Labour's border bill to 'block migrants from claiming slavery protections'
Labour's new small boats legislation will reportedly retain a number of controversial measures the party previously opposed, including a ban on migrants claiming modern slavery protections and powers to detain children.
The Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill – set to be published on Thursday – is expected to include new counterterrorism-style powers to target people smugglers, including the seizure of mobile phones and financial assets.
Sir Keir Starmer has promised to use the legislation to 'smash the gangs' and significantly reduce the number of people illegally arriving in the UK, with more than a thousand people having arrived in the UK via small boat this year so far.
While Labour previously accused the Tories of trashing slavery protections through their 2023 Illegal Migration Act - which the party repeatedly voted against - the new bill will reportedly fail to reverse a number of measures included in the old bill.
According to The Times, the legislation is expected to include a ban on illegal migrants claiming protections under the Modern Slavery Act 2015, as well as powers to detain child refugees for up to 28 days.
Victims of modern slavery who arrived in the UK illegally were prevented from accessing the UK's national referral mechanism (NRM) under the last government's legislation — the system for supporting and identifying victims.
Sir Keir Starmer said the legislation would 'drive a coach and horses' through protections for women who were trafficked to the UK as victims of modern slavery.
Meanwhile, Jess Phillips – who now sits in Sir Keir's government as safeguarding minister – claimed it was as a 'a traffickers' dream, a tool for their control' as it effectively hid modern slavery victims from UK authorities.
But the Conservative government argued that the NRM was being unfairly used by migrants to avoid deportation.
Mr Sunak's illegal migration act also allowed unaccompanied children to be detained for up to eight days, and up to 28 if their age was under dispute by the Home Office. This is also said to be retained in the new bill.
In addition, the government is expected to retain the cap on the number of migrants who can arrive each year on safe and legal routes - a measure which government sources told The Times was imposed to mitigate criticism from the Conservatives and Reform UK.
The legislation is expected to see people-smuggling suspects facing travel bans and social media blackouts as part of an attempt to crack down on organised immigration crime.
Court orders to restrict the activity of those under investigation for such crimes will be strengthened, with suspects facing bans on laptop or mobile phones, accessing social media networks, associating with certain people, or accessing their finances under the measures announced by the Home Office.
Serious Crime Prevention Orders (SCPOs) can already be sought to curb the movement of people involved in organised immigration crime.
But the government said the measures are not being used to their full effect and plans to introduce new 'interim' SCPOs designed to place 'immediate' restrictions on suspects' activity while a full order is considered by the courts.
Home secretary Yvette Cooper said: 'Dangerous criminal people-smugglers are profiting from undermining our border security and putting lives at risk. They cannot be allowed to get away with it.
'Stronger international collaboration has already led to important arrests and action against dangerous gangs over the last few months.
'We will give law enforcement stronger powers they need to pursue and stop more of these vile gang networks.
'Border security is one of the foundations of this Government's Plan for Change, including making people better off, delivering safer streets and strengthening our NHS, and we will do everything in our power to deliver for working people.'
The Home Office has been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
22 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Starmer in Talks With Labour Rebels About Easing Welfare Cuts
Prime Minister Keir Starmer looks ready to water down another of the UK government's key policies, offering concessions to stop Labour party colleagues derailing his reforms to Britain's expensive welfare payments. Starmer's government planned to save £5 billion ($6.9 billion) a year by tightening criteria for disability payments, yet this week over 100 of Labour's own Members of Parliament put their names to an amendment that could effectively kill the new laws at a vote next Tuesday.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Starmer seeking to quell revolt over welfare reform plan
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is trying to head off a growing Labour rebellion over the Government's welfare reforms. Downing Street insiders said talks were taking place with Labour MPs about the legislation after 126 of them publicly backed a move to block the legislation. The first vote on the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill is due to take place on Tuesday and a concerted effort has been launched by ministers to win round potential rebels. A No 10 source said: 'The broken welfare system is failing the most vulnerable and holding too many people back. 'It's fair and responsible to fix it. There is broad consensus across the party on this.' The source insisted the reforms were 'underpinned by… Labour values'. They said: 'Delivering fundamental change is not easy, and we all want to get it right, so of course we're talking to colleagues about the Bill and the changes it will bring, we want to start delivering this together on Tuesday.' Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner said talks between backbenchers and the Government were 'ongoing' as six more Labour MPs added their names to the rebel amendment that would halt the legislation in its tracks. The reasoned amendment argues that disabled people have not been properly consulted and further scrutiny of the changes is needed. The new signatories include the Commons Environmental Audit Select Committee chairman Toby Perkins, Stoke-on-Trent Central MP Gareth Snell, Newcastle upon Tyne MP Mary Glindon and Tamworth MP Sarah Edwards. North Ayrshire and Arran MP Irene Campbell and Colchester MP Pam Cox, both of whom won their seats in the party's 2024 landslide election victory, have also added their names. The new names take the total number of Labour backbenchers supporting the amendment, tabled by Treasury Select Committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier, to 126. The plans restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limit the sickness-related element of universal credit. The Government hopes the changes will get more people back into work and save up to £5 billion a year. Existing claimants will be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support, a move seen as a bid to head off opposition by aiming to soften the impact of the changes. But the fact so many Labour MPs are prepared to put their names to the 'reasoned amendment' calling for a change of course shows how entrenched the opposition remains. One backbencher preparing to vote against the Bill told the PA news agency: 'A lot of people have been saying they're upset about this for months. 'To leave it until a few days before the vote, it's not a very good way of running the country. 'It's not very grown-up.' They said that minor concessions would not be enough, warning: 'I don't think you can tinker with this. They need to go back to the drawing board.' The Daily Telegraph reported that potential concessions being considered include a commitment to speed up payment of support to help people back into work and offering assurances that reviews of policies in this area will be published. Meanwhile, The Times reported some MPs opposed to the plans had blamed Sir Keir's chief of staff Morgan McSweeney and suggested the time had come for 'regime change' in Downing Street. Other senior Labour figures outside Parliament, including Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham and London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan, have publicly expressed their opposition to the plans. Meanwhile, the Tories seem unlikely to lend the Government their support, with leader Kemi Badenoch setting out conditions for doing so, including a commitment to rule out tax rises in the autumn budget and further cut to the benefits bill.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'I don't want to live on benefits, I want to work'
"I don't want to live off benefits all my life." Teenager Kailee Kember-Brown, a wheelchair user, says she has so far applied for more than 40 jobs without success. Kailee, from Dover, in Kent, is currently entitled to a top-up to her Universal Credit income because of her disability. It means the 19-year-old is not required to look for a job, but she wants one to avoid having to stay at home getting bored. Most of her friends are also in work. And her financial situation could soon be changing too, under government plans to cut the Universal Credit health top-up for under-22s with long-term illnesses or disabilities, currently worth £423-a-month to people like Kailee, as part of their wide-ranging welfare reform proposals. A government consultation on the proposed cut to the top-up for under-22s is due to end on Monday. The wider reforms, many of which are set out in the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill, have prompted a rebellion from over 120 Labour MPs, who have signed an amendment calling for the proposals to be scrapped. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said on Wednesday that he planned to press ahead with the plans despite the criticism, adding that his party was "pretty united" on the need for reform. Overall, the government says it will save £5bn a year by 2030 through the cuts to disability and sickness-related benefits payments. Ministers also say they want the changes to help those who are "trapped" in the benefits system to find work. But Kailee, whose functional neurological disorder means she feels physically weak and struggles to walk, says she has only heard back from a quarter of the job applications she has sent out. Her disability means she requires certain adjustments from employers, such as accessible facilities and flexible hours to allow her to attend physiotherapy and doctor's appointments. A lot of the jobs she has applied for are with companies listed in the government's Disability Confident scheme, which encourages employers to hire and retain disabled staff, and Kailee says it's particularly "disheartening" when she fails to hear back from them. "When you apply for it and you're like, 'Oh my God, I tick all the boxes,' and then they never get back to you or even look at your CV, it's kind of like, well, what am I meant to do now?" Jane Hatton, who runs a jobs platform for disabled job seekers and only employs disabled staff, says many employers harbour misconceptions that disabled employees won't have the necessary skills for the job or might take more sick days than their non-disabled colleagues. "As an employer, if you interview two candidates of equal value in every other respect - one of them is non-disabled and one might need adjustments - [you might be] tempted to go with a non-disabled person," she says But those stereotypes are not borne out of reality, she says, adding that prospective employers should support all their candidates with whatever adjustments they may need. "The barriers that people face tend to be inaccessible recruitment processes," she says. "What we say to employers is that it's about making adjustments so that people can flourish." She also says government schemes like Access to Work (AtW) have not been working effectively enough to get jobs for the disabled people it's designed to support. Ministers have previously acknowledged the problems with AtW and say they will look at how it can be updated. It's one of a long list of issues the government hopes to fix in order to get more disabled people into work, while reducing the benefits bill. Disability Minister Sir Stephen Timms told the BBC he acknowledged that the jobs market was tough for disabled people, adding that the government was "making the changes that are needed to welcome disabled people into employment". One of the biggest concerns for disabled people and campaigners among the government's welfare reforms is the plan to change the eligibility criteria for the Personal Independence Payment (Pip). The benefit is designed to pay for the additional living costs many disabled people face, from travel and transport to home adaptations and care. The proposed changes to Pip is one of the reasons given by many of the Labour backbenchers who have decided to oppose the government's legislation. But Timms said Pip does need reform, adding that the rising cost of delivering the benefit has been "unsustainable", and that if the government "didn't act then it would end in tears". "I want to make sure that Pip is going to be there in full, uprated properly every year, for those with severe impairments who are very dependent on it," he said. What are the Pip and universal credit changes and who is affected? PM defends leadership amid growing welfare rebellion MP who backed out of welfare rebellion apologises
