
Ireland AM viewers praise Tommy Bowe for giving TD ‘hard grilling' on air as he says ‘this needs action now'
IRELAND AM viewers have praised Tommy Bowe for giving a TD a "hard grilling" on air.
14-year-old
4
Hildegarde Naughton appeared on Ireland AM yesterday
Credit: VMTV
4
Tommy made sure to ask the hard hitting questions
Credit: VMTV
4
Cara and Mark Darmody outside Leinster House
Credit: VMTV
Currently there are more than 15,000 children waiting for an assessment of need, which is often a key requirement for children accessing certain services and supports.
Under the law, children are legally entitled to an assessment of need within six months of applying.
But shocking figures show just seven per cent of assessments were completed last year within the timeframes set out in the Disability Act 2005.
read more on ireland am
Turning to the TD, Muireann said: "Minister, looking at Cara and her dad there, outside your place of work, to try to get people to talk about this…"
Tommy added: "In her Winnie the Pooh pyjamas. It's sad."
Naughton replied: "Good morning, Cara. Nobody should have to protest outside the gates of Leinster House."
The politician explained that she wants to "make sure" the government are "getting through those waiting lists" as well as ensuring "children and adults across the country" have access to therapists and those with "disabilities" to access the services they need.
read more on the irish sun
During their chat, Tommy asked: "So at the end of 2023, it was 8,893 people looking for this. It then is at 15,000, we're expecting to be at 25,000. You're saying we want to reduce this.
"It's going the wrong direction. How many people are currently employed as AON or clinical disability?"
Ireland AM stars confront TD on air
Naughton replied: "Within the sector of therapists, we have about 1,800 across the sector. This is what we need to look at as part of the assessment of need process.
"At the moment, the average time an assessment of needs takes is on average 30 hours. It can take up to 90 hours. So we want to look at that whole process, how that works, through working with clinicians, the HSE, and my department is engaging with that at the moment.
"If legislative reform is needed, we will absolutely consider that. But it's really important to say we will not deny anybody their statutory right to have an assessment of need. But this is not just about tackling the waiting list. We also need to look at the health system, where there is no wrong door for people."
The former rugby star cut across the
"How long is it going to take to look at these things and put them into place? Because this needs action now."
'WHAT ARE YOU DOING?'
Naughton responded: "As I said, we're looking at the assessment of need process itself and how that can be changed. The draw on assessment of needs, where people are being asked for them, where they shouldn't be asked for them. We're looking at the retention and recruitment of therapists."
Tommy clarified his question saying: "You keep saying looking at. What are you doing?"
Muireann added: "Do you have a timeline for this?"
She replied: "There is a Cabinet Committee for Disability that I sit on. The Tanaiste,
"We had a meeting only two weeks ago. Myself and Minister Foley are going to report back to the leaders within the next few weeks in relation to what we can do around the assessment of need. I want action on this. So we're going to be meeting very regularly, as we are."
HEATED HOST
After Naughton's lengthy reply about looking for therapists, she said: "But around timelines, so we're coming back to the leaders in the next few weeks, and by, I suppose, September, October, I want to act on this this year.
"This is not going to be easy."
Tommy remarked: "We're going to be over 20,000 at that stage!"
The politician replied: "If it was a money problem, this would have been sorted."
Tommy butted in and said: "Oh, we know that. We know the government has lots of money."
'VERY SIMPLE'
During the heated conversation, Naughton admitted she knows it's a "huge issue" and that the government are "failing children" but reassured that she's "working day and night to tackle the issue".
Mark Darmody and his daughter Cara was then shown again from their protest and Tommy asked: "You're going to be meeting the Taoiseach later on this morning. What would you like to say?"
Mark replied: "The main thing is this. I have a simple question for him today, is he going to declare this a national emergency or not? Because it is.
"It's a yes or no answer. It's very, very simple. Because we've heard all this talk before.
'WHATEVER'
"We've heard it from three different Taoiseach before about what they're going to do and all the great plans. They failed dramatically. We want him to declare this a national emergency and then every agency then will have to act in a different way."
Back in the studio, Muireann asked Naughton the very same question but her answer was not straight forward.
She said: "I'm treating this with absolute… this is the top priority for government, not just me. And we can name it what we want, but what we need is action. And that's what was said in the Dáil last night.
That's what I'm hearing right across the country."
After being asked the same question over and over again, Naughton refused to answer yes or no and just reiterated that "you can call it what you want".
'FAIR PLAY'
Tommy remarked: "Okay. So Mark has asked just… that's his one question. 'You can call it what you like'. You're obviously not saying that this morning. We will see if the Taoiseach does that."
A short segment of the interview was posted on Ireland AM's Instagram page and everyone flooded the comment section with praise.
One viewer wrote: "Good man Tommy, you put her in her place!!"
Kyle said: "It's funny that it's the morning TV show that gives politicians a harder grilling than the nighttime current affairs panel discussions. Fair play lads."
Lynn commented: "Fair play Tommy!"
Another fan added: "Tommy,
well done for how you handled this
."
4
Ireland AM viewers all praised Tommy Bowe after the interview
Credit: VMTV

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
3 days ago
- Irish Times
HSE must specify when services will be provided to children with disabilities, Supreme Court says
The Supreme Court has delivered an important judgment concerning the obligations of the HSE towards children with disabilities, including a need to specify when services will be provided to them. Compliance by the HSE with its obligations under the Disability Act 2005 involves setting out and implementing 'measurable' actions, the court said. Although there is 'nothing objectionable' about the HSE's Individual Family Support Plan (IFSP) model for delivering services to children with disabilities, the court said the HSE must ensure it complies with its obligations and with the legislature's intention to give 'enforceable rights' to individuals. The five-judge court on Wednesday rejected the HSE's appeal against the High Court's finding that it failed to comply with its legal obligations in relation to an eight-year-old girl assessed as having autism spectrum disorder and global developmental delay. READ MORE Giving the judgment, Ms Justice Iseult O'Malley said the statutory process obliges the HSE to specify what services will be provided to children with disabilities and when they will be provided. Delays in assessments of need are a 'recurring' theme in cases before the courts, she noted. There was a delay of more than 18 months in assessing the girl and further delays in providing her with therapy services identified as being her health needs. The High Court, in finding the statutory requirements were not complied with, said the only service for the girl where the HSE specified a time frame for delivery was the development of an IFSP, but that was not a 'clinical service'. The core issues in the HSE's appeal were whether the 2005 Act required that each health service identified in an assessment report should be specified in a service statement; and whether the statutory requirements regarding the content of service statements were breached by identifying the development of the IFSP as a 'specified' health service. Ms Justice O'Malley found, while not every service recommended in an assessment report must be included in the service statement, there must be 'a rational connection' between the content of both. On the second issue, she ruled an IFSP is a 'health service' within the meaning of section seven of the 2005 Act. She said the commencement of an IFSP is the starting point for delivery of services and the plan continues as the evolving basis for development of further goals. The legislature had intended a process through which particular services and dates would be 'clearly identified' in the service statements, with a legal right to seek implementation through the courts if necessary. If each service statement only specifies a start date for the IFSP process, the right may appear reduced as the only complaint apparently possible would be the failure to commence that process, she said. The HSE can, within the IFSP model, comply with its obligations to set out and implement measurable actions, she said. The first service statement should 'spell out' what will be involved in the IFSP process. Reviews of the service statement also required greater detail, including an overall assessment of the goals set out, whether those have been achieved, identification of overall goals for the near future and the work to achieve those, the judge said. That might mean 'relatively frequent' reviews. If the only service specified in the first service statement is an IFSP, the HSE should record that the needs specified in the assessment of need have not been included. This was necessary under the HSE's obligation to assist in measuring aggregate needs. In the case of the girl, represented by Derek Shortall SC and Colin Smith SC, instructed by solicitor Wendy Lyon, she said the original service statement and the first review statement did not meet these criteria. The original statement had been superseded and it seemed likely there would have been further reviews, she noted.


The Irish Sun
3 days ago
- The Irish Sun
Molly-Mae Hague posts cute beauty tutorial with Bambi – but fans are distracted by VERY naked detail in the background
MOLLY-MAE HAGUE has posted a cute beauty tutorial with Bambi - but fans have been left distracted by a very naked detail in the background of the video. The Love Island star shared a clip from her recent time in Dubai, and adorable Bambi could be seen waltzing in with a bag in the background. Advertisement 5 Molly has posted a cute beauty tutorial with Bambi - but fans have been left distracted by a very naked detail in the background of the video Credit: Instagram 5 A certain someone was spotted in the background by fans Credit: Instagram Molly is doing her makeup in the video, shared to her Instagram Stories, and shares a tutorial on her evening look. The 26-year-old penned to fans: 'Missing holiday nights doing makeup with my girl.' But despite the cute scenes of Molly popping a bit of makeup on Bambi's face for the playful video, it was a topless appearance in the background that caught fan attention. Mid-way through the clip, Advertisement Read More on Molly-Mae Hague His appearance is only fleeting, and Molly glances over her shoulder as he walks in the room behind her, before appearing to dodge the camera. Commenting on the moment, one person penned: 'Did I spy a half naked man in the bathroom?' A second added: 'So happy to see you and Tommy together. I am routing for both of you. Bambi is growing up so fast. She's so cute.' And a third said: 'Ooo I just spotted Tommy in the background.' Advertisement Most read in News TV As Molly and Tommy's New Year's Eve kiss first suggested, as it went viral, the relationship is now well and truly back on. Molly Mae drops HUGE C4 show hint as she returns to reality TV for first time since Love Island The strict rule has become quite the talking point among But if he wants to stay with Molly, he may have no choice but to fall into line. Advertisement A source said: 'It sounds extreme, but Molly feels much more reassured when Tommy checks in. It all helps with trust, honesty and transparency between the two of them. Timeline of Molly-Mae and Tommy Fury's split After five years together, Molly-Mae and Tommy Fury split up in August 2024. At around 4pm on Wednesday, August 14, Molly-Mae and Tommy suffer an explosive showdown and An hour later Tommy shares a The real reason they split emerges and on Thursday, August 15 On Saturday , August 17, The Sun reveals how Exactly one week after the split a Danish woman accused of getting close to Tommy speaks to The Sun. On Wednesday, August 21, she 'Tommy has been very dedicated so far — if he's on a train, he will FaceTime the moment he gets off. 'It's the same with any flights that he takes or hotels he's staying in. 'Tommy dutifully phones Molly the minute that he arrives anywhere. Advertisement 'And then she likes him to also show her where he is. 'This has been going on for months now, and Tommy's friends are impressed that he has agreed to it whole-heartedly.' The reunited couple — who have a two-year-old daughter, Bambi, together — were pictured last month on a romantic getaway in Dubai . It was their sixth holiday, no less, this year. Advertisement The source added: 'Tommy's camp have raised their eyebrows at Molly's rule. 'He can't do anything without having to report straight back to her. 'But Molly's team, on the other hand, feel that this is what he needs to do if he wants to keep his family together. 'The question is, does Molly really trust Tommy? Some highly doubt it.' Advertisement 5 Fans loved the Tommy sighting in the clip Credit: Instagram 5 Molly has secretly laid down the law with her boxer beau, and has implemented a new relationship rule Credit: Instagram 5 The couple often jet off to Dubai together Credit: Splash


Irish Examiner
30-05-2025
- Irish Examiner
Satchwell guilty of murder: Here's what the jury didn't hear
TRIAL MOVED TO DUBLIN Richard Satchwell's trial was initially scheduled to sit in his home county of Cork but, due to the "intense publicity" surrounding the case, his lawyers applied late last year to move the trial to the capital. The move was resisted by the State, who pointed out that much of the publicity was generated by Satchwell himself. In November last year Brendan Grehan SC, for Satchwell, said that as the media attention was concentrated in Cork, it would be "impossible to retain an impartial jury" there who had not heard of the case and formed "adverse views of Mr Satchwell". Mr Grehan said that most trials can be held in local venues but some generate media attention that can be "macabre" and lead to "greater hostility than it is possible to imagine in an ordinary case." Satchwell's preference, Mr Grehan said, was for the trial to be held in Limerick so it would be closer to the prison where he was being held. "He has a position of responsibility there, which enables him to be a productive prisoner," counsel told the court. Gerardine Small SC, for the Director of Public Prosecutions, opposed the change of venue, arguing that publicity around the case was national, not local. File picture: Collins Courts Gerardine Small SC, for the Director of Public Prosecutions, opposed the change of venue, arguing that publicity around the case was national, not local. Also, she said, much of that publicity was generated by Satchwell who "sought the attention of the media" by appearing on radio and television shows. Ms Small pointed to Satchwell's appearances on RTÉ's Prime Time, TV3's Ireland AM, the Ray D'Arcy Show and the numerous interviews he gave to journalists. She added: "It is an unusual factor that it [the media attention] can be attributed to the accused man while he was aware the body of his wife was buried where it was." Mr Justice Paul McDermott agreed to change the venue to Dublin, due to the significant risk of an unfair trial. He said: "The high degree of local coverage and engagement with the case takes it out of the ordinary." 'SOMEWHAT OF A SIDE SHOW: TWEETS AND CHARGINGS' During the trial and in the absence of the jury, Mr Grehan applied to exclude Satchwell's "cryptic" reply of "Guilty or not guilty, guilty" when he was formally charged with the murder of Tina on October 13, 2023. Counsel said a second part of the application - which was "somewhat of a side show" - was connected to the fact that a member of the press - Paul Byrne, formerly of Virgin Media News - tweeted that Satchwell was going to be charged before gardaí had actually done so. He said Superintendent Anne Marie Twomey had received directions from a legal officer at 7.28pm to charge Satchwell with the murder of his wife and he was formally charged at 8:07pm on October 13. Mr Grehan said Mr Byrne had tweeted at 8.03pm that "a man in his 50's had been charged with the murder of Tina Satchwell" - four minutes before his client was formally charged. Counsel said Michael O'Toole, of The Irish Daily Mirror and Irish Daily Star, had "retweeted" at 8.09pm from the handle @mickthehack that "Richard Satchwell had been charged with the murder of his wife". A number of gardaí who were called to give evidence in the voir dire denied that they had contacted anyone in the media but accepted that Mr Byrne had tweeted about it several minutes in advance and that Mr O'Toole had named Satchwell as being charged two minutes after it occurred. Mr Grehan said it was "implicit" that contact was made with a number of people in the media "to enable them to do their job". Counsel also submitted that Satchwell should have been informed that he could consult with his solicitor before the charging process took place and was entitled to legal advice "at this critical juncture". "It vitiated the process and the court should not permit the fruits of the charging to be now available to the prosecution," he added. Richard Satchwell's Senior council Brendan Grehan (left) and solicitor Eddie Burke. During the trial and in the absence of the jury, Mr Grehan applied to exclude Satchwell's 'cryptic' reply of 'Guilty or not guilty, guilty' when he was formally charged with the murder of Tina on October 13, 2023. Photo: Niall Carson/PA He said the defendant's solicitor Eddie Burke had left the garda station at 7.07pm that evening and didn't arrive back until 8.10pm - three minutes after the charging took place. The lawyer said his client's reply after caution was more prejudicial than probative and would create difficulties in terms of how the jury could be properly directed. In reply, Ms Small said Satchwell, who was interviewed by gardaí on 10 separate occasions, had a "full appreciation of his entitlement not to say anything" in reply to the caution and was acutely aware of this. The defence, she said, was claiming there is an entitlement to have a solicitor present on charging and she wasn't aware of any such entitlement. She said the entitlement was to legal advice, which Satchwell had received "in abundance". She called the media tweets "completely irrelevant". In his ruling, Mr Justice McDermott said the defendant's reply was fully voluntary and found that the absence of a solicitor in the garda station had not impaired the fairness of the process. He refused to exclude the reply to charge. DIRECTION TO REMOVE MURDER CHARGE FROM INDICTMENT When the prosecution's case was at an end, Mr Grehan applied to the judge to withdraw the charge of murder against his client, submitting there was no evidence of an intention to kill or cause serious injury, which he said was "a huge lacuna" in the State's case. "It is one of the elements of the offence of murder which the prosecution have to adduce evidence of, which they have singularly failed to do," he argued. He said Assistant State Pathologist Dr Margaret Bolster couldn't give a cause of death due to a very long post mortem period and had confirmed there were no broken bones in Tina's body. He said she wasn't able to conclude anything about the state of the organs due to the lapse of time. Mr Grehan said there was an explanation available to the jury as to how death was caused in the case without the evidence of the pathologist or anthropologist and that explanation was given by his client, where Satchwell said the belt of Tina's bathrobe had been held up against her neck until she collapsed. Counsel said this was the only account available as to what happened to Tina and was of "immense importance" as there was no evidence of violence discovered in the post mortem. Counsel said it was significant that Tina's hyoid bone was unfractured. He said there was also no medical evidence to say that his client's account of holding Tina off with a restraint against her neck before she collapsed suddenly was not possible. In a ruling, Mr Justice McDermott said Richard Satchwell's (pictured) immediate response was to create a false impression that Tina was alive and he had taken every conceivable step to protect himself. File photo: Brian Lawless/PA In reply, Ms Small submitted that there was "a wealth of evidence" from the surrounding circumstances in the case from which intent could be inferred. Counsel said the deception began on March 20, 2017, very shortly after Satchwell killed Tina and the plethora of lies were an acknowledgement of guilt. Ms Small said a limited post mortem examination was conducted because the defendant had buried his wife in a manner to ensure the cause of death wasn't available. She added: "There is also motive on his own account, Satchwell says she is threatening to leave him. She has wasted 28 years of her life, that is all part of the evidence for the jury to accept or not." Mr Grehan said the lies told were not sufficient to show intent for murder. Referring to motive, he said there was also clearly a basis for which Tina might have wanted nothing further to do with her husband and attacked him in that manner. In his ruling, Mr Justice McDermott said Satchwell's immediate response was to create a false impression that Tina was alive and he had taken every conceivable step to protect himself. He said Satchwell told lie after lie "to any journalist who'd indulge him" and portrayed a scenario that his wife had deserted him suddenly without any explanation. Mr Justice McDermott said Satchwell had shown a degree of malevolence towards his wife and the defendant was totally focused on protecting himself from discovery. There had been, he said, a period of six prolonged years before Tina's body, of which Satchwell had disposed of, was found and this was relevant to the issue of intention. He said it was a matter for the jury as to whether Satchwell had formed the requisite intent and whether he was guilty of his wife's murder. He rejected the application to withdraw the murder charge. APPLICATION TO DISCHARGE THE JURY At the very end of the trial, when Mr Justice McDermott had finished charging the jurors, Mr Grehan said on foot of instructions from his client he "regrettably" had to seek the discharge of the jury. Counsel voiced his opposition to the tone of the charge, which he said was intended to "nudge" the jurors towards a guilty verdict. Counsel said he became increasingly concerned as the charge proceeded that it was not resembling a charge but a "second prosecution speech" in terms of the emphasis the court was placing on the State's case to the detriment of the defence. Mr Grehan told the judge he had not put the defence case in full at all to the jury. He said the two separate tasks of directions on the law and a summary of the evidence had become "intermingled" and submitted there was no balance in what had been said to the panel. "The whole emphasis of what was said to the court seemed to be to reiterate the prosecution case," he argued. Richard Satchwell's Senior council Brendan Grehan (left) and solicitor Eddie Burke. Mr Grehan had sought the discharge of the jury on foot of instructions from his client. Photo: Niall Carson/PA Mr Grehan said the facts of the case "shouted and screamed for themselves" in terms of what Satchwell did and didn't do. "They are not facts that need to be nudged or pushed for the jury in any particular way". Counsel said it was beyond remedy at this stage and the court should discharge the jury. Ms Small called Mr Grehan's application "wholly inappropriate", describing the charge as balanced, fair and extremely comprehensible. "The criticism is unfounded, a court will rarely outline all the evidence, that is a matter for the jury". In his ruling, the judge said this was a difficult case in which to sum up the evidence for the jury and he didn't accept that his charge was "so wildly unbalanced". He disagreed that the absence of references to certain parts of the evidence in any sense justified the jury being discharged. Mr Justice McDermott refused the application but did give the jury further directions in relation to two matters of which complaints were made, one relating to the detailed evidence of Lorraine Howard concerning her half sister Tina, the other to evidence that Satchwell loved or was "besotted" with his wife. Read More How a concrete patch under the stairs in Youghal revealed Tina Satchwell's tragic fate