logo
The American experiment launched with the sound of gunshots

The American experiment launched with the sound of gunshots

Washington Post18-04-2025

Warning: This graphic requires JavaScript. for the best experience.
Rick Atkinson, a former reporter and editor at The Post, is author of the forthcoming 'The Fate of the Day: The War for America, Fort Ticonderoga to Charleston, 1777-1780.'
It began just after dawn on April 19, 250 years ago, with an abrupt spatter of gunfire in rural Massachusetts that left eight Americans dead on Lexington Common, a bucolic crossroads of 750 people and 400 cows. For the next eight years, an obscure squabble on the edge of the world metastasized into both a civil war of internecine fury and a global conflict fought on four continents and the seven seas. By the end, after 1,300 battlefield actions, plus 241 naval engagements, the British Empire was badly diminished and the new United States of America was ascendant, a fledgling republic with its own imperial ambitions.
The American semiquincentennial begins now, marking the 250th anniversary of this country's founding. Like the bicentennial five decades ago, it's an opportunity for both celebration and reflection on who we are, where we came from, what our forebears believed and — perhaps the most fearsome question any people can ask themselves — what they were willing to die for.
Today, the revolution that midwifed a nation seems an ancient, arcane quarrel over taxes, trade policy and self-rule. But even now, certain truths can be discerned across the centuries: that this nation was born from violence, with bitter discord part of that birthright; that high-minded leaders worthy of esteem can rise to the occasion with pluck, wisdom and equanimity; and that regardless of the trials bedeviling us in 2025, when national unity is elusive and when partisan rancor seems ever more venomous, we have surmounted greater perils, existential perils, throughout our history.
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
Much about the American Revolution has been forgotten or distorted. The nation's founders often are either embalmed in reverence or condemned for their manifest flaws. Certainly 18th-century revolutionary rhetoric tended to be aspirational, if not delusional. The galvanic assertion that 'all men are created equal' hardly held true for half a million enslaved Black people — 1 in 5 of all Americans occupying the 13 colonies when those words were written in 1776. Nor was it valid for women, Native Americans or poor people Throughout the Revolution, Americans still loyal to the British crown, or just skeptical of armed rebellion against their government, were subjected to disenfranchisement, jail, confiscation, torture, exile and even execution.
Yet the American creation story remains pertinent, vivid and exhilarating, a reminder that we are the beneficiaries of an enlightened political heritage handed down to us from that revolutionary generation. The bequest includes a legacy of personal liberty and strictures on how to divide power and prevent it from concentrating in the hands of authoritarians who think primarily of themselves. We cannot let that heritage slip away. We cannot permit it to be taken away. We cannot be oblivious to this priceless gift, or the hundreds of thousands of Americans who have given their lives to affirm and sustain it over the past two and a half centuries.
Time and distance have largely bleached the blood from the Revolution, giving it the lusterless, tidy look of a faded lithograph. Yet the war was brutal, relentless and often cruel. British troops burned numerous towns, including Norfolk, Charlestown near Boston, Falmouth in what's now Maine, Kingston in New York, and Fairfield and Norwalk in Connecticut. Britain's German allies, the Hessians, were accused of many rapes in central New Jersey and pillaging everywhere. American troops captured and murdered Indians allied with the British before flinging their bodies into the Wabash River. Other American soldiers destroyed 40 Native American villages in western New York during a vengeful campaign.
Some of the towns burned down by British forces around New England
New Hampshire
Charlestown
Lexington
massachusetts
Boston
Norfolk
connecticut
R.I.
Fairfield
Norwalk
N
Atlantic
Ocean
50 miles
Falmouth
New
Hampshire
Charlestown
Lexington
New
york
Boston
massachusetts
Norfolk
Kingston
connecticut
Fairfield
Norwalk
N
Atlantic
Ocean
50 miles
Falmouth
MAINE
Vermont
New
Hampshire
N
Lexington
New
york
Charlestown
massachusetts
Boston
Norfolk
Kingston
connecticut
r.i.
Fairfield
Norwalk
50 miles
Atlantic Ocean
At least 25,000 of the 2.5 million Americans in 1775 perished in the struggle for independence, and possibly many more, a larger proportion of our population to die in any conflict other than the Civil War. The hostility convulsing the country bred partisan violence and retribution. 'Everywhere distrust, fear, hatred, and abominable selfishness,' a Lutheran pastor outside Philadelphia wrote. 'Parents and children, brothers and sisters, wife and husband were enemies to one another.'
Rebel militiamen whipped loyalists in Virginia until they shouted, 'Liberty forever.' South Carolina divided loyalists into four categories, with varying degrees of reprisal depending on the extent of alignment with the enemy. Mandatory oaths renouncing allegiance to the crown helped distinguish friend from foe; those who refused to swear could be fined or imprisoned without bond. 'Tory hunting' expeditions seized 'inimicals' such as Moses Dunbar, who was captured while enlisting Connecticut men for a loyalist regiment. Before his hanging in Hartford in March 1777 — and it was said that Dunbar's patriot father offered to provide hemp for the noose — his pregnant young wife was forced to sit beside him as he rode in a tumbrel to the gallows. This fracturing of the body politic foreshadowed the Civil War nearly a century later, not in the causes of the schism but in the bitter estrangement of American from American.
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
Many myths persist about the rebellion. The romantic image of a yeoman farmer leaving his plow in the furrow to grab a musket on behalf of freedom hardly does justice to the real Continental Army. Rabid enthusiasm for the patriot cause faded quickly after 1775, when the ranks at first had been filled with propertied freeholders and tradesmen, many of whom soon returned to their farms, tanneries or shops to attend families and businesses they could no longer ignore.
Instead, the army increasingly depended on the landless young, the poor, the desperate and sometimes the shiftless. These ranks included unemployed laborers, apprentices, farmhands, servants, drifters and recent immigrants, notably Irish Protestants driven to America by crop failures and a collapse of the weaving industry. They needed the income, even if it was only the $6 and change that a private earned each month. States began conscripting troops, sometimes with names drawn from a hat, although some local governments permitted the hiring of substitutes for Continental Army service, or the buying of exemptions with a fine. In New Jersey, drafted masters enrolled their slaves or indentured servants in their stead, and up to 40 percent of that state's soldiers in the Continental Army were substitutes. Maryland began forcing vagrants into service. Desertion was such a persistent problem that Gen. George Washington warned that 'we shall be obliged to detach one-half of the army to bring back the other.'
Washington himself remains heavily mythified. The man proverbially incapable of telling a lie could certainly be disingenuous, notably in his dispatches to Congress after another battlefield setback. He at times was moody and self-pitying, with a molten temper. 'I do not think any officer since the creation ever had such a variety of difficulties and perplexities to encounter as I have,' he complained in 1777. For much of the Revolution, he was an indifferent tactician, and his generalship proved a medley of miscalculation and misfortune, periodically redeemed with bold aggression and the good luck provided by stumbling enemies, providential fogs and bullets that barely missed.
During Washington's lifetime at Mount Vernon, at least 577 enslaved people worked his plantation, an appalling reminder that much of the country's prosperity was predicated on human bondage. One of those enslaved men said, 'I never see that man laugh to show his teeth. He done all his laughing inside.' That no doubt reflected a lifetime of dental miseries that kept Washington tight-lipped, but it also was because, as an aide wrote, 'the weight of the whole war may justly be said to lay upon his shoulders.' John Adams, who was wary of what he called the 'superstitious veneration' accorded Washington by many Americans, nevertheless conceded that his 'great, manly, warlike virtues' reassured the public, as did his rectitude and readiness to sacrifice self-interest for the greater good.
And in truth he embodied the classical virtues cherished by his countrymen: fortitude, prudence, temperance and the subordination of private advantage to public benefit, 'one steady line of conduct for the good of the great whole,' as Washington put it. Repeatedly refusing to use his power for his own ends, he consciously tried to emulate the Roman republicans he admired, notably Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus, a Roman military leader who saved Rome on the battlefield but then put away his sword to retire to his farm.
(Illustration by Sergio García Sánchez and Lola Moral for The Washington Post)
Americans faced daunting odds in opposing the British. No colonial rebellion in modern times had ever succeeded in casting off imperial shackles. Britain's advantages included the greatest navy the world had ever seen, sophisticated financing of military ventures, a population more than triple that of America and a knack for expeditionary warfare reminiscent of the Romans'.
But a dry rot had undermined King George III's cause virtually from those first shots at Lexington. Britain's war effort leaned on several strategic misconceptions in underestimating rebel resolve against British firepower and overestimating the depth of loyalist support across the colonies. Protecting and arming loyalists, so that the 'good Americans' (those loyal to the crown) could help subjugate the 'bad Americans' (the rebels) were critical if the insurgency was to be crushed. Yet recent scholarship has estimated that no more than 20 percent of White Americans during the Revolution were steadfast loyalists.
That was never enough to tip the scales during the war. Loyalists lacked national leaders, effective propaganda and self-sufficiency without massive British support. None of the 13 states remained under loyalist control as the war intensified, notwithstanding pockets of loyal strength along the western frontier from New York to Georgia and in maritime regions of the middle states. Despite few rebel military victories, virtually all levers of power, from municipal committees of safety to state governments and the national Congress, remained under insurrectionist control.
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
British commanders also underrated the difficulty of feeding tens of thousands of redcoats deployed in North America, as well as the 4,000 horses that consumed 20,000 tons of hay and oats a year. Because foraging expeditions often faced ambush by aroused rebels, nearly all supplies — from flour, salt meat and fodder to candles, musket balls and opium — had to be shipped from England or Ireland across 3,000 miles of open ocean in the age of sail, a voyage that could take at least three months even if not disrupted by rebel privateers or Atlantic storms. 'We can expect no supplies or assistance from this country,' the British commissary general wrote to London from occupied Philadelphia in late 1777. 'We cannot with safety go a hundred yards beyond our lines without a large escort.'
George III and his ministers moreover believed that allowing the American colonies to detach themselves from the empire would encourage insurrections in Canada, Ireland, India and the West Indies sugar islands. Dominos would topple, pushing Britain into 'a state of inferiority and consequently falling into a very low class among the European states,' as the king declared in 1780. That premise, disputed by the likes of political economist Adam Smith, whose monumental 'The Wealth of Nations' was published in 1776, proved ruinously wrong, yet it underpinned the king's determination to wage war for eight years at an estimated cost of 128 million pounds — or roughly $25 billion in today's money — with more than 30,000 British and German casualties and the eventual reduction of the British Empire by half a million square miles.
Against such obduracy an indomitable American persistence survived from season to season through the war, not in every patriot heart and not without despair, but in enough hearts and with enough hope to fight on. Ebenezer Stanton, a Connecticut army paymaster, wrote to a friend, 'I could wish I had two lives to lose in defense of so glorious a cause. … I was freeborn, and if I can support myself, I will stand or fall in defense of my country.'
My country. That concept had taken root in the American seedbed, nurtured by a shared faith that this struggle — ostensibly over taxes, autonomy and other parochial complaints — was ultimately about the chance to build both a new nation and a better world. Capt. John Marshall of Virginia, who survived Valley Forge and the battles at Brandywine, Germantown, Monmouth and Stony Point, and who was destined to become chief justice of the United States for 34 years, wrote, 'I was confirmed in the habit of considering America as my country and Congress as my government.' He also added, 'I had imbibed these sentiments so thoroughly that they constituted a part of my being.' Faith in the future sustained an irrational optimism, despite all the obvious perils.
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
During the dreary winter of 1778-1779, when the Continental Army was bivouacked across northern New Jersey, Washington and his officers organized a homely celebration to commemorate the first anniversary of France's joining the American cause, an alliance that eventually made victory possible. Thirteen cannons fired a salute, an army band played, and the guests wandered through 13 arches with illuminated paintings depicting scenes from the war: the first shots at Lexington; the stunning capture of British forces at Saratoga in 1777; the burning of Norfolk, Falmouth and other towns. A final arch imagined a future, peaceable America as 'a rising empire,' her rivers covered with merchant ships and new canals traversing the land. This is why they fought, suffered and died. They saw peace and prosperity, a land stretching from sea to shining sea. They saw us.
In 1790, Benjamin Franklin, whose service to the cause included duty in France as the country's first and greatest diplomat, died at the age of 84 in Philadelphia. But a few months before he passed, he wrote, in a letter to a friend, one of the lines for which he's best remembered: 'Our new Constitution is now established. Everything seems to promise it will be durable. But, in this world, nothing is certain except death and taxes.' What he's telling us, virtually from the grave, is that there's work to be done. The dream endures, but so does the struggle.
America is predicated on an idea: that all of us are created equal, that we are endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That should act as a polestar, providing true north and telling us what it is that we think we can do as a people. The perpetual challenge of the American experiment is to draw on these aspirational ideals, to make them our own, to hand them off to our children and our grandchildren, and to use that as a propulsion system for being the nation that those forebears thought we could become.
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
Graphics by Sergio Peçanha. Design by Chiqui Esteban.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US imposes sanctions on Los Chapitos, a faction of the Sinaloa Cartel
US imposes sanctions on Los Chapitos, a faction of the Sinaloa Cartel

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US imposes sanctions on Los Chapitos, a faction of the Sinaloa Cartel

By Daphne Psaledakis WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The United States on Monday imposed sanctions on Los Chapitos, a faction of the Sinaloa Cartel, labeling it a Specially Designated Global Terrorist as President Donald Trump's administration seeks to tackle cross-border drug trafficking. The U.S. Treasury Department in a statement said it designated Los Chapitos under illicit drug and terrorism authorities, accusing it of facilitating trafficking and production of fentanyl, the lethally potent opioid. Two of its fugitive leaders, both sons of convicted Mexican drug kingpin Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, were also hit with sanctions, according to the Treasury Department. "Los Chapitos is a powerful, hyperviolent faction of the Sinaloa Cartel at the forefront of fentanyl trafficking into the United States," Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in the statement. "At the Department of the Treasury, we are executing on President Trump's mandate to completely eliminate drug cartels and take on violent leaders like 'El Chapo's' children. Treasury is maximizing all available tools to stop the fentanyl crisis and help save lives." The Treasury on Monday also imposed sanctions on what it said was a regional network of Los Chapitos associates and businesses based in Mexico. Monday's action freezes any of their U.S. assets and generally bars Americans from dealing with them. Those that engage in certain transactions with the sanctioned parties also risk being hit with sanctions. The move comes after the Trump administration in February designated Tren de Aragua, the Sinaloa Cartel and other drug cartels as global terrorist organizations. Trump, a Republican, issued an executive order after taking office on January 20 that called on officials to evaluate whether any criminal cartels or transnational gangs should be designated as terrorism groups. The U.S. terrorism designations have come alongside a government crackdown on migration, with thousands of foreigners being deported to third countries in Latin America.

Noem praised Trump for sending National Guard. She opposed it when Biden considered it.
Noem praised Trump for sending National Guard. She opposed it when Biden considered it.

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Noem praised Trump for sending National Guard. She opposed it when Biden considered it.

WASHINGTON – As South Dakota governor in February 2024, Kristi Noem threatened then-President Joe Biden when Democrats said he should federalize the National Guard in Texas to disrupt that state governor's anti-immigration efforts. If he did, Noem warned, Biden would be mounting a 'direct attack on states' rights,' and sparking a 'war' between Washington and Republican-led state governments, she said in a Feb. 6, 2024 interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity. On June 8, Noem − now President Donald Trump's Homeland Security secretary − cheered Trump for doing the same thing to the Democratic governor of the state of California. Over the weekend, Trump deployed riot gear-clad National Guard troops to Los Angeles to shut down anti-immigration protests over the objections of California Gov. Gavin Newsom. If Newsom 'was doing his job," Noem said, "our ICE agents would not be injured and attacked while doing their jobs and carrying out immigration enforcement." 'Under the leadership of @POTUS," Noem added in a post on X, "Trump we will put the safety of American citizens FIRST not these criminal illegal aliens that sanctuary city politicians are defending.' Trump said late Sunday that he sent the National Guard to California to restore order amid mounting violent clashes between police and rock-throwing protesters angry at his aggressive efforts to detain and deport undocumented immigrants in the U.S. illegally. 'We're not going to let this happen to our country." Traditionally, it is up to the governor of a particular state to deploy the National Guard. Trump's National Guard deployment of 2,000 troops in Los Angeles is expected to last 60 days, according to a directive from California's adjutant general. Trump's memo June 7 invoked a section of federal code authorizing the president to call the guard into service to 'repel an invasion of the United States by a foreign nation' or to 'suppress a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States' or to 'execute the laws of the United States when the President is unable to do so with regular forces.' Newsom has vocally opposed Trump's intervention, and on Sunday formally asked the President to rescind the 'unlawful' deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles. 'This is a serious breach of state sovereignty," he said, 'Rescind the order. Return control to California.' Former acting vice chief of the National Guard bureau (Ret) Maj Gen Randy Manner criticized Trump for sending the National Guard to Los Angeles against Newsom's wishes. 'The President's federal deployment of the National Guard over the official wishes of a governor is bad for all Americans concerned about freedom of speech and states rights," Manner said in a statement to Fox News. Manner said that while Trump's order was technically legal, Newsom has "the authority and ability to respond to the civil disturbances with law enforcement capabilities within his state," augmented as needed by requesting law enforcement assistance from other governors. Trump's order, he said, "tramples the governor's rights and obligations to protect his people. This is an inappropriate use of the National Guard and is not warranted.' On CBS News' Face the Nation Sunday, Noem explained her reversal by saying, "Governor Newsom has proven that he makes bad decisions." "The president knows that he makes bad decisions, and that's why the President chose the safety of this community over waiting for Governor Newsom to get some sanity," Noem said. "And that's one of the reasons why these National Guard soldiers are being federalized so they can use their special skill set to keep peace." Last year, Noem's tune was much different. At the time, Democratic lawmakers and immigration-rights activists were lobbying heavily for Biden to federalize the National Guard in Texas to defuse a brewing crisis there over the state's aggressive crackdown on illegal immigration. More: National Guard on the ground in LA as immigration tensions escalate: Live updates Biden's Department of Homeland Security was complaining that razor wire that Texas had installed at the border with Mexico was preventing DHS agents from Customs and Border Protection and Immigration and Customs Enforcement from doing their jobs. Activists said the wire was endangering the lives of those trying to cross into the United States, especially via rivers at the border where the wire was installed. The Supreme Court had ruled that the federal government could cut through the razor wire. But the Republican governor in Texas, Greg Abbott, was refusing to take it down. The dispute led to a prolonged standoff between Abbott and the Biden administration, with the Texas National Guard at times blocking Border Patrol agents from accessing certain areas of the border. To resolve the standoff, Democrats and others demanded that Biden federalize National Guard soldiers in Texas and order them to stand down and get out of the way of federal immigration agents. In response, Noem not only sent National Guard soldiers from South Dakota to the border to support Abbott's efforts. She also went there personally, she said at the time, to stand with him in case Biden decided to intervene against Abbott's wishes. For his part, Biden never said he was even considering the move, which would have been unprecedented in recent history. The last time a President deployed the National Guard over the home state governor's objections was during the Civil Rights protests of the 1950s and 1960s, when Southern governors refused to comply with orders to desegregate schools and other public institutions. 'That would be a boneheaded move on his part, total disaster,' Abbott told conservative host Tucker Carlson on his show 'Uncensored." In her interview with Hannity, the Fox News host told Noem that she and other Republican governors who "stood by Gov. Abbott's side' and opposed federal intervention likely caused Biden to back down from doing something that likely would "have precipitated a real, real crisis down there.' That's why she personally went down to Texas, Noem said, because she recognized 'the real threat that was to states' rights.' 'We will defend our Constitution. We will defend our rights because the last several years, we've seen Democrats take away our freedom of religion, our freedom of assembly, our freedom of speech,' Noem told Hannity. 'We can't let them take away our state's rights too, especially our rights protect ourselves.' This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: DHS Sec. Noem opposed Biden, but praises Trump, on National Guard

How Elon Musk Is Responding to LA Riots During Feud With Trump
How Elon Musk Is Responding to LA Riots During Feud With Trump

Newsweek

time40 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

How Elon Musk Is Responding to LA Riots During Feud With Trump

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Elon Musk shared comments made by President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance related to the Los Angeles riots during his ongoing public feud with Trump over the "One Big Beautiful Bill" proposal. On Sunday, Musk shared a Truth Social post by Trump on X criticizing California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass. "Governor Gavin Newscum and 'Mayor' Bass should apologize to the people of Los Angeles for the absolutely horrible job that they have done, and this now includes the ongoing L.A. riots," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "These are not protesters, they are troublemakers and insurrectionists." Why It Matters Protests broke out in Los Angeles over the weekend following reports that detainees were being held in the basement of a federal building. ICE denied these allegations, with a spokesperson previously telling Newsweek the agency "categorically refutes the assertions made by immigration activists in Los Angeles." The Trump administration has conducted numerous ICE raids, some of which have swept up individuals with proper documentation. Trump deployed National Guard troops to Los Angeles following violence toward law enforcement officials. What To Know Musk also showed support after Vance shared another Truth Social post made by Trump on X. "A once great American city, Los Angeles, has been invaded and occupied by Illegal Aliens and Criminals," Trump wrote. "Now violent, insurrectionist mobs are swarming and attacking our Federal Agents to try and stop our deportation operations—But these lawless riots only strengthen our resolve." In Vance's repost of the comments, he added, "This moment calls for decisive leadership. The president will not tolerate rioting and violence." Musk shared both Vance and Trump's comments with two American flag emojis. Elon Musk attends a news conference with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House, Friday, May 30, 2025, in Washington. Elon Musk attends a news conference with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House, Friday, May 30, 2025, in Washington. AP Photo/Evan Vucci Newsweek reached out to the White House and representatives for Musk for comment. The rift between Musk and Trump had intensified after Musk, once the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) in Trump's administration, launched scathing public criticism of Trump's signature "One Big Beautiful Bill" proposal. Musk repeatedly denounced the legislation as "outrageous," "pork-filled," and a "disgusting abomination," a stance that undercut the two men's previously close working and political relationship. Trump initially avoided direct confrontation, but as Musk's messaging intensified across social media, Trump publicly responded, calling his former ally "crazy" and suggesting Musk suffered from "Trump derangement syndrome." The situation escalated further after Musk went beyond fiscal disagreements and claimed, without substantiation, that Trump's name appeared in the Jeffrey Epstein files. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt has called Musk's claim "an unfortunate episode." Trump countered by threatening "very serious consequences" if Musk decided to financially back Democratic candidates, a move some observers speculated Musk might consider as the feud deepened. Trump has dismissed the idea of reconciliation, asserting the relationship was over and accusing Musk of disrespecting the office of the presidency. Trump pushed the confrontation into the economic realm by announcing that cutting government contracts and subsidies to Musk's various enterprises, such as SpaceX and Tesla, would be the "easiest way" for the government to save money. Trump referenced Musk's critical response to the removal of the so-called EV Mandate as a turning point, accusing Musk of having gone "crazy" after this policy change. The White House characterized Musk's criticisms as stemming from disappointment over the legislative process, and Trump used his social media platform to emphasize the bill's fiscal benefits and to further depict Musk as acting erratically in the aftermath of regulatory shifts affecting electric vehicles. What People Are Saying Trump, on Truth Social: "Order will be restored, the Illegals will be expelled, and Los Angeles will be set free." Musk, reacting to a photo of the riots on X: "This is not O.K …." What Happens Next The riots in Los Angeles are ongoing. California officials are calling for the withdrawal of the National Guard. Do you have a story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have any questions about this story? Contact LiveNews@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store