Google records 1,800% increase in searches for "development company"
Demand for developers grows amid global digitalization and advances in artificial intellig
The search for technological innovations has driven the software development market, directly contributing to the rise in online searches for professionals in the field.
This trend is highlighted by Google data, which shows a 1,800% increase in searches for the term 'development company.'
Platforms like FileMaker, for example, have also stood out in recent search trends, according to search engines. In this context, it's worth exploring what's driving the demand for software developers in the United States and around the world.
The surge in demand for technology development services comes amid an expanding market. According to Statista, the app development sector is projected to reach a value of US$195 billion in 2025 , with an expected annual growth rate of 6.3% through 2029.
At this pace, industry revenue is expected to hit approximately US$250 billion by the end of that period. The United States currently leads this segment, with a market valued at US$97 billion.
In addition to the U.S., China and India are also emerging as major players in technological innovation, contributing to the global increase in searches for development solutions. Companies worldwide are seeking ways to integrate these innovations into their operations.
The advancement of digitalization in business benefits both large corporations and new startups. While established companies tend to be quicker in adopting these technologies, new businesses have gained visibility by focusing on differentiation.
In this landscape, investing in customization has become one of the key strategies. According to McKinsey, 70% of the highest-revenue companies use custom-built software in their daily operations .
As a result, there is also growing interest in specialized developers, such as a FileMaker Developer, who can create systems tailored to the specific needs of each company. This level of customization often helps streamline processes and improve financial performance.
Generally, entrepreneurs interested in innovation within their companies are the main drivers behind these searches. The adoption of new technologies is typically tied to increased efficiency and competitiveness.
Marketing professionals are also showing growing interest in customized solutions, as custom-developed software can support sales initiatives and communication strategies.
The growing demand is directly reflected in the increasing number of professionals working in the sector. The United States currently has around 4.4 million developers , ranking just behind India and China.
Globally, the number of developers rose from 24.5 million in 2020 to 28.7 million in 2024. Worldwide, the industry generates approximately US$3.5 billion in revenue, with annual growth expected to reach 8.95% through 2028, according to Statista projections.
This trend suggests that the profession will continue to grow in the coming years, keeping pace with the rising demand for technological solutions.
Artificial intelligence (AI) has played a key role in transforming the development market. Its ability to learn from data and automate tasks helps make processes faster, more efficient, and less prone to error.
According to a recent survey, 76% of developers are already using AI or plan to incorporate it into their work soon.
In software development, generative AI has become particularly prominent. This technology enables the automation of steps like idea generation, code creation, testing, and requirements management.
As a result, AI is becoming an essential tool, helping developers work more efficiently and at a higher level.
TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Android Authority
21 minutes ago
- Android Authority
Spotted: Google Maps on Wear OS is testing an Expressive new UI
Rita El Khoury / Android Authority TL;DR Google Maps is testing a Material 3 Expressive-style redesign on Wear OS 5. The new UI features larger icons and an improved layout. The changes have only been rolled out to select users so far. Google Maps is getting a fresh look on smartwatches, and it's not waiting for Wear OS 6 to do it. The app is now testing a redesigned interface with some users on Wear OS 5, introducing a bolder, more modern layout in line with Google's Material 3 Expressive design. Screenshots and video shared with us by Telegram user Hardik show several UI changes. Captured on a Galaxy Watch 4 running Maps version 25.23.01.766241648.W, the new look features larger icons and layout choices that better suit small circular screens. Frequently used actions like 'Home,' 'Work,' and 'Recents' now appear as colorful modules, while navigation modes are presented as compact pills with clearer icons. Here's a video of the wearable in use with the new design elements: It's a noticeable departure from the old UI, which leaned heavily on minimalist icons and black menus. Where previous versions often buried options in stacked lists, the updated layout brings everything to the surface with bigger touch targets, echoing similar changes seen recently in redesigned Wear OS versions of Gmail and Keep. Check out these screenshots of the new UI: While the Maps redesign doesn't include the full theming found in the Wear OS 6 developer preview, it still reflects Google's broader push toward consistency and accessibility across its smartwatch apps. Compare the images above to how the interface currently looks for most Wear OS Google Maps users, as shown below: Google hasn't officially acknowledged the rollout, and not all users are seeing the new layout yet during this testing phase. However, with more core apps starting to follow suit, it's another sign that Google is laying the groundwork for a more unified visual experience. Got a tip? Talk to us! Email our staff at Email our staff at news@ . You can stay anonymous or get credit for the info, it's your choice.
Bloomberg
40 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
McKinsey Chief Says Global Clients Are Rethinking US Market
Companies are giving more consideration to opportunities outside the US because of policy upheaval under the Trump administration, said McKinsey & Co. Global Managing Partner Bob Sternfels. Business leaders are concerned about being 'vulnerable' to tariffs and other shifts to US economic and geopolitical positions, Sternfels said Tuesday at an event hosted by the Boston College Chief Executives Club, citing conversations with the consulting firm's clients. That's leading some companies to reevaluate opportunities in Southeast Asia, Europe and the Gulf region of the Middle East, he added.
Politico
41 minutes ago
- Politico
What to do when an AI lies about you
As AI chatbots spread throughout American life — from personal assistants to romantic partners — one of the biggest puzzles is what to do when they misbehave. They're famous for making things up, or 'hallucinating,' to use the industry term. And when those hallucinations hurt people, it's not clear how they can fight back. One tool, of course, is existing defamation law — and a new federal lawsuit in Minnesota could start to answer the question of whether a company can be held liable for what an AI does. The suit was filed by a 200-employee solar panel company called Wolf River Electric, which alleges Google's AI Overview hurt its business by offering made-up, defamatory facts about the company. Assuming that Wolf River Electric can back up its complaint, this may be a telling test for whether existing law can rein in AI that harms people's reputations — or whether it falls short, and lawmakers need to step in. 'This might be one of the first cases where we actually get to see how the courts are going to really dig down and apply the basic principles of defamation law to AI,' said Ari Cohn, lead counsel for tech policy at the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE). So, what did the AI get wrong? According to Wolf River Electric's complaint, employees were Googling the company when they discovered problems with the search engine's AI Overview, which summarizes the results for a particular query. A screenshot in the exhibits appears to show an AI Overview inaccurately stating that the company was being sued by Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison for deceptive sales practices, among other legal violations. The screenshotted overview cites multiple sources, but if you go back and read through them, none of webpages actually say Wolf River Electric is being sued. Some other solar companies are being sued, and Wolf River Electric is named in an article — but the connection appears to have been made up entirely by the AI. The screenshotted AI Overview warns at the end of its summary: 'Generative AI is experimental. For legal advice, consult a professional.' Wolf River Electric did, indeed, consult a professional — and sued Google. Google generally denied the defamation allegations in a filing last week, though it's yet to fully elaborate on its defense. In a statement to DFD, Google said, 'The vast majority of our AI Overviews are accurate and helpful but like with any new technology, mistakes can happen. As soon as we found out about the problem, we acted quickly to fix it.' In its own statement, Wolf River said: 'We've earned our reputation one customer and one project at a time. Now, that decade of hard work is at risk.' Wolf River's lawsuit adds to a small but growing roster of cases trying to pin some responsibility on companies when AI makes up defamatory information. Nationally syndicated radio host Mark Walters filed a lawsuit in 2023 against OpenAI, accusing ChatGPT of falsely claiming that he was being sued for embezzlement. A Georgia court dismissed Walters' suit in May, though the ruling isn't a binding precedent for the Minnesota case. Robby Starbuck, an anti-DEI activist with more than 800,000 X followers, sued Meta in April alleging that its chatbot inaccurately identified him as a participant in the January 6, 2021 insurrection. The case is ongoing. Wolf River's case is different for a couple of important reasons, say legal experts. One is that it purports to show actual harm from the defamation — lost business from particular clients. 'Wolf River Electric claims they've got the receipts,' UCLA Law professor Eugene Volokh told DFD. 'They've got what a lot of people who've been libeled have a hard time proving.' More importantly, the company doesn't have as much name recognition as Walters or Starbuck, which gives it a different status under First Amendment law. Well-known people have to meet a higher 'actual malice' standard to prove they've been defamed — whereas if the judge agrees that Wolf River Electric is a private figure, which the company asserted in a statement to DFD, then it would only have to show that Google was negligent. Assuming the company's argument holds up, the case will steer into uncharted and important territory: What counts as 'reasonable' or 'negligent' in AI design? Yale Law professor Robert Post, who specializes in the First Amendment, said product liability laws are a helpful analogy for navigating these murky issues. 'If you're marketing a toaster, you're responsible that it doesn't burst into flames,' he told DFD. 'What precautions did you take?' Because tools like ChatGPT have only become more popular over the past few years, it's hard to tell what the industry's standard is for preventing defamatory hallucinations — if AI companies have widely adopted one at all. Without these standards, courts and juries may be left to decide whether an AI developer acted reasonably, making judgments on a whole new kind of product without many helpful signposts to guide them. AI software is arguably the most complex in the world, so some regulation may be merited to help juries make sense of negligent design, regardless of how these cases turn out. 'It's not the kind of issue that you'd want different juries deciding on throughout the country,' said Post. 'You'd want national standards laid out by people who are technically well informed about what makes sense and what doesn't.' OpenAI builds out its Stargate vision Ambitions for Stargate are getting pretty lofty — and political. OpenAI released a policy paper titled 'Ideas to Power Democratic AI' on Tuesday, which puts its 'Stargate' data center initiative at the core of its aims to catalyze U.S. reindustrialization, ward off repressive governments abroad and build education-based communities across the country. Reading through this aspirational to-do list, you'd be forgiven for forgetting that Stargate was initially conceived as a data center construction project. President Donald Trump announced the initiative in January, as OpenAI entered into a $100 billion deal with SoftBank and Oracle to build the data centers that power AI systems like ChatGPT. The White House pledged to expedite permitting processes to aid the venture. OpenAI's policy paper brings Stargate to the forefront of the day's buzziest policy debates. The company promotes plans to develop infrastructure based on Stargate abroad, to ensure that global AI ecosystems are built on 'democratic rails' to counteract China's 'autocratic version of AI.' It pushes for data centers to be fixtures of their communities, with 'Stargate Academies' to train high-skilled workforces, and endowments for local governments. The company further trumpets Stargate as an important component in industrial policies like modernizing the energy grid. Stargate, it seems, is no longer just a construction deal – it's quickly becoming a political platform. Phone subsidies lead to mass privacy protections Roughly 1.4 million Californians rely on phones subsidized by the state's Lifeline program, and a leading proposal to expand its services now includes measures to shield all user data from the federal government. POLITICO's California Decoded team reported on Tuesday that Democratic Assemblymember Avelino Valencia is broadening privacy protections in AB 1303, a bill that would make undocumented immigrants without Social Security numbers eligible for state Lifeline subsidies. The bill's initial privacy measures restricted certain Lifeline data from being shared with the federal government, out of concern that undocumented users would unintentionally disclose their immigration statuses to the Trump administration. The amendment expands those protections to all customers, prohibiting telecom companies from sharing such data with federal officials without a warrant or subpoena. These privacy-oriented modifications to the bill come as Democrats and immigration advocates raise concerns about the administration wielding government databases to further its deportation efforts. An Associated Press investigation last weekend found that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services shared data on Medicaid enrollees, including immigrants, with the Department of Homeland Security. The Internal Revenue Service and Department Housing and Urban Development have also entered data-sharing agreements with Homeland Security for immigration enforcement. post of the day THE FUTURE IN 5 LINKS Stay in touch with the whole team: Aaron Mak (amak@ Mohar Chatterjee (mchatterjee@ Steve Heuser (sheuser@ Nate Robson (nrobson@ and Daniella Cheslow (dcheslow@
