logo
Bird Flu Found In Sheep For First Time, Sparking Health Concerns

Bird Flu Found In Sheep For First Time, Sparking Health Concerns

Forbes25-03-2025

SYDNEY, NSW - SEPTEMBER 28: A sign warning of the dangers of importing avian products is displayed ... More at Sydney International Airport September 28, 2005 in Sydney, Australia. (Photo by)
You can add one more animal to the list of mammals that the bird flu has infected.
For the first time ever, the UK has reported a case of the bird flu in a sheep. This groundbreaking development occurred on a farm in Yorkshire, England where the highly pathogenic strain of H5N1 bird flu was identified in a female sheep during routine surveillance. The farm had previously confirmed bird flu in birds, suggesting a possible mechanism for spread from birds to sheep, although this transmission route has not been confirmed. Importantly, the infected ewe was culled, and no other infections of bird flu were detected among any other animals on the farm related directly to the sheep.
Since March of 2024, there have been 70 confirmed cases of bird flu in humans in the US, as well as one death confirmed in an elderly man in Louisiana who was hospitalized and had chronic medical conditions, according to the CDC. The virus has been difficult to control in birds as well as mammals including cats, dairy cows and now sheep.
As I have explained previously in Forbes, for most humans, the symptoms of bird flu are usually mild and consistent of fever, cough, sore throat, runny nose, muscle aches and fatigue. Rarely, severe symptoms can occur which can result in difficulty breathing, infection of the lung and even respiratory failure.
The virus can spread in humans in a couple ways. Most commonly, exposure occurs through direct contact with infected animals like birds and dairy cattle. Also, body fluids from infected animals like saliva and feces can cause infection if humans interact with those fluids and then touch their mouths or noses. Finally, humans can inhale small dust particles in habitats where the virus lives and then get infected.
Bird flu now appearing in another animal is noteworthy because it means the virus has adapted and has been able to infect new hosts. Interspecies spread has previously occurred, but never to sheep. Despite the isolated case found in the sheep, the public health threat to humans remains low, according to the UK Health Security Agency.
The ability for H5N1 to infect a broader range of mammalian species raises concerns about future transmission, potentially increasing its pandemic potential. For that to occur, there would need to be increased and sustained human to human transmission, which has not occurred yet, with yet being the key word here. This could occur in the future with genetic reassortment, which is when two different strains of the virus infect a single individual and then swap some of their genetic material with each other. This could allow the virus to acquire mutations that could enhance transmissibility among humans. This has not occurred yet and the risk to humans remains low.
The USDA will invest one billion dollars to curb bird flu, which includes enhancing biosecurity practices, ensuring financial relief for farmers and funding vaccine and therapeutic research. However, there remains significant ambiguity on specific strategies. For example, it remains unclear if the United States will start to vaccinate dairy cattle or poultry against the bird flu, or will just provide anti-viral medications.
In addition, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Secretary for Health and Human Services, has advocated to allow bird flu to spread through flocks to potentially induce immunity among birds and animals. Public health experts warn that this approach will not mitigate or contain the spread of bird flu, but rather call for culling and enhanced biosecurity measures to reduce bird flu transmission.
For humans, prevention should be of utmost importance. This means avoiding contact with sick animals, practicing good hygiene with handwashing, wearing personal protective equipment like gloves and goggles around livestock and avoiding contact with surfaces that could be contaminated.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Vaccine board purge stokes talk of CDC alternatives
Vaccine board purge stokes talk of CDC alternatives

Axios

time29 minutes ago

  • Axios

Vaccine board purge stokes talk of CDC alternatives

By gutting the expert panel that's advised the government on vaccine policy for more than 60 years, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. earned the condemnation of virtually every medical society, as well as former public health officials and local practitioners. What became immediately clear is that no outside group can immediately step in and fill the vacuum if the public won't trust the reconstituted Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. The big picture: The distress and lack of organization apparent in health circles on Tuesday was a sign that a new independent body that could act as a "shadow CDC" to truth-squad the Trump administration isn't close to materializing. "We are clearly working on it and we think it's very important, but I don't think anyone has an answer yet," said Michael Osterholm, director of the University of Minnesota's Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy, who's behind one ad hoc effort. "Right now, we're in such uncharted territory." The medical establishment has floated ideas such as state-appointed boards or medical specialty associations serving as clearinghouses for information on vaccine safety and efficacy for clinicians. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) during the pandemic created a state entity to review the safety of federally approved COVID-19 vaccines before distributing them to the public. But it would be difficult to replicate the professional clout of ACIP, whose recommendations can influence whether insurers cover vaccines. That would leave Kennedy's handpicked successors controlling the narrative — a prospect many researchers and physicians think will bring a radical departure from ACIP's evidence-based deliberations on safety and efficacy. Friction point: Kennedy and other Trump health officials' assertions that ACIP has been a rubber stamp for vaccines have infuriated public health officials, who say the physicians, infectious disease experts and researchers constituted a vital body of nongovernmental health leaders who took their jobs seriously. Panel members were carefully vetted for conflicts and had their professional credentials scrutinized. Discussions took place in a high-profile public forum that would be difficult, if not impossible, to replicate. "Many of us can provide a read of the science, and we can convene formally or informally to create consensus around vaccine recommendations," said Megan Ranney, dean of the Yale School of Public Health. "But I suspect that it won't be sufficient for insurers, for Medicaid, for the Vaccines for Children program, and it's unclear how pediatricians and primary care physicians and pharmacies across the country are going to be able to respond," she said. The other side: Kennedy wrote on X Tuesday night that he would announce new ACIP members in the coming days. "None of these individuals will be ideological anti-vaxxers. They will be highly credentialed physicians and scientists," Kennedy wrote. He added he would detail instances of "historical corruption at ACIP to help the public understand why this clean sweep was necessary. "Kennedy cited the panel's "stubborn unwillingness to demand adequate safety trials before recommending new vaccines for our children" as the most "outrageous example." What to watch: All eyes are on the new appointees for the board, including their scientific backgrounds, track records when it comes to defending vaccines and any potential conflicts of interest. HHS has indicated it has every intention of moving forward with ACIP's next meeting, scheduled for June 25-27. The agenda includes recommendation votes for COVID–19, HPV, influenza, meningococcal and RSV vaccines. "If nothing else, I think [the committee] may have trouble functioning because you've just lost a whole lot of institutional memory," said Adam Ratner, a member of the American Academy of Pediatrics' Committee on Infectious Diseases. "That agenda has the committee voting on real things that matter to real people, and I don't know how they're possibly going to do that in any kind of way that is based on science or evidence," he said.

It's Code Red for Vaccines
It's Code Red for Vaccines

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

It's Code Red for Vaccines

The number of changes to vaccine policy in the United States in recent weeks is dizzying — and we've just hit Code Red. The federal government has sown confusion by changing recommendations for Covid-19 vaccines, ending contracts for mRNA technology research and firing the entire congressionally authorized panel that guides the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's vaccine decisions. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the secretary of health, is a longtime vaccine conspirator. Though he most likely couldn't unilaterally revoke vaccine licenses or rewrite the children's vaccination schedule, there has been concern that he will spur an insidious unraveling of vaccine infrastructure, starting with his destruction on Monday of the C.D.C.'s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. With so much happening, it can be difficult to know what's truly concerning and what changes are probably fine — or even worthwhile. As an expert in vaccines and public health, I'm looking at the shifting landscape like this: What keeps me up at night 1. The firing of the A.C.I.P. members: The ousting of all 17 members is a warning of what might be coming. The committee has served for decades as the C.D.C.'s independent scientific body on immunization. Removing its entire membership in one day, under the guise of restoring 'public trust,' destroys the firewall between science and politics. There's no clear plan for its new makeup, but all signs point to a committee aligned with Mr. Kennedy's longstanding antagonism toward vaccines — and unlike him, a reconstituted committee will be in a position to more directly rearrange, alter or dismantle the national vaccine schedule as it sees fit. 2. Canceling mRNA vaccine development: Mr. Kennedy's Department of Health and Human Services recently canceled a $766 million contract with the pharmaceutical company Moderna to develop next-generation mRNA flu vaccines that use the same technology that made the Covid-19 vaccines so effective. This is despite promising early data on the effectiveness of the company's bird flu vaccine, and an urgent need for more pandemic response tools. This is not fiscal prudence. It's sabotage of a platform that helped end the worst of the Covid pandemic and remains our best defense should a deadlier one emerge. 3. Politicizing autism research: Mr. Kennedy has appointed the longtime vaccine critic David Geier to lead a government study on autism. Mr. Geier, who has been disciplined for practicing medicine without a license, has promoted debunked links between vaccines and autism. The mission of this research isn't scientific discovery; it's laundering fringe ideas through federal legitimacy. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

CDC firings: Former director, fired vaccine panelist on RFK Jr's changes
CDC firings: Former director, fired vaccine panelist on RFK Jr's changes

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

CDC firings: Former director, fired vaccine panelist on RFK Jr's changes

(NewsNation) — While Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says he wanted to restore public trust by firing the entire vaccine advisory panel at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, one person he fired says Kennedy did the opposite in the academic community. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices members was made up of medical and health professionals who made recommendations on the safety and use of vaccines. One of the 17 panelists fired is Dr. Noel Brewer, who joined NewsNation's 'CUOMO' on Tuesday night. 'My concern is that we've taken 60 years of efforts to build trust among health care providers in the recommendations of the advisory committee through CDC, and that trust just evaporated overnight,' Brewer said. 'It is going to be hard to get that back.' The committee was set to meet in two weeks to discuss COVID-19 and other vaccines. Judge determined OPM broke law with DOGE access to data 'I don't think most Americans even care that much about it. And now that there's all this news and people like me out from our ivory towers, it's generating interest,' Brewer said. 'But I don't think that the impact here is going to be primarily among the general public.' Dr. Robert Redfield was CDC director under the first Trump administration, and he said the public lost trust in the power of vaccines. 'I believe vaccines are the most important gift of science to modern medicine. When I was CDC director, I was very disturbed that over half of the population didn't get the flu vaccine,' he said. 'Then, the COVID pandemic came, and I have to say, although I have a lot of respect for Noel and the other people on the committee, the reality is the guidance that came out of the ACIP for COVID vaccines, I think in general, was ill-advised.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store