Regional Hospital remains open amid negotiations with potential buyer
Regional Hospital of Scranton will remain open amid ongoing negotiations with a potential buyer to acquire the health care facility, according to a state representative who has advocated for the city hospital.
'The hospital is OK right now, not closing,' state Rep. Bridget Kosierowski, D-114, Waverly Twp., said in a phone interview Wednesday. 'We're still actively working with an all-hands-on-deck situation with a potential buyer.'
Last month, union health care workers, elected officials and other stakeholders held a town hall forum aimed at saving Commonwealth Health's Regional Hospital of Scranton and its Moses Taylor Hospital campus following the late 2024 collapse of a sale considered by many to be a potential lifeline for the hospital. During that March 13 forum, advocates for the hospital, including members of the SEIU Healthcare workers' union, sought to preserve the critical services at Regional and Moses Taylor, along with the union jobs necessary to deliver that care. It was the second town hall since December.
The for-profit Tennessee-based Community Health Systems Inc., or CHS, is Commonwealth's parent company.
In a statement late Wednesday afternoon, Commonwealth Health spokeswoman Annmarie Poslock said work with Pennsylvania's elected officials to find another operator for Regional Hospital and its associated campuses, clinics and outpatient centers is continuing.
'We are happy to share that we believe we have reached a deal with the Governor's office and other groups that makes us optimistic about the future of our hospital,' Poslock said. 'We hope to share more details about this in the coming months. In the meantime, we will continue to focus on our patients and providing for the medical care they need.'
Critical negotiations took place Wednesday morning, said Kosierowski, who is a longtime nurse and local leader on the issue of local health care access. Hospital and health system executives initially met at 10 a.m. Wednesday discussing the closure, Kosierowski said. Later meetings included the board and medical leadership, employee department leadership and finally all medical staff. Those meetings shifted to thanking Gov. Josh Shapiro and the health system's plan to keep Regional open until a new operator comes in, she said.
The hospital is operating as usual, she said, emphasizing the importance of its continued operations.
'At this time, I can say that they are not announcing closure. Lots of active negotiating is still happening, and those that are at the table are still at the table,' she said. 'This place must stay open and operational for the community — it is catastrophic if it does not. '
Regional and Moses Taylor are separate facilities but operate under a single license following a 2022 merger, with operations coordinated across the two campuses. When advocates talk about saving Regional, they're referring to jobs and services at Moses Taylor as well.
Last year, nonprofit WoodBridge Healthcare's interest in acquiring Regional Hospital, Moses Taylor, Commonwealth's Wilkes-Barre General Hospital and other health care assets appeared to provide a potential path to stability, but that fell through in November due to a lack of financing. With that sale dead, advocates quickly raised concerns that Regional could close if it were not acquired by new ownership, launching a search for a buyer.
In a hospital data sheet hosted on its protectregionalcareandjobs.org website, SEIU Healthcare contends that if Regional Hospital were to close, there would not be enough beds between Geisinger Community Medical Center in Scranton and Lehigh Valley Hospital — Dickson City to absorb the necessary patient care across Lackawanna County. While Luzerne County hospitals could absorb some of that care, closing Regional would diminish access to health care and increase travel times, including for life-threatening conditions, SEIU said.
A 2023 Community Benefit Report for Regional and its Moses Taylor campus put the number of patient encounters there, at Commonwealth Health Physician Network clinics and other outpatient sites at 381,000 that year.
Closing Regional would also create a significant void in birth and delivery services because Regional accounts for about 70% of births in Lackawanna County, according to an SEIU press release.
SEIU officials had not heard news of a change of ownership or potential closure but said in a statement early Wednesday evening that union members continue to be concerned about the future of Regional, and they are deeply committed to doing whatever it takes to save their hospital. The healthcare workers' union attributed its remarks to Pennsylvania members Corinne Cianfichi, an occupational therapist with 30 years of service, and Sue Wiggins, a lab technician with six years of service.
'We stand ready to welcome any new owner and work collaboratively with them to preserve and expand services, protect good union jobs and ensure that community concerns are addressed,' according to the statement. 'Regional Hospital is absolutely critical for the health and economy of the entire NEPA area. Our population is older, sicker, and needs more complex care than ever before.'
Any job losses would be devastating for working residents in Northeast Pennsylvania, the union said. The hospital provides more than 1,000 jobs, contributing $148 million in wages and benefits to local families, according to SEIU.
'We are calling on all stakeholders to continue working diligently together in good faith so that Regional can remain open and we can provide the quality healthcare that our community urgently needs,' according to the statement.
As negotiations continue, Kosierowski stressed the importance of keeping Regional open while also pointing to support from community partners, from local foundations to legislators.
'When I say everyone is doing all they can, it's the truth,' she said. 'It's essential for everybody in the community to make sure we have access to Regional Hospital.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Anti-DEI group targets Geisinger College of Health Sciences over program
SCRANTON — A national anti-DEI group has targeted the Geisinger College of Health Sciences with recent filings of discrimination complaints. Virginia-based Do No Harm purported in news releases in March and June that it filed separate complaints with two federal agencies against the college, citing as discriminatory its federally funded Center of Excellence for Diversity and Inclusion and a summer program that aimed to help students from Black, Hispanic or Native American communities that are underrepresented in the medical field transition into medical school. The Do No Harm discrimination complaints come amid President Donald Trump's efforts to dismantle DEI, or diversity, equity and inclusion, programs in the public and private sectors. Trump issued executive orders in the first week of his second term targeting DEI initiatives. 'Geisinger College of Health Sciences did a thorough review of our programs after the presidential executive orders were issued to ensure compliance. The pre-matriculation program referenced in the (Do No Harm) complaint ended in 2024 and is no longer active,' Geisinger CHS said in a statement. Do No Harm is labeled by the Southern Poverty Law Center as an 'anti-LGBTQ+ hate group.' Critics of the SPLC say it's politically biased and its definition of hate group is overly broad. Do No Harm first filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on March 19 against Geisinger CHS, according to a news release posted on the Do No Harm website. A member of Do No Harm then filed a similar complaint June 5 with the U.S. Department of Education, because Geisinger 'did not learn its lesson' from the initial complaint filed with HHS, the advocacy organization announced in another news release. The Times-Tribune could not verify that the complaints were filed with both departments, and whether either agency investigated the allegations or took any actions. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Department of Education through separate representatives said they do not confirm the existence of complaints. Do No Harm, established in April 2022, claims it has 17,000 members, including doctors, nurses, physicians and concerned citizens, and cites its mission as safeguarding health care from ideological threats. 'Do No Harm seeks to highlight and counteract divisive trends in medicine, such as 'Diversity, Equity and Inclusion' and youth-focused gender ideology,' the organization's website says. According to the SPLC, Do No Harm in 2024 filed eight lawsuits challenging programs such as scholarships and fellowships for marginalized people. 'The group claims that the practice of nonprofit organizations like the American Association of University Women to provide fellowships to students of color and LGBTQ+ students — groups historically underrepresented in academia and medicine — harms patients by requiring medical schools to accept or fund unqualified candidates. According to the group, the case was dismissed 'after AAUW agreed to drop the racial criteria in the fellowship's selection process,'' the SPLC website says. According to the website of Geisinger College of Health Sciences, it is the research and education arm of the Geisinger health system. Established in 2022, the college unifies the Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Geisinger School of Nursing, Geisinger School of Graduate Education, graduate medical education, Center for Faculty and Professional Development and more. * Geisinger College of Medicine in Scranton on Monday, June 9, 2025. (REBECCA PARTICKA/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER) * Geisinger College of Medicine in Scranton on Monday, June 9, 2025. (REBECCA PARTICKA/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER) * Geisinger College of Medicine in Scranton on Monday, June 9, 2025. (REBECCA PARTICKA/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER) Show Caption 1 of 3 Geisinger College of Medicine in Scranton on Monday, June 9, 2025. (REBECCA PARTICKA/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER) Expand
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fewer than 1 in 4 Colorado voters support Medicaid cuts
(Stock photo by) Just 21% of Colorado voters want Congress to decrease Medicaid spending, according to a poll released Tuesday. Concerns about gutted health care access come as U.S. Senate Republican leaders work to push through a tax and spending bill that would cut Medicaid by an estimated $625 billion over the next decade. The poll zeroed in on the 8th Congressional District, which includes the northern Denver metro area and parts of Weld County. In the district, where 1 in 4 residents receive Medicaid benefits, 63% of voters said they would be less likely to vote for a candidate who voted to cut Medicaid. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX The 8th District is represented by Republican Gabe Evans, who voted in favor of the plan that would reduce federal Medicaid spending when it was brought to the U.S. House of Representatives in May. A spokesperson for Evans defended the vote, saying a proposed provision to institute part-time work requirements for some people to retain Medicaid eligibility would make 'the program more efficient by cutting out fraud, waste, and abuse.' 'Congressman Gabe Evans has been steadfast in his support of protecting Medicaid for the vulnerable populations it was created to serve — pregnant women, kids, and disabled people,' said spokesperson Delanie Bomar in a statement Tuesday. Evans, who was elected to the House last year, represents one of the country's few congressional swing districts. According to the poll, 42% of voters in the district want to see increased federal Medicaid spending, 20% want it to stay about the same and 28% want it to decrease. Medicaid, the state-federal health care program for lower-income people and some with disabilities, serves more than 70 million U.S. residents. The poll of 675 registered Colorado voters was conducted by Broomfield-based firm Magellan Strategies on behalf of the nonprofit Healthier Colorado. It has a margin of error of 3.7%. 'Politicians are saying that they want to cut Medicaid to make it better, but the poll shows clearly that voters aren't buying what they're selling,' said Jake Williams, CEO of Healthier Colorado. 'It shows that there's real political peril for any candidate who votes to cut Medicaid.' Bomar pointed to the poll's findings that many respondents, especially those who are Republicans or unaffiliated, said Medicaid 'should only be for U.S. citizens or legal residents, with some calling for stricter eligibility enforcement.' Immigrants who are in the U.S. unlawfully are not eligible for federal Medicaid benefits, but Colorado and 13 other states provide some state-funded coverage to immigrants lacking permanent legal status. Under the proposed federal cuts, an estimated 7.8 million people, most of them citizens or lawful residents, would lose access to Medicaid, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Some of the main reasons cited in the poll by respondents who said they have favorable opinions of Medicaid are the benefits it provides to low-income Coloradans, seniors, children, people with disabilities and single parents. 'The poll shows that Medicaid cuts would have devastating effects for both our health and economy here in Colorado,' Williams said. 'I also think it shows that Colorado voters aren't dummies.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Chicago-based American Medical Association to ask Senate to investigate RFK Jr.'s firing of vaccine committee members
The Chicago-based American Medical Association plans to ask a U.S. Senate committee to investigate Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s decision to overhaul a key vaccine advisory group, the medical association said in an emergency resolution passed Tuesday. The House of Delegates of the AMA, which is the nation's premier doctors group, adopted the emergency resolution at its annual meeting in Chicago. The adoption came just one day after Kennedy, who is the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary, announced that he had removed all 17 members of the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices. That advisory committee is tasked with making recommendations on the use of vaccines to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which then sets U.S. adult and childhood immunization schedules. Kennedy said he planned to replace the 17 members with new members. 'Today we are prioritizing the restoration of public trust above any specific pro- or anti-vaccine agenda,' Kennedy said in a news release Monday. 'The public must know that unbiased science — evaluated through a transparent process and insulated from conflicts of interest — guides the recommendations of our health agencies.' It's a move, however, that has met with sharp criticism, including from the American Medical Association. Kennedy has long been a vaccine skeptic, putting him at odds with doctors and scientists who tout vaccines as lifesaving. The AMA's emergency resolution also says that it will send an open letter to Kennedy asking him to reverse his recent changes to the committee. And the association will 'identify and evaluate alternative evidence-based vaccine advisory structures,' according to the resolution. On Monday, outgoing American Medical Association President Dr. Bruce Scott said in a statement that the advisory committee has long been a trusted source of science and data-driven guidance on vaccines. 'Today's action to remove the 17 sitting members of ACIP undermines that trust and upends a transparent process that has saved countless lives,' Scott said. 'With an ongoing measles outbreak and routine child vaccination rates declining, this move will further fuel the spread of vaccine-preventable illnesses.'
