against the Republican candidate in November. The 33-year-old Democratic candidate, who is a former Republican, was born to immigrant parents, supports Palestine, has a socialist agenda for New York, including free childcare and rent cap, feels strongly about climate change, wants to tax wealthy Big Apple residents, and increase corporate tax. His pro-Palestine slogan, 'Globalise the intifada (rebellion or uprising)', has his opponents gunning for him and the American media dissecting his politics, but he has stood his ground. In many ways, Mamdani symbolises multiculturalism, which stems from the family he comes from, the relationships he has forged, and the arts he has embraced. His mother, Mira Nair, is a well-recognised Indian-American filmmaker, many of whose movies have been critically acclaimed globally. Among them are Salaam Bombay!, Mississippi Masala, The Namesake, Queen of Katwe, Monsoon Wedding, in each of which she pushes boundaries, often turning the spotlight on the underdog, bringing the missable into focus: Whether it is about the struggles of first-generation immigrants (The Namesake), who are caught between two cultures, and their children, who believe they belong to their parents' adopted country but don't quite; or, about the precarious lives of children in the slums of the financial powerhouse now called Mumbai (Salaam Bombay!), where the actors are the street children themselves; or about the travails of a 10-year-old chess prodigy born in a disadvantaged part of Uganda (Queen of Katwe). There is a story behind the name 'Nair', which appears to indicate that Mamdani's mother has roots in Kerala. She is, however, a Punjabi, and her father was in the Indian Administrative Service and mother a social worker. The family name, Nayyar, was changed to 'Nair' by her grandfather for reasons unclear. There is also a story behind Mamdani's middle name, 'Kwame'. It was given to him by his Indian-Ugandan father, Mahmood Mamdani, in honour of the first President of Ghana, Kwame Nkrumah, whom the BBC described as a 'Hero of Independence' and an 'international symbol of freedom as the leader of the first black African country to shake off the chains of colonial rule'. An academic, Mamdani Senior, whose specialisation includes colonialism and post-colonialism, was born in pre-Independence Bombay to Gujarati Shia Muslim parents, who later migrated to Kampala, Uganda. He would, after coming to study in the United States in the '60s, participate in the civil rights movement, and would also be jailed. It wouldn't be amiss to say that a lot of Zohran Mamdani's politics has been shaped by his parents'. In 2013, for instance, Mira Nair had turned down an invitation to the Haifa International Film Festival in Israel as a guest of honour. On what was then called Twitter, and is now X, she posted: 'I will go to Israel when the walls come down. I will go to Israel when occupation is gone... I stand w/ Palestine for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel…' The mayor probable's parents, incidentally, met in Uganda while Nair was researching for Mississippi Masala, and that's where he was born in 1991 – coincidentally, the year the film was released. The couple immigrated to the US when he was seven. Earlier this year, Zohran Mamdani married Syrian-American artist Rama Duwaji, whose work, besides exploring migration, heritage, community and identity, also draws to pro-Palestinian themes. The arts have been Mamdani's constant companion – not just because of his filmmaker mother and artist wife. He is a former rapper. Nine years ago, he released an EP, titled 'Sidda Mukyaalo' (Luganda for 'No going back to the village'), along with Ugandan rapper HAB. And in 2019 came a single, titled 'Nani' – a tribute to his maternal grandmother, Praveen Nair, rich with cultural references to India. It featured the multifaceted actor and cookbook author Madhur Jaffrey as a revolutionary 'nani'. This video can be found on the YouTube channel called 'Mr Cardamom', a moniker Mamdani gave himself. It's a clever sobriquet, given that he is a lawmaker from Queens, and cardamom is recognised as the 'queen of spices'. It is a versatile spice, one that works both in sweet and savoury preparations, and while it is never the core ingredient, it always makes its presence known. Mamdani has also made the world sit up and take note. In 2019, when he first ran for office (New York State Assembly), he redirected his followers from 'Mr Cardamom' to his official handle on X with this message: 'You know I'll be forever spicy but I'm taking a break from being a spice to answer the question of what happens when a B-list rapper runs for office….'. His official handle now has something like 376,000 followers, whereas Mr Cardamom is at 380. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump has gone after Mamdani through his social media platform, Truth Social, branding him a '100 per cent communist lunatic' and saying that 'the Democrats have crossed the line'. The rapper-turned-politician, however, is staying the course. In November, if he is elected New York City's mayor, one of the things he'll be doing is to oversee the largest municipal Budget in the US.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
18 minutes ago
- Business Standard
'Water won't go anywhere': Jal Shakti minister on Indus Waters Treaty
Union Jal Shakti Minister CR Patil on Thursday said the water from the Indus river system won't go anywhere, and whatever decision the government takes will be for the benefit of the nation. His statement comes months after India suspended the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) with Pakistan following the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack. At a press conference, the minister was asked about the status of the treaty, "This decision belongs to the Indian government and the Prime Minister... There is no update on the abeyance of the treaty. Whatever decision will be taken will only benefit the nation," he said. #WATCH | Delhi | On Indus Water Treaty, Union Jal Shakti Minister CR Patil says, "This decision belongs to the Indian government and the Prime Minister... There is no update on the abeyance of the treaty. Whatever decision will be taken will only benefit the nation..." — ANI (@ANI) June 26, 2025 Referring to the recent remarks by former Pakistani foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto on IWT, Patil said that India is "not afraid of false threats". Two days ago, Bhutto said that India should either share the water fairly or Pakistan will direct the water towards them from all six rivers, news agency PTI reported. #WATCH | Delhi | On Bilawal Bhutto's reported statement on Indus Water Treaty, Union Jal Shakti Minister CR Patil says, "The water won't go anywhere... What he says is his own question... We are not afraid of false threats..." — ANI (@ANI) June 26, 2025 The Indus Waters Treaty, signed in 1960, governs the distribution of water from the Indus river system — Indus, Jhelum, Chenab, Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej — between India and Pakistan. Islamabad depends on water from the three rivers originating in India for around 80 per cent of its agricultural needs. India had suspended the treaty as a diplomatic retaliation after the Pahalgam terrorist attack that killed 26 people, mostly tourists. Last week, in an interview with The Times of India, Union Home Minister Amit Shah also said that India will never revive the Indus Waters Treaty and will instead redirect river water currently flowing to Pakistan for use within India.
