Lindsay Clancy trial set for 2026 as prosecutors seek husband's statements to New Yorker
Prosecutors in the case against Lindsay Clancy, a 34-year-old Duxbury mother accused of killing her three children in January 2023, seek to obtain notes and recordings from an interview her husband gave to The New Yorker magazine.
During a Wednesday hearing in Plymouth Superior Court, prosecutors asked the judge to order the publication to hand over the information.
Clancy, who is paralyzed from the waist down, was indicted two years ago on three counts of murder and strangulation in the deaths of her three children: Cora, 5; Dawson, 3; and 7-month-old Callan. She is being held for court-ordered treatment at Tewksbury Hospital.
Her case has renewed attention surrounding perinatal and postpartum mood and anxiety disorders, also known as PMADs. One of the disorders, postpartum psychosis — which Clancy's defense attorney has referenced in court — is rare and affects one or two in a thousand women.
Read more: It's been 2 years since Lindsay Clancy's children were killed: What we know
Clancy appeared for a motion hearing via Zoom during which prosecutors and her attorney, Kevin Reddington, laid the groundwork for her upcoming trial in 2026.
Patrick Clancy has since moved to Manhattan after his wife's indictment, and told The New Yorker that he hoped to root out 'lies and misinformation' surrounding her case.
'I wasn't married to a monster — I was married to someone who got sick,' Patrick Clancy said in an article published in October 2024.
In a GoFundMe started by Patrick Clancy only days after the children died, he wrote, 'The real Lindsay was generously loving and caring … All I wish for her now is that she can somehow find peace.'
In the days after the killings, Clancy's attorney said at her arraignment that she suffered from severe mental illness at the time, dealt with complications from overmedication and grappled with postpartum depression — and potentially postpartum psychosis.
On Wednesday, prosecutors said they're looking for 'the entirety of the statements and the context of those statements' made by Patrick Clancy to the New Yorker reporter to better understand Lindsay Clancy's mental state leading up to and immediately after the children's deaths.
An attorney for the New Yorker was not present in the courtroom Wednesday, but prosecutors noted an email that indicated the media company was 'not taking a position' on the filed motion.
Read more: Prosecutors to file motion to access Lindsay Clancy's medical records
'Most significantly, the defendant's husband does report statements that the defendant made about the actual crime itself,' Prosecutor Julianne Campbell said.
Additionally, there are statements attributed to Lindsay Clancy referenced in the article that 'she made to others in her life ... both before and after the events' she is charged in connection with, prosecutors said.
Because Clancy is pursuing what's known as the insanity defense — therefore making her state of mind 'squarely at issue,' prosecutors said — and she has not made any statements to law enforcement, the records are crucial to prosecutors for their understanding of her mental health.
Reddington did not object to the prosecution's motion for discovery.
'The way I analyze it is that this reporter or author, Lindsay never participated with him. We made no statements, we had nothing to do with this report and ultimate article whatsoever,' Reddington said.
Reddington said he will 'embrace and adopt and welcome' the statements Clancy's husband, friends and co-workers made that she was 'a wonderful person, an incredible mother, a lovely human being,' and would 'welcome access to those statements as well.'
Judge William F. Sullivan allowed the prosecution to seek the records through an interstate process, with a possible 90-day timeline.
A final pretrial conference is scheduled for Jan. 25, 2026. Clancy's case is expected to go to trial on Feb. 9, 2026.
At Clancy's initial arraignment in 2023, prosecutors described how she is accused of strangling her children with exercise bands before jumping out of the house's second-story window in an attempted suicide.
She had been found at the scene in January 2023 with 'superficial' cuts to her wrist and neck, but the wounds weren't bleeding by the time her husband had found her.
Reddington previously described Clancy as a 'marvelous' mother and said that he walked through the house where there were artworks and photographs in every room that showed Clancy and her husband's devotion to their children.
'She's a woman who was obviously struggling from postpartum depression,' Reddington said. 'This woman was a troubled soul.'
Clancy was on several medications, which she tracked carefully in notebooks and cellphone notes, and Reddington said she was having problems with the medications. Her husband told doctors she was 'acting like a zombie' in the weeks leading up to their children's deaths, according to Reddington.
Prosecutors to file motion to access Lindsay Clancy's medical records
It's been 2 years since Lindsay Clancy's children were killed: What we know
Lindsay Clancy ordered to undergo psychiatric exam before murder trial
Read the original article on MassLive.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Could Trump pardon Diddy and end his trial?
Sean "Diddy" Combs is being tried in a New York courtroom for racketeering and sexual trafficking. Could that daily drama vanish instantly if President Donald Trump pardoned the embattled rapper? "Yes, it could," says Brian Kalt, law professor at Michigan State University College of Law, who focuses on legal issues and the presidency. According to Kalt, Trump — who appears to be in the middle of a pardoning spree — would be within his presidential rights to extend a preemptive pardon to fellow New Yorker Combs, who has been described by witnesses so far as violent and abusive. "These are federal charges (against Combs), so that's the main limit. The matter has be federal, it has to be criminal vs. civil, and related to something that's already been done," says Kalt. "But the person doesn't have to even be charged yet, or convicted. The Supreme Court has said preemptive pardons are OK." Trump weighed in on the possibility Friday, May 30, in the Oval Office. "Nobody's asked" about a pardon, the president said. "But I know people are thinking about it. I know they're thinking about it. I think some people have been very close to asking." Trump added, "I haven't spoken to him in years. He really liked me a lot." 'Nobody's asked': President Trump doesn't rule out pardoning Sean 'Diddy' Combs Typically, one of the last gestures from an outgoing president is a pardon. In President Joe Biden's final days in office, he famously pardoned his son, Hunter, convicted of federal gun felonies and federal tax charges. At the end of Trump's first term, he granted clemency to political allies such as Roger Stone, found guilty of obstructing a congressional investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and related offenses. But pardons can take place during a president's term, says Kalt. The right was established in Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 of the Constitution, which among other things gives the president "power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment." Kalt says the power to pardon is derived from the British monarch's historic right and stems from a recognition that criminal law was often too harsh, and it was important to have a safety valve. "The president was the best person to be that safety valve because of his political accountability," he says. But that's where things get murky, he adds, noting that Republican lawmakers "don't appear willing to hold the president accountable" for granting pardons, meaning they aren't costing him in terms of political capital. In contrast, President Gerald Ford's controversial pardoning of disgraced President Richard Nixon was perceived so negatively "that it probably cost Ford re-election in 1976," Kalt says. In just over 100 days since taking office, Trump has issued pardons to a broad range of personalities. They include Todd and Julie Chrisley, stars of the reality show "Chrisley Knows Best," who were convicted in 2022 of swindling $36 million from Atlanta banks and being tax evaders, and rapper NBA YoungBoy, who in 2024 was sentenced to two years in prison for weapons possession. He also pardoned former Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich, convicted of wire fraud and extortion, and Jan. 6 participant and "Bob's Burgers" actor Jay Johnston. The reason many presidents issue pardons at the end of their terms is precisely to avoid political fallout, says Kalt. In that sense, Trump's brash approach suggests he has no concerns about such ramifications. "I don't agree with these pardons on their merits, but the fact that he did them when he is politically accountable as opposed to slinking out the door does add some legitimacy to them in that sense," he says. "With pardons, you don't need Congress, you wave your magic wand and it happens. You can see the appeal for a president, particularly one like Trump." One can also see the appeal for those such as Combs, whose ordeal could end instantly should Trump's pardon "wand" wave his way. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Will Trump pardon Diddy? Trial could end, experts say

Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
State Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal combined units to create his Manhattan co-op
State Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal has long spoken out about the need for more units to address New York City's affordable housing crisis — but has consolidated multiple homes in a pricey co-op to create a multi-million dollar apartment for himself. Between 2006 and 2016, Hoylman-Sigal and his husband combined three Greenwich Village apartments to form their 2,000-square-foot pad. There is no market value listed for the apartment, though with three bedrooms and three baths, the sale price would likely be in the millions. Hoylman-Sigal is an advocate for tenants' rights, slamming rent increases for rent-stabilized tenants and speaking out about the city's low vacancy rate. He is currently running for Manhattan borough president against Keith Powers, a current city councilmember. On a 2019 podcast, Hoylman-Sigal, who represents much of the west side of Manhattan, talked to host Jason Haber, a real estate entrepreneur, about the city's affordable housing problem. Haber said that consolidating units chips away at the city's housing stock and brought up an example of a wealthy New Yorker who combined nine apartments to form a single huge luxury home. Hoylman-Sigal agreed, explaining it makes financial sense for ultra-wealthy Manhattanites to buy multiple occupied units and merge them into mansions. He lamented this practice would force more rent-stabilized tenants out of their homes. 'On my block alone, on 10th Street, there's a software entrepreneur who's combining not one, not two, but three townhouses,' Hoylman-Sigal said, in an apparent reference to Sean Parker, a Facebook co-founder. 'It may be one of the largest townhouses in the Village by the time he's through with it. And I can't imagine to think how many families were pushed out of that residence over the years when he assembled this massive property. So it's a sad reality.' Parker's combination of the three mansions made headlines in 2016, although it does not appear he pushed any tenants out with his purchases. Hoylman-Sigal told the Daily News this week he had been referring to so-called 'Frankensteining,' or loopholes in rent stabilization laws that allowed landlords to combine or change apartments in order to hike rents up or push tenants out. That loophole was closed at the end of 2023 with the passage of legislation in Albany. Caroline Crowell, Hoylman-Sigal's campaign manager, cited his record on housing. 'In 2024, he helped secure more than 500 additional units of supportive and affordable housing in his senate district — in that same period, his opponent secured a paltry nine units in his council district,' Crowell said. 'The idea that the apartment he and his husband own in the Village has anything to do with Brad's record on increasing affordable housing is an absurd political hit.' The state senator also said he does not currently reside in the apartment, as he moved last year due to redistricting that shifted the bounds of the 47th District, which he represents.

14 hours ago
Trump is making the ‘economy of influence' beyond ‘anything people have seen': Osnos
On 'This Week,' The New Yorker's Evan Osnos and former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie discuss President Trump's recent pardons and the Trump family's business ventures.