logo
Got a tax notice for a sudden income spike? What it means what you must do

Got a tax notice for a sudden income spike? What it means what you must do

If you receive a notice from the Income Tax Department under Section 133(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, don't jump to conclusions. This provision allows tax officers to seek specific financial information or documents from any person, regardless of whether a formal assessment or investigation is ongoing.
According to Kunal Savani, partner at Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, 'Section 133(6) empowers tax authorities to call for information not only during ongoing assessment but even when no proceedings are pending.'
He added that such notices are commonly sent when there are high-value transactions, sudden income spikes, or large deductions that appear inconsistent with the income reported by the taxpayer.
What kind of documents are usually sought?
Ankit Jain, partner at Ved Jain and Associates, says that the notice may ask for documents such as:
Bank statements
Purchase or sale agreements
GST returns
Invoices
Loan documents
Agreements with customers or vendors
He explained that even third parties, like banks or vendors, can receive such notices if they are linked to a taxpayer under scrutiny.
Steps to follow after receiving the notice
According to Jain, the taxpayer should follow a structured response:
Verify the notice: Ensure it has been issued by a valid income tax officer and carries a DIN (Document Identification Number).
Compile documents: Gather all relevant data and check it for accuracy.
Submit the response: The information should ideally be furnished via the Income Tax e-filing portal, Jain said. 'For hard copy submissions, get an acknowledged copy,' he added.
Seek more time if needed: If documents can't be provided within the deadline, Jain advised sending a formal request for extension.
Is it a sign of trouble?
Both experts clarified that a notice under this section does not imply wrongdoing. 'It's a routine tool for verification. No proceedings can be initiated solely on the basis of this notice,' said Jain.
How to avoid receiving one in the first place
To steer clear of such notices, Naveen Wadhwa, Vice President at Taxmann, recommended maintaining financial transparency. He advised avoiding large cash transactions, especially for property or jewellery, and ensuring accurate income reporting throughout the year.
'These notices are often triggered by mismatches or anomalies. If your disclosures are consistent with your financial activities, there's little reason to worry,' Wadhwa said

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I-T's benami unit attaches 170 acre of land in MP linked to private firm
I-T's benami unit attaches 170 acre of land in MP linked to private firm

Time of India

time5 hours ago

  • Time of India

I-T's benami unit attaches 170 acre of land in MP linked to private firm

Bhopal: In a major crackdown on alleged benami transactions , the Benami Prohibition Unit of the Income Tax department has provisionally attached 170 acres of land in Rewa district, Madhya Pradesh, under Section 24(3) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions (PBPT) Act, 1988. The attached land is part of a larger block of approximately 700 acres across 112 khasras, originally purchased in 2011 for Rs 10.35 crore. The transactions were made in the names of Kardam Mishra and Ajay Kumar — both salaried employees of a wholly-owned subsidiary firm of a major private company. According to the department's findings, Mishra and Kumar were employees with nominal salaries, and their financial profiles did not support such a substantial investment in immovable property. During investigation, Mishra admitted under oath that the properties were purchased by senior officials of the private company in their names. A forensic financial analysis revealed that payments to the original landowners were made directly from the company's bank accounts. Subsequently, these properties were registered in the name of Prosperous Energy Pvt. Ltd. Meanwhile, the "consideration amount" was shown as routed through the bank accounts of Mishra and Kumar, only to be transferred back to the company in multiple tranches, indicating a classic case of layered benami transactions. The Income Tax department has determined that the real ownership and beneficial use of these properties rested with the private company and its subsidiary. This arrangement falls squarely under the definition of a "benami transaction" as per Section 2(9)(A) of the PBPT Act. A show-cause notice under Section 24(1) has been served to both the benamidars and the beneficial owners. Adding another layer to the case, it was discovered that the company had secured a short-term loan of Rs 925 crore from IDBI Bank by mortgaging these properties, along with others belonging to private firm. Due to default in repayment, IDBI Bank auctioned several of these properties. However, 46 khasras, covering approximately 170 acres, remained unsold and have now been provisionally attached to prevent any further alienation. Further proceedings under the PBPT Act are underway.

State GST dept detects Rs 45cr tax evasion by four contractor firms
State GST dept detects Rs 45cr tax evasion by four contractor firms

Time of India

time7 hours ago

  • Time of India

State GST dept detects Rs 45cr tax evasion by four contractor firms

Ahmedabad: The Gujarat State GST Department on June 9 carried out searches on four firms located in Dahod and Veraval towns and detected tax evasion to the tune of Rs 45 crore. The infrastructure contractor firms are engaged in executing works under various govt schemes, including centrally-sponsored schemes such as MNREGA, said officials. During the searches, several irregularities were detected, such as the misclassification of taxable services as exempt, under-reporting of turnover, and wrongfully availing input tax credit (ITC). These findings point to a systematic and deliberate attempt by these four taxpayers to suppress taxable income and manipulate tax liability with the objective of evading taxes and misusing govt funds, mentioned a release by the state GST department. Preliminary assessments indicated that the total liability of these four taxpayers, including tax, interest, and penalty, amounts to over Rs 45 crore, said GST officials. Appropriate legal action to secure and realise govt revenue is being pursued by the state GST department, they added.

GST evasion detection hits all-time high of ₹2.23 trillion in FY25
GST evasion detection hits all-time high of ₹2.23 trillion in FY25

Business Standard

time8 hours ago

  • Business Standard

GST evasion detection hits all-time high of ₹2.23 trillion in FY25

FM Nirmala Sitharaman urges faster probe closures and easier registrations Monika Yadav The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) detected Goods and Services Tax (GST) evasion of ₹2.23 trillion in the financial year 2024-25 (FY25), an all time high figure which was 10 per cent more than the previous year's ₹2.02 trillion. In FY23, the GST evasion stood at ₹1.01 trillion. In FY25, voluntary payments by taxpayers stood at ₹28,909 crore, according to data shared at the CBIC Conclave held in New Delhi on Thursday. Chairing the meeting, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman called for speedy closure of investigations in Customs and CGST cases, stronger action on tax evasion, and time-bound improvements in GST registration and grievance redressal. Audit coverage under GST rose from 62.21 per cent in FY23 to 88.74 per cent in FY25, with officials highlighting that no taxpayer had been audited more than once in a three-year span. Refund performance also improved, with 85 per cent of claims processed within the statutory 60-day limit. The national average for GSTR-3B return filing reached 94.3 per cent during the FY25. 'An impressive 95 per cent to 97 per cent of CPGRAMS appeals are being disposed of within 30 days. This performance has placed CBIC among the top 5 out of 90 central ministries in CPGRAMS rankings since February 2024,' the release stated. Sitharaman urged the department to intensify awareness campaigns among taxpayers and trade bodies, particularly on the documentation required for GST registration-- citing frequent rejections due to issues with proof of principal place of business. She called for dedicated helpdesks within CGST zones to assist with registration applications. In Customs, cargo facilitation through the Risk Management System rose to 86 per cent in 2025, up from 82 per cent in 2022. The finance minister asked zones to further reduce dwell time for imports and exports at ports and Inland Container Depots (ICDs) to improve India's trade logistics competitiveness. As per the government, CBIC handed over 2,140.35 kg of seized gold to the Security Printing and Minting Corporation of India (SPMCIL) in FY25.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store